‘Real reason' why Prince Harry and Meghan Markle left royal family; biographer reveals
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's dramatic exit from royal life in 2020 may have had less to do with family tensions and more to do with money and personal ambition, according to royal biographer Valentine Low.
In his book Courtiers, Low claims the couple left the British monarchy not just for privacy, but for the freedom to build their brand, explore political engagement in the US, and—most significantly—generate independent wealth, the New York Post reported.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who relocated to California shortly after stepping back from their royal roles, reportedly found the constraints of royal protocol incompatible with their personal and professional aspirations. According to Low, Meghan's desire to earn on her terms was a decisive factor in their departure. 'Some suspected that in the end, she wanted to make money. And the only way to do that was by leaving the royal life behind,' he writes.
While the couple initially proposed a hybrid model—engaging in select royal duties while living independently—the Palace reportedly declined, citing concerns about preserving the neutrality and decorum of the Crown. Queen Elizabeth II is said to have taken a firm stance: members of the Royal Family must follow its protocols or step aside entirely.
The Sussexes' post-royal chapter has included headline-grabbing deals and strategic brand building. In 2020, they inked a reported $100 million content deal with Netflix, marking their entry into the global streaming and storytelling space. Markle has since launched a lifestyle brand and podcast, while also planning new digital ventures. These business moves have turned the couple into high-profile entrepreneurs on the world stage.
Their proximity to US political circles has also stirred speculation. Though they have stopped short of formal political involvement, both have shown support for the Biden administration, including collaborations during the Invictus Games. Meghan's connections with top Democrats—including Valerie Biden Owens, the US president's sister—have fuelled ongoing rumours about a potential future in politics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Ghazala Hashmi? Indian-American wins lieutenant governor nomination; Democrat to contest Virginia race
Source- Instagram Senator Ghazala Hashmi made history on Wednesday by winning the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor of Virginia. She is now the first Muslim and the first Indian-American ever nominated for a statewide office in Virginia. Hashmi defeated five Democratic candidates, including former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, clinching the nomination by a razor-thin margin of less than one percentage point. She will now face Republican John Reid in November. Reid is the first openly gay man nominated by a major party for statewide office in Virginia. With Hashmi joining gubernatorial nominee Rep. Abigail Spanberger and attorney general candidate Jay Jones, Democrats have now completed their statewide ticket. The general election could be historic in multiple ways, including the possibility of Virginia electing its first woman governor. Who is Ghazala Hashmi? Hashmi is the first Muslim woman and first South Asian American elected to Virginia's state Senate. She was born in India and moved to the US at age 4, settling in Georgia with her family. Hashmi holds a PhD in American literature and spent most of her professional life as a professor. She taught at the University of Richmond and later at Reynolds Community College before entering politics. In 2019, she entered the Virginia Senate by defeating Republican Glen Sturtevant in a closely watched race. She was re-elected in 2023. In the Senate, she championed reproductive rights. One of her key bills aimed to protect Virginians' access to contraception. The bill passed both chambers but was vetoed by Governor Glenn Youngkin.
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Big Pay Packages Spark Growing Dissent Among UK Shareholders
Shareholder dissent over executive pay at British companies is rising just as firms seek to bolster pay packages to remain internationally competitive. Three times as many companies faced opposition from more than 20% of shareholders so far this year compared with the same period in 2024, data from proxy-solicitation firm Georgeson Inc. shows. With investors having already voted on remuneration reports from more than half of FTSE 350 companies, 16 faced dissent exceeding 20% between Jan. 1 and May 31 this year, up from five in 2024, the data shows. 'Last year, FTSE 350 companies were more conservative in recommending higher levels of pay, which led to high shareholder support and low levels of opposition,' said Daniel Veazey, Georgeson's corporate governance manager. Pay packages of UK-based chief executive officers have grown faster this year than those of US rivals, with companies racing to close the gap to attract and retain top talent. The median FTSE 100 CEO package increased 7% to £4.79 million in 2024, according to Deloitte. 'UK Plcs are feeling freer to propose new remuneration policies designed to remain competitive with US and EU peers,' said Sonia Gilbert, Clifford Chance's incentives partner. London Stock Exchange Group Plc came up against a shareholder revolt at its annual meeting on May 1, with 31% voting against the company's remuneration report, which saw CEO David Schwimmer take home £7.9 million in its latest financial year. Consumer giant Unilever Plc also faced close to 30% opposition against new boss Fernando Fernandez's base salary, which was just modestly short of his predecessor's. UK companies are challenging the status quo a little more this year, encouraged by widespread shareholder support in 2024 and relaxed Investment Association guidelines on pay, Georgeson's Veazey said. Of 55 FTSE 100 companies that had published their fiscal 2024 reports, 24 were seeking shareholder approval for new remuneration policies, compared with 16 at the same time last year, research by Deloitte in April shows. Of those proposing changes, more than 40% submitted their policies ahead of the usual three-year cycle. British American Tobacco Plc CEO Tadeu Luiz Marroco could earn as much as £18.2 million this year under a performance-related policy, a jump from the £6 million he earned in 2024. Compass Group Plc's Dominic Blakemore also stands to benefit from a proposed maximum payout of £15.3 million in 2025, up from the £9.5 million he earned in total last year. Both maximum figures are based on a 50% increase in the stock awards from the date of grant to vesting. These proposals highlight 'the need to attract top talent in a competitive global market and address pay compression challenges,' said Mitul Shah, a partner at Deloitte's executive remuneration and rewards practice. The UK government's decision to maintain the removal of the cap on banker bonuses has gone some way to bridging the transatlantic gap. Bank of America Corp. is the latest to join a slew of rivals in scrapping the crisis-era limit. Some of the world's biggest banks are pushing UK regulators to accelerate plans to ease rules around deferred bonuses so they can apply the lighter regime to payouts for 2025. This follows long-time calls by executives including London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggett that restrictions on pay were hindering companies' efforts to attract game-changing candidates and undermining the attractiveness of the City of London. Performance, especially in sectors with key competitors in the US and a tight market for talent, will ultimately steer how amenable shareholders are to boosting compensation. 'It comes down to the right shareholder engagement,' Clifford Chance's Gilbert said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kiss, marry or kill? Carlos Alcaraz, Emma Raducanu and more pick between Federer, Nadal and Djokovic
Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu shared a lighthearted moment off the court at the Queen's Club in London during an interview with British comedian and impersonator Josh Berry. The pair, who will team up for the mixed doubles at this year's US Open in August, were put to the test by Berry while at the Queen's Club. The resulting video quickly gained popularity across social media. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Berry showcased his impressive tennis impersonations, including spot-on impressions of Andy Murray and John McEnroe's iconic voices. Alcaraz couldn't help but laugh as he listened to Berry mimic fellow Spanish tennis star Rafael Nadal . The interview, crafted by Berry alongside the LTA and ATP Media teams, featured playful questions — including one challenging the players to choose who they would kiss, marry, or kill among the legendary trio of Roger Federer , Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic . Raducanu opted not to answer that particular question and appeared puzzled when asked the classic brain teaser: 'Which came first, the chicken or the egg?' Poll Who would you choose to Kiss, Marry, or Kill among Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic? Kiss Federer, Marry Nadal, Kill Djokovic Kiss Nadal, Marry Federer, Kill Djokovic Kiss Djokovic, Marry Nadal, Kill Federer Kiss Nadal, Marry Djokovic, Kill Federer On the Kiss-Marry-Kill question, Alcaraz chuckled and responded, 'I would kill Novak, (for) winning that Olympic final. I could marry Rafa Nadal.' The clip sparked quite a buzz on social media, and it was clear the players enjoyed the entertaining exchange with Berry. Other tennis stars featured in the comedian's quiz included Australian Open champion Madison Keys, the charismatic Frances Tiafoe, Bulgaria's Grigor Dimitrov, Daria Kasatkina, as well as British player Katie Boulter and her fiancé Alex De Minaur. Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
