logo
50 years ‘Jaws,' the number of white sharks off Cape Cod is growing. Scientists say that's a good thing.

50 years ‘Jaws,' the number of white sharks off Cape Cod is growing. Scientists say that's a good thing.

Boston Globe12-07-2025
The white shark population is recovering as the blockbuster film 'Jaws,' which ignited many people's fear of great whites, celebrates its 50th anniversary this summer.
'There are more white sharks off the coast of Massachusetts, and specifically off the coast of Cape Cod, than there were twenty years ago,' Greg Skomal, a senior fisheries biologist with the state's Division of Marine Fisheries and a leading expert on white sharks, said. 'That's what you expect when you restore an ecosystem.'
White sharks once dominated the waters around Cape Cod, but scientists believe recreational fishers looking for a big catch and accidental catches by commercial tuna and swordfish fisheries are to blame for their decline. The white shark population in New England dropped by 63 to 73 percent during the 1970s and 1980s,
according to scientists.
Advertisement
At the time, many saw sharks' disappearance from the waters as a boon for humans. 'Jaws,' which premiered in 1975, left many viewers terrified of encountering the animals on a swim.
Advertisement
'The perception at the time of 'Jaws' and even prior to 'Jaws' was that the only good shark was a dead shark,' Skomal, who wrote a book on the history of shark research, said.
But without white sharks, the ocean's natural food chains are thrown off balance, leading to the proliferation of certain species of fish as others languish, like the coral reefs and kelp that fish eat.
In 1993, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the first management measures for Atlantic
sharks, including a prohibition on removing their fins. A turning point came four years later, when white sharks were marked as a prohibited species for harvesting.
Although scientists cannot pin down a direct cause of the population recovery, the increasing numbers of sharks are correlated with the implementation of shark management plans and the growing population of grey seals, their prey. Congress banned the killing of seals under the Marine Mammal Protection Act in 1972.
Around 800 white sharks visited the waters off Cape Cod from 2015 to 2018, according to the Atlantic White Shark Conservancy (AWSC).
Although scientists do not know how many sharks frequented the coast before that, they said the number generally indicates the species is recovering in the region.
'We don't have that magic number of 'this is the perfect ecosystem,'' Ashleigh Novak, a research coordinator at AWSC, said. 'But what we do know is that from these protective measures for seals and sharks we're seeing them begin to recover.'
It's hard to miss the sharks' return to Cape Cod from the shore. Beachgoers
Advertisement
Skomal believes people's warming attitudes towards sharks represent a transformative change for marine biology.
'I think this prevalence of fear in the seventies that persisted for, perhaps, another decade or so has morphed into fascination,' he said.
It certainly did for Skomal, who saw 'Jaws' with his friends in Fairfield, Conn., when he was 13 years old. He remembers watching Richard Dreyfuss as shark expert Matt Hooper, who came to Amity Island to 'solve the shark conundrum.'
'I thought it was like, the most amazing film,' Skomal said. 'I was inspired by that and decided really at that age that this was something I wanted to go into for the rest of my life.'
At the time of the film's release, researchers largely studied how the 'man-eaters' attack humans, as scientists referred to sharks in scientific papers. A new generation of biologists has expanded humans' understanding of the species 'by orders of magnitude,' including how they grow, reproduce, and most importantly for humans, feed, Skomal said.
Skomal studies white sharks' predatory behavior when hunting grey seals for insights into how to keep humans safer in the ocean. He uses video cameras mounted on sharks' bodies and accelerometer tags, which measure movements like tail-beat frequency and swimming depth, to understand when, where, and how sharks hunt their prey.
'We could take that information and translate it into recommendations for the public,' Skomal said.
The National Park Service offers safety guidance for visitors to Cape Cod, including tips to stay close to the shore, swim in groups, limit splashing, and avoid areas where seals and schools of fish are swimming.
Advertisement
Endurance swimmer Lewis Pugh wants to see humans and sharks coexist in the ocean. In May,
He considers the Shark Swim a step towards undoing the film's lasting negative impact.
'It shaped the narrative about sharks for the past fifty years, no question about that. It created a culture of fear around the world,' Pugh said.
Vendetta killings, shark-fishing tournaments, and commercial shark fishing proliferated in the decades after the film's release.
'There was a lot of fear around sharks resulting from them watching 'Jaws,' and there were shark tournaments,' said Novak, referring to fishing
competitions where participants try to catch the biggest shark.
'There is this really big public perception shift that has happened in the last fifty years.'
Pugh's swim sought to raise awareness of the
'It is complete madness. It is ecocide that is happening right now,' he said. 'I think we still have quite a long way to go to educate the public about how important they are.'
Pugh, who has crossed the Red Sea and
swum the length of the Hudson River, could not help but feel a touch of nervousness before getting in the water himself.
'I'm doing interview after interview after interview speaking about sharks, and then I have to get in the water and I've got to swim,' he said.
Advertisement
Jade Lozada can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

His 'Yellow Submarine' dream sat in a swamp for decades. Why it was just hauled away.
His 'Yellow Submarine' dream sat in a swamp for decades. Why it was just hauled away.

USA Today

time2 days ago

  • USA Today

His 'Yellow Submarine' dream sat in a swamp for decades. Why it was just hauled away.

Thousands of abandoned and derelict vessels around the US pose environmental and navigational challenges. A Florida man's dream to build a 100-foot-long submarine has formally ended after workers hauled the giant steel tube out of a Keys mangrove swamp to be hacked up and recycled. Known locally as the "Yellow Submarine" even though it had mostly rusted to a dirty red, the former piece of industrial equipment was the pipe dream of a Marathon resident who envisioned turning the windowless tube into an eco-tourism attraction. But the man's efforts ran squarely into that old nautical saying: A boat is a hole in the water you throw money into. The vessel had been tucked in a canal on a tiny island called Boot Key since the late 1990s. The then-owner told a reporter in 2008 that he'd rescued the steel vessel from a Chicago scrapyard and had it barged to the Keys, where he planned to renovate it into a powered submarine. He described floating around the erstwhile vessel on a homemade raft and predicted he was close to being finished. But 17 years later, contractors this week surrounded the rusting 100-ton tube with rigging and float bags so they could haul it ashore for recycling. The painstaking $195,000 removal of the vessel highlights the environmental and navigational challenges posed by the thousands of other abandoned and derelict vessels around the United States, from Florida to Alaska, Minnesota and Oregon. Florida law allows the government to seize and remove abandoned vessels, and to charge the owner for the cleanup. The 2008 news article said the then-owner discovered it would cost him $750,000 to get the vessel certified as seaworthy. "There was basically nothing inside ‒ it's just a huge tube," said Brittany Burtner, who oversaw the vessel's Aug. 11 removal. "It was actually still floating." 'It's shocking how much of it can be recycled' Burtner, who is Monroe County, Florida's, senior administrator for marine resources, said abandoned boats can contain everything from diesel fuel to oil and cleaning supplies that can leak into waterways when a vessel runs around or springs a leak. Because of the ongoing legal case involving the now-removed Yellow Submarine, Burtner said she didn't have publicly available information about who currently owned the vessel or why it had been abandoned. She said a 2021 change to Florida law allowed authorities to launch a derelict-vessel investigation after years of it sitting in the canal. Monroe County has been using a Biden-era $3 million federal grant to clean up abandoned vessels, and has already removed about 250 in the past 12 months. "A lot of things had to happen at once, and they all came together this year," Burtner said. "Even though this thing looks like a rust bucket … it's shocking how much of it can be recycled. They're probably going to spend the next month cutting it apart." Working to solve the problem The federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is separately funding the removal of more than 300 abandoned and derelict vessels across six states over the next four years, both on the seacoasts and along the Great Lakes. NOAA is providing $69 million for the work, which also includes removing abandoned fishing gear, tires and marine debris. Burtner said people often buy cheap used boats thinking they'll renovate them, get in over their heads, and then leave them anchored in a quiet cove before boating away. "What will be fairly common is that someone will abandon a boat and it will just sit there at anchor and just slowly fall apart," she said. "It's really hard to tell the difference between a boat that's just sitting there and a boat that's been abandoned. It can take years. It's a difficult problem we're working to solve from many different angles."

700-pound shark caught off Connecticut coast may break state record: ‘Holy Mackerel'
700-pound shark caught off Connecticut coast may break state record: ‘Holy Mackerel'

New York Post

time7 days ago

  • New York Post

700-pound shark caught off Connecticut coast may break state record: ‘Holy Mackerel'

Two Connecticut fishermen reeled in a massive 700-pound Thresher shark that could be the largest ever caught in state waters, according to a report. Ed Lovely, 46, spent over six hours wrestling the powerful predator alongside a friend off the coast of Stonington last Wednesday, ABC News reported. Once out on the water, Lovely strung out a fishing line and recalled thinking, 'Bang, I feel something,' as the hefty fish began pulling, he told the outlet. Two Connecticut fishermen reeled in a massive 700-pound Thresher shark that could be the largest ever caught in state waters. Ed Lovely 'We started fighting from there,' he said. Lovely worked for over six hours into the night with his fishing partner to reel in the 16.5-foot, 700-pound shark, which was longer than his entire boat, he recalled. At one point, he was in complete 'awe' over the shark's mammoth head peeking out of the waters. 'Wow, holy mackerel, look at that shark, it is the biggest shark I've ever seen,' Lovely remembered thinking at the time. Once they completed the harrowing catch, the pair of grown fishermen 'laid on the deck and started laughing like kids, just laying there in the dark with headlamps on,' he said. Since the shark was too big for Lovely's boat, it had to be rigged to the side of the boat — then towed away in a trailer once reaching land, the outlet reported. Lovely is currently in talks with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to see if the catch will break a Connecticut state record. Lovely is currently in talks with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to see if the catch will break a Connecticut state record. Ed Lovely A spokesperson for the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection also confirmed to the outlet that the triumph may qualify for a Marine Trophy Fish Award. Thresher sharks can be up to 20 feet long, according to the NOAA. Lovely's family has since cut up the shark's meat to be shared with family and friends, his wife, Cynthia, told the outlet.

50 years after ‘Jaws,' US beaches still aren't safe for swimming
50 years after ‘Jaws,' US beaches still aren't safe for swimming

Miami Herald

time03-08-2025

  • Miami Herald

50 years after ‘Jaws,' US beaches still aren't safe for swimming

I still remember seeing the movie 'Jaws' in the theater in 1975. I was 9 years old. Whenever the great white shark appeared, my mom put her hands over her eyes — but I was transfixed, caught between fear and fascination. My friends and I then spent countless hours that summer learning about sharks and drawing them. Only later did I learn that the more widespread threat in the water was not killer sharks but man-made pollution. Just three years before 'Jaws' hit the theaters, Congress responded to the unrestrained dumping of toxins and heavy metals into our waters by passing the Clean Water Act, which pledged to make all of America's waters safe for swimming. Five decades later, that promise of the Clean Water Act remains unfulfilled. While we have made some progress in reducing direct discharges of industrial pollution, billions of gallons of sewage and polluted stormwater continue to flow into America's rivers, lakes and bays and onto beaches. New research shows just how scary that pathogen pollution can be. Environment America Research & Policy Center's recent 'Safe for Swimming?' report found that 61% of U.S. beaches had potentially unsafe contamination levels of fecal bacteria on at least one day in 2024. Each year, people swimming in contaminated U.S. waters experience an estimated 57 million cases of illness. These include nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, as well as respiratory disease, ear and eye infection and skin rash. Even though 'Jaws' is about a shark rather than fecal bacteria (I'm pretty sure no one wants to see a movie about that), it contains a lesson for dealing with any pervasive threat in nearby waters: You need adequate resources and political will. In the movie, the failure of Mayor Larry Vaughn to protect residents of the fictional New England beach town of Amity Island compounds the danger posed by the shark. Only after appeals from local Police Chief Martin Brody does the mayor commit the resources and take the steps needed to find the shark. Similarly, it will take significant resources to stop sewage overflows and runoff pollution. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that managing our nation's wastewater and stormwater will require at least $630 billion over the next 20 years. The main federal program that communities rely on for projects to reduce sewage and stormwater pollution — the Clean Water State Revolving Fund — is currently funded at less than 20% of that annual cost. You can't fight water pollution (or a shark) without enough resources at your disposal. Yet some in Congress are steering us in the wrong direction. Amid a summer of floods and beach closures across America, the U.S. House Appropriations Committee recently voted to slash funding for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund. The committee's bill also significantly reduces funding for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, even as toxic PFAS 'forever chemicals' taint the drinking water of more than 158 million Americans, and more than 9 million dangerous lead pipes are still in use. It's clear that Congress needs to increase water infrastructure funding — not slash it. We need our elected representatives to act in the spirit of Chief Brody, who urged swift action to protect the public and joined the expedition to hunt the killer shark. After an epic battle, with the help of a scuba tank and a rifle, Brody delivered the fatal blow, finally making Amity Islands beaches once again safe for swimming. With Congress now in recess, we have a critical window of time to stop these proposed cuts to the money we need to tackle sewage pollution. Americans can add their voices by contacting their representatives in Congress to urge them to vote against the committee's bill. For our members of Congress to make our waters safer, the only weapon they need is their vote. John Rumpler is clean water director at the 501(c)(4) nonprofit Environment America. He is also co-author of the 'Safe for Swimming?' report by Environment America Research & Policy Center.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store