&w=3840&q=100)
New North Korean warship damaged in 'serious accident,' leaving Kim furious
A new North Korean warship was damaged during a 'serious accident' at a launch ceremony on Wednesday, leaving the country's Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un furious read more
This undated picture released from North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) via KNS on April 30, 2025 shows North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un (centre R) with his daughter Ju Ae (centre L) attending the test-firing of a weapons system from North Korea's latest destroyer, the Choe Hyon (behind), during two days of tests on April 28-29 off the coast of an undisclosed location in North Korea. AFP
A new North Korean warship was damaged in a 'serious accident,' leaving the country's Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un furious. According to the Korean Central News Agency, the accident occurred on Wednesday at the northeastern port of Chongjin during a launch ceremony of the warship. The report came as a surprise because it was seen as a rare admission of failure by the hermit nation.
According to KCNA, the 5,000-ton destroyer slid off a flatcar due to 'inexperienced command and operational carelessness in the course of the launch." The accident crushed the bottom parts of the ship. During the event, Kim reportedly stressed the importance of such destroyers for advancing North Korea's military capabilities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Kim later described the accident as a 'criminal act caused by absolute carelessness' that 'could not be tolerated,' KCNA reported. He slammed the officials involved in the accident and said that the incident 'brought the dignity and self-respect of our state to a collapse". He ordered the ship to be restored before next month's plenary meeting of the Central Committee of the ruling Workers' Party.
Warship laid sideways
Meanwhile, on Thursday, South Korea's military said the warship was lying sideways in the water. According to KCNA, Kim said the 'irresponsible errors' of officials responsible would be 'dealt with at the plenary meeting of the Party Central Committee to be convened next month'.
The incident took place a month after Pyongyang unveiled another 5,000-tonne destroyer-class vessel named Choe Hyon . The launch ceremony was attended by Kim with his daughter Ju Ae, considered by many experts to be his likely successor. North Korea claimed that the vessel was equipped with the 'most powerful weapons' and that it would 'enter into operation early next year'.
Following the launch event, some analysts argued that the ship could be equipped with short-range tactical nuclear missiles, although North Korea has not proven it can miniaturise its nukes. Amid speculations, the South Korean military argued that Choe Hyon could have been developed with Russian help , possibly in exchange for Pyongyang deploying thousands of troops in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Interestingly, the Wednesday ceremony was held in the North Korean city, which is conveniently close to Russia's Vladivostok port. Hence, Russian involvement cannot be disregarded.
With inputs from agencies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
War upends the oil trade. How it could play out.
Israel's attack on Iran early Friday sent shock waves through the oil market, which relies on the region for one-third of global supplies. The reverberations won't go away soon. Oil prices spiked 14% in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, before giving back some of those gains. Brent crude, the international benchmark oil price, rose 7% on Friday to $74.23 per barrel. Based on recent history, oil's rise might seem fleeting. For most of the past three years—since the early days of the Russia-Ukraine war—geopolitical events haven't had a lasting impact on oil prices. The Israel-Hamas war and continuing violence in Ukraine have barely impacted the oil market, because they didn't dramatically affect supply and demand. But the price shock from the Israel-Iran conflict could last weeks because major oil infrastructure could be in the line of fire. 'It is something that seems like prices could remain elevated for some time," says Rob Haworth, who oversees investment strategy for U.S. Bank Asset Management Group. If the conflict grows substantially, analysts have predicted oil prices could surge over $100 per barrel, and perhaps as high as $120. The extent of the price-move depends on how the war escalates. Israel didn't directly strike Iran's oil infrastructure on Friday, but some analysts expect Israel to hit those facilities if the war continues. Iran, for its part, is in a position to disrupt oil shipments in the region, which could cause prices to spike even more. Iran produces about 3.2 million barrels of oil a day, and exports between 1.5 million and two million barrels of it. That is a significant piece of the 103 million barrels of global oil production, but not enough to completely disrupt the market. Israel isn't a major player, historically pumping less than 10,000 barrels a day. Israel could disrupt production if it hits Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf, which houses much of Iran's oil export infrastructure. Iran, in turn, has plenty of ways to respond that could affect the oil market even more. Iran and the military groups it supports, including the Houthis in Yemen, could create much wider disarray. After the Israel-Hamas war began in 2023, the Houthis attacked ships in the Red Sea—some of those carried energy products—causing a brief spike in the price of oil. But the Red Sea doesn't transport that much oil. The most important waterway is the Persian Gulf, which sits between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Iran and its proxies could block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and which offers access to markets all over the world. Thirty percent of the world's seaborne oil trade flows through it. China, which buys more of Iran's oil than any other country, is particularly dependent on supplies that come through the strait. Financial firm Lazard thinks oil prices would surge above $120 if the strait is blocked, and the U.S. would probably have to get involved to unblock it. Lazard thinks a short disruption to the strait is possible but considers an extended blockade 'highly unlikely due to catastrophic internal and international consequences and the ability of the U.S. Navy to intervene to open up the strait." Given its location and military capabilities, Iran could impact the market in other ways. Two Saudi Arabian oil facilities were damaged in military strikes in 2019, severely curtailing oil production, and Iran was believed to be behind the attacks. Tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran have eased since then, but Iran could widen the conflict again by hitting Saudi facilities. J.P. Morgan analyst Natasha Kaneva thinks a wider Middle East conflict would cause an oil shock that could take prices over $120. Based on how oil traders reacted to the latest escalation of the war, she thinks the market is implying a 17% chance of a much more severe impact. Such a dramatic price spike feels like a long shot. The overall oil supply-demand picture is still bearish, with global oil supply set to outpace demand this year because of expected production hikes from members of OPEC. 'We expect, absent a wider war, today's rise in prices will likely prove to be a sell-the-news event," wrote Morningstar analyst Allen Good. The conflict, and its higher oil prices, isn't a reason for investors to pile into energy stocks, but it's a reminder of why they can be important pieces of a portfolio. Oil stocks jumped on Friday, even as the broader market and some Big Tech names fell. Exxon Mobil was up 2.2%, and Occidental Petroleum rose 3.8%. 'When tech stalls out, there's a natural rotation to energy companies," says Jay Hatfield, portfolio manager of the Infrastructure Capital Equity Income exchange-traded fund. 'They're actually pretty good hedges." Hatfield's fund owns Exxon and Chevron, which he thinks offer investors exposure to the industry without as much risk as smaller names. Oil's gains may well fizzle out eventually. But this war appears to be far from over, and oil is right in the middle of it. Write to Avi Salzman at
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
BTS Jungkook's apology vs aespa Karina's sorry: K-pop fans drag both over alleged 'MAGA' connection; but ARMY reacts differently
It was on June 13, 2025, that the BTS fandom, called ARMY, saw Jungkook perform on stage after a long time, as he had been enlisted in the South Korean military for his mandatory service. Having been discharged on June 11, he and the eldest member, Jin, made surprise appearances on stage at J-Hope's HOPE ON THE STAGE concert finale, which also marked BTS's debut anniversary. As the fandom was busy showering praises on BTS and all the members who came to the venue, many didn't even realize that a drama was unfolding on social media and various talk forums in South Korea. What drama? It was all about the cap the maknae of BTS wore during rehearsal. What cap did Jungkook wear? As photos of Jungkook from BTS Festa surfaced, some fans leaked images of him rehearsing for his upcoming performance. In one of those photos, K-pop fans spotted him wearing a cap with the slogan "Make Tokyo Great Again" — a phrase that drew immediate comparisons to former U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial "Make America Great Again" motto. The slogan has also been associated with Tokyo Governor Koike Yuriko, who has faced criticism for holding an alleged anti-Korean stance. While most of ARMY were initially unaware of the issue, being fully immersed in the excitement of the concert, news quickly spread once Jungkook posted a prompt apology after the event ended. In a detailed message, he directly addressed the controversy and revealed that he had already discarded the cap in question. Acknowledging his mistake, Jungkook wrote, "I wasn't good enough; I was careless. From now on, I will think more deeply and act more cautiously, step by step." He reassured fans and the public that the item had been "disposed of immediately." He ended his message with a sincere, "Once again, I'm sorry," expressing his willingness to accept criticism and learn from the experience. BTS Jungkook's apology vs aespa Karina's sorry While many have moved on after Jungkook's apology, K-pop fans — especially those of aespa — have pointed out a stark contrast. They argued that Karina was dragged for days despite also apologizing. For those unfamiliar with the situation, Karina sparked controversy after posting a photo of herself on Instagram, wearing a black jacket with red patterns and the number 2 printed on the side. The photo, which appeared to be taken on the streets of Japan, included a single red rose emoji — with no additional context. Though it may have seemed harmless to some, the timing and symbolism didn't go unnoticed. The image went viral during South Korea's election period as critics pointed out that the number 2 on her jacket coincided with Kim Moon-soo, the People Power Party (PPP) candidate, who was listed as No. 2 on the ballot and is represented by the color red. This led netizens to label her with politically charged nicknames like "Conservative Karina," "No. 2 Voter Karina," and "Patriotic Karina" — all terms associated with conservative voters. Although the post was quickly deleted, the backlash was swift and intense, with many accusing her of subtly expressing political leanings — intentional or not. ARMY give reasons why Jungkook's apology was better After the issue escalated, Karina issued an apology. "I apologize to fans for creating this misunderstanding," Karina wrote on the paid fan platform Bubble. "I didn't have any intentions [with the post], and I will act more carefully in the future." However, many were unhappy with the apology. First, she didn't post it on Instagram — the very platform where the controversy started. Second, the apology didn't clearly explain what exactly she was apologizing for. As for Jungkook, many believe his apology was straightforward and timely. He addressed the situation even before it escalated further, which earned him praise for being proactive and sincere. no because he handled it better. Next! since karina fans wants to drag this more. heres the difference :karina : had no clear apology, not admitting her mistake only "im sorry for worrying you" jungkook : was quick to address the issue, apologised properly and mentioned that he discarded the hat. the apology Hey so actually Karina posted her apology on a paid fan app and it was like 4 sentences with no mention of what she's done. Meanwhile jungkook released his own apology before his company, owned up and discarded the hat. It was a clean and fast apology she posted a photo during election week with the party's color, the party's number, and even the election symbol in her caption, of course it's not the same. BTS Jungkook encounters a sasaeng outside his home Meanwhile, Jungkook recently found himself at the center of a deeply unsettling sasaeng incident. According to reports from Korean media, a Chinese woman in her 30s attempted to illegally enter his residence on the very day he was discharged from the military — a moment that was meant to mark his peaceful return to civilian life. Fortunately, the woman was arrested by authorities. For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Netanyahu dials Modi over Israeli strikes
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday said he had received a phone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who briefed him on the evolving security situation following Israel's airstrikes on Iranian targets. In a post on X, Modi said, 'Received a phone call from PM @netanyahu of Israel. He briefed me on the evolving situation. I shared India's concerns and emphasized the need for early restoration of peace and stability in the region.' The conversation comes amid growing international alarm after Israel launched a wide-ranging assault on Iranian military and nuclear facilities, reportedly killing senior officials and scientists. Netanyahu's office confirmed that he has spoken with several global leaders, including those of India, Germany, and France, besides US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and UK PM Keir Starmer.
