logo
UK marks London 7/7 attacks as king hails 'spirit of unity'

UK marks London 7/7 attacks as king hails 'spirit of unity'

Yahoo7 hours ago
The UK on Monday commemorated the 20th anniversary of the London July 7 bombings that killed 52 people, as King Charles III paid tribute to the spirit of unity shown after the atrocity.
To mark the moment the first bomb went off Prime Minister Keir Starmer and London Mayor Sadiq Khan laid wreaths at the July 7 memorial in the capital's Hyde Park at 8:50 am (0750 GMT).
On July 7, 2005, four homegrown Islamist extremists detonated suicide bombs on three underground trains and a bus across central London, killing dozens and injuring hundreds more.
The city is holding events to mark the anniversary, with members of the royal family expected to join survivors, bereaved relatives and emergency services personnel at commemorations.
The king urged people to draw on the "extraordinary courage and compassion" shown following the attack.
"We remember with profound sadness the 52 innocent people who were killed in senseless acts of evil -- and the enduring grief of their loved ones," he said in a statement published by the domestic Press Association news agency.
"In doing so, we should also remember the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion that emerged from the darkness of that day.
"The selfless bravery of our emergency services, transport workers, and fellow citizens who rushed towards danger to help strangers reminds us of the very best of humanity in the face of the very worst," he said.
- 'We stood together' -
Daniel Biddle, who was 26 when he lost both legs and his left eye, recalled the moment he saw one of the bombers prepare to detonate his explosive just after their train pulled out of the Edgware Road station.
"I saw the guy lean forward and look along the carriage," he told BBC radio.
"I was just about to ask him what he was staring at, what his problem was, then he reached for his bag and there was a brilliant white light. That's a face seared into my mind," he said.
Biddle said the anniversary would be "one of those days where you're thankful you've survived it".
But he said he still felt "immense sadness and grief" at the suffering the four suicide bombers had inflicted.
"I feel like I'm living the life sentence of the men that should be serving," he said.
Other bombs went off on London's underground train network near Aldgate station and King's Cross station.
An hour after the first explosion, a fourth bomb exploded on the top deck of a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square.
Starmer said the bombers had tried to divide the nation but failed.
"We stood together then, and we stand together now -- against hate and for the values that define us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law."
The king's brother Edward, the Duke of Edinburgh, and his wife Sophie will attend a a national service of commemoration at St Paul's Cathedral.
Charles added that "while the horrors will never be forgotten", the country "may take comfort from the way such events rally communities together".
"It is this spirit of unity that has helped London, and our nation, to heal," he said.
Tony Blair, who was prime minister during the 7/7 bombings, said the UK was safer in the years since the attacks.
"We're a lot safer from terrorism because the security services have a very good system in place," he said.
"But there will be a problem as long as the ideology exists."
Speaking ahead of the anniversary, interior minister Yvette Cooper also warned that Islamist and right-wing extremism remained the country's most significant threats.
jwp-har/giv
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wealth tax may not be fully formed proposal - but could be put in the mix
Wealth tax may not be fully formed proposal - but could be put in the mix

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wealth tax may not be fully formed proposal - but could be put in the mix

I want to take you into the daily Downing Street briefing for political journalists to try and explain the likelihood of the government introducing a wealth tax. Referred to as 'lobby', the sessions are the main chance for reporters to grill the prime minister's official spokesperson about the big political issues of the day. Now, occasionally the spokesperson comes to these sessions with a clear and obvious update that will 'create news'. Most of the time though, we're left trying to read between the lines of what's being said, searching for hints or steers that could indicate whether Number 10 is trying to shut a story down or let it run. This isn't always straightforward, as was proven in this briefing. Politics latest: Take this first answer from the PM's spokesperson when asked if backed a wealth tax. "Those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden and the choices we've made reflect that… our progressive tax system means the top 1% of taxpayers contribute nearly a third of income tax with revenue from wealth and asset taxes… going towards funding tens of billions of pounds for public services." Now, one way of interpreting that is Downing Street saying they're already hitting the wealthiest so there's no need to whack them with more taxes. But then again, he could also be saying that raising money from the super-rich is a preferred policy of this government and as such may happen again. So which is it? Well, we asked that, and this is the answer we got. "The has said that we are not going to be bringing in a wealth tax". Pointing to a previous on the record statement is a classic lobby method of shutting a story down without commenting on it directly. So a clear answer? Well in this instance, the spokesperson still seemed somewhat reluctant to throw his full weight behind this previous comment from Rachel Reeves. It all meant the few dozen journalists left the briefing room perplexed at where Downing Street stood on the policy with the only solid outcome being the fact that the government had certainly not ruled anything out. Read more:Government declines to rule out wealth tax For what it's worth, my read on the situation - based on other conversations and the many lobby briefings I've sat in over the years - is that the wealth tax idea hasn't (at this time) reached the point of becoming a formal proposal but may yet be put in the mix. The reason it's being talked about now is because the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock suggested on Sky News' that cabinet ministers may be sympathetic to it. Lord Kinnock, who was leader from 1983 to 1992, said that imposing a 2% tax on assets valued above £10m would bring in up to £11bn a year. Whether this party veteran is reflecting back chatter from within government or simply pitching fresh suggestions is unclear. But you can see how such a measure would slot into the existing crease hardening down the middle of the cabinet between those more inclined to tax and spend (Angela Rayner, Lisa Nandy, Ed Miliband) and others more concerned about making savings and investing (Rachel Reeves and Darren Jones). For now, three to four months from a budget that will need to raise a significant amount of money, we can probably think of this as something of a Schrodinger's tax - simultaneously on and off with its final state only revealed when the chancellor opens her red box come the autumn.

Media faces existential threat from ‘thieving' AI, ministers warned
Media faces existential threat from ‘thieving' AI, ministers warned

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Media faces existential threat from ‘thieving' AI, ministers warned

Artificial intelligence poses an 'existential threat' to the free press by stealing content and so putting at risk quality news and thousands of reporter jobs, the Government has been warned at Westminster. Urgent reform was demanded in Parliament, as ministers were also tackled over Whitehall striking an agreement with a Canadian tech giant that faces legal action by media firms over accusations of large-scale copyright infringement. The call for swift action follows a bitter stand-off in the House of Lords over attempts to prevent the creative industries, including news outlets, being ripped off by machine-learning developers. The controversy centred on fears of AI companies using copyrighted work without permission, with the Government accused of 'supporting thieves'. Responding to a question on the issue in the upper chamber, media minister Baroness Twycross said: 'Trustworthy journalism plays a vital role in our democracy. 'Rapid recent developments in generative AI pose both significant risks and opportunities for news media. 'We are engaging with press stakeholders on this.' She added: 'The Government will support our news media to capitalise on the huge potential benefits of the technology while mitigating its risk.' But deputy chairman of the Telegraph Group, and Conservative peer, Lord Black of Brentwood said: 'AI poses an existential threat to independent media because of the way it scrapes their high quality content without either attribution or payment to those who create it, which is an act of theft, directly threatening the provision of quality news and the jobs of thousands of reporters. 'Is the minister aware that research by market leader, Cloudflare, shows that, for example, for every 73,000 pages of content scraped by Anthropic's AI crawlers from news providers, there's just one single referral back to publishers' websites? 'Does she realise that without this vital traffic, publishers can't sell advertising or subscriptions, and their businesses become unsustainable? 'The free press can't wait years for copyright reform… we were promised immediate action on this issue when the Data Act went through. When will we get some of it?' Responding, Lady Twycross said: 'We want to get this right and for AI to work for everyone. 'All of our work is around protecting rights that already exist for creatives and press and ensuring AI creates new revenue streams for them. 'We are carefully reviewing all the responses to our consultation to ensure any proposals taken forward properly support both AI and creative sectors, including the media.' Filmmaker Baroness Kidron, who has been a leading critic of the Labour administration on the issue, said: 'During the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Bill, the Government asked repeatedly that Parliament trust that they had the interest of UK copyright holders front and centre. 'So can the minister explain why the UK Government has now signed a memorandum of understanding with Canadian AI firm Cohere, when Cohere is facing legal action from 13 news media copyright holders, including The Guardian, Forbes and The Atlantic? 'Does she not agree with me that the Government might better earn Parliament's trust if, instead of rewarding AI companies which infringe copyright with opportunities, that it limited those opportunities and indeed future Government contracts to companies that lawfully license inputs?' Lady Twycross said: 'As I said, we do want to and need to make sure we get this right for everyone. I'm happy to have a conversation with her about the issue she raises.'

Wealthy UK households rush to leave England over tax change
Wealthy UK households rush to leave England over tax change

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wealthy UK households rush to leave England over tax change

Labour has been warned over a "flight of the non-doms" as the super-rich flock to leave the UK. Reports say the wealthy elite are leaving over tax changes – prompting a possible rethink by Rachel Reeves, the Labour Party Chancellor. More than 20 luxury properties in the Belgravia postcode are on the market, says a buying agent. One Indian non-dom, who has been living in the UK for the past five years, said she was considering moving her family to Switzerland as a result of the tax changes. 'We love England. We feel very much at home here,' she told the Guardian. 'We want to pay fair tax as members of society. But the biggest pain point was inheritance tax … it is not just ours, but my grandfather's and my parents' wealth that would now be taxed by the UK. That feels deeply unfair as the money was not made here. READ MORE: Warning for thousands of drivers who have 'quiet' EVs on driveway READ MORE: Dame Deborah James' husband's new girlfriend 'unmasked' as he finds love again READ MORE Next UK heatwave set to be 'even hotter than expected' and will start within days 'The current philosophical approach seems to be shrinking everyone's pie instead of enlarging the pie, bringing more investment, employability and wealth to the country.' Sean Cockburn, of the advisers Forvis Mazars, said: 'There has been an acceptance of higher income and capital gains but the emotional trigger has been inheritance tax. That seems to be the motivator for those moving. But not everyone is leaving the UK entirely. 'Yes some people have left, some people are considering it, but some people have decided to stay and are broadly accepting of the new rules. In the media there have been very high-profile, very wealthy people leaving who receive a lot of coverage. I personally have not had many clients leaving.' "Non-dom" describes a UK resident whose permanent home - or domicile - for tax purposes is outside the UK. It refers to a person's tax status, and has nothing to do with their nationality, citizenship or resident status - although it can be affected by these factors. A non-dom only pays UK tax on the money they earn in the UK. They do not have to pay tax to the UK government on money made elsewhere in the world (unless they pay that money into a UK bank account). For wealthy individuals, this presents the opportunity for significant - and entirely legal - savings, if they nominate a lower-tax country as their domicile.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store