BP plans six new gas wells to sustain output from Azeri Caspian Sea field
BAKU, Feb 11 (Reuters) - BP (BP.L), opens new tab plans to add six new wells to its operation in Azerbaijan's Shah Deniz gas field in the Caspian Sea to ensure stable production in the years ahead, a senior manager at the international energy major told Reuters.
BP currently operates 21 gas wells in Shah Deniz, which is developed by a BP-led consortium and which is critical to Azerbaijan's commitment to boost gas exports to the European Union, providing an alternative to dwindling Russian supplies.
Under a 2022 deal, Azerbaijan is expected to double its exports to the EU to at least 20 billion cubic metres a year by 2027.
Bakhtiyar Aslanbayli BP's vice president for the Caspian region, told Reuters in an interview that last year the field's output increased to around 28 billion cubic metres in 2024 from around 26 bcm in 2023. Current output averaged 76 million cubic metres per day, while the field's total capacity was 79 million cubic metres per day.
"We plan to put into production six more wells in this field in the coming years, which will help maintain a plateau for several years," he said.
Last month, gas flows from Azerbaijan to Bulgaria and Serbia were halted for several days due to a technical problem with the subsea condensate export pipeline connecting the Shah Deniz Alpha platform, one of two platforms at Shah Deniz, to the Sangachal terminal.
Aslanbayli said the company did not plan to stop platforms for planned maintenance this year.
BP, which also produces oil in Azerbaijan, last year started production at a new Azeri Central East (ACE) offshore platform in the Caspian Sea. The new development aims to help counter a decline in output at the Azeri–Chirag–Gunashli (ACG) complex of offshore oilfields, also operated by BP, which has passed its peak of 50 million metric tons, or 1 million barrels per day (bpd), in 2010.
Azerbaijan's oil output is expected to be 29 million tons per year both in 2024 and 2025, or 580,000 bpd.
Aslanbayli said АСЕ produced 4 million barrels (10,000 bpd on average) in 2024 and it will increase output as more wells are drilled in 2025.
"This is helpful, as we work to slow down the natural decline and maximize recovery from ACG," he said.
here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
14 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Elon Musk's dad says he's 'not a good politician' and Trump row 'was a mistake'
Elon Musk's dad Errol claimed his son was prepared to admit he had 'made a mistake' after lashing out against US President Donald Trump during their public fallout Elon Musk's father has arrived in Moscow to speak at a forum organised by Vladimir Putin 's closest aides. This comes after key Kremlin associates offered political asylum to his son - the world 's richest man - in the wake of his spectacular bust-up with Donald Trump. Errol Musk, 79, said there was PTSD in the White House, while also likening the ugly breakup to a marriage going wrong. He told Putin-controlled media: 'So at the moment, Elon is inclined to say that he's made a mistake.' Musk Snr added: 'Trump will prevail. He's the president, he was elected as the president. ' Elon made a mistake, I think, but he's tired, he's stressed. Five months of continuous stress, continuous, continuous stress, stress, stress. 'And then in the end, it's just him and Trump left... They still don't know what to do, so they fight with each other until they can come to normal conditions.' Suggesting his son was out of his depth in Washington's febrile politics, he told pro-Putin media outlet Izvestia: "They've been under a lot of stress for five months, a lot of stress for five months." Errol - a South African businessman - also predicted: "It's just a small thing. It'll be over tomorrow." And speaking to Tsargrad TV - owned by mogul Konstantin Malofeev, seen as linked to Russian military intelligence - Errol said: 'Elon with Trump and the new administration, they took over a somewhat broken United States, broken by the previous administration, with intent, evil intent. 'They've had five months at least of intense repair work, removing all the spurious opposition, all the crazies and so on. They've been under a lot of stress. 'Recently a new bill was put out - and Elon is still in the 'Let's get everything right' mode. He said, 'No, we must not include in such a bill more of this Democrat stupid schemes and money for them, it's not right'. 'But unfortunately, he doesn't realise that in order to get their votes in the Senate and the Congress, Trump has to do that... In order to take something, you have to give. 'So they had an argument about that, and as they are all suffering from a bit of PTSD, a post-traumatic stress disorder over the last few months, they started hitting out at each other. They are the only two people left in the arena, Trump and Elon, and all they were used to was fighting with the opposition 'So they took to each other, which is understandable. It happens in marriages, it happens in partnerships, it happens a lot. And people have to understand that at the moment, Elon is having second thoughts. 'He's not a great politician, he is still learning, he's a great tech innovator and so forth. But his politics is, as I've said before, is a swimming pool with no bottom, it's a swimming pool with no sides." Errol is set to speak at the Future Forum 2050, organised by Malofeev as well as Putin ideologist Alexander Dugin. A key speaker is Kremlin veteran foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, a war hardliner. Earlier Putin crony Dmitry Medvedev - formerly Russian president and prime minister - offered to mediate in the Trump-Musk row. He said on X: 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' He also offered asylum to Musk. 'Elon @elonmusk, don't be upset! You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us,' he said. Senior lawmaker Dmitry Novikov also told state media Russia could offer asylum to Musk 'if he needs it'.
Scottish Sun
14 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Elon Musk has PTSD & made a MISTAKE by helping Trump, his dad claims as he reveals verdict on what caused explosive feud
ELON Musk has "White House PTSD" and thinks he made a mistake by helping Trump get reelected, his dad has claimed. Errol Musk, 79, made the explosive remarks in Moscow, where he's set to appear at a Kremlin-backed forum organised by Putin's inner circle. Advertisement 9 Errol Musk claims his son Elon has 'PTSD from the White House' Credit: East2West 9 Musk Snr also believes the Tesla boss regrets helping Trump get reelected Credit: Reuters 9 Errol is currently in Moscow to appear at a Kremlin-backed forum Credit: East2West 9 Elon reportedly donated $288 million to Trump's 2024 campaign Credit: AFP It comes just days after his billionaire son's high-profile alliance with the US President imploded in a fierce online feud. The world's richest man — who reportedly donated $288 million to Trump's 2024 campaign and briefly served as a White House aide — has now turned on the president over his sweeping tax and spending bill. Elon even claimed on X that Trump was tied to disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, though the post was later deleted and the White House dismissed the allegation outright. Their bromance is now beyond repair. Advertisement On Sunday, Trump confirmed to NBC that he has no interest in making amends: 'I would assume so, yeah,' he said when asked if their relationship was over. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' Now, the Tesla and SpaceX boss is said to be grappling with regret and fatigue from his turbulent stint in Washington. Musk Snr told Putin-controlled media: 'So at the moment, Elon is inclined to say that he's made a mistake.' 'Trump will prevail. He's the president, he was elected as the president. Advertisement 'Elon made a mistake, I think, but he's tired, he's stressed. He added: 'Five months of continuous stress, continuous, continuous stress, stress, stress. Trump crushes 'peace talk' hopes with Musk as he insists Elon has 'lost his mind' and 'vows to get rid of his Tesla' 'And then in the end, it's just him and Trump left… They still don't know what to do, so they fight with each other until they can come to normal conditions.' The South African businessman likened the split to a "marriage going wrong" and suggested his son was out of depth in the brutal political arena. Advertisement He told Russian outlet Izvestia: 'It happens in marriages, it happens in partnerships, it happens a lot . 'And people have to understand that at the moment, Elon is having second thoughts... 'He's not a great politician, he is still learning, he's a great tech innovator and so forth. 'But his politics is, as I've said before, is a swimming pool with no bottom, it's a swimming pool with no sides. Advertisement 'When you're in a swimming pool of politics, you've got to really know where to go. 'And he [Elon] doesn't realise that.' 9 Errol made the explosive claims on Putin-controlled media in Russia Credit: East2West 9 He said his son had a very stressful five months Credit: East2West Advertisement Errol added that Elon had been trying to "get everything right" with a recent bill, but clashed with Trump over what he saw as excessive Democratic spending concessions. 'But unfortunately, he doesn't realise that in order to get their votes in the Senate and the Congress, Trump has to do that,' he said. 'They are the only two people left in the arena… and they took to each other, which is understandable.' Errol's comments were made to Tsargrad TV — owned by Konstantin Malofeev, a businessman with alleged links to Russian military intelligence. Advertisement He praised Moscow, saying: 'Whoever designed this city is a true genius. These majestic buildings remind me of Ancient Rome.' He also dismissed Western portrayals of the Russian capital as 'nonsense.' 9 Trump and Musk's bromance fell through in a spectacular public feud online Credit: AFP 9 The feud erupted over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which proposed stripping billions in government subsidies from Tesla Credit: AP Advertisement Errol will speak at the Future Forum 2050, organised by Malofeev and Putin ideologist and 'philosopher' Alexander Dugin. Meanwhile, Russia appears eager to capitalize on Musk's estrangement from the US political elite. Putin crony Dmitry Medvedev cheekily offered to mediate peace talks between 'D and E' — Trump and Elon— 'for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment.' Another Kremlin loyalist, ex-space chief Dmitry Rogozin, publicly offered Musk asylum. Advertisement 'You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us,' Rogozin wrote. Russia would offer him 'reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity'.
Scotsman
20 hours ago
- Scotsman
Inside the battle for North Sea control: How oil giants like BP lobbied over emission restrictions
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The North Sea oil regulator weakened environmental requirements designed to control greenhouse gas emissions after being lobbied by oil and gas companies including energy giant BP, a new investigation has revealed. The findings have heightened concerns over the level of influence large oil firms have over independent UK agencies charged with managing the sector. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the BP ETAP (Eastern Trough Area Project) oil platform in the North Sea, around 100 miles east of Aberdeen. Picture: Andy Buchanan -| Getty Images Documents obtained by The Scotsman through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request, in partnership with the investigative organisation Point Source, show BP pushed back against a wide range of proposed requirements that had been drafted by the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) as part of their Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) Plan. These included requirements to reduce the 'emissions intensity' of offshore oil platforms, as well as requirements to 'secure substantial and consistent total emissions reductions'. The scope of the North Sea consultation The NSTA received 32 responses from respondents that included industry bodies, relevant persons, energy transition companies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Outside of BP, the list of respondents also included Shell, Ithaca Energy - the company pushing to extra oil from the Rosebank field, west of Shetland - and Harbour Energy, which last month announced it was cutting a further 250 jobs in Aberdeen. The two-month consultation closed on November 30, 2023. People protest against the Rosebank offshore development off Shetland (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images The Scotsman was denied a request to access unredacted consultation responses from other companies outside of BP involved in the consultation, with confidentiality exemptions cited. BP responses - and how the regulator adapted the oil plan In the wake of BP's communications with the NSTA, a requirement to reduce the emissions intensity was removed from the strategy document, along with a series other concessions that included relaxing requirements for the electrification of offshore platforms. Pushing back on an NSTA drive to shut down low-production fields that have high emissions intensity that was outlined in a draft plan, BP said the NSTA needed to take into consideration wider implications of shutting down these assets such as 'investor confidence' and 'risk of company defaults'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After changes were made to the OGA plan, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) said in its newsletter for members the consultation had led to the NSTA "softening" the language within the document. The trade association body said: "The plan originated from the position that the offshore industries own, and will continue to own, the agenda". Mark Wilson, OEUK's HSE and operations director, added: "Regulatory intervention should only be available as a backstop if required." Lang Banks, the director of the environmental group WWF Scotland, said: 'The influence that oil companies have over the supposedly independent North Sea Transition Authority means that instead of helping to support a planned and fair transition away from fossil fuels it prioritises watering down requirements that would reduce polluting emissions. This delays action on climate change, and stalls progress on green job opportunities. 'As we head towards the Holyrood elections next year, we need all political parties to commit to ensuring Scotland and the wider UK reaps the multiple benefits that will come from a properly planned and fair transition to clean energy.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour candidate Davy Russell wins the by-election and celebrates alongside party leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson Consultation documents obtained by The Scotsman under FOI legislation show BP called for deadlines to be abolished for requirements to electrify oil platforms, a move that was intended to reduce the reliance on burning oil and gas to provide power for platforms. Following the consultation, the NSTA scrapped its proposed target of making all platforms 'fully electrified' by January 1, 2030 and replaced it with a requirement for platforms to be either fully electrified or 'run on alternative low carbon power with near equivalent emission reductions' by the same date. Ahead of the publication of the final OGA Plan, BP also criticised a proposed requirement that would force oil companies to carry out an assessment of 'potential emissions savings' that was based on 'the societal cost of emissions'. The oil and gas company said that including an assessment of this kind was a departure from 'traditional practice' and could cause market distortion. After receiving submissions, the NSTA removed the phrase 'based on the societal cost of emissions' from the finished version of the plan, which was published in March last year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The consultation documents also reveal BP pushed back against a proposal that would require oil companies to execute emissions reduction initiatives aimed at reducing the 'emissions intensity' of an asset over a reasonable time scale and a requirement to deliver 'secure substantial and consistent total emissions reductions'. BP called these requirements 'impractical'. The NSTA changed the wording for both parts of the OGA Plan following the consultation, making the requirements less onerous for oil and gas companies. BP lowered its outlook for gas production in the first quarter of 2025. Picture: Yui Mok/PA Wire The NSTA replaced the phrase 'emissions intensity' with 'emissions' in the first paragraph, and said companies needed to 'secure substantial and emission reductions', removing the requirement for consistent improvements in the second paragraph. BP's position A BP spokesperson said: 'BP, similar to many organisations, engages appropriately with policymakers, industry groups and non-governmental organisations to offer feedback, expertise and insights into the policy-making process. This includes responses to public consultations. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Our aim is to inform the development of balanced and practical policy and regulation that promotes shared objectives across the industry.' The company's view on flaring The consultation documents also show BP criticised proposals that would require oil companies to put in place plans to deliver 'continuous improvements in flaring and venting reductions' as well as a proposed requirement that 'all assets must deliver zero routine flaring and venting by 2030'. Flaring is the practice of burning off methane that is produced alongside oil and venting is when methane is released into the atmosphere without being burned. In 2023, oil and gas companies operating in the North Sea flared and vented enough gas to heat more than 700,000 homes, representing a lost market value of £250 million, according to the NSTA's 2024 emissions monitoring report. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BP pushed back against the proposed requirements for 'continuous improvements' in flaring and venting saying this was not 'technically feasible', according to communications obtained by The Scotsman. The oil company also stated dissatisfaction with plans to require oil companies to reduce gas leaks, also known as 'fugitive emissions', on a yearly basis. BP said: 'Due to the nature of leaks and seeps, continuous reduction is unachievable as they are by their nature ad hoc.' Louis-Maxence Delaporte, an energy sector analyst at the campaign group Reclaim Finance, said: "This investigation puts the spotlight once again on BP's weak climate strategy, which relies even more heavily on oil and gas than previously. "BP has severely reduced its planned investment in so-called 'low carbon' activities, it has increased its 2030 oil and gas production trajectory and abandoned its critical target for reducing scope 3 emissions. Far from being in transition, BP is building a fossil future.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Other company submissions The UK-based oil and gas company Serica was one of the other companies that responded to the consultation and pushed back against some aspects of the draft OGA Plan. The company stated that requiring yearly improvements in emissions 'may not be a useful target', adding the 'overall direction should be lowering emissions'. Serica said the proposed requirement for 'continuous improvement' to flaring and venting was 'not realistic' due to 'unforeseen disruptions to production and the time it takes to implement material flare reduction projects'. The company also called for the NSTA to make the 'intent and mechanics' clearer for its proposed methodology to determine the that date oil and gas assets should be shut down. Serica was contacted for comment by The Scotsman. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The OGA Plan was published ahead of the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruling earlier this year that permissions granted to the Rosebank oil field and the Jackdaw gas field under the previous Conservative government were unlawful and the fossil fuel giants behind the plans, Shell, Equinor and Ithaca, should have to reapply for permission. Conflicts of interest? However, significant concerns remain about the influence that large oil companies have over regulators like the NSTA, partly due to financial conflicts of interest. According to the NSTA's most recent financial results, which were published in July last year, the regulator's board members and their family members held shares in companies linked to the energy sector worth £351,258, including shares in BP. The family of the NSTA chairman Tim Eggar, who stood down in September last year, held 4,099 BP shares worth £20,331, as well as 1,875 shares in Shell worth £49,219. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Iain Lanaghan, another NSTA director held 1,017 BP shares worth £5,044 as well as 358 shares in Shell that are worth £9,398. The NSTA said that its board did not consider these holdings sufficient to 'impair their independent judgement in board discussions' An NSTA spokesperson said: 'The OGA Plan is a robust set of requirements, which demands that industry takes immediate action to reduce production emissions on the path to net zero by 2050. 'It was finalised following extensive public consultation, including responses from several operators and, as with any thorough consultation, all responses were considered.'
