Ask a solicitor: Should I be worried about trespassers on my land?
Dear Karen,
I am always concerned about trespassers coming on my land and making a claim against me. It seems very unfair that they possibly could. What is the law in relation to this?
Dear Reader,
This is a worry for many landowners. A trespasser is defined as 'an entrant, other than a recreational user or a visitor'. Such entrants do not have permission or authority to be present on the property. A burglar falls within this definition.
The duty owed to trespassers is set out in Section 4 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1995. It is similar to that owed to recreational users. However, an occupier may not be liable for injury or damage unintentionally caused to a person who enters on land or premises for the purposes of committing an offence, unless the court determines otherwise. The decision of the court will be based on the facts of the case.
In the case of Williams vs. TP Wallace Construction Limited, the entrant plaintiff did not have permission or authority to be on the property in question. The defendant company had hired the plaintiff to install guttering at a shopping centre.
On the day of the accident, the plaintiff attended the defendant's premises unannounced in order to establish whether the job was being carried out properly.
The plaintiff proceeded to inspect the site without express permission while the site workers were on a break and the architect was not present.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries he sustained as a result of a fall from a ladder, which was not tied to the scaffolding. The plaintiff contended that the defendant was negligent in failing to have the ladder secured.
The court held that the plaintiff was not a visitor, but was instead a trespasser, because he was not on the site by invitation or arrangement. The court found in favour of the defendant and dismissed the plaintiff's case on the basis that the failure to tie the ladder to the scaffolding was not an act of reckless disregard, and the defendant did not breach his duty to the plaintiff, a trespasser, in this regard.
The 1995 Act does not draw a distinction between an adult and a child, so a child is owed the same duty of care, however gauging the standard of reckless disregard, the court must have regard of all circumstances, such as the conduct of the person, and the care that he or she may reasonably be expected to take for his or her own safety while on a premises. Naturally, a child is not aware of dangers as an adult would be, and they may ignore or fail to understand warning signs.
As a result, the courts have traditionally afforded more leniency to children who come onto premises as a trespasser, if it could be shown that the child was at an age that he or she would 'follow a bait as mechanically as a fish' and the occupier's premises contained 'an allurement'.
The case law states that in order for something to be an allurement, it must be both 'fascinating and fatal'.
In the case of O'Leary vs John A. Wood Limited, the court held that 'an object should not be considered an allurement unless the temptations which it presents are such that no normal child could be expected to restrain themselves from intermeddling even if he knows that to intermeddle is wrong'.
Clearly, the allurement approach in these types of cases is of great benefit to children, but the courts appear to have taken a restrictive approach so as to ensure that the net for liability is not cast so widely as to be unjust.
Karen Walsh, from a farming background, is a solicitor practising at Walsh & Partners Solicitors, 17 South Mall, Cork, and 88 Main Street, Midleton, Co Cork, and also the author of 'Farming and the Law'. Walsh & Partners also specialises in personal injury claims, conveyancing, probate, and family law.
Email: info@walshandpartners.ie
Web: walshandpartners.ie
While every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, Karen Walsh does not accept responsibility for errors or omissions howsoever arising. Readers should seek legal advice in relation to their particular circumstances at the earliest opportunity.
Read More
Ask a solicitor: A contractor fell off a ladder on my farm
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
Second new Love Island hunk questioned by cops after being accused of stealing woman's phone during night out
LOVE Island hunk Dejon Noel-Williams was questioned by police after he was accused of stealing a phone on a night out. The semi-pro footballer, 26, who is set to star in the 2 Love Island hunk Dejon Noel-Williams was questioned by police after he was accused of stealing a phone on a night out Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 2 The semi-pro footballer, 26, was interviewed after a woman's mobile was taken in London Credit: Instagram It makes Both were released with no further action. ITV was aware of the incident with Dejon when he secured his place on the dating show, a spokesman confirmed. He spoke to cops alongside Kettering FC footballer Harlain Mbayo, who was ordered to carry out a community resolution, which can involve an apology or compensation. Read more on Love Island The dispute was sparked over payment for food and an Uber taxi ride. Personal trainer 'I voluntarily spoke to the police to clarify the truth about what happened in this incident, with no further action taken. "To stress, my intentions here were entirely honourable and it is very upsetting to read claims that suggest otherwise.' Most read in Love Island The Met Police said: 'On March 16 at 04:05hrs officers responded to a report of a robbery in which a phone was taken. 'An investigation was launched and two men voluntarily took part in interviews. The victim's phone was recovered and has been returned. Love Island's Kyle Ashman reveals he wants show return as Casa Amor hunk after being axed over machete attack on dad 'No further action was taken against the 26-year-old man.' ITV added: 'We speak to our Islanders in advance of the show in addition to rigorous background screening, including DBS checks.'
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
‘I didn't deserve it' says Ireland AM's Karen Koster as she gets huge ‘fright' after shock incident that ‘rattled' her
IRELAND AM star Karen Koster was "rattled" after being "taken out" by a cyclist. The 44-year-old has been 3 Karen Koster has been filling in for Muireann O'Connell this week Credit: Instagram 3 Karen was knocked down by a cyclist Credit: VMTV 3 Karen said she got a 'fright' after her fall Credit: VMTV On yesterday's show, herself, And as the presenters spoke about the issue of "cyclists speeding", Alan prompted Karen to tell viewers her "tragic story". The mum-of-three told the story of how she was knocked down while walking her dog. read more on ireland am She started off the story admitting: "I did have headphones on, but…" Tommy quickly interjected saying: "Oh did you?" Alan joked: "Not paying attention!" Karen defended herself saying: "Now hang on a second. I did not deserve to be thrown to the ground." read more on the irish sun Tommy replied: "So they were ringing the bell, but you were in your own little land." Karen explained: "No I wasn't, I actually think he was on his phone, it was a teenage guy. Ireland AM star jokes about co-host lineup "I think he was actually so mortified because women kind of came and hurled a bit of abuse at him saying, 'You're going too fast, you shouldn't be cycling down here'. "I think he just kind of did a U-turn and didn't see me and took me down." The Dublin native opened up on how "rattled" she felt after her fall. HOST DIG She said: "But it's the fright you get. Like I felt like very elderly going, 'Oh my God, I've had a fall'. "You do feel rattled and you do. It's almost like your nervous system." And a quick-witted Alan interrupted poor Karen saying: "You are getting on, though." Karen shouted out: "No I am not!" The former Six O'Clock Show host also joked that her "tennis career is over" as her shoulder was sore from the fall.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Ask a solicitor: Should I be worried about trespassers on my land?
Dear Karen, I am always concerned about trespassers coming on my land and making a claim against me. It seems very unfair that they possibly could. What is the law in relation to this? Dear Reader, This is a worry for many landowners. A trespasser is defined as 'an entrant, other than a recreational user or a visitor'. Such entrants do not have permission or authority to be present on the property. A burglar falls within this definition. The duty owed to trespassers is set out in Section 4 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1995. It is similar to that owed to recreational users. However, an occupier may not be liable for injury or damage unintentionally caused to a person who enters on land or premises for the purposes of committing an offence, unless the court determines otherwise. The decision of the court will be based on the facts of the case. In the case of Williams vs. TP Wallace Construction Limited, the entrant plaintiff did not have permission or authority to be on the property in question. The defendant company had hired the plaintiff to install guttering at a shopping centre. On the day of the accident, the plaintiff attended the defendant's premises unannounced in order to establish whether the job was being carried out properly. The plaintiff proceeded to inspect the site without express permission while the site workers were on a break and the architect was not present. The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries he sustained as a result of a fall from a ladder, which was not tied to the scaffolding. The plaintiff contended that the defendant was negligent in failing to have the ladder secured. The court held that the plaintiff was not a visitor, but was instead a trespasser, because he was not on the site by invitation or arrangement. The court found in favour of the defendant and dismissed the plaintiff's case on the basis that the failure to tie the ladder to the scaffolding was not an act of reckless disregard, and the defendant did not breach his duty to the plaintiff, a trespasser, in this regard. The 1995 Act does not draw a distinction between an adult and a child, so a child is owed the same duty of care, however gauging the standard of reckless disregard, the court must have regard of all circumstances, such as the conduct of the person, and the care that he or she may reasonably be expected to take for his or her own safety while on a premises. Naturally, a child is not aware of dangers as an adult would be, and they may ignore or fail to understand warning signs. As a result, the courts have traditionally afforded more leniency to children who come onto premises as a trespasser, if it could be shown that the child was at an age that he or she would 'follow a bait as mechanically as a fish' and the occupier's premises contained 'an allurement'. The case law states that in order for something to be an allurement, it must be both 'fascinating and fatal'. In the case of O'Leary vs John A. Wood Limited, the court held that 'an object should not be considered an allurement unless the temptations which it presents are such that no normal child could be expected to restrain themselves from intermeddling even if he knows that to intermeddle is wrong'. Clearly, the allurement approach in these types of cases is of great benefit to children, but the courts appear to have taken a restrictive approach so as to ensure that the net for liability is not cast so widely as to be unjust. Karen Walsh, from a farming background, is a solicitor practising at Walsh & Partners Solicitors, 17 South Mall, Cork, and 88 Main Street, Midleton, Co Cork, and also the author of 'Farming and the Law'. Walsh & Partners also specialises in personal injury claims, conveyancing, probate, and family law. Email: info@ Web: While every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, Karen Walsh does not accept responsibility for errors or omissions howsoever arising. Readers should seek legal advice in relation to their particular circumstances at the earliest opportunity. Read More Ask a solicitor: A contractor fell off a ladder on my farm
