logo
EXCLUSIVE The travellers' tactics: How travellers are obliterating Britain's prized countryside to turn them into concrete carbuncles for their caravans in illegal landgrabs

EXCLUSIVE The travellers' tactics: How travellers are obliterating Britain's prized countryside to turn them into concrete carbuncles for their caravans in illegal landgrabs

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Travellers are using 'military' shock and awe-style tactics to obliterate areas of idyllic British countryside and turn them into concrete 'carbuncles' for their caravans, it can be revealed.
Groups across the UK have been accused of carrying out brazen bank holiday 'landgrabs' to rapidly build camps under the noses of council chiefs while their offices are closed.
Allegedly weaponising the national breaks, industrial diggers, excavators and lorries carrying gravel, are mobilised to rip up and pave over fields in protected green belts during 'deliberate and meticulously planned' operations.
Cynically, the 'illegal' conversions are done without any planning permission, flouting development rules - with 'retrospective' applications later submitted to councils to allow the newly-constructed sites to remain.
In the past month, at least two new encampments have been set up in West Sussex and Cheshire during the two May bank holidays, with fuming locals accusing travellers of making a 'mockery' of building laws.
The latest unauthorised works took place in the quaint village of Burtonwood, near Warrington, in Cheshire, during last week's bank holiday, with travellers taking less than 72 hours to convert a field into a gravel car park.
They covered half the open space in hardcore and also built a 10ft-high wooden fence around the boundary, with groups allegedly working through the night - much to the fury of dismayed locals.
'I have never felt so impotent as a councillor in not being able to do something,' local politician Stuart Mann said last night. 'The neighbours suffered for 36 hours solid that went through the night. It was a military operation in terms of how [the travellers] achieved it.'
The works on the land appear to mirror a similar incident weeks earlier near the West Sussex town of Petworth, in the heart of the protected South Downs National Park, during the VE Day bank holiday at the start of May.
A tranquil plot in Blind Lane, Lurgashall, was transformed into a building site as heavy machinery ploughed through the field without planning permission, turning it into gravel car park, with 10 caravans later appearing there.
Local MP Andrew Griffith was left horrified by the unauthorised development and now fears travellers elsewhere could launch similar landgrabs if planning rules aren't tightened up.
'These are clearly deliberate and meticulously planned operations,' Mr Griffith, the Conservatives' Shadow Business and Trade Secretary, told MailOnline.
'In the Lurgashall case it took far too long for the local council to act leaving ratepayers and residents at the mercy of this devastating planning blight.
'It is clearly foreseeable that bank holiday weekends are the moment of maximum danger and yet that's when town halls fail to ensure staff cover.'
Work at the six-acre Burtonwood site in Cheshire reportedly started at 6pm on Friday, May 23.
MailOnline understands it came after travellers legitimately purchased the plot of land.
Within hours, villagers reported excavators and tipper trucks working through the night to remove soil and replace it with concrete, completing the job in less than three days.
Before and after aerial photographs show the extent of the destruction and more than a dozen caravans and other vehicles have since moved onto the site.
Although a retrospective planning application has now been submitted to Warrington Borough Council, Cllr Mann said an investigation had been launched after complaints from locals, who say the land is green belt and should be for agricultural use only.
He claimed to have been bombarded by 'hundreds' of emails from worried locals, with more than 50 people turning up at his surgery to express concerns.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Cllr Mann said the community had been left feeling 'helpless' and angry at the development.
But it has also led to questions about how the local authority could have reacted to the issue, which could now take weeks to resolve despite an enforcement notice being issued.
'In my head, why was there nothing that could be done to at least put a pause on what was happening?' he said. 'Why couldn't someone turn up and say stop let's work something out.'
Other residents have reportedly had applications for their own developments on neighbouring land refused by the council, according to Cllr Mann.
'We have to have a level of faith in the planning process but it needs to be fair for anybody to build something,' he added.
Nigel Catlow, vice chairman, of Burtonwood and Westbrook Parish Council, described it as a 'very serious and fast-moving issue'.
In a letter to the council, he said: 'The landowners appear to be in serious breach, making the most of the Bank Holiday and the council being on a long weekend. 'This is of great concern to many residents and council taxpayers in Burtonwood and the wider area of Warrington West.'
Locals took to social media to express their anger, with one saying: 'The transformation is shocking.'
Another, Jacqui Worrall, wrote: 'Breach!?.. it's a s****** concrete jungle!!!!'
While Ray Houghton added: 'Blame the person who sold the land to them in the first place. The people doing this have no respect for the laws.'
At the West Sussex site, efforts made to stop the development from going ahead appeared to fail.
Builders arrived at the site on Friday, May 2, and work continued over the Bank Holiday weekend despite council notices and visits from Sussex Police.
By Sunday afternoon, a septic tank was seen being delivered to the site as well as more gravel - with caravans later occupying the plot.
A female council planning officer posted a second notice on the gate to the site on the Monday as three men carried on working. An earlier order to stop work was ignored.
It's unclear who was responsible for the unauthorised development. However, Mr Griffith said locals had been left appalled by it.
Speaking at the time, the MP for Arundel and South Downs said: 'I completely share the outrage and concern of residents about this illegal breach of all respected planning standards and behaviour.
'It makes a mockery of a system where we all jump through lengthy and costly hoops to install a dormer window when such brazen breaches happen unchecked.'
The MP added the incident came 'almost a year to the day' that Chichester District Council's Lib Dem administration 'advertised a £50,000-a-year traveller liaison role which many felt sent precisely the wrong signal'.
In May 2023, a beauty spot in the Cotswolds was ruined by travellers, who bulldozed their way onto a site they had not got permission to live on, despite the council trying to stop it happening for 17 years.
People in Kayte Lane, a rural community below Cleeve Hill, in Southam, near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, feared for years the unauthorised occupation of the land would happen before it finally did two years ago.
Sixteen caravans plus several cars and vans entered the site, which the travellers moved onto over the late spring bank holiday.
Travellers laid down hardstanding in the field, put up a high wooden fence along the edge of it and installed CCTV cameras, some of which overlook their neighbours.
One local resident, who did not want to be identified, said the group used a bulldozer to clear vegetation from parts of the site when they moved on to it.
It sparked a legal row, with locals last year accusing the authorities of not doing enough to prevent it from happening.
Tewkesbury Borough Council first obtained a court order in 2007 to try to protect the greenbelt land, which is close to Cheltenham Racecourse, from being developed.
It refused a retrospective planning application from the travellers in November 2023, after receiving more than 200 objections.
But the unauthorised development still went ahead, sparking local fury.
'Tewkesbury Borough Council don't enforce anything. We're fighting against a brick wall,' one resident raged at the time.'
Speaking last night, Mr Griffith urged action by Labour to clampdown on groups brazenly flouting planning laws nationally.
'The government must use the Planning and Infrastructure Bill currently going through Parliament to remove what increasingly feels to many like a 'two-tier' planning system,' he said.Chichester District Council has already secured a High Court injunction to halt further activity on the two-hectare field near Lurgashall.
The injunction prohibits any further unauthorised works or vehicles and caravans entering the site. If a person fails to comply with the order, it could result in a jail term.
Council leader Adrian Moss insisted the authority would 'not hesitate to take action' when planning rules are broken.
'We want to assure the community that we are doing everything in our power to respond to this. We will also be working with those on the site, local parish councils, and the local community, to offer support,' he said.
A spokesman for Chichester District Council added: 'We take these matters incredibly seriously. We have planning rules in place to protect areas of countryside in our district, including the South Downs National Park, and if harmful development is carried out then we will take appropriate enforcement action.
'We want to assure the community that we are doing everything in our power to respond to this. We will also be working with those on the site, local parish councils, and the local community, to offer support.'
Sussex Police told MailOnline it was aware of the traveller site but said it was a 'civil matter'.
A spokesman for Warrington Borough Council confirmed it had 'established a priority enforcement case' over the situation in Burtonwood.
'We have received a report about a potential breach of planning on land off Farmers Lane in Burtonwood and are currently investigating the issue.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 safe places should World War Three start
4 safe places should World War Three start

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

4 safe places should World War Three start

British Army Chief, General Sir Patrick Sanders (pictured), recently warned the UK to train and equip a 'citizen army' to ready the country for a potential land war. The Chief of General Staff said Britain's army is 'too small' and urged ministers to 'mobilise the nation' in preparation for a wider conflict against Russia amid the invasion of Ukraine . More recently tensions heightened between the United States and Iran, after a drone attack killed three American soldiers. With Russia and China warning the US against a 'cycle of retaliation' after Joe Biden threatened to target their ally, MailOnline takes a look at the five places on Earth that could be safe in the event of World War III. Wood Norton, Worcestershire. With only a small radio mast and a security barrier in sight, you would perhaps miss the huge network of tunnels running deep into the Worcestershire forest. Originally bought by the BBC at the beginning of World War II, the bunker's initial purpose was to be a hidden base for the broadcaster in the event a crisis in London. According to GloucestershireLive, Wood Norton is used as a training base for sound engineers and technical staff at the broadcasting company. The bunker also has a mast which would continue broadcasting messages from the BBC if the UK were ever to go into crisis mode. Also referred to as PAWN, Protected Area Wood Norton, the site is hidden deep in the Worcestershire hillside, boasting several storeys of architecture underground. The broadcaster outlined in documents released, also known as the War Book, in 2016 that the base would be utilised in the event of a grave attack on the UK. The facility is reportedly able to house up 90 BBC staff - including 12 news editors and sub-editors - and also boasts a ping-pong table. Raven Rock Mountain Complex, Pennsylvania. The Raven Rock Mountain Complex has maintained an air of mystique ever since they began building the facility in 1948. Dubbed 'Harry's Hole' after President Truman, who gave the project the go-ahead, the Pennsylvanian facility first opened its doors in 1953. Raven's Rock was constructed with the intention of being a 'centrepiece of a large emergency hub' according to Garret Graff, author of Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government's Secret Plan to Save Itself - While The Rest Of Us Die. Boasting 100,000 feet of office space, the bunker could facilitate up to 1,400 people. The base also has two 1,000 foot-long tunnels as well as 34-ton blast doors to help reduce the impact of a possible bomb attack. Even though the site was placed into standby mode by President George H.W. Bush in 1991, $652 million worth of upgrades were pumped into the site following 9/11. According to Graff, the underground city was kitted out with 27 new fuel tanks in 2012, with both having the ability to carry 20,000 gallons. Presently, the bunker is thought to have a whopping 900,000 square feet of office space, as well as the capacity for between 3,000 to 5.000 government employees. Family members would not be permitted to reside in the base. He said: 'Families would have been prohibited from Raven Rock — as they would have been from effectively all of the Doomsday bunkers. Athough in recent years as the veil of complete secrecy has lifted, family members of Raven Rock personnel are allowed to visit it for specific ceremonies. So at the very least, family members today can picture where their relatives will spend Doomsday, even as they're barred outside.' Peters Mountain, Virginia. Peters Mountain, situated in the vast Appalachian Mountains of Virginia has been there for some time, functioning as an AT&T communications station. When you spot the sight you can even see an AT&T logo painted on a helicopter landing pad. It serves as one of several secret centres also known as AT&T project offices, according to The New York Post. These facilities are essential for the US government's continuity planning. The centre tucked away in Appalachia has the ability to house a few hundred people. According to Graff, the bunker has received renovations costing $67 million in recent years. He stated that an attack on Washington were to occur, it would potentially be used as a relocation site for intelligence agencies. Cheyenne Mountain Complex - NORAD. Although Peters Mountain and Raven Rock were kept under wraps from the public, one bunker has always been public since its inception. Cheyenne Mountain Complex, which is located in El Paso County, Colorado, is a defense bunker for the United States Space Force. Better known as the headquarters for NORAD, (North American Aerospace Defense Command), the site was constructed in the 1950 in response to Cold War paranoia. The five chambers within the extraordinary bunker all have reservoirs for fuel and water - and in one section they reportedly even have an underground lake. Almost $40 million was invested into the facility in order to kit it out with the best technology, including 15 console displays and three room-sized Philco 212 computers. In the midst of a crisis, the Cheyenne Mountain Complex can hold up to 1,000 people a month. The facility, which costs an eye-watering $250-million a year to run, was on the brink of closure prior to 9/11. Although it was briefly put on standby mode in 2006, the Obama administration opted to breath a new lease of life into the base.

Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday
Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday

Meghan Markle has posted a cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth. The Duchess of Sussex shared the clip on her Instagram to mark her daughter's fourth birthday. One of the pictures showed the Duke of Sussex holding Lilibet's hand as they walked along a sandy road barefoot in the sunshine, while he held his shoes and a cap. The other image was of Harry holding Lilibet as a baby while they looked at each other. Meghan wrote in a post accompanying the pictures: 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold. Daddy's little girl and favorite adventurer. Happy birthday Lili!' The post was made at 7.40am California time (3.40pm UK), just under eight hours after Meghan earlier posted two other intimate family photos of her with Lilibet. In that post, the Duchess shared a black-and-white snap of herself cuddling Lili, who was sat on her lap, with the pair both sporting windswept hair, seemingly on a boat. The second image in the first post showed Meghan tenderly cradling newborn Lilibet as she enjoyed skin-to-skin time with the new addition to her family in 2021. Meghan wrote in the first post: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! Four years ago today she came into our lives - and each day is brighter and better because of it. 'Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' The duchess usually only shares photos of her daughter pictured from behind to protect her privacy. But in the more recent photo, Lili's eyes and the top half of her face could be seen, with her nose and mouth and the rest of her face covered by Meghan's arms as she hugged the princess. Lili - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's youngest child - was born on June 4 2021 and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. She only became entitled to be a princess when her grandfather the King acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917. Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lili after the princess's christening in 2023, following correspondence with Charles about the matter. Yesterday, Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future business with Lili as she chatted to Beyonce's mother Tina Knowles on her podcast. 'I wonder if one day I'll be in business with Lili and we'll be building something,' the duchess said, with Knowles adding: 'That's the best.' Last week, the Duchess shared a clip of her and her daughter beekeeping in matching protective suits, writing: 'Harvesting honey with my little honey. (Like mother, like daughter; she's even wearing my gloves).' Lilibet is named after her great-grandmother Queen Elizabeth II. Princess Elizabeth had difficultly pronouncing her own name as a toddler and her grandfather George V would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say Elizabeth. The sweet nickname stuck and she became known as Lilibet to her family from then on. But the late Queen was reportedly 'as angry as I'd ever seen her ' after Harry and Meghan claimed they had her blessing to use the name for their daughter Lilibet, a royal aide said. Royal author Robert Hardman, in his biography of the King, told how a member of staff recounted Elizabeth II's fury following Harry and Meghan's announcement in 2021 over the use of her childhood family nickname. Meghan shared a picture with Archie and Lilibet to mark Mother's Day in the US on May 11 The BBC later reported a Palace source said the Queen was not asked by the Sussexes whether they could use Lilibet. But the Sussexes' lawyers fired off legal letters to the broadcaster and other publishers, saying the claim was false and defamatory. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan insisted at the time that the duke spoke to his grandmother in advance and would not have used the name had the monarch not been supportive. Hardman wrote however: 'One privately recalled that Elizabeth II had been 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter 'Lilibet', the Queen's childhood nickname.'

Arrests in Matthew Schofield murder inquiry nearly two years on
Arrests in Matthew Schofield murder inquiry nearly two years on

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Arrests in Matthew Schofield murder inquiry nearly two years on

Police investigating the murder of a 34-year-old man almost two years ago have made new arrests. Matthew Schofield died in the early hours of 11 June 2022 after being found unresponsive in Belgrave Road, Leicester, following an Wednesday, Leicestershire Police said it had re-arrested a 32-year-old man on suspicion of murder and had arrested a woman aged 62 on suspicion of assisting an offender. A total of 19 people have so far been arrested in connection with the investigation and 13 people remain suspects, police said, but nobody has ever been charged. The force said work had continued to establish the full circumstances of Mr Schofield's death and identify the people involved in the attack. Det Insp Emma Matts, senior investigating officer in the case, said: "We still have active lines of inquiry we are investigating."As part of this, arrests are still being made as we work to identify people who may have been involved in Matthew's death."Throughout the investigation we have continued to appeal for people to come forward with information which may assist us, and I would make that plea again."Det Insp Matts added: "Matthew's mum, Emma Daniels, remains fully supportive of our investigation and at the heart of this is a grieving mum who deserves to know fully what happened to her son."Anyone with information is urged to come forward.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store