France, Eq. Guinea To Clash At UN Top Court Over Paris Mansion
The central African nation has asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to issue emergency orders preventing France from selling the building, seized after Vice President Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, known as Teodorin, was convicted of corruption.
French authorities seized the property, which boasts a cinema, a hammam, and marble and gold water taps, after convicting Obiang under a law targeting fortunes fraudulently amassed by foreign leaders.
In 2021, France's top appeals court gave Obiang -- the eldest son of the long-standing president of Equatorial Guinea, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo -- a three-year suspended sentence and 30 million euros ($35 million) in fines.
France also confiscated assets, including the luxurious building near the Arc de Triomphe, which has an estimated value well above 100 million euros.
In its latest complaint to the ICJ last week, Equatorial Guinea argued French police entered the property last month and changed the locks on several of the doors.
Equatorial Guinea called on the court to order France to give it "immediate, complete and unhindered access" to the building.
Lawyers for Equatorial Guinea will address judges at the Peace Palace in The Hague at around 10:00 am (0800 GMT), before France responds at around 4:00 pm.
The mansion was also at the centre of an earlier case filed by Equatorial Guinea in 2016 at the ICJ, which rules on disputes between UN member states.
Equatorial Guinea argued the building served as the country's embassy in France and that Paris had broken the Vienna Convention, which safeguards diplomats from interference by host countries.
But the UN court sided with France, which said the building was merely Teodorin Obiang's residence and served no diplomatic purpose.
The ICJ upheld France's objections that Equatorial Guinea had only tried to designate it as such after the investigation into Obiang began, and that the country already had an embassy in Paris.
A request for emergency orders -- provisional measures, in the court's jargon -- takes precedence over all other court business.
The ICJ is currently wrestling with a busy caseload, including a high-profile case brought by South Africa against Israel, alleging its actions in Gaza have breached the UN Genocide Convention.
The court will also deliver a key ruling on countries' climate change obligations next Wednesday.
While the ICJ is the highest United Nations court, whose rulings are binding, it has no way of enforcing its decisions.
For example, it has ordered Russia to stop its invasion of Ukraine -- to no avail. The ICJ rules on disputes between UN member states AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
12 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Western Nations Call For Immediate End To Gaza War As Israel Expands Offensive
More than two dozen Western countries called for an immediate end to the war in Gaza on Monday, saying that suffering there had "reached new depths" as Israel's military expanded its operations to the central city of Deir el-Balah. After more than 21 months of fighting that have triggered catastrophic humanitarian conditions for Gaza's more than two million people, Israeli allies Britain, France, Australia, Canada and 21 other countries, plus the EU, said in a joint statement that the war "must end now". "The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths," the signatories added, urging a negotiated ceasefire, the release of hostages held by Palestinian militants and the free flow of much-needed aid. The plea came as Deir el-Balah came under intense shelling on Monday, after Israel's military warned of imminent action in an area where it had not previously operated. The military a day earlier had ordered those in the central Gaza area to leave immediately as it was expanding operations, including "in an area where it has not operated before". Between 50,000 and 80,000 people were in the area when the evacuation order was issued, according to initial estimates from the UN's humanitarian agency OCHA. Deir el-Balah resident Abdullah Abu Saleem, 48, told AFP on Monday that "during the night, we heard huge and powerful explosions shaking the area as if it were an earthquake". He said this was "due to artillery shelling in the south-central part of Deir el-Balah and the southeastern area". "We are extremely worried and fearful that the army is planning a ground operation in Deir el-Balah and the central camps where hundreds of thousands of displaced people are sheltering," he added. In their statement, the Western countries also denounced Israel's aid delivery model in Gaza, saying it was "dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity". The UN has recorded 875 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food since late May, when Israel began easing a more than two-month aid blockade. "We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food," the statement said. In Deir el-Balah, AFP images showed plumes of dark smoke billowing into the sky. The spokesman for Gaza's civil defence agency, Mahmud Bassal, told AFP that "we received calls from several families trapped in the Al-Baraka area of Deir el-Balah due to shelling by Israeli tanks". The Israeli military did not provide immediate comment when contacted by AFP. Since the start of the war, nearly all of Gaza's population has been displaced at least once by repeated Israeli evacuation orders. According to OCHA, the latest order means that 87.8 percent of the territory is now under evacuation orders or within Israeli militarised zones. Hamdi Abu Mughseeb, 50, told AFP that he and his family had fled northwards from their tent south of Deir el-Balah at dawn following a night of intense shelling. "There is no safe place anywhere in the Gaza Strip," he said. "I don't know where we can go." Mai Elawawda, communications officer in Gaza for the UK-based charity Medical Aid for Palestinians, said the situation was "extremely critical", describing shelling "all around our office, and military vehicles are just 400 metres (1,300 feet) away from our colleagues and their families". The families of hostages held in Gaza since Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the war said they were "shocked and alarmed" by reports of evacuation orders for parts of Deir el-Balah. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum demanded political and military authorities "to clearly explain why the offensive in the Deir el-Balah area does not put the hostages at serious risk". Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's attack on Israel, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Civil defence spokesman Bassal reported at least 15 people killed by Israeli forces across Gaza on Monday. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify tolls and details provided by the agency and other parties. Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 59,029 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. Hamas's 2023 attack that sparked the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. AFP photos from Deir el-Balah showed plumes of dark smoke billowing into the sky AFP According to OCHA, 87.8 percent of Gaza's area is now under evacuation orders or within Israeli militarised zones AFP
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
EU-Africa migration policy shift: Cooperation or coersion? – DW – 07/21/2025
New hardline EU immigration policy could see development funding cut unless African nations prevent migrants from leaving. Some experts are warning its counterproductive, undermines sovereignty and fuels resentment. The European Union (EU) Commission has proposed conditioning development aid for African and other third countries on their cooperation with migration enforcement. Under its Global Europe instrument, aid allocations may now depend on how well a country cooperates with returns, readmissions, and border controls. Internal EU documents cited by the Financial Times and Reuters state that countries that do not comply with deportation agreements could see aid slashed. The move has led to criticism from humanitarian organizations, with Oxfam calling it a "distortion of the EU's development goals" and a "short-term political fix" to deeper structural issues. The policy shift comes amid mounting pressure within Europe to curb irregular migration across the Mediterranean and Sahara routes. The pressure is particularly intense in countries like Germany, Italy, and Greece, where national governments face increasing domestic opposition to asylum seekers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Policy experts and scholars across Africa are condemning the policy shift, calling it coercive and neocolonial. The EU's approach, they argue, is likely to undermine both sovereignty and trust. "Stop your people from migrating or lose aid — sounds to me like a message of cohesion and not cooperation," Dr. Maria Ayuk, a postdoctoral researcher in peace and security at the Otto-von-Guericke University in Germany, told DW. "This reduces the African nations actually to border guards rather than equal partners in EU is securitizing and has over the years politicized migration." Ayuk added: "What the EU is doing is forcing Africans to keep people in Africa because they are afraid of the Africanization of Europe." While European policymakers often emphasize "pull factors" such as jobs and security, African analysts say greater attention is needed on the conditions driving people to migrate in the first place. "People will definitely have the urge to move," said Fidel Amakye Owusu, a Ghana-based geopolitical and security advisor. Some of the main drivers are "socioeconomic problems, rural-urban development gaps, abject poverty, conflicts, and unemployment," he told DW. Paul Ejime, a media and global affairs analyst, agrees: "They are leaving because the environment…is not conducive." Ejime also noted that "poverty, hardship, and instability" are pushing Africans to risk their lives in search of opportunity. "Shutting the door or building walls is not the solution." According to Ayuk, governance failures are a part of the problem. "We have several autocratic leaders that want to stay in power forever… These are the core issues we have to address," she told DW. Experts are of the consensus that Europe's trade practices and foreign interventions have directly contributed to instability and economic underdevelopment in Africa. These conditions, they argue, further drive migration. "Europe's extractive trade policies, arms exports, and selective interventions… have contributed to instability and insecurity, and of course underdevelopment, fueling the very migration it seeks to prevent," Ayuk said. "Most of the health personnel in these countries are in Europe and America. The health sector is poorly funded, under-resourced, and the personnel they have are leaving the country," Ejime noted. The problem is exacerbated by Europe's double standards: "They can open their doors for people from Ukraine…but when it concerns Africans, they tighten the rules." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EU's tactic of conditioning development aid on cooperation with its migration objectives is also perceived as exploitative. "Yes, I think that the EU is tying aid to migration control," said Ayuk. "It weaponizes it and it shifts aid from solidarity to self-interest." She said that such an approach "undermines trust and mutual respect" between Europe and Africa. Ejime is also of the view that "Of course, they have always done that…At times they come up with conditionalities when they want to give you any support," he told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While sharply critical of the EU policy shift, the three experts who spoke to DW agreed that African governments bear significant responsibility for the crisis and the tough immigration policies towards their citizens. "Africa is the problem because it lacks the international agency," said Ayuk. "Those that are supposed to represent Africa do not represent the collective interest of Africa, but rather the individual interests of elites."Some experts are calling on African leaders to re-define the terms of negotiations with the EU. "Unfortunately, they are negotiating from a position of weakness. They are weak. The economies are weak. Politically, they are not even popular in their own countries and some of them are corrupt," Ejime said. "In the past, under slavery, Africans were forced to go abroad. Today, young people are the ones running the environment is not conducive." Despite their critiques, the experts believe Africa is not powerless — but maintain that, its strength can only come if it can mobilize political will. "Africa has the potential and leverage exists," Ayuk said, pointing to the continent's resources and regional blocs. "But Africa requires unified leadership and a shift from dependence to a self-defined development." Owusu sees a need to harness technology and ensure effective management of national borders. "Many African countries lack the technology to patrol all their borders… It is very difficult to manage such borders and control the flow of people." However, he warns that the EU's approach could be counter-productive for countries making genuine efforts. As Europe grows more insular in its migration policies, some African countries may begin to pivot toward alternative global partnerships. "With the rise of the BRICS countries and other Global South initiatives," said Owusu. "The more [the West] looks inwards for solutions, the more confrontational their policies become, and the more Africa moves towards the East." Owusu suggests that if Europe continues using development aid as leverage, Africa could deepen ties with emerging powers like China, India, Brazil, and Russia But Ejime proposed a different approach: "Africa needs to be strategic, maximize its own interest, and negotiate from a position of strength." He added, "If skilled workers go abroad, maybe there should be a kind of agreement or contract that sends money back to develop the health and education systems." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The experts agree that the current EU model that links aid to migration control, risks damaging long-term relations with Africa and fails to address root causes. "Migration should be managed, yes, but not securitized or politicized. We need reciprocal relations based on respect, equity, and justice," Ayuk said. Owusu also emphasised the need for mutual respect in achieving desired outcomes. "Europe must stop seeing Africa as the problem and start treating it as a partner," he told DW. Ejime turns the spotlight back on Africa and the need for effective leadership: "Africa is not zero-poor. It's poorly managed. And has been impoverished by bad leadership." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Kenya Drops Terror Charge Against Prominent Activist
Kenya dropped terror charges against prominent Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi on Monday, following widespread condemnation, hitting him with a lesser charge of unlawful possession of ammunition. The east African country has seen a wave of deadly protests against President William Ruto and police brutality that have left dozens dead and thousands of businesses destroyed. Rights groups have criticised the government's heavy-handed response, including the recent use of terrorism charges against protesters. Mwangi was detained on Saturday and accused by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations with the "facilitation of terrorist acts", which he denied, declaring in an image on X: "I am not a terrorist". He appeared in a Nairobi court on Monday chanting "Ruto Must Go". His charge sheet, seen by AFP, accused him of "possession of noxious substances to wit three teargas cannisters without lawful authority", as well as a single round of blank ammunition. He pleaded not guilty and was released on a one million shilling (around $7,000) bail bond. "The truth is our president is scared of young people, because young people are organising by themselves, they are going to the streets, they are demanding better," Mwangi told supporters and journalists outside the court. "Our president thinks people are being paid to go to the streets, and they think I am the financer. "People hate Ruto for free," he said. A coalition of rights groups welcomed the court's decision to drop the terrorism charges, but said they remained "deeply concerned" by the use "in more than 100 other cases". It urged authorities to "abandon this dangerous approach to managing public dissent". Mwangi's detention over the weekend triggered significant online condemnation under the hashtag #FreeBonifaceMwangi. The search warrant police used to raid his home and office accused the campaigner of paying "goons" to stoke unrest at protests last month. Mwangi has been arrested multiple times in Kenya. He was also detained in May in neighbouring Tanzania where he was attending the treason trial of opposition leader Tundu Lissu. Mwangi and Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire say they were tortured and sexually abused while in the custody of Tanzanian police before being returned to their respective countries. The pair brought a case against the Kenyan, Tanzanian and Ugandan governments to the East African Court of Justice last week. Mass protests initially broke out in Kenya in June 2024 over tax rises, and reignited last month over police violence and illegal detentions. Rights groups say more than 100 people have been killed by police in the latest round of protests, while the government puts the figure at 42.
