logo
‘Stealing from us': Miami drivers fed up with school district's bus camera program

‘Stealing from us': Miami drivers fed up with school district's bus camera program

Miami Herald28-02-2025

Robert Strongarone was driving his Volvo SUV down Southwest 212th Street south of Miami, obeying all the traffic laws, when – in the blink of a camera lens – he got hit with a $225 automated traffic violation.
The same thing happened to Paul Morris Edelman, except on a different day, in a different car, on a different street. And to Jennifer Gonzalez.
All three were issued 'violation notices' and fined for illegally passing a camera-equipped Miami-Dade school bus - but none of them did anything illegal.
After a contract hastily signed by the school district kickstarted the program last year, a company called BusPatrol America installed cameras on all Miami-Dade school buses to catch motorists in the act of illegally passing a school bus with its 'stop-arm' extended. Since then, the School Bus Safety Program has papered the county with tens of thousands of $225 violation notices. Revenue numbers provided by the school district indicate the program is flagging more than 407 paid violations per day, seven days a week, generating a staggering $19.5 million in the first six months of the program.
A joint investigation by the Miami Herald and The Tributary, a Florida-based not-for-profit newsroom, found that many motorists who did nothing wrong are receiving violation notices. Sheriff's deputies are supposed to examine each video before fines are assessed, but a review of videos by Herald/Tributary journalists suggests there are plenty of bogus violations the deputies aren't weeding out.
'They are literally stealing from us,' said Ernesto Dominguez, who was shocked by the cost of an infraction. 'As a family with a 10-month-old baby and a single income, it was a hard blow for the holidays.'
Motorists who feel they wrongfully received a notice of violation have the right to contest the violation and receive a hearing. But getting a hearing has so far been impossible. As of January, the Miami-Dade court system had scheduled none, despite challenges dating back to early last summer.
Advocates of the program say it protects children entering and exiting school buses on busy streets from getting hit by passing vehicles. But critics, including Mark Gold, CEO and founder of The Ticket Clinic, the largest traffic ticket defense firm in the United States, call it a 'money grab.'
BusPatrol reaps the lion's share of the revenue – 70%, although that cut will be reduced to 60% after two years. The school district receives the rest and is supposed to spend it on bus safety.
In response to specific questions about the hearing process, BusPatrol sent reporters a general statement attesting to the company's 'commitment to keeping students safe,' accompanied by links to news articles about fatal school bus accidents.
South Florida motorists will soon see more of BusPatrol's violation notices. The company, which also operates in Hillsborough County, is finalizing a deal with Broward schools.
The Miami Herald/Tributary invited the Herald's audience to discuss its interactions with the Miami-Dade program. More than 250 responded, sharing videos and photos of their alleged infractions. Many expressed fury and frustration – over what are clearly wrongfully issued violation notices, over the lack of discretion when a violation is borderline, and over the hefty size of the fines, which is established by Florida statute.
Many motorists are being fined for driving in a safe and responsible manner. Although it is illegal to pass a school bus with its stop-arm extended – even if a driver is headed in the opposite direction several lanes over from the bus – there is a crucial exception: If the road has a raised median, motorists on the opposite side of that divide can legally pass.
That's what Strongarone, Edelman, and Gonzalez all did – and all got fined anyway.
Gonzalez, who received a violation notice in June, said she is sick of waiting for the hearing she requested last summer.
'I imagine many people just pay it without disputing, which is robbery,' she said, 'Also, I feel like they make it so difficult for you to get a resolution that people just pay it. And I don't think that that's fair.'
Paul Edelman's video not only has him driving on the legal side of a raised median, but shows a stream of other cars doing the same thing. Whether the other drivers were fined is not known – but at least 16 other motorists who responded to the Herald/Tributary survey complained of being wrongfully fined for the same thing.
Luis Sierra, public affairs detective with the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office, insisted deputies carefully review the videos and eliminate the violations that are not valid. He said deputies have weeded out 27,440 improper violations so far.
District 'should be ashamed'
The Bus Safety Program is the result of a three-way partnership between BusPatrol, the school district, and the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office.
BusPatrol monitors the cameras and sends the telltale videos to the sheriff's office for review before deputies give the company the OK to issue violation notices. Motorists are given a month to pay. If they fail to do so but do not challenge the violation, a uniform traffic citation, also known as a moving violation, is supposed to be issued. These citations can result in points on a driver's license. If the driver challenges the fine, it goes to the courts … in theory.
Since no single agency is in charge, getting answers about the program's problems is difficult.
The school district said unhappy motorists should take their complaints to the sheriff's office since it is charged with reviewing the videos. The contact for the sheriff's office is not printed on the violations.
A statement provided by Detective AC Colome from the sheriff's office blamed 'technical issues with the clerk of courts' filing portal' for the lack of hearings and uniform traffic citations to date, but said: 'Program partners are working diligently to mitigate circumstances that have delayed the processing of contestations [hearing requests] and uniform traffic citations.'
The clerk of courts' Chief of Staff Barby Rodriguez did not answer questions about challenges to traffic citations, and said that the courts' involvement in the School Bus Safety Program is 'strictly ministerial' and referred reporters to the sheriff's office and BusPatrol.
Eleven months into the program, challenges to the BusPatrol tickets are just now reaching the courts. At the end of January, only five challenges to alleged bus-safety violations were in the court system. Two days after the Herald/Tributary questioned the Sheriff's office about the delay in filing these challenges, the courts received nearly 1,000 of them.
As of Monday, Rodriguez said the courts have received 1,028 notices that motorists plan to contest their citations. Still, since no hearings for such challenges have been scheduled, it's unclear when relief might come for drivers who received bogus citations.
Callers to BusPatrol's Virginia headquarters encounter an automated phone tree explaining how to pay their bill, depending on state of residence. Persistent callers can eventually get through to a human voice.
After he was fined in September, Strongarone clipped and filled out the appeal form at the bottom of the notice. No hearing was scheduled, so he started calling.
'Every time I would call, I would get put on hold, and it would take hours. Nobody would answer the phone,' he said. Finally, someone at BusPatrol picked up the phone in January, he said, but that person knew nothing about the process of getting a Miami-Dade hearing.
The absence of hearings is not unique to Miami-Dade. ABC Action News reported earlier this month that there haven't been any scheduled in Hillsborough, either.
Motorists like Edelman, Gonzalez, and Strongarone constitute just one category of complaint. Other drivers told reporters they were several lanes wide of the school bus and no threat to school children when they rolled past the bus. That's still illegal. A common grievance was that the bus's stop-arm extended just as they were passing, making it dangerous for them to have lurched to a halt.
Still others said they were turning left at a busy intersection unaware that a bus had pulled to the side, hidden from view, on the cross street. Even had they seen the bus, slamming on the brakes in the middle of a turn in heavy traffic would have caused a chain reaction pileup, they said.
Some who responded to the survey told reporters they felt powerless and abused.
'Government officials should be ashamed,' said Don Casey, who is challenging his violation notice. 'I'm a 77-year-old person and a $225 dollar fine...is grocery money for a couple of weeks.'
A hasty no-bid contract
Like many drivers who were caught by the cameras, Samira Sami reluctantly paid the $225. But she isn't happy.
'Someone should investigate the linkages with this private company and commissioners or state representatives,' she wrote.
Last year, The Tributary did that, revealing how BusPatrol spent up to $1.4 million lobbying Florida's Legislature to adopt a bill permitting the installation of cameras on public school buses, then, after that, to allow camera companies to take a cut of the proceeds. BusPatrol also spent hundreds of thousands on campaign contributions at the state and local level, including to four current school board members.
Read more: Red lights, green cash: How a Florida lawmaker boosted BusPatrol and benefited her family
BusPatrol hired the son of one of the legislation's co-sponsors, Rep Vicki Lopez, R-Miami, as a vice president. Steve Randazzo, the company's chief growth officer, said those two things – the hiring and the legislation – had 'nothing to do' with each other.
In Miami-Dade, big contracts like BusPatrol's typically go through a rigorous procurement procedure where vendors compete for the school district's business. That's how the district ensures taxpayers get the best deal. It's what is happening in Broward County. Miami-Dade schools navigated around that practice, hiring BusPatrol with whirlwind speed.
A month and a half after the state legislation took effect, the school board voted on Aug. 16, 2023, to have staff 'explore the feasibility' of a bus camera program and if the idea proved feasible 'implement procurement procedures.' Twelve days later, staff had signed a 25-page contract with BusPatrol.
The district initially told reporters it had 'piggybacked' off a contract in another district. In response to a public records request for documentation, the district provided an unsigned contract between Hillsborough County schools and BusPatrol from August 2023 that never went into effect.
Days before publication, the district walked that back and said it didn't have to go through a bid process because it was a no-cost contract.
'We did not circumvent the process,' said Andrew Ruiz, a spokesman for the district. 'We followed the process.'
In any event, BusPatrol had 'the most comprehensive package,' said board member Danny Espino, who introduced the initial item to bring the program to Miami-Dade after meeting a BusPatrol lobbyist at a conference. Espino's political committee received $8,000 between July and September 2023 from the only political committee that BusPatrol contributed to, run by a lobbyist firm on the company's payroll.
Espino said he wasn't aware of the contribution to his committee amid donations from several other committees.
Numbers provided by the sheriff and the school district suggest many motorists are rebelling against the program either by contesting the fines, which puts collection on hold, or ignoring them. The sheriff's office reported that 120,000 violation notices had been issued as of Dec. 19., the last working day for the school district before winter break. If, as the district says, $19.5 million had been collected, that would suggest over 30% of fines are going unpaid.
Under the contract with Miami-Dade, unpaid violations can be sold to a collection agency with the district obliged to assist in collection. But that hasn't happened – yet.
Mark Gold, the Ticket Clinic founder, said he suspects the county doesn't want to be bothered with hearings and that unpaid violations might simply fade away, although he said most alleged violators probably pay because the violation notices look official and people just don't want to deal with the process of contesting.
As he did with red light cameras, Gold said he would relish the chance to challenge bus camera fines in court– if the county ever schedules a hearing. Already, BusPatrol has faced scrutiny, criticism and legal attacks in several jurisdictions around the country,
Until then, Capt. Ryan Howett, who oversees planning and special projects for the Miami-Dade sheriff, said drivers can alert his agency if they feel they were given a violation for doing nothing wrong. The email he provided: SSCP@MDSO.com.
Nandhini Srinivasan is an investigative reporting fellow with The Tributary, a Florida nonprofit investigative newsroom.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DNC chair ripped David Hogg over party infighting in leaked meeting audio: 'Really frustrating'
DNC chair ripped David Hogg over party infighting in leaked meeting audio: 'Really frustrating'

Fox News

time32 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DNC chair ripped David Hogg over party infighting in leaked meeting audio: 'Really frustrating'

Several Democratic National Committee officers are accusing DNC vice chair David Hogg of leaking an audio recording exposing infighting, as the 25-year-old progressive reformer faces possible ouster. Politico first obtained about two minutes of audio from a May 15 Zoom call in which Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin is heard accusing Hogg of impacting his ability to lead. Hogg, 25, was elected vice chair in February but is currently at risk of losing that role after stirring tensions with party leadership. A survivor of the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, Hogg has been vocal about how his group, Leaders We Deserve, is planning to spend $20 million to support progressive – and primarily younger – candidates challenging incumbent Democrats in safe districts during the next election. "It has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again," Martin said in the recording, as the party is trying to regroup following Democrats' 2024 election defeat. About 10 people were on the call, including Hogg, other DNC officers and staff, according to Politico. "I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation, and I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job," Martin continued, "The other night I said to myself for the first time, 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore.' And partly, not because of the stress and all the naysayers, right? I'm used to that. I spent 14 years as a chair. I'm used to getting beat up on." "But you know, this is, this is really, everything you know from this election, this credentials report, how Malcom's been treated in this to you know, the fact the election itself, how Shasti and Jeanna were treated in this," Martin said. "I'm just quite frustrated to be in this position because what you've done, whether you like it or not, or know it or not, David, I'm trying to – no one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility, so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win." "And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to," Martin said. "So, it's really frustrating." Several party officers alleged in statements to Fox News Digital that Hogg was behind the audio leak. "Breaking news: a human being had a frustrating day at work. That's all Ken expressed on that call – I was there," DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta said. "For weeks, I've pointed out David's causal relationship with the truth. He proves he has no relationship with integrity if he's willing to record and leak private conversations." "The Democratic Party is not the past. The Democratic Party is what we do next. The endless, self-serving narratives – and the deliberate leaking of private conversations – by David Hogg and his allies must stop," Jane Kleeb, president of the Association of State Democratic Committees, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Instead of helping to rebuild the party he's supposed to serve, he's attacking it for personal gain," Kleeb continued. "That might boost his PAC's fundraising, but it erodes trust in the very institution we're trying to reform and strengthen. I'm proud of Chair Martin and the reforms we're advancing, which includes keeping the DNC out of primaries so voters decide on Democratic nominees. Just this past month, we made historic gains in traditional red states like Nebraska and Mississippi. People's lives will be better. That's the work that matters." The Democratic National Committee is holding an electronic vote beginning Monday on whether to nullify the February elections of Hogg and Kenyatta as vice chairs. Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free filed a formal complaint with the DNC alleging that the February election of the two male vice chairs violated the DNC's gender-balanced rules, yet Hogg has claimed the DNC is using the vote to push for his ouster as he tries to reform the party. Hogg responded to the leaked audio in a statement to X. "There's a lot going on right now. Here's what matters: Trump just nationalized California's national guard in his latest step on his authoritarian march to stomp out dissent against mass deportations," Hogg said, referring to the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots in Los Angeles. "Republicans want us turning on each other so they can continue getting away with this. While Chair Martin and I have had our disagreements we are both in this to build the strongest party possible." "Our nation is in a moment of crisis and the people are looking for us to lead," Hogg said. "This is a distraction that prevents us from doing that. Do not help the GOP." Hogg also said that "a lot of people are accusing me of leaking this recording," sharing messages from the Politico reporter seeking comment on the story. He did not affirm or deny whether he was behind the leak. "BS. It was you. Everyone knows it," New York Democratic state Sen. James Skoufis responded on X. "Leaking audio of a private call with party leadership is a disgrace and shows how deeply unserious and uncommitted you are to building a better, stronger, more inclusive Democratic Party." Martin, meanwhile, said in a statement that he's "not going anywhere," and he took the job as DNC chair "to fight Republicans, not Democrats." "As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda," he said. "That's the work that I will continue to do every day." In statements to Fox News Digital, more DNC officers voiced support for Martin, as well as condemnation of Hogg. "We have a lot of work to do as a party, and Chair Martin is doing it," DNC Associate Chair Stuart Applebaum said. "I have total confidence in his leadership. The stakes are so high right now that we can't afford distractions like the ones that David is creating." "Like Chair Martin said, infighting is a waste of time when Donald Trump and the Republican Congress is taking healthcare and food away from millions of Americans," DNC Vice Chair Artie Blanco said. "Ken wouldn't be here today if not for SNAP and Medicaid. That's the type of passionate leadership we should want for our party. The fact that someone would secretly record and share audio of him candidly discussing that is more a reflection of their character than the Chair's. Begs the question, what are their true intentions." DNC Associate Chair Shasti Conrad, who was briefly mentioned on the recording, said in a statement to Fox News Digital, "During the DNC Officers call, we all were operating under the assumption that this was a confidential call amongst colleagues. Does David Hogg benefit from this? Yes. Regardless, how are we able to lead if there is no trust?" Fox News Digital also reached out to Hogg and Leaders We Deserve seeking comment on the recording, but they have yet to provide a response.

Victims of Chaotic Crowd Stampede at Dallas Cheer Competition File Lawsuit
Victims of Chaotic Crowd Stampede at Dallas Cheer Competition File Lawsuit

Business Wire

timean hour ago

  • Business Wire

Victims of Chaotic Crowd Stampede at Dallas Cheer Competition File Lawsuit

DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Lawyers representing hundreds of people who were injured during a chaotic crowd stampede at a March cheerleading competition in Dallas have sued the organizer, Varsity Spirit, and facility management saying they failed to provide proper security at the event. In their court filing, the attorneys say those failures led to parents and children being trampled and suffering broken bones, concussions, brain bleeds, and other physical injuries when participants and attendees went running from the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center, following reports of gunshots being fired. Many others, including children, continue to suffer from the emotional trauma they endured. 'This wasn't a little something. This was mass chaos,' said Ashlea Schwarz of Paul LLP in Kansas City, Mo., who represents the victims. 'You had parents separated from their kids for hours. You had a facility that had no plan for reunification in place. People had no idea where they would go to find their children.' Video of attorney Ashlea Schwarz and victim Rachel Meyer 'It was pure chaos,' said Rachel Meyer of St. Louis, who attended the event along with her 9-year-old daughter. 'Nobody knew what was happening. Everybody was screaming, looking every way. There were people pushing other people. And the pure panic in everybody's voices – that's something I'll never forget.' Records show there were approximately 25,000 participants – most under the age of 18 – who attended the 2025 National Cheerleaders Association All-Star National Championship event, from Feb. 28 to March 2. An estimated 38,000 spectators attended. Police and event officials have said the crowd crush was ignited by the sound of metal poles crashing to the concrete floor of the convention center following a fight between two parents. 'It really doesn't matter what started the panic,' said Charla Aldous of Dallas-based Aldous Law. 'What matters is the chaos and crowd crush happened because Varsity and the convention center were not prepared. And that resulted in the injuries these people suffered.' The lawsuit details injuries suffered by attendees from Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Texas, and Virginia. They include a woman knocked unconscious during the stampede who suffered a series of brain bleeds; a mother who was slammed face-first into the concrete and was so severely hurt that her young daughter thought her mom had been fatally shot; and an event participant suffering from a concussion who sheltered alone under tractor-trailers outside the convention center. Varsity Brands is the parent company of Varsity Spirit, and is headquartered in Farmers Branch, Texas. The lawsuit is Albold, et al. v. Varsity Spirit LLC et al., No. CC-25-04400-C in Dallas County Court at Law No. 3. About Paul LLP Paul LLP is a Kansas City, Missouri-based trial firm focused on complex commercial and consumer litigation involving the prosecution of class and mass actions, frequently leading multi-faceted, nationwide teams of co-counsel in complex litigation. Learn more about the firm at About Aldous Law Aldous Law specializes in high-stakes personal injury litigation, including wrongful death, trucking collisions, medical malpractice, products liability and sexual assault cases. Learn more about the Dallas-based firm at

University of Michigan dumping undercover security guards for 'unethical' behavior
University of Michigan dumping undercover security guards for 'unethical' behavior

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

University of Michigan dumping undercover security guards for 'unethical' behavior

The University of Michigan is terminating all contracts with outside firms to provide plainclothes security officers on campus. Interim President Domenico Grasso announced the decision in a note to the campus community Sunday, just days after media reports of Gaza War protesters being tailed. The London-based Guardian reported last week that in at least one case caught on video, a plainclothes security officer appeared to fake a disability by pretend he was hearing-impaired when he was confronted by a protester. "We recently learned that an employee of one of our security contractors has acted in ways that go against our values and directives," Grasso wrote. "What happened was disturbing, unacceptable, and unethical, and we will not tolerate it. Going forward, we are terminating all contracts with external vendors to provide plainclothes security on campus." The school didn't say what action the security contract took that was unacceptable, but said that an employee was no longer with the company. It also didn't say if the company would still provide uniformed security officers on campus. In a separate statement, U-M defended the use of such contractors to supplement its own officers, calling it "an industry-standard approach used widely across college campuses, sporting venues and medical facilities." The school said the security guards were hired to "keep watch over our campus and enable us to respond quickly to emergencies." The statement said that the school "does not surveil individuals or student groups, nor has it requested or authorized the surveillance of any students on or off campus." Several protesters disagreed, telling the Guardian that they were being followed. In his note, Grasso urged anyone who's witnessed inappropriate behavior by private security personnel to report it to the campus police or the Equity, Civil Rights and Title IX Office. He said it would be promptly investigated. The Free Press left a message with the university seeking comment on any complaints it has received about private security personnel. The Free Press also left a request for comment with Amerishield, the parent company of Detroit-based City Shield, which provided the officers. Payment records from the Board of Regents show that between June and September of last year alone, the university paid Amerishield more than $851,000 for what it called "general goods and services." The U-M campus has seen repeated controversies over the Gaza War protests and the school's response to them. In May of 2024, the school broke up an encampment on the diag and several protesters were charged with crimes ranging from trespassing to resisting and obstructing police. Last month, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced that she was dropping all charges against some of those protesters. The school's handling of the protesters has prompted multiple lawsuits, claiming the school violated the constitutional rights of protesters and fired some employees who took part. Detroit Free Press staff writer Andrea Souhari contributed to this report. Contact John Wisely: jwisely@ On X: @jwisely This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: U-M dumping undercover security guards for 'unethical' behavior

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store