AI tools are killing students' critical thinking. It's time to fight back
And yet, universities and K-12 institutions are agreeing to substantial deals and partnerships with generic AI platforms, such as ChatGPT EDU, to bring these destructive tools into their classrooms, encouraging their use among the student body even as the correlation between usage of current AI tools and critical thinking shows devastating negative effects. Reading competencies are down for the fourth straight year and 50% of students admit to using ChatGPT for a quiz, test or essay.
We've all had some version of the same conversation about COVID's effects on students. Many lost an entire year or more and were just passed through to the next grade level. It was a disastrous effect for students who were already behind the curve. In effect, direct answer generation AI tools are creating a 'COVID 2.0'' generation of students who won't lose just one year but a significant portion of their educational experience. Their development and personal agency is diminishing every day by using AI as a tool for shortcuts and cheating.
It's Worse than you Think
There's a reason we don't allow children to drive a car before a certain age. There's a level of responsibility society has determined is necessary to drive a powerful machine. AI is a powerful machine but we're handing our children the keys to a Mustang GPT with no training and no protections. Predictably, it's not going well.
You may be wondering why a founder of an edtech AI platform is critical of AI in education. To be clear, I know that AI can have an immensely positive impact on education. I know that AI can act as a force-multiplier for teachers and it can open up a world of knowledge and inspiration for every student, everywhere.
AI can do all of these things but not the way we're currently using it. Not with generic AI platforms like ChatGPT that simply give students the answers.
AI makes things substantially easier, and that's amazing. I use AI, including ChatGPT, consistently every day and it makes me and my team 10x more productive. I've seen some amazing things, like a 6-year-old building a functioning app using AI, and so many others releasing a massive amount of creativity. But we cannot teach children that life is as easy as sticking in a prompt and waiting for an output, there will always be hard problems that require critical thinking and a lack of tools.
As a recent student, I have seen the outsized role this technology plays in our day-to-day lives, the immense ramifications of irresponsible integration, and that the situation is far worse than even the media is portraying it right now.
Let me repeat that: the situation is far worse than even the media is portraying it right now. Seemingly every headline regarding AI in education highlights the devastating impacts and, for maybe the first time in history, the media is actually downplaying the ramifications.
A friend and recent graduate told me that he hasn't typed an assignment in two years; he's simply copied and pasted from ChatGPT every single time. He just graduated from a top-tier university and is wholly unprepared for the workforce. Have an issue? Oh ill just ChatGPT it, no how, no why. This is the norm now, it's not an outlier.
As 96% of teachers acknowledge AI is the future of education, change must be made today or this and subsequent generations of students will continue to see their critical thinking, literacy, attention spans, and ability to contribute to the workforce severely degraded. This change must begin with an acknowledgement by the wider educational and technology communities: generic productivity AI platforms, like ChatGPT, are not a solution to integrating AI into classrooms.
There is Hope, if We Act. Right. Now.
Every school needs to make a simple declaration today: they will not use platforms that do not focus on ethical and responsible use of AI for studying and learning. This means tools like ChatGPT, which allow for direct answer generation, have no place in our educational system.
The promotion of purpose-built AI learning platforms that don't give students the answer will provide schools and teachers, regardless of their bandwidth, with a foundation to take confident steps forward and create a better future for students.
Tech Leaders and Educators Must Work Together to Establish Guidelines
The education establishment is in a tough spot right now. They know they need to implement AI solutions into their classrooms to prepare students for the workforce of the future, but the leadership often doesn't see alternatives to generic tools like ChatGPT. Universities are eager to remain competitive and educators on every level want to give their students the best chance to succeed in the AI world.
We have to start with a set of core principals that we all agree is in the best interests of our students and in the best interests of society:
Responsible AI edtech companies must work hand-in-hand with educators at every level to develop and enhance AI platforms built for true learning.
Generic direct answer generation AI tools, like ChatGPT, have no place in the classroom.
AI must be used as a tool for learning, not shortcuts and cheating.
AI will never replace teachers. AI is a tool to help teachers, to save them time and free them up to focus on their students.
Any AI tool introduced to classrooms must be designed to promote responsible studying and true learning.
This is a list that will grow and evolve over time, but we have to start somewhere.
Tomorrow is Too Late
We have an opportunity right now, today, to act. We're already seeing the devastating effects of ChatGPT on our students and the worst side effects won't even show up for years to come. We have a chance to change course and realize all of the amazing things AI can bring to our students but only if we act now.
It's time to introduce responsible AI use to every student, everywhere, including productivity tips, prompt strategies, collaborative tutors, and true workforce prep for the AI world.
AI can have such a positive impact on education. It can help us realize true equality of opportunity for every student who wants to succeed.
The time to act is now. There are alternatives. There is a better way and a better future.
If we don't act soon, we risk lobotomizing an entire generation and making them completely dependent on AI systems to do everything for them; but maybe that's what some want . . .
Let's get to work.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Women's dating app Tea reports 72,000 images stolen in security breach
(Reuters) -Tea, an app that lets women anonymously comment and review dates with men, said it has suffered a data breach, with hackers gaining access to 72,000 user images. A Tea spokesperson confirmed the hack to Reuters on Saturday, saying they had detected "unauthorized access to our systems" and about 72,000 images had been exposed, including 13,000 selfies and photo identifications submitted for account verification purposes, as well as 59,000 images from posts, comments, and direct messages. "We have engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and are working around the clock to secure our systems," the company said in a statement, adding that no emails or phone numbers were exposed, and that only users who signed up before February 2024 were affected. The breach was first reported by 404 Media early on Friday. The app, which says its motto is "women should never have to compromise their safety while dating," is a platform where women who sign up and are approved after a verification process can anonymously share information about men they are interested in in Yelp-style reviews. It has gained increasing popularity, saying on Instagram that more than two million users in the past few days had asked to join the app. Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could a Quantum Computing Bubble Be About to Pop? History Offers a Clear Answer
Key Points IonQ, Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing have reached valuation levels well beyond those seen during prior stock market bubbles. Each of these companies has recently raised capital through a series of equity offerings and stock issuances. These moves could suggest that the valuation levels for these businesses are not only abnormally high, but unsustainable. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Last summer, companies such as IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS), and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT) were unknown penny stocks. However, as quantum computing steadily made its way toward center stage in the artificial intelligence (AI) realm, each of these companies witnessed meteoric rises in their share prices. Over the last 12 months, IonQ stock has blasted higher by 517%, while Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing have experienced surges of at least 1,500% as of this writing (July 21). With valuations reaching historically high levels, could investors be on the verge of witnessing a quantum computing bubble bursting? Is quantum computing in a bubble? The chart below illustrates valuation trends among popular quantum computing stocks on a price-to-sales (P/S) basis. As I outlined in a prior article, the quantum computing stocks above are trading at far higher P/S multiples compared to levels seen during the dot-com and COVID-19 stock bubbles. For example, during the internet boom in the late 1990s, stocks such as Amazon, Cisco, and Microsoft experienced peak P/S ratios in the range of 30x and 40x. Taking this a step further, popular COVID stocks such as Zoom Communications and Peloton saw P/S multiples top out at 124x and 20x, respectively. The big theme here is that IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing are each trading for valuation multiples that could be seen as historically high, even when compared to prior bubble events. With that said, other AI companies that are also exploring quantum computing -- such as Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft -- currently trade for much more reasonable valuation multiples when compared to the companies in the chart above. For this reason, I do not think the entire quantum computing landscape is at risk of experiencing a bubble-bursting event. However, IonQ and its peers have been dropping some breadcrumbs in recent months that lead me to think the smaller quantum computing players could be on the verge of a harsh sell-off. What's going on under the hood with quantum computing stocks? After some digging into certain filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), I think IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing may be trying to signal some important things to investors: In February, IonQ announced that it planned to raise up to $500 million through a series of stock issuances. The company doubled down on its capital-raising ambitions more recently, offering 14,165,708 shares at a price of $55.49 -- raising nearly $1 billion in the process. In June, Rigetti raised $350 million in capital after completing an at-the-market (ATM) equity offering. Between June 11 and June 27, D-Wave Quantum raised $400 million through an ATM offering. Of note: This followed a prior raise of $150 million that occurred in January. In late June, Quantum Computing raised $200 million following the issuance of 14 million shares at an average price of $14.25. What's really going on here? With each of these quantum computing stocks trading near all-time highs, it appears to me that management is looking to take advantage of frothy market conditions. Quantum computing is a research-heavy, capital-intensive industry. Management at IonQ and its peers surely understand this, and so I see these capital raises as a calculated move to capitalize on inflated, overstretched valuations. Should you invest in quantum computing stocks? To me, any hint of a bubble surrounding IonQ and its smaller peers may already be in the process of bursting. Under the surface, the various stock issuances and equity offerings annotated above could suggest that management does not believe current price levels are sustainable. By using the dot-com and COVID bubbles as benchmarks, history would suggest that a major correction could be on the horizon for these small quantum computing stocks. Issuing stock to raise funds is not sustainable in the long run. Furthermore, consistently diluting shareholders through these offerings could call into question how these companies are allocating capital. In my eyes, if investors are seeking exposure to the quantum computing industry, they are best off exploring more diversified opportunities in big tech as opposed to the smaller, more speculative players analyzed in this piece. Trump's Tariffs Could Create $1.5 Trillion AI Gold Rush The Motley Fool's analysts are tracking a massive shift in U.S. tech. Over $1.5 trillion is already flowing into infrastructure, AI, and advanced manufacturing… and the number keeps climbing. Following a major tariff policy shift, a new AI Gold Rush is taking shape, and we think . It builds the tech infrastructure that Apple, OpenAI, and others suddenly can't live without. We just released a full write-up on this under-the-radar stock — and why now might be the exact moment to move. Continue » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, Nvidia, Peloton Interactive, and Zoom Communications. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could a Quantum Computing Bubble Be About to Pop? History Offers a Clear Answer was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Precision Global Corporation Partners with CubeSmart to Manage Four Strategic Storage Facilities Across Texas
ROCKWALL, Texas, July 26, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- In a move that underscores its rapid growth and commitment to operational excellence, Precision Global Corporation (PGC) proudly announces its new partnership with CubeSmart, one of the nation's leading self-storage operators, to manage four of its Texas-based storage assets: Brazosport Storage in Clute, TX FM 1777 Storage in Royse City, TX Lakehill Storage in Lakehills, TX Tin Top Storage in Granbury, TX As of Friday, July 25, 2025, CubeSmart officially assumes third-party management of all four properties. This marks a significant milestone in PGC's expansion within the self-storage sector and reflects the company's focus on enhancing value through best-in-class operations and strategic partnerships. "CubeSmart doesn't just manage storage—they redefine it," said Brian Sullivan, President of Precision Global Corporation. "Their leadership in this space is undeniable. By entrusting CubeSmart with these four facilities, we're elevating the customer experience while positioning each asset for sustained success." With more than two decades of experience and a reputation for operational excellence, CubeSmart is the third-largest owner and operator of self-storage facilities in the U.S., managing over 1,300 properties nationwide. Their systems, marketing infrastructure, and service-first culture make them the gold standard for facility owners looking to scale. Under CubeSmart's management, tenants at all four Texas locations can expect elevated service, improved visibility, and enhanced operational performance through CubeSmart's proven model. This partnership aligns with Precision Global's ongoing mission: to scale a national portfolio of self-storage and RV park assets by partnering with elite operators and creating long-term value for both customers and investors. About Precision Global Corporation Precision Global Corporation is a national private equity firm specializing in real estate investment and development. With a focus on high-growth, income-producing assets like self-storage and RV parks, PGC is known for its entrepreneurial spirit, disciplined execution, and strategic partnerships. The company is actively expanding its portfolio in markets with strong demographic and economic fundamentals. For more information, visit About CubeSmart Founded in 2004, CubeSmart is a publicly traded REIT and recognized industry leader in the self-storage sector. Managing over 1,300 facilities nationwide, CubeSmart offers expert third-party management, technology-driven solutions, and a customer-first culture that sets them apart as the go-to partner for facility owners across the U.S. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Precision Global Corporation LLC
