Quebec says it will impose out-of-province tuition hike despite court ruling
Despite a court ruling striking down its tuition hikes for out-of-province Canadian students, the Quebec government will not appeal the decision.
Higher Education Minister Pascale Déry said the court found fault with the rationale for the increases — not the increases themselves — and says the government intends to stay the course.
In a social media post on Tuesday, Déry said the court had not overturned the government's move to increase tuition by 33 per cent for out-of-province Canadian students.
"We are standing by the decision. We firmly believe it is not the Quebec government's role to ensure financial accessibility to education for non-Quebecers," she said, noting that she wanted to "set the record straight" about the ruling after claiming it was misreported by Montreal news outlets.
In April, Quebec Superior Court Justice Éric Dufour said the government lacked data to support its claims that out-of-province students weren't integrating into Quebec society.
"The evidence shows that the ministry has absolutely no data on this subject, or only fragile information to back it up," he wrote in his ruling.
Dufour gave the government a nine-month timeline to revise the fee structure, but maintained the tuition increase for that time frame.
He also threw out the province's requirement to have 80 per cent of out-of-province undergraduate students at English-language universities reach an intermediate level of proficiency in French by graduation, calling the expectation "unreasonable given the near-certain impossibility of achievement."
WATCH | What does the ruling mean?
Quebec court strikes down tuition hike for out-of-province students
2 months ago
Duration 1:43
The heads of Quebec's English universities criticized the move, saying the increase in tuition fees made their programs unappealing to students across the country.
Last month, Concordia reported it anticipates a deficit of nearly $32 million for the 2025–26 academic year, while McGill has already put in place measures to cut $45 million from its 2025-26 budget to eliminate operating deficits over the next three years.
Vannina Maestracci, a spokesperson for Concordia, said in an email on Tuesday that the university was "astonished" by the higher education minister's comments, which suggest the government will return to court with new arguments to justify the tuition increase.
"We had hoped that the decision by the Superior Court in April could mark a reset of our relationship with the government," Maestracci wrote. "The comments, made one day after the end of the appeal period, make it clear that this is not the case."
No plans to appeal
Simon Savignac, a spokesperson for Déry, said the province will not try to fight the judge's orders.
Over the next few months, the province will try to rework the rules and find another rationale for the hike.
But he pointed out that the ruling recognizes the government's right to take steps to protect French.
"The ruling not only supports the measure aimed at correcting the financial imbalance between English-language and French-language universities, it also recognizes the government's responsibility to take the necessary steps to protect the French language in Quebec," Savignac said.
Savignac said the government still believes "it is not the responsibility of the Quebec government to guarantee financial accessibility to education for non-Quebecers."
He added that the government "will continue discussions with English-speaking universities over the coming weeks" about out-of-province students' knowledge of French.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law
The Quebec government says legal opponents challenging its secularism law at the Supreme Court of Canada are merely rehashing old, failed arguments in an effort to overturn established legal precedent. On Tuesday, Quebec filed 100 pages of legal arguments to the Supreme Court ahead of a hearing in which it will defend Bill 21 in court for a third time. The province won two previous decisions in the lower courts in Quebec, which led to the current appeal at the Supreme Court. Quebec's Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans public sector workers, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols such as hijabs on the job. The province's goal is to promote secularism in Quebec, but critics argue it is an attack on minority rights. Record number of groups to speak at Supreme Court case against Quebec secularism law Quebec has won two court battles for overriding Charter rights to implement its secularism law. Now the fight hits the Supreme Court The Bill 21 case represents a landmark hearing at the Supreme Court, where the country's top court will consider governments' ability to override the rights and freedoms of Canadians in detail for the first time in almost four decades. The provincial government used Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the notwithstanding clause, to shield the secularism law from constitutional challenges on the basis of freedom of religion and other rights. The province's Tuesday filing says opponents are trying to circumvent its proper use of Section 33. In French, the filing says such arguments are asking the Supreme Court 'to amend established law.' Quebec further said its opponents are using legal arguments that have previously failed and that the challengers have not exposed errors in last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision on Bill 21, which broadly upheld the provincial government's actions. The appeal court, Quebec said in its filing, 'conducted a detailed and meticulous analysis of all the arguments raised by the appellants and rightly dismissed them.' The key precedent is a 1988 case called Ford, where the Supreme Court considered Section 33 on a narrow legal basis but didn't delve in deeper questions about the notwithstanding clause. The Supreme Court at the time said the 'essential requirement' is for a government that uses Section 33 to name the Charter sections it aims to override. The basis of Quebec's Bill 21 argument is that the Ford decision is a precedent that should not be reconsidered. In Bill 21, Quebec stated it was using Section 33 to override the 10 sections of the Charter to which the notwithstanding clause can apply. But in the decades since Ford, and especially in recent years as more provincial governments have used Section 33 to shield laws, legal academics and others have argued there may be more for the top court to say about the notwithstanding clause. That includes whether it can be invoked pre-emptively, as Quebec did with Bill 21, or whether a court can declare rights have been violated even if a law is allowed to continue to operate because of Section 33. This week, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal said there is room for such judicial declarations. Last year, the Quebec appeal court came to the opposite conclusion. Six groups are appealing last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision. They filed their legal arguments in mid-April. The appellants want the Supreme Court to overturn Bill 21. Among the arguments is a call to reconsider the 1988 Ford precedent. Further arguments include looking at other parts of the Charter, the Constitution, Canada's history and the limits of provincial powers to question the validity of Quebec's use of Section 33 in Bill 21. In Quebec's arguments filed Tuesday, the province said the Bill 21 case 'does not raise any new issues distinct from those considered in Ford.' Quebec then suggested that two of the appellants are effectively trying to rewrite Section 33 of the Charter 'to add conditions that are not found there.' A Bill 21 hearing has not been scheduled, but it could happen this winter. Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner has said it could be heard over three days. Most Supreme Court hearings take one day; rare cases occupy two days. The landmark Bill 21 case has attracted a record number of intervenors, as 38 outside groups will present written legal arguments to the court by mid-September. The federal government is also set to file its legal arguments at the same time, alongside six provincial attorneys-general, including Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Ottawa has previously expressed concern about provincial governments pre-emptively invoking Section 33.
CTV News
4 minutes ago
- CTV News
Former CEO facing legal action from company over allegedly misusing funds
The Manitoba Law Courts building in Winnipeg on Wednesday, May 8, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/John Woods A Winnipeg-based business that helps nonprofits fundraise with online raffles has filed a lawsuit against its co-founder, alleging he misused funds being held in trust for charities and other organizations. Nicholas Tenszen, who served as the CEO and president of Funding Change from June 1, 2021, to July 8, 2024, is facing legal action for an unspecified amount, including punitive damages, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba's Court of King's Bench earlier this month. The lawsuit alleges that Tenszen, 'who had complete access and control over Funding Change's finances and operations, including control over the trust funds and payroll,' processed payments directly to himself without the knowledge or consent of its board of directors from August 2022 to July 2024. The court filing says Tenszen used the trust funds to pay operational expenses of Funding Change, breaching the company's trust obligations and the terms and conditions of its licence issued by the Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Authority of Manitoba (LGCA). This resulted in 'Funding Change being unable to pay charities raffle proceeds in a timely matter, or at all,' according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that Tenszen also used funds belonging to Funding Change to pay for personal expenses and failed to pay company liabilities to the Canada Revenue Agency. A Winnipeg Police Service spokesperson said that no criminal investigation is ongoing and that no report has been received regarding the incident. The lawsuit says that after Funding Change discovered 'significant financial and other improprieties,' it disclosed the findings to the LGCA which prompted 'emergency financing in order to maintain the integrity of its obligations to charities and liquidity of its operations.' The company also revoked Tenszen's signing authority and he was removed as a director of Funding Change, according to the lawsuit. The court filing says he later resigned as its CEO and president. The lawsuit says the LGCA conducted an investigation into Funding Change from July 2024 to November 2024, concluding that the company made 'inaccurate and untimely payments of the trust funds' during the period in which the finances and operations were controlled by Tenszen. Funding Change's licence with LGCA was ultimately renewed, though it included 'special terms and conditions, including that (Tenszen) could not be responsible for financial decisions or for the management or operation of Funding Change's business,' per the statement of claim. '(Tenszen's) foregoing conduct was malicious, deliberate, in bad faith, for improper purposes, and was in wanton disregard of (Funding Change)'s rights and ought to offend the community's sense of fair play,' says the lawsuit. Tenszen could not be reached for comment. Funding Change's website said it has completed over 2,300 raffles with a wide range of organizations—such as sports teams, schools, parent councils, festivals and health foundations—with total raffle sales over $19 million. 'Funding Change is stronger than ever': chair In a statement obtained through the company's lawyer, Funding Change chair David Asper said the company is 'stronger than ever' following changes to its leadership and finances. 'We moved quickly to refinance the business so that no partner would be negatively affected, and we immediately resolved outstanding matters with the CRA and other creditors,' said Asper. Asper said Funding Change has also engaged with an accounting firm to complete a thorough and independent audit. Jamie Gowryluk has been appointed as the company's new president and chief operating officer. No statement of defence has been filed and the allegations have not been proven in court.
CTV News
4 minutes ago
- CTV News
Black-owned business owners in Little Jamaica seek supports after dozens of stores close during LRT construction
Dozens of Black-owned businesses have closed in Little Jamaica since the start of the Eglinton LRT construction 15 years ago, and it's time governments step up to support local shops, owners say. Traffic lanes are open and new wide sidewalks are ready for foot traffic to return, but it's not business as usual. This week is Rastafest on Eglinton Avenue West and organizers believe it's an ideal time to welcome many back to the neighbourhood. They want people to know even though the LRT isn't open, the construction has ended. 'No joke we have really good food down here, and you will not be disappointed,' said Kingston 12 owner Gordon Gennetho, who is taking advantage of the new sidewalk to cook delicious jerk chicken and specializes in Jamaican dishes. Since LRT construction began about 30 black-owned businesses between Marlee and Keele streets have closed. 'Literally the sidewalk was closed, 100 per cent closed, you couldn't get around, especially there was lots of dust so you couldn't even open the doors for the customers to come in,' Gennetho said. Gordon Gennetho, owner Kingston 12 Gordon Gennetho is the owner of Kingston 12 in Toronto's Little jamaica neighbourhood. Down the street, Maxwell Blackwood has been doing business in the area for 40 years. 'This LRT devastated actually this community and what is so troublesome about it, it just looks like they don't care,' said Blackwood, who owns Black Diamond Gallery and Art. 'Anyone can delay something but when they behave like nothing is happening, that's really troubling.' He and other black owned businesses are calling on all levels of government to support this historically and culturally rich area with Caribbean roots so that it remains vibrant. They say developers have moved in, buying up buildings, which is driving up rents. 'A lot of incentives are going to the developers who are building the condos, but not the business owners. The business owners need financial incentives so we can stay afloat, pay our rent, survive as business owners,' Masani Montague, owner of the production company Studio M and Rastafest, told CTV News Toronto. In an email to CTV News Toronto, Metrolinx said roads in the area of Little Jamaica were opened up in summer 2023. 'We understand that construction can be challenging for local businesses. To support businesses during construction, we created a Community Benefits and Supports program. To date, this program has provided $171.2 million to local businesses and social enterprises,' the provincial transportation agency said it also worked with local businesses to provide supports through three City-led programs and formed a Construction Liaison Committee in the area. 'We are thankful to local businesses for their patience during construction. Metrolinx will continue to support local BIAs and businesses and the LRT will bring thousands of people into communities across midtown, providing significant positive benefits to local businesses,' it added. Rastafest, meanwhile, will be running through the weekend in the community. Organizers say in addition to sales, activities, and a street market, attendees can expect lots of food and entertainment. It's an opportunity show off the people, the tastes, and the culture in Little Jamaica, they say.
