
AI's Energy Crisis: Can Next-Gen Chips Outrace Data Centers' Growing Carbon Footprint?
TOPSHOT - Joel Kjellgren, Data Center Manager walks in one of the server rooms at the Facebook Data ... More Center on November 7, 2013 in Lulea, in Swedish Lapland.
The environmental impact of data centers, mainly due to the growing demands of AI computing, is already huge, and is only bound to increase. Major tech companies are investing in renewable energy sources, but due to the frantic pace of development – AI-related demand for computing power is doubling every three to four months – that alone won't solve the problem.
Currently, estimates from the International Energy Agency hold data centers responsible for 1% of the world's electricity consumption and 0.6% of global greenhouse emissions, figures that are projected to grow by 2030 to 2.8% and 1.9% respectively.
Could the solution lie in reimagining computing architecture themselves, to make them more efficient and environmentally friendly?
A new report by the World Fund, a European VC investing in clean tech companies, Intel's startup program Ignite, and Dealroom turns the spotlight on new material innovations that could provide alternatives to traditional silicon-based semiconductors, and next-generation computing paradigms, such as quantum computing and neuromorphic systems that could help mitigate the issue.
The white paper focuses specifically on European startups and scaleups operating in these sectors and provides a comprehensive overview of the latest opportunities for clean tech investors. Funding in this sector is soaring: the white paper highlights 65 green computing startups that have already raised $1.5billion. However, it should be noted that none of the solutions presented is in itself a silver bullet to address AI's energy consumption, and that additional technical and geopolitical considerations beyond the scope of the report should be taken into account, when considering their implementation.
Take, for instance, Gallium Nitride, or GaN, a wideband gap semiconductor (simply speaking, a material in which there is a wide energy difference between the band where electrons reside and the conduction band, where electrons can move freely), which has emerged as one of the most promising alternatives to silicon.
GaN semiconductors promise significant efficiency gains – up to 40–50% compared to traditional silicon power transistors, and they also enable more compact designs; for instance, Texas Instruments demonstrated GaN-based adapters that are about 50% smaller, while still achieving power conversion efficiency. European GaN startups have collectively raised an impressive $70 billion over the last five years, with companies like GaN Systems, Cambridge GaN Devices and Hexagem leading innovation in this space.
This clearly shows that there is a perceived market opportunity, as well as a potential benefit for the environment, as the widespread adoption of GaN could cut global CO2 emissions by up to 2.6 gigatons annually by 2050. However, scaling up GaN technology comes with manufacturing and supply-chain limitations. Wide-bandgap semiconductors like GaN (or Silicon Carbide, another alternative to silicon mentioned in the report) are currently more expensive to produce, can be prone to crystal defects, and have a less mature supply chain.
In fact, the raw material gallium is a strategic choke point – China produces an estimated 98% of the world's gallium supply, raising concerns about resource constraints.
These factors make it challenging to ramp up GaN production quickly, which in turn limits how rapidly the efficiency benefits can be realized at scale. Of course, these challenges can, and probably will, be overcome over time. The question is: when?
As things stand, rather than adopting innovations that might require the rebuilding or restructuring of entire supply chains, in the short to mid-term, big tech companies are more likely to keep pace with the rushing advances in artificial intelligence by relying more on fossil-fuel or nuclear-generated energy.
In the U.S., for instance, there are already cases of coal-fired power plants whose closure has been postponed, and there are plans to build more than 200 gas (natural gas) power plants in the next few years. This is not to downplay the promises of new material innovations, but to avoid creating overblown expectations either.
Similar caveats apply to next-generation computing paradigms, such as quantum computing, of which Europe is a global leader.
The continent's quantum startups raised $781M in 2023 - triple the amount raised in North America. The efficiency gains are potentially revolutionary: quantum systems can solve certain problems 100 million times faster than classical computers, translating directly to massive energy savings. Experts estimate that quantum-enabled innovations across various sectors could reduce global emissions by up to 7 gigatons annually by 2035—representing an 18% reduction in total global emissions.
However, it's unclear whether and when quantum computing could become a general-purpose technology ready to speed up arbitrary AI workloads. Generally speaking, today's quantum computers are highly specialized machines that excel at specific optimization or simulation tasks, they also require complex cryogenics and control systems that themselves consume significant energy. It is true, though, that as the report notes, 'quantum simulations are already accelerating breakthroughs' in fields such as 'battery chemistry'.
'These advances lay the groundwork for next-generation high-performance batteries, which, if scaled effectively, could mitigate up to 14 gigatons of emissions annually by 2035,' the authors say. And of course, it's always possible that new breakthroughs change the rules of the game and quantum computing quickly becomes an all-purpose solution, applicable to all sorts of situations.
I reached out to the report's authors for comment on a possible timeline for implementation of the new materials and techniques highlighted in the report. 'While it is true that some solutions explored in our report (e.g., biocomputing) are still in their early research and development phases, there are definitely solutions that can help limit the damage in the short-to mid-term.
Technologies such as GaN and SiC are already available today, and as they scale, increased usage will help drive immediate efficiency savings and decreased power consumption. Software efficiency improvements, such as the model optimization recently seen by DeepSeek, also have the potential to make a more immediate impact. We also expect significant near-term positive impact from both quantum and optical computing,' a spokesperson for World Fund said. They also emphasize the need to deliver cleaner sources of energy alongside next-gen computing innovations, pointing at Google's collaboration with Fervo to provide clean base load power for its data centers or Amazon's investment into X-energy, to provide another source of clean baseload power from small modular reactors, as positive examples.
There's much more information in the white paper that can be covered here; for instance, a chapter discusses software-based approaches – like data compression and server virtualization – as ways to curb energy use. An EPA report has found that aggressive virtualization and consolidation can reduce total server energy consumption by as much as 80% in certain data center setups.
All in all, though, it seems fair to say that there's no magic plan, no silver bullet, that will solve AI's environmental footprint overnight; instead, a combination of hardware advances, software optimizations, and clean energy transitions could provide the best way to go. It is also clear that, due to the scale of the challenge and the pace of increase in data center energy consumption, even imperfect steps today are better than perfect solutions tomorrow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. That referred to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' And in response to recent comments by Trump, it said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not OK, computer: firms using AI to cut corners are playing with fire
The corporate world is agog. Ever since Eben Upton, the chief executive of Raspberry Pi, said he ran his annual results statement through AI before its publication, the talk has been of machines taking over the boardroom. The reaction to Upton's admission was astonishment. Raspberry Pi is stock market listed — these were its first full set of figures since flotation. They were eagerly awaited and, as with any quoted company, they were a closely guarded secret. Upton asked Claude, the AI bot designed by Amazon-funded Anthropic, to conduct a 'tone analysis'of the document, to say how it felt the microcomputer business was doing, on a scale of one to 100. Getting a so-so score, he set the computer to work. As the bot dialled up the language, the score improved. Too much, as it made his words seem breathlessly over the top. He made some improvements of his own, took out descriptions like 'exceptional' and reached an acceptable level. Eyebrows shot up on two counts. AI is a third-party, it's mechanical, susceptible to intrusion. It was not clear if he did but it is to be hoped Upton used a secure internal system. Then, there is the issue of the statement being entirely his — it is supposed to be his thoughts on the company's performance. Here he was, asking AI to look at what he planned to say. To be fair to Upton, he said in public what others may well be doing in private. Still, it was the most glaring instance yet of AI doing a boss's bidding. Others include a multinational senior executive freely saying he uses AI to draft his emails. An avatar of a CEO recently 'spoke' in a short video accompanying a stock exchange results announcement. Another corporate head told a tech conference how he uses AI to help prepare his speeches. While the software advances, the authorities stall. No regulation or guidance on AI's expansion and use is forthcoming. It is up to companies to make their own policies, not only to reap the benefits of AI but also to prevent a scandal and shareholder disaster. That is a worrying state of affairs. Specialist financial reporting and advisory consultancy Falcon Windsor teamed up with Insig AI, which delivers data infrastructure and AI-powered environmental, social and governance research tools, to look at the FTSE 350 companies. Their study, based on engagement with 40 firms and analysis of all FTSE 350 reports published from 2020 to 2024, revealed that generative AI use is multiplying across UK companies, often without any training, policy or oversight. They titled their report Your Precocious Intern, using the term to describe AI as useful but also a liability, the equivalent of someone who requires careful handling. While investors see the adoption of AI as inevitable and look forward to the advantages and efficiencies it could bring, they are increasingly alarmed about its implications for the truthfulness and authorship of corporate reporting. Everyone agrees that company reports and statements must remain the direct expression of management's thinking. Without rules and a common code, AI risks undermining the accuracy, authenticity and accountability that underpin trust in the stock markets. AI is moving so fast that there is only 'a short window of opportunity' to upskill and mitigate the risks it represents to the financial system. Their conclusion? 'Treat generative AI like a precocious intern: useful, quick, capable, but inexperienced, prone to overconfidence and should never be left unsupervised.' Claire Bodanis, a leading authority on UK corporate reporting and founder and director at Falcon Windsor, told The London Standard: 'If people use it unthinkingly, without proper training or guidelines, it could fatally undermine the accuracy and truthfulness of reporting.' Comments like these from two FTSE company secretaries should also be a warning. 'I think there are some real benefits in using generative AI as a summarising tool, and I'm quite keen to utilise it a bit more for efficiency if we can get comfortable with the accuracy of it,' said one. Another said: 'Would I be able hand on heart say that none of my contributors had used gen AI to provide the bit they've sent in? I have no idea.' Institutional investors are understandably afraid. As one told the researchers: 'I would be very wary about AI being used in forward[1]looking statements, or anything that is based around an opinion or a judgment.' Another said: 'I see generative AI as a flawed subordinate who's learning the ropes.' A third said: 'I feel very strongly that there should be a notification in the annual report if there's anything that has not been written by a human — there's no accountability through generative AI.' According to Bodanis, Raspberry Pi ought to act as a wake-up call. She asked: 'If a director gets AI to decide what is his or her opinion of their results based on what people are likely to think, then how is that honestly and truthfully their opinion?' History tells us, she said, what can happen. 'You think back to those stock market bubbles. Companies have to account to investors what they've done with their money and what they are going to do with it.' There must, said Bodanis, be 'a building of trust between a company and its shareholders'. One issue is the amount of material companies are obliged to produce. Annual reports that had grown to 80 pages, which felt huge, can reach 300 pages. That is because of the amount of non-financial reporting they must provide — on issues such as climate change, for example. If CEOs are using AI, it's difficult to decide what's true and what's not Claire Bodanis 'They are expected to use detail and opinion to create the truth of the state of the company,' said Bodanis. 'But if they are using AI, it is very difficult to decide what is true and what is not.' Just when corporate reporting is becoming 'ever more onerous and important', supplying all manner of information by law, along comes AI to make it easier. 'We should be using AI to do things humans can't do like crunch the numbers, not using it to do the things humans can do, like express opinions,' says Bodanis. A company report, she said, 'should be like looking the chairman in the eye and hearing it from them direct'. The slippery slope, too, is that distinction is lost. All company communications end up resembling each other — with the same wording and descriptions — when they are meant to be unique, coming straight from the top. The Financial Reporting Council, which regulates financial reporting and accounting, is dragging its heels, thinking about what to do about generative AI but so far not doing anything to police its rise. The FRC last got in touch with company boards about where it thought AI was heading in relation to results and reports some 18 months ago. That feels like a lifetime, such is AI's acceleration. As for companies uploading their sensitive figures to AI, Bodanis's point is succinct: 'AI has not signed an NDA. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement.