‘If we think we're going down…': Pak Army Asim Munir chief makes nuke threat in US
'We are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us,' ThePrint quoted Munir as saying at the event in Tampa.
Munir made this nuclear threat from the US soil at a black-tie dinner he hosted for businessman Adnan Asad, who serves as Pakistan's honorary consul in Tampa.
After his nuclear threat, Munir raked up the issue over the Indus Waters Treaty, and said that India's decision to suspend the treaty could place 250 million people at risk of starvation. He warned, "We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, 10 missiles se faarigh kar denge (we will destroy it with 10 missiles)."
"The Indus River is not the Indians' family property. Humein missilon ki kami nahi hai, al-Hamdulillah (we don't have a missile shortage, Praise be to God)," Munir was quoted as saying by ThePrint, citing sources.
Those invited to the black-tie dinner were reportedly not allowed to carry mobile phones or any other digital devices, and no text of the speech was provided. The news outlet reported the speech from the memory of many participants present at the event.
ALSO READ | Asim Munir reacts as India exposes Chinese support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor
Munir reportedly made several references to the conflict with India during his speech. "Ek tweet karwaya tha with Surah Fil and a picture of (the industrialist) Mukesh Ambani to show them what we will do the next time," he said. Surah Fil is a verse which describes how Allah sent birds to drop stones on an enemy's battle elephants and reduced them to "chewed-up straw".
"We'll start from India's East, where they have located their most valuable resources, and then move westwards," Munir was quoted as saying by ThePrint.
Using what he termed a 'crude analogy', the Field Marshal further said, "India is shining Mercedes coming on a highway like Ferrari, but we are a dump truck full of gravel. If the truck hits the car, who is going to be the loser?" he said.
He reportedly took note of India's recent diplomatic tensions with the US amid the Trump tariffs row, and joked that Pakistan should start offering masterclasses on how to balance rival powers. "The real reason for our success is that we are not misers. If someone does good work, we praise and appreciate them. That is why we nominated President Donald Trump for the Nobel Prize," Munir added.
Field Marshal Asim Munir was in Tampa to attend the Retirement Ceremony of the outgoing US Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Michael E. Kurilla, and the Change of Command Ceremony, marking the assumption of the role by Admiral Brad Cooper.
ALSO READ | Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir backs terror groups operating in Jammu and Kashmir
This was Munir's second visit to Washington since the intense fighting with India during Operation Sindoor.
According to an official statement released by the Pakistani army, Munir engaged in high-level interactions with senior political and military leadership and members of the Pakistani diaspora during his US visit.
The Pakistani Army chief also met with Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, and discussed several matters of mutual professional interest. He invited Caine to visit Pakistan, the statement added.
ALSO READ | Shashi Tharoor's message to US as Donald Trump hosts Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir at White House
Addressing an interactive session with the Pakistani diaspora, the Field Marshal urged them to remain confident in Islamabad's bright future and asked them to actively contribute to attracting investments. The diaspora also reaffirmed its backing to Pakistan's development, the army statement, as cited by news agency PTI, said.
Munir visited the US for a five-day trip in June, wherein he attended a private luncheon with President Donald Trump, a gesture which is typically reserved for visiting heads of government or state. As a result of the meeting, Trump announced enhanced US-Pakistan cooperation in several fields, including an oil deal.
(with PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The nearly 150-year old law that Trump is testing with domestic troop deployment
AP As President Donald Trump pushes the bounds of military activity on domestic soil, a debate has emerged over a nearly 150-year old law that regulates when federal troops can intervene in state issues. About 800 National Guard troops filed into Washington, D.C., on Tuesday after President Donald Trump said - without substantiation - that they were needed to reduce crime in the "lawless" national capital. Thousands of miles away, a judge in California is hearing arguments about whether the president's recent decision to federalize Guard personnel in Los Angeles during protests against immigration raids violated federal law. Trump has also created militarized zones along the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a major shift that has thrust the army into immigration enforcement like never before. The cases in both California and Washington mainly hinge on Posse Comitatus Act, which passed in 1878 and largely prevents the military from enforcing domestic laws. Experts say that in both cases there are clear limitations to the law's enforcement. Here is what to know about the law. Posse Comitatus Act stops military from enforcing US law The Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute that prevents the military from enforcing domestic law. It also prevents the military from investigating local crimes, overriding local law enforcement or compelling certain behavior. Posse Comitatus can be bypassed by a congressional vote or in order to defend the Constitution. The Insurrection Act of 1807 can also trigger the suspension of the Posse Comitatus Act and allows the president to deploy the military domestically in cases of invasion or rebellion. There is an exception for the U.S. Coast Guard, which has some law enforcement responsibility. The military is also allowed to share intelligence and certain resources if there is an overlwith civilian law enforcement jurisdiction, according to the Library of Congress. Law was enacted after Reconstruction era The law was enacted in 1878 following the post-Civil War era known as Reconstruction. Pro-segregationist representatives in Congress wanted to keep the military from blocking the enforcement of Jim Crow laws that allowed racial segregation. But the spirit of the law also has roots going all the way back to the Revolutionary War, when the founders of the United States were scarred by the British monarchy's absolute military control, said William C. Banks, a professor at the Syracuse University College of Law. "We have a tradition in the United States, which is more a norm than a law, that we want law enforcement to be conducted by civilians, not the military," Banks said. That ethos - ingrained in National Guard personnel starting in basic training - becomes especially powerful in the case of the Posse Comitatus Act, because the law has hardly been tested before now, said Steve Vladeck, a professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center. "There is no authoritative precedent on exactly where these lines are, and so that's why over the years the military's own interpretation has been so important," Vladeck said. Law applies to 'federalized' troops The Posse Comitatus Act typically doesn't apply to the National Guard because members of the Guard report to the governor, not the federal government. But when Guard personnel are "federalized" they are bound by the act until they are returned to state control, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The state of California said in a federal lawsuit that the Trump administration violated the act when it deployed National Guard soldiers and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles following June protests over immigration raids. The Trump administration has argued that the Posse Comitatus Act does not apply because the president used a provision known as Title 10 to federalize the troops. It allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service when the country "is invaded," when "there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government," or when the president is otherwise unable "to execute the laws of the United States." Attorneys for the federal government also argue that the troops are not enforcing domestic laws and are only acting to protect federal property and agents. In Washington, by contrast, the president is already in charge of the National Guard and can legally deploy troops for 30 days without congressional approval. Vladeck said that both deployments over the past three months suggest that the Trump administration "appears to be trying to dance around the Posse Comitatus Act" rather than disregard it altogether. "There is a lot in the water about the Trump administration being lawless. What is striking is actually how much the administration is trying to wrap itself in the law," Vladeck said. Law depends on executive branch policing itself Beyond the legal exceptions written into the law, there is a practical question of how to enforce it, said Joseph Nunn, counsel in the Brennan Center for Justice's Liberty and National Security Program. Because the Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute, not a civil one, the U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for prosecution in criminal court, Nunn said. "It's premised on the executive branch policing itself," he said. That leaves unclear legal standing for whether a state government like California's has a right to sue in civil court in the first place. The ruling in the California case will likely be a narrow interpretation based on the circumstances of the Guard's deployment in Los Angeles, Vladeck said. But he said it could still dictate how the administration uses the Guard in other cities like Chicago and New York, where Trump has threatened to federalize troops next. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulatory gray area makes investing in LVMH, BP tough For Indian retail How IDBI banker landed plush Delhi properties in Amtek's INR33k crore skimming As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Stock Radar: Astra Microwave showing signs of bottoming out after 16% fall from highs; time to buy? F&O Radar | Deploy Broken Wing in Paytm to play stock's bullish outlook These 9 banking stocks can give more than 28% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Why 2025 Could Be The Astrological Turning Point We've Been Waiting For
India.com
2 minutes ago
- India.com
‘India Has Long History Of...': Singapore Ambassador Says US ‘Not Reliable But Indispensable'
The 3rd India-Singapore Ministerial Roundtable (ISMR) is taking place today and amid this, Singapore Ambassador Bilahari Kausikan has said that while the United States is not a reliable partner, it is indispensable. He said that every country has to find a way to work with the United States, as there is only one America, and its policies might change every four years. Kausikan said that the US role in the world is undergoing a 'Fundamental Shift'. India-Bangladesh Ties Responding to a question, the Singapore Ambassador said that India's relations with its neighbours have not been good from time to time. 'I don't think India's relationship with Bangladesh is suffering only because to Chinese influence. You (India) have not been very nice to Bangladesh. India is a big power and has not been very nice to its neighbours from time to time. As a small country, I see all big countries with a jaundiced eye,' he said. India's Ties With US, China Kausikan further said that India relies on itself and its relation with China is strained, not to please the US, but due to the border dispute. 'I don't think India relies on the US. It has to prove its relationship with the US for strategic reasons. India has a long history of relying only on itself. You (India) are not having a bad relationship with China to do the US a favour. You have a strained relationship with China because of the border dispute in the Himalayas,' he said. US A Reliable Partner? The Ambassador added that there is an old Chinese saying - one mountain can have only one tiger. 'You (India) need to build up your capability in a different way and you are doing it. You (India) have improved your relations with the US for simple reasons, not just for China, but for several fundamental reasons. Of course, the US is not reliable is indispensable. It's up to a country to find a way to work with the don't need America to defend you,' said Kausikan. India-Singapore Ministerial Dialogue India-Singapore Ministerial Roundtable (ISMR), a unique mechanism, is held to strengthen the India-Singapore Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. The third ISMR will review the progress made since the second roundtable held in Singapore in August 2024 and identify new growth opportunities to deepen bilateral collaboration. Leading the Singapore delegation is Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry Gan Kim Yong. This roundtable continues the momentum of high-level visits and exchanges between India and Singapore, coinciding with the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations in 2025. The milestone reflects the importance both nations place on their bilateral ties and joint commitment to expand collaboration for mutual benefit.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India-China thaw takes shape as PM Modi embraces Brics over Trump
India and China are restoring economic links strained by a deadly 2020 border clash, the latest sign Prime Minister Narendra Modi is drawing closer to Brics after US President Donald Trump hit the South Asian nation with a 50 per cent tariff. Modi's latest move is to resume direct flights with China as soon as next month, said people familiar with the negotiations who asked for anonymity to discuss private matters. The effort gained momentum in recent weeks, and airlines have been briefed on the proposal, they said. Flights were suspended during the Covid-19 pandemic, which coincided with a sharp decline in relations between the nuclear-armed neighbours after border clashes in the Himalayas killed 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese troops. The blow from India's largest trading partner hit hard, especially after Modi had lavished praise on Trump and was among the first foreign leaders to visit after his return to the White House. Henry Wang, president of the Center for China and Globalisation think tank in Beijing, said relations between India and China are in an 'up cycle,' and as leaders of the Global South, 'they have to really speak to each other.' 'Trump's tariff war on India has made India realise that they have to maintain some kind of strategic autonomy and strategic independence,' he said. China, also a prime target in Trump's trade wars, has also shown signs it's ready for a thaw. This month, it eased curbs on urea shipments to India — the world's largest importer of the fertiliser. Although initial volumes are small, the trade could expand, easing global shortages and prices. China relaxed the ban in June but had maintained restrictions on India until now. The Adani Group is exploring a tieup with Chinese EV giant BYD Co. that would allow billionaire Gautam Adani's conglomerate to manufacture batteries in India and extend its push into clean energy, according to people familiar with the matter. India recently allowed tourist visas for Chinese nationals after years of curbs, and Modi may meet Chinese President Xi Jinping at a summit in Tianjin starting on Aug. 31. China is India's second-largest trade partner after the US, and India needs key inputs from China to develop its manufacturing base. While there may be a thaw, the two Asian powers are not likely to restore full trust overnight. They have seen each other as rivals for years and friction increased a few months ago when China supplied weapons and intelligence to Pakistan in its recent military dispute with India. Part of Trump's recent anger toward New Delhi comes from India denying the his claims that his mediation helped defuse tensions with Pakistan. Modi also challenged those assertions directly in a call with Trump in June. India saw a shift in tone from the White House after that, according to the officials in New Delhi. Modi is also strengthening ties with Brazil and Russia, fellow Brics founding members. In August, he invited President Vladimir Putin to visit India as relations with the US soured. Trump is frustrated with India's continued imports of discounted Russian oil, which help fund the Kremlin's war in Ukraine. Modi has shown no signs of backing down, and his government signed agreements with Moscow this month to deepen economic cooperation. Modi has also talked trade and the imposition of unilateral tariffs against their nations with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Bolstering commercial ties between Brazil and India was a key topic of Modi's visit to Brasilia in July. During the call in early August, Lula and Modi also agreed to expand India's trade deal with Mercosur, the South American customs union that includes Brazil. The US has long courted India as a counterbalance to China in geopolitics but with Trump's trade wars, Beijing and New Delhi are finding common ground. Xu Feihong, China's ambassador to India, has Modi offered moral support over the tariffs. 'Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile,' Xu last week wrote on X over a quote from Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi denouncing the use of tariffs 'as a weapon to suppress other countries.'
