Western Sahara conflict builds up as Morocco gains support from the UK
France, in July 2024, noted that it was siding with Morocco on the matter of its sovereignty over the small country of Western Sahara. This support was to the detriment of Algeria, which also lays claim to the small North African territory.
France declared its support for Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara in July 2024.
The United Kingdom joined France in backing Morocco's proposal for limited autonomy for Western Sahara.
Morocco's claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara is endorsed by several Western nations, strengthening diplomatic ties with Morocco.
Recent reports indicate that other Western powerhouses have also followed in France's footsteps, opting to support the Moroccan side in its quest to seize administrative control of Western Sahara.
The United Kingdom is the latest country to throw its weight behind Morocco, whereby it would have authority over the region while providing it with limited autonomy.
The UK via its Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, noted that this move was the 'most credible and viable and pragmatic basis' to resolve the half-century dispute over the region between its neighbours, and other players.
In the last year alone, given France's support of Morocco's claim to the region, Algeria, which also aims to gain autonomy over Western Sahara, has been at odds with the Western European nation.
In July 2024, an open letter from France to Morocco's King Mohammed VI, Emmanuel Macron declared that the "only basis" for resolving the conflict was Morocco's 2007 proposal to provide Western Sahara limited autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty.
The UK seems to share this sentiment as Lammy stated that 'a resolution is long overdue.'
The Foreign Minister, in the same breath, noted that the UK would be strengthening its commercial ties with the monarchy of Morocco, according to a Bloomberg report.
The Western Sahara, which is a huge area of desert and coastline, has been the subject of intense conflict since Morocco invaded after Spanish colonial forces left in 1975.
Over 16 years, sporadic skirmishes with the Polisario Front, which sought independence, cost almost 9,000 lives.
Late in 2020, a three-decade truce broke down. Shortly thereafter, the administration of US President Donald Trump supported Morocco's claim to the region in an agreement that also saw Rabat consent to reestablish diplomatic relations with Israel.
France's damaged relationship with Algeria and the Western Sahara dispute
As mentioned above, in July 2024, France aligned with Morocco against Algeria over the sovereignty of the small Western Sahara republic.
Algeria responded sharply to France's decision by withdrawing its ambassador in August of that year.
Since then, a succession of arrests, expulsions, and public pronouncements have strained the relationship between the two countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump blasts Rand Paul as ‘crazy' for resisting tax-cut bill over debt limit
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump attacked fiscal conservative Rand Paul as 'crazy' Tuesday morning as he pressed reluctant Republican senators to move forward swiftly with his massive tax and spending package. Where the Wild Children's Museums Are Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending The Kentucky senator earlier said on CNBC that he wouldn't vote for the president's signature legislation because it would increase the legal US debt limit. 'I'm just not for that. That's not conservative,' said Paul, who also has argued the tax measure would add too much to the national debt. Trump quickly responded with a series of social media posts, saying the senator 'never has any practical or constructive ideas. His ideas are actually crazy (losers!)' While most outside economists have forecast the House version of the legislation would add trillions of dollars to the US debt over 10 years, the White House has claimed that the tax bill would pay for itself in part through economic growth. Trump and Republican leaders have said they have no choice but to add the debt ceiling to the tax bill in order to ensure smooth passage and avoid a payment default as soon as August. Paul posted a response to Trump, saying he favors the tax cuts but 'I also want to see the $5 trillion in new debt removed from the bill,' adding at least three other Republican senators agreed with him, enough to block the legislation. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Team Signals It Wants to Keep Control of Fannie, Freddie to Boost Budget
(Bloomberg) -- Signs are emerging that the Trump administration may be less willing to give up control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than investors have bargained for, as policymakers scrounge for ways to close US budget gaps. Where the Wild Children's Museums Are Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending In recent social media posts, Donald Trump said he's exploring the sale of new shares in the two companies, which play a key role in determining how much Americans pay for home loans — but he also made clear the government will keep a strong oversight role. And in recent interviews, Federal Housing Finance Agency director William Pulte said the administration is considering a public offering without actually exiting conservatorship, the quasi-government ownership imposed on the two companies since a 2008 bailout. 'Maybe there's a way to take these companies public and use these companies for what they are, which are assets for the American people,' Pulte said Monday in an appearance on Fox Business. The comments suggest the administration could choose a different outcome for the two mortgage giants than the one it pursued during the first Trump administration. Back then, the goal was to minimize government involvement. Now the goal may be to generate as much cash as possible for the US, potentially to help fund tax cuts. 'Until two weeks ago, we thought Trump would pick up where he left off,' said Jim Parrott, nonresident fellow at the Urban Institute and former housing policy adviser to President Barack Obama. Instead, the plan may be to keep substantial control and generate revenue for other policy priorities, he said. 'That is a dramatic shift in focus,' Parrott said. This might deeply disappoint Wall Street investors such as Pershing Square Capital Management's Bill Ackman who've been counting on a windfall if Fannie and Freddie are set free. Since Trump's election win, shares of Fannie Mae have been up some 700%, hovering near their highest levels in two decades. The bet is that removing the so-called government-sponsored enterprises or GSEs from conservatorship will unleash a torrent of pent-up earnings power. Fannie Mae stock dropped 4.6% to $10.28 at 9:32 a.m. in New York trading. To be sure, administration officials say many alternatives are still on the table for the two firms, which together control $7.8 trillion in assets and last year generated $29 billion in profits. Pulte said last week the government is 'studying all different options' for the companies' future, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg last month his agency is studying privatization — but said other policies will come first, such as trade and peace deals. The first Trump administration made strides toward ending conservatorship, for example by stopping a provision that swept all their profits to the government and thus allowing them to build capital. And after leaving office, Trump wrote in 2021 that he would have quickly ordered the release of Fannie and Freddie from conservatorship had it not been for rules that prevented him from doing so at the time. The US Supreme Court struck down those rules in 2021, freeing Trump's hand. But the priorities may be different now, at least judging by early signals from the administration. Mortgage Rates Sensitive to rising interest rates, Pulte and Bessent have repeatedly stressed the importance of keeping mortgage costs in check. That's a risk if the conservatorship ends, because US backing helps Fannie and Freddie keep interest rates down on home loans. At the same time, scary-looking budget deficits may be creating a greater incentive to use the GSEs to generate funds for the Treasury, rather than private investors. A spokesperson at the FHFA, which oversees Fannie and Freddie, confirmed the agency is studying how to take the companies public should the president decide to pursue such an offering. This includes potentially taking them public while still in conservatorship, the spokesperson said. 'In any scenario, we will ensure the mortgage-backed securities market is safe and sound and that there is no upward pressure on rates,' the spokesperson added. 'Little Flummoxed' Ironically, retaining substantial control could complicate efforts to sell off the government's stakes for significant amounts of value. To extract cash, the government would need to generate lots of enthusiasm from private investors as part of a public offering — but they'd be interested only if the US surrendered more control. 'We're still a little flummoxed by Pulte's comments about taking the GSEs public but not necessarily privatizing,' wrote strategists including Nicholas Maciunas at JPMorgan in a Friday note. 'If the goal is to sell off the Treasury stake, potentially raising hundreds of billions of dollars to pay down the U.S. debt, we'd think that private investors would want the government's involvement to be somewhat lighter than today.' For now, any would-be windfall for the US isn't reflected in accounting by the Congressional Budget Office, the scorekeeper legislators rely upon to estimate how proposed laws would affect the government's budget. The CBO's analysts have indicated they won't adjust the value assigned to the government's GSE stakes until plans for ending conservatorship are concrete. Trump's insistence that he would keep the government's 'implicit guarantee' of Fannie and Freddie could also inhibit efforts to change the CBO's stance. 'There is uncertainty around the CBOs treatment of the GSEs but the president's plan to keep providing Fannie and Freddie with a financial lifeline may mean they continue to view the two companies as obligations of the government, and thus refrain from writing up their financial value in its scoring,' said Ankur Mehta, a strategist at Citigroup Inc. --With assistance from Norah Mulinda. (Updates with Tuesday's stock trading in the eighth paragraph.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Peace has long been elusive in rural Colombia – Black women's community groups try to bring it closer each day
It's been almost nine years since Colombia celebrated a landmark peace agreement between one guerrilla group and the government, and three years since President Gustavo Petro vowed 'total peace.' But in reality, the country's decades-long internal conflict continues – making it one of the oldest in the world. Violence surged in early 2025, the most intense uptick in years. Fighting between two armed guerrilla groups in the northeastern Catatumbo region killed dozens of people and displaced tens of thousands more. Since the largest armed group – the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC – signed the 2016 peace accord, more than 400 signatories have been killed. Meanwhile, more than 1,200 social leaders and human rights defenders have been assassinated. We often define peace as the absence of war. The problem with thinking about peace and war as an all-or-nothing binary, however, is that it obscures the violence that takes place in 'peaceful times.' For Colombians, that paradox is nothing new. In many communities most affected by the violence, thinking about a 'post-conflict era' feels utopian. As a Colombian researcher who has collaborated with Afro-Colombian leaders for over a decade, I have noticed that emphasizing peace talks and accords erases the historical violence that is still present, especially for racial minorities. Colombia has the largest Black population in Spanish-speaking Latin America. In Chocó – a region on the Pacific coast where I conducted my research – Afro-Colombians form a majority. Communities there are contending not only with the contemporary conflict, but also ongoing challenges from the legacies of slavery, colonialism and extractive industries. Many residents, particularly women, work together every day to try to bring peace and justice within reach. Colombia has been mired in war for over six decades, as legal and illegal armed groups across the political spectrum fight for territories and resources. The conflict is estimated to have killed around 450,000 people and displaced around 7 million. Black and Indigenous communities have disproportionately suffered the brunt of the war – especially in rural areas, where their lives and territories have been threatened by armed groups and companies alike. In Chocó Department, the site of my research, the region's remoteness and biodiversity have attracted illegal groups and practices like drug trafficking, as well as mining and other types of resource extraction that threaten traditional livelihoods. Mercury from industrial mining poses an additional danger to people's health and the environment. Black rural communities in the Pacific lowlands, where most of Chocó is located, have a legal right to collective ownership of their territories and to be consulted about development plans. In reality, land grabs and targeted killings over illegal crops, mining and other extractive practices have become the norm here, as is true throughout rural Colombia. The conflict has intensified racism and gender hierarchies, with Black women, particularly activists, especially vulnerable. Vice President Francia Márquez Mina, for example – who has won awards for her activism against illegal mining – survived an attack near her home in the nearby department of Cauca in 2019. She and her family have received other threats on their lives since then. Even in 'postconflict' times, peace is a challenging task. It requires social change that does not happen overnight. Rather, it is the accumulation of tiny sparks in people's daily commitments. In my book 'Postconflict Utopias: Everyday Survival in Chocó, Colombia,' I write about how Black women's organizations care for their territories and communities. The 'comisionadas,' for example, belong to one of the largest such groups in Colombia, called COCOMACIA. These women travel the Atrato River and its tributaries to lead workshops about the organization, as well as territorial rights and women's rights. Everyone in the community is welcome to participate in dialogues about issues such as women's political participation, land ownership and related legislation. Comisionada María del Socorro Mosquera Pérez, for example, wrote a song to share the importance of Law 1257, a landmark 2008 law against violence and discrimination against women. In her story for the research project that I discuss in my book, 'Mujeres Pacíficas,' comisionada Rubiela Cuesta Córdoba says it best: 'The best legacy that one leaves to family and friends is resistance.' One focus of these women's groups' work is the Atrato River itself. Since 2016, the same year of the peace accords, Colombian courts have recognized the river as a legal person, with rights to protection, conservation, maintenance and restoration. The river is a source of food and transportation between many basin communities where potable water, electricity and other amenities are scarce. But it is also intertwined with politics and spirituality. Pilgrimages like 'Atratiando,' a trip along the river and its tributaries that has taken place multiple times since 1999, highlight that there is no life without the river. Participants travel through areas where paramilitaries and guerrillas are active, showing solidarity with vulnerable communities. COCOMACIA's comisionadas are part of many other organizations – highlighting how survival is not only intertwined with lands and rivers, but other regions and countries. The struggle for women's rights has led the comisionadas to collaborate with other organizations, creating wider networks of care. These include La Red Departamental de Mujeres Chocoanas, a feminist coalition of women's organizations in Chocó; La Ruta Pacífica de las Mujeres, a feminist movement of 300 organizations from across Colombia; and Women in Black, an anti-militarism network with members in over 150 countries. Their solidarity is a reminder that peace and justice are a collaborative, everyday effort. As Justa Germania Mena Córdoba, leader of the comisionadas at the time, told me in 2012: 'One cannot change the world by herself.' This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Tania Lizarazo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Read more: Activism on foot: When Indigenous activists walk the land to honor their past and reshape their future Land acknowledgments meant to honor Indigenous people too often do the opposite – erasing American Indians and sanitizing history instead How Ecuador went from being Latin America's model of stability to a nation in crisis Tania Lizarazo does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
