BTS Jungkook's apology vs aespa Karina's sorry: K-pop fans drag both over alleged 'MAGA' connection; but ARMY reacts differently
It was on June 13, 2025, that the BTS fandom, called ARMY, saw Jungkook perform on stage after a long time, as he had been enlisted in the South Korean military for his mandatory service. Having been discharged on June 11, he and the eldest member, Jin, made surprise appearances on stage at J-Hope's HOPE ON THE STAGE concert finale, which also marked BTS's debut anniversary.
As the fandom was busy showering praises on BTS and all the members who came to the venue, many didn't even realize that a drama was unfolding on social media and various talk forums in South Korea. What drama? It was all about the cap the maknae of BTS wore during rehearsal.
What cap did Jungkook wear?
As photos of Jungkook from BTS Festa surfaced, some fans leaked images of him rehearsing for his upcoming performance. In one of those photos, K-pop fans spotted him wearing a cap with the slogan "Make Tokyo Great Again" — a phrase that drew immediate comparisons to former U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial "Make America Great Again" motto. The slogan has also been associated with Tokyo Governor Koike Yuriko, who has faced criticism for holding an alleged anti-Korean stance.
While most of ARMY were initially unaware of the issue, being fully immersed in the excitement of the concert, news quickly spread once Jungkook posted a prompt apology after the event ended. In a detailed message, he directly addressed the controversy and revealed that he had already discarded the cap in question.
Acknowledging his mistake, Jungkook wrote, "I wasn't good enough; I was careless. From now on, I will think more deeply and act more cautiously, step by step." He reassured fans and the public that the item had been "disposed of immediately." He ended his message with a sincere, "Once again, I'm sorry," expressing his willingness to accept criticism and learn from the experience.
BTS Jungkook's apology vs aespa Karina's sorry
While many have moved on after Jungkook's apology, K-pop fans — especially those of aespa — have pointed out a stark contrast. They argued that Karina was dragged for days despite also apologizing.
For those unfamiliar with the situation, Karina sparked controversy after posting a photo of herself on Instagram, wearing a black jacket with red patterns and the number 2 printed on the side. The photo, which appeared to be taken on the streets of Japan, included a single red rose emoji — with no additional context.
Though it may have seemed harmless to some, the timing and symbolism didn't go unnoticed. The image went viral during South Korea's election period as critics pointed out that the number 2 on her jacket coincided with Kim Moon-soo, the People Power Party (PPP) candidate, who was listed as No. 2 on the ballot and is represented by the color red.
This led netizens to label her with politically charged nicknames like "Conservative Karina," "No. 2 Voter Karina," and "Patriotic Karina" — all terms associated with conservative voters.
Although the post was quickly deleted, the backlash was swift and intense, with many accusing her of subtly expressing political leanings — intentional or not.
ARMY give reasons why Jungkook's apology was better
After the issue escalated, Karina issued an apology. "I apologize to fans for creating this misunderstanding," Karina wrote on the paid fan platform Bubble. "I didn't have any intentions [with the post], and I will act more carefully in the future."
However, many were unhappy with the apology. First, she didn't post it on Instagram — the very platform where the controversy started. Second, the apology didn't clearly explain what exactly she was apologizing for.
As for Jungkook, many believe his apology was straightforward and timely. He addressed the situation even before it escalated further, which earned him praise for being proactive and sincere.
no because he handled it better. Next! https://t.co/7sQrGBprLw pic.twitter.com/mBhryRFmZw
since karina fans wants to drag this more. heres the difference :karina : had no clear apology, not admitting her mistake only "im sorry for worrying you" jungkook : was quick to address the issue, apologised properly and mentioned that he discarded the hat. pic.twitter.com/MKLjE0AFFa
the apology https://t.co/JjKiwOMWxn pic.twitter.com/A94mSmXtWU
Hey so actually Karina posted her apology on a paid fan app and it was like 4 sentences with no mention of what she's done. Meanwhile jungkook released his own apology before his company, owned up and discarded the hat. It was a clean and fast apology https://t.co/tQFfs0Kpaw
she posted a photo during election week with the party's color, the party's number, and even the election symbol in her caption, of course it's not the same. https://t.co/kaQLxoAJG6
BTS Jungkook encounters a sasaeng outside his home
Meanwhile, Jungkook recently found himself at the center of a deeply unsettling sasaeng incident. According to reports from Korean media, a Chinese woman in her 30s attempted to illegally enter his residence on the very day he was discharged from the military — a moment that was meant to mark his peaceful return to civilian life. Fortunately, the woman was arrested by authorities.
For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
Israel's Big Claims: Air Superiority From Western Iran To Tehran, Strikes On Nuclear Sites
Last Updated: The Israeli military said its military campaign in Iran had secured control of the airspace from Western Iran to Tehran as the two countries exchanged fire for a second day. The Israeli military said on Saturday that its military campaign in Iran had secured control of the airspace from Western Iran to Tehran, where 70 fighter jets carried out airstrikes overnight in one of the biggest direct attacks between the two sworn enemies. 'We have created aerial freedom of action from west Iran all the way to Tehran," said Israel Defence Forces (IDF) spokesperson Brigadier General Effie Defrin. 'Tehran is no longer immune, the capital is exposed to Israeli strikes," he added. Defrin said some 40 sites were targeted in Israel's offensive, including air defence systems and related assets. 'The dozens of aircraft are flying freely over Tehran, thanks to the opening blow that removed the threat of Iranian air defence systems," he added. The Israeli military launched a devastating offensive against Iran, targeting its nuclear and military infrastructure under Operation Rising Lion. The military killed most of Iran's military leadership and nuclear scientists involved in Tehran's controversial nuclear programme. The IDF said at least 20 top military Iranian commanders have been killed since Israel launched its operation against Iran on Friday, including Army Chief Mohammed Bagheri, who 'oversaw most of Iran's long-range surface-to-surface and cruise missile capabilities". The military also released a video of Israeli strikes, showing it dismantling some of Iran's most dangerous military assets, from nuclear sites to air defence systems. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israeli forces dealt 'serious damage" to Iran's nuclear programme and threatened to strike 'every target of the ayatollah regime" in Iran. He said the Israeli campaign delayed Iran's nuclear programme by several years. Iran-Israel Conflict Continues Meanwhile, Israel continued to strike several sites in Iran after Tehran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Tel Aviv overnight, leaving three people dead and 70 others injured. According to Iranian media, an Israeli strike on Saturday killed three members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the country's northwest. A police chief and another officer were killed in a drone strike about 300 km from Tehran. (with agency inputs) First Published: June 14, 2025, 21:01 IST
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tanks, thunder, and Trump: The military parade that split America
Amid traffic jams, military flyovers, and thousands of troops marching down Constitution Avenue, the United States Army celebrated its 250th anniversary on Saturday. But it wasn't just about history. It was also President Donald Trump's 79th birthday — a detail that has split public opinion and overshadowed the event's original intent. The scale was massive: 6,700 soldiers, 150 vehicles including tanks and howitzers, and more than 50 aircraft. Fighter jets, including the Air Force's Thunderbirds — a last-minute addition at Trump's request — were among the parade's highlights. 'I think it's time for us to celebrate a little bit. You know, we've had a lot of victories,' Trump said earlier in the week. 'It is my birthday, but I'm not celebrating my birthday,' he insisted, pointing instead to Flag Day. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing to Do with Age. Just Stop Doing This One Common Thing! Health Benefits Undo It was the first national military parade of this scale since 1991, when troops returned home victorious from the Gulf War. Among the highlights: tanks on urban roads, a White House parachute flag-drop, and a flyover. Trump, stationed at his own reviewing stand, called it 'a celebration of our country' and 'of the Army, actually.' But protests are mounting, weather warnings loomed, and concerns about the parade's cost and purpose deepened — especially as it occurred while the U.S. military engages in controversial operations at home and abroad. Live Events 'This would make great TV' The idea took root last year. At a long-running Army pageant called the 'Twilight Tattoo,' General Randy George and Army spokesperson Col. Dave Butler were hosting media executives when one leaned over and said, 'This would make great television,' according to Butler. From there, things escalated. The Army was already looking for ways to mark its milestone. The suggestion of turning their ceremonial show into a full-blown parade landed without resistance. 'We wanted to reintroduce this nation's Army to the American people,' Butler said. 'To do that, we thought we needed to be in their living rooms and on their phones. We needed something that would catch the national eye.' With Trump's interest piqued — a former media executive who had previously tried and failed to stage a military parade — the door opened. 'It was like knocking on an unlocked door,' said one planning official. Millions in costs, disruptions, and doubts Not everyone is clapping. A poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center shows nearly 60% of Americans think the parade is a poor use of government money. The Army has estimated its own logistics could cost up to $45 million. Security, air traffic closures, and city disruptions will drive the price higher. 'I remain concerned about it, I have to tell you,' said Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. 'These are, for the most part, local streets, and if they're rendered unusable, we have to make them usable and then go seek our money from the feds.' The city is already bracing for road closures, suspended flights, and potential damage to infrastructure. Tanks have been spotted rolling down Rhode Island Avenue, escorted by police. Steel plates and rubber pads have been deployed along the route to mitigate damage, according to Army spokesperson Heather J. Hagan, who said the expected road damage would be 'minimal.' 'A prop for the President' The backlash hasn't been limited to cost. Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth , a former Army officer, called the parade 'Donald Trump's birthday parade,' accusing the president of exploiting the event for his own image. 'It's to stroke his own ego and make taxpayers foot the bill,' she said. Critics have compared the event to military displays in Russia or North Korea — performative demonstrations of power under authoritarian regimes. Local advisory commissioners have passed resolutions calling for the parade's cancellation, saying it reflects 'authoritarian governments more than democracies.' Samuel Port, a former Army logistics officer and now unemployed contractor, summed up a common sentiment: 'Trump is using this as an excuse to prop himself up. It demeans the soldiers because it's using them as a political prop.' Flashpoints: Immigration raids, Iran aid and public disapproval The parade comes at a sensitive time. Just one day earlier, the United States began assisting Israel's defence against Iranian missile attacks. And earlier in the week, Trump deployed both National Guard and Marine forces to Southern California to suppress protests against immigration raids. The president bypassed state authority in doing so, drawing legal and political scrutiny. 'The President is deploying the American military to police the American people,' Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee , told Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth during hearings this week. 'Sending the Marines — not after foreign threats, but after American protesters... should stop every one of us cold.' According to a new NBC News/Decision Desk poll released Saturday morning, 64% of Americans disapprove of the parade. Many cite both the financial burden and the optics of military power being used domestically. 'I wouldn't have done it,' said Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), likening the display to Soviet-era demonstrations. 'We were proud not to be that.' Pomp, power, and the President's image The parade also drew comparisons to past authoritarian spectacles. Trump, who has long admired large-scale military demonstrations, first pushed for a parade of this kind after visiting France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017. That effort stalled during his first term, but the 250th Army anniversary provided the perfect excuse. Critics say this was not merely about honouring service. 'It's a stupid order,' said retired Rear Admiral Ken Carodine. 'But it's a legal order. Most of the guys organising or marching in this thing, it's the last thing they want to be doing.' Presidential historian Barbara Perry from the University of Virginia noted the personalisation of the event. 'Usually it's about the personnel,' she said. 'If [Trump] views it as 'his generals' or 'his military,' and ties it to his birthday — that's what's different.' Trump, however, insists the parade is not about him. 'It will be a parade like we haven't had in many, many decades here,' he said this week. 'And it's a celebration of our country.' Weather threatens parade, not public backlash Despite forecasts warning of heavy rain and possible thunderstorms, federal officials opted to proceed with the event as scheduled. The parade was set to begin at 6:30 p.m., following a day of commemorations along the National Mall. For Trump, the parade marks a symbolic high point following his return to the presidency in the 2024 elections. Supporters see it as a reaffirmation of strength and patriotism. But detractors view it as a diversion from failed foreign policy pledges, especially regarding the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. The president had campaigned on promises to end these conflicts. But the parade's timing — against the backdrop of ongoing deployments and incomplete missions — raises questions about whether the event is celebrating victory, or distracting from the lack of it. 'No Kings': Protesters reject militarisation Demonstrations have erupted in Washington and across the country, organised under the slogan 'No Kings.' Activists accuse the president of using military force to bolster his own image. Trump has warned protesters that they 'will be met with very big force,' echoing his broader posture on dissent. That rhetoric has only intensified criticism that the commander-in-chief is merging military spectacle with authoritarian messaging. Local leaders are also frustrated. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser expressed concerns over costs and disruptions. Neighbourhood commissioners passed resolutions calling the parade 'a grotesque spectacle.' And with tanks rolling through streets that recently saw the forced removal of homeless encampments, many see the juxtaposition as deliberate. 'It's appalling that we're spending $45 million on a parade after kicking out the most vulnerable residents of our neighbourhood,' said local commissioner Jim Malec. A parade for whom? Unlike the parades following the Civil War, World Wars I and II, or even Desert Storm — all tied to clear victories — this event lacks a unifying triumph. 'The U.S. is not coming off any war victory,' said Carodine. 'Nobody had a parade for the kids coming back from Afghanistan. That would have made a lot more sense than what we're doing tomorrow.' America's recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have left a mixed legacy. The Afghanistan conflict formally ended in 2021 under a deal negotiated by Trump and executed by President Joe Biden. Many veterans returned home quietly, without recognition or celebration. For some, this parade is a missed opportunity — one that honours political ambition more than military service.
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
As Trump Turns 79, Washington To Host Military Parade Amid National Protests
Washington DC is preparing to host a large-scale military parade on Saturday to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States Army. The event also aligns with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, which he has described as a "parade like no other." Set to begin at 6:00 p.m. local time (23:00 GMT) on June 14, the parade will take place around the National Mall, including the Washington Monument Grounds. While tickets aren't required, the US Army recommends advance registration on its website for better viewing access. More than 7,000 uniformed troops are expected to participate, accompanied by tanks, armoured vehicles, marching bands, flyovers, and a large-scale fireworks display. The Army estimates the cost of the festivities to be between $25 million and $45 million, with a portion earmarked for repairing city streets not built to support heavy military hardware. "Thundering tanks and breath-taking flyovers will roar through our capital city," President Trump said ahead of the parade. This will mark the first major US military parade since 1991, when President George HW Bush presided over celebrations honouring the end of the Gulf War. That event drew approximately 200,000 spectators. Previous parades date back to 1961 under President John F. Kennedy, 1953 during Dwight Eisenhower's first inauguration, and the World War II-era parades of 1942 and 1946. Protests Across the Nation While the capital prepares for military fanfare, demonstrations opposing the Trump administration are set to erupt in over 1,500 locations nationwide. The protests, organised under the banner "No Kings," are being promoted as a "national day of defiance" by the activist group 50501 Movement-short for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. The group's website criticises the parade as political theatre: "President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday. A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." Much of the anger has been fuelled by Trump's recent decision to deploy US Marines and National Guard units to Los Angeles, California, against the wishes of the state's governor, in response to ongoing immigration-related protests. Major protest rallies are planned in key cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Charlotte, Atlanta, Houston, and Phoenix. Demonstrations will span all 50 states, including dozens in Trump strongholds like Texas and Florida.
