logo
Native American radio stations at risk as US looks to cut $1 bn funding

Native American radio stations at risk as US looks to cut $1 bn funding

Dozens of Native American radio stations across the country vital to tribal communities will be at risk of going off the air if Congress cuts more than $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, according to industry leaders.
The US Senate is set to vote this week on whether to approve the Department of Government Efficiency's plan to rescind previously approved public broadcasting funding for 2026 and 2027.
Fear is growing that most of the 59 tribal radio stations that receive the funding will go dark, depriving isolated populations of news, local events and critical weather alerts. The House already approved the cuts last month.
For Indian Country in general, 80 per cent of the communities are rural, and their only access to national news, native story sharing, community news, whatever it is, is through PBS stations or public radio, said Francene Blythe-Lewis, CEO of the Lincoln, Nebraska-based Native American video programming producer Vision Maker Media. If the claw back happens, I would say a good 90 per cent of those stations will cease to exist.
Native American communities rely on local radio stations.
Local radio plays an outsized role in the lives of many who live in Indigenous communities, where cable television and broadband internet access are spotty, at best, and nonexistent for many. That leaves over-the-air TV stations usually a PBS station and more often local radio to provide local news, community event details and music by Indigenous artists. Sometimes the news is delivered in Indigenous languages.
It means we're not going to hear our language on the radio, Blythe-Lewis said.
Flagstaff, Arizona-based Native Public Media, which supports the network of 59 radio stations and three television stations serving tribal nations across the country, said about three dozen of those radio stations that rely heavily on Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding will be the first to go dark if funding is cut for the coming fiscal year that starts October 1.
Loris Taylor, CEO of Native Public Media, said in an op-ed that the tribal stations reach more than 1.5 million people and may be the only source of locally relevant news, emergency alerts, public safety announcements, language preservation, health information and election coverage.
Republicans face pressure to pass the cuts GOP senators are under pressure from President Donald Trump, who promised last week on his Truth Social platform that any Republican who votes against the cuts will not have my support or Endorsement.
Many Republicans say the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. Sen Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, recently defended the cuts as necessary to hack away at the nearly $37 trillion national debt, adding, It is critical in restoring trust in government.
But some Republicans have pushed back, such as Maine Sen Susan Collins, who questioned the proposed cuts last month during a Senate committee hearing. She said that while some of the federal money is assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, most of it goes to locally owned public radio and television stations.
Tribal stations provide lifesaving alerts Jaclyn Sallee is president and CEO of Koahnic Broadcast Corporation and KNBA, its radio station in Anchorage, Alaska. Koahnic produces National Native News, a five-minute daily newscast that features headline news from across Indian Country, and Native America Calling, a daily hour-long call-in programme, for about 190 stations across the nation. It also produces Indigefi, a music programme in Indigenous languages.
KNBA is on Native Public Media's list of those stations that would be most affected by the federal funding cuts a concern Sallee confirmed, as 40 per cent of the station's funding comes from CPB.
What we're really worried about are the rural stations in Alaska where they may be the only station in the community, she said. The people that live there depend on the station for vital weather alerts, emergency alerts; it's the local hub of the community where people share information. So that is very troublesome because people's lives are at risk without this service.
It's currently fishing season in Alaska, she said, which means getting out in the ocean or in rivers and going long distances to subsist, and so they really rely on weather reports.
Having the news reported in a tribe's language isn't just about preserving that language, she said. Sallee spent summers in Nome with her mother's family. Her grandmother, she said, spoke only Inupiaq.
Loss of small stations could hurt the larger system.
New Mexico PBS's signal reaches all but one of the more than 20 tribes and pueblos in the state. It has also signed an agreement with the Navajo Nation, which has the largest reservation of any tribe in the US, that allows the tribe to carry the PBS signal and programming on the Navajo Nation Television network, New Mexico PBS general manager Franz Joachim said.
It's no question in my mind that, you know, immediately some stations will pretty much go dark, Joachim said.
When those first stations fail, it won't take long for others to follow, Joachim said. And as they do, it will mean fewer and fewer stations left to pay membership dues that also help fund all of the stations.
So now the whole system starts to fracture, he said. So for me, the federal funding is really about the system as a whole that keeps us in place.
That funding also helps produce national content that groups like Vision Maker Media produce. Those include Native American documentaries shown on PBS like Mankiller, the story of Wilma Mankiller, who became the first woman elected principal chief of the Cherokee Nation.
Blythe-Lewis compared the potential loss of tribal stations to the country's past attempts to erase Native American cultures, such as through federal boarding schools where Indigenous children were sent for generations to assimilate them into white society and where systemic abuse of Indigenous children was carried out.
We're erased from public media and therefore invisible and therefore become unknown and unheard of, she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who are Syria's Druze, caught in sectarian clashes and Israeli strikes?
Who are Syria's Druze, caught in sectarian clashes and Israeli strikes?

Business Standard

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Who are Syria's Druze, caught in sectarian clashes and Israeli strikes?

Israel has launched air strikes in southern Syria after days of intense clashes between Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin fighters in the province of Suweida, according to several media reports. Fighting broke out on July 13 following the reported abduction of a Druze merchant, triggering violence that has left at least 350 people dead, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). On July 15, Israel said its military stepped in to protect the Druze community and eliminate pro-government forces accused of attacking them. The strikes initially targeted Syrian security forces and military vehicles in Suweida but expanded the following day to include the Ministry of Defence and army headquarters in Damascus. Syrian authorities have condemned the attacks. Who are the Druze, caught between Damascus and militias? The Druze community, who represent about 3 per cent of Syria's population, have historically operated local militias in southern regions, resisting integration into national forces. Since the fall of former president Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, many Druze factions have opposed the new government's attempts to assert authority over Suweida. Syria's current leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has pledged to safeguard the country's minorities. However, the SOHR has documented incidents of government forces attacking Druze civilians, including reports of summary executions, fuelling mistrust between the community and Damascus, according to a BBC report. The current violence in Suweida is the first major unrest in the Druze-majority region since fighting between Druze militias and Syrian security forces in April and May. Combined with Israeli air strikes, the clashes highlight Syria's fragile security landscape following over a decade of civil conflict and the Islamist-led takeover of Damascus in December 2024. Israeli military escalation in Syria the largest since December 2024 The latest strikes are Israel's most significant military escalation in Syria since December 2024, when it carried out extensive operations across Syrian territory and seized a United Nations buffer zone in the Golan Heights. Israeli officials said their primary goal is to prevent Syrian army deployments near its northern border and establish a demilitarised zone in southern Syria, citing concerns over Islamist fighter presence near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. In recent months, Israel has attempted to build relations with Syria's minority groups, specifically the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Israel's officials have depicted the state as a defender of minorities in the region amid Syria's on-going instability. On the contrary, some Druze leaders in Syria and Lebanon claim that Israel promotes sectarian divisions to achieve its own strategic ends in the region. As Ahmed al-Sharaa's government implements strategies to stabilise the country, sectarian standoffs and foreign involvement pose a threat to reconstruction and state-building. Analysts are of the opinion that Israel will likely have a suspicious view of Syria's new Islamist-aligned leadership and continue military actions against the Syrian government while promoting alliances with marginalised groups in southern Syria.

Development or Domination? Unravelling China's Hybrid Infrastructure Ambitions
Development or Domination? Unravelling China's Hybrid Infrastructure Ambitions

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Development or Domination? Unravelling China's Hybrid Infrastructure Ambitions

China's increasing deployment of development infrastructure as a tool of geopolitical coercion signifies a dangerous evolution in hybrid statecraft As China increasingly swells up with ambition to become the regional and global hegemon, its trojan-horse tactics of acquiring geopolitical leverage are correspondingly turning more evident and insidious. The country has, particularly under Xi Jinping, garnered international attention for its revisionist and expansionist manoeuvres along its borders and the South China Sea, as well as entrenching its surveillance state and intensifying systemic persecution of its religious minorities such as the Uyghurs and the Tibetans. Recently, a June 2025 report by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies has uncovered in detail China's deployment of hybrid or 'grey-zone' infrastructure which is constructed under the neutral garb of economic development but covertly serves as a geopolitical tool to ensure compellence or deterrence. As opposed to being a new practice, the report highlights that major powers have long exploited infrastructure-based dependencies as a tool of geostrategic coercion. However, the scale of China's activities and its impact on the affected countries makes it a unique case and one that must be monitored and checked. The report outlines three areas wherein this strategy of China can be observed- water, land, and the digital domain. For the first two, China has relied on its coercive control of Tibet to exploit its resource-abundant qualities and strategic location. Home to the great Himalayas, the Tibetan plateau houses massive glaciers that melt and provide water to the rivers that flow downstream into India, Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar. Since China annexed Tibet in the 1950s and early 60s, it has embarked on a project of relentless dam construction and diversion of water to the arid lands in the north. However, in the past decade or so, what has also been observed is the scaled-up construction of these dams and hydro-power projects particularly near the border areas and disputed zones. This not only creates a point of contention with respect to claim to territory but also threatens the downstream countries with change in the flow of water, artificial floods or drought, and destruction of ecological and economic structures. This is the reason why China's hydraulic activities on the Brahmaputra River frequently become an issue for India and Bangladesh wherein lives and livelihoods are dependent on the flow of the river, which increasingly rests in Beijing's hand. Similarly, China's construction of dams on the Mekong River since the 1980s has severely impacted water levels, flow, and sediment collection, causing huge damages to downstream Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Thailand. The next domain that the report highlights is China's use of land settlement and connectivity projects in the name of development to incrementally seize disputed or neighboring territory. This has been seen in the case of the nearly 1,000 xiaokang or 'well-off' villages along the LAC, most recently added in Arunachal Pradesh, India. This is a known tactic by China which has also received the name 'salami-slicing' and serves to avoid full-scale war while surreptitiously and gradually encroaching into another's territory. These settlements are accompanied by the construction of transportation infrastructure like roads and railways, under the pretext of achieving connectivity and integration for these remote villages. However, this infrastructure serves a dual-purpose of quick military mobilisation in case a conflict breaks out, thereby positioning China with a great advantage as it pursues activities that are sure to cause conflicts sooner or later. Finally, China employs the export of its digital technologies to execute surveillance and persecution; it influences digital governance policies in recipient countries, effectively exporting its authoritarian model. An example of this is Nepal, which having awarded the Chinese telecom giant Huawei the contract to upgrade the country's telecom sector in 2010 found the company deeply entrenched in its Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MOCIT) over the years. The report highlights cases wherein China digitally monitored and then targeted Tibetan refugees and dissidents in Nepal, while also influencing Nepalese officials regarding the country's policies on media, censorship, digital surveillance and freedom. As China increases the export of its digital gear into countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, it will become exceedingly urgent for global democracies to put norms in place to curtail this unhinged expansion of digital authoritarianism. In sum, China's increasing deployment of development infrastructure as a tool of geopolitical coercion signifies a dangerous evolution in hybrid statecraft. By weaponising water resources, strategically expanding land settlement and connectivity infrastructure, and exporting digital surveillance technologies, China is subtly projecting itself as the regional hegemon. This has grave implications for both short- and long-term regional stability and security, sovereignty, and democratic governance. The international community must demonstrate urgency in dealing with this menace and encourage countries to collaborate with transparent actors, rather than an authoritarian and revisionist state like China, to pursue development. Moreover, there must be a mechanism through which China's unilateral exploitation and strategic positioning of water and territory is accounted for, impeded, and sanctioned. The writer is an author and a columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Kamala Harris Eyeing A Comeback? Ex-US Vice President Leads 2028 Democratic Primary Poll
Kamala Harris Eyeing A Comeback? Ex-US Vice President Leads 2028 Democratic Primary Poll

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Kamala Harris Eyeing A Comeback? Ex-US Vice President Leads 2028 Democratic Primary Poll

Last Updated: Kamala Harris leads the 2028 Democratic nomination poll with 26% followed by Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom. Former US Vice President Kamala Harris, who lost in a landslide to Donald Trump in 2024, is now the early frontrunner for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, according to a new poll from Echelon Insights. Kamala Harris commands 26% support among Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters- far ahead of other contenders. Trailing Kamala Harris are former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg with 11% and California Governor Gavin Newsom with 10%. Another 13% of Democratic voters remain undecided. Earlier when Kamala Harris was excluded from the polling list- amid reports she may consider a run for California governor- support redistributed slightly. Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom both rose to 12%, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jumped to 9% and Senator Cory Booker reached 8%. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz rounded out the top five with 7%. JD Vance Dominates Early GOP Field Among Republican voters, US Vice President JD Vance leads with a commanding 42%, a full 33-point advantage over Florida Governor Ron DeSantis who earned 9% support. Other GOP figures included Marco Rubio (7%), Nikki Haley (6%), Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (5%) and Vivek Ramaswamy (4%). Sixteen percent of Republican voters said they were unsure. Among political outsiders, entrepreneur Mark Cuban polled at 3% while Stephen A. Smith and Jon Stewart received 1% each. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store