
Latest round of US-Iran nuclear talks ends in Rome
Iranian and US negotiators closed on Friday a fifth round of nuclear talks in Rome with "some but not conclusive progress", mediator Oman said, after a public disagreement over Tehran's uranium enrichment.
The talks, which began in April, are the highest-level contact between the foes since the United States quit a landmark 2015 nuclear accord during President Donald Trump's first term.
Since returning to office, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Iran, backing talks but warning of military action if diplomacy fails.
Iran wants a new deal that would ease the sanctions which have battered its economy.
"The fifth round of Iran US talks have concluded today in Rome with some but not conclusive progress," Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X, adding that he hoped "the remaining issues" will be clarified in the coming days.
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei had earlier said that chief US negotiator Steve Witkoff had left the talks "due to his flight schedule".
The fourth round of talks, in the Omani capital Muscat, ended with a public spat over enrichment.
Witkoff said Washington "could not authorise even one percent" enrichment -- a position Tehran called a red line, citing its rights under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
'Fundamental differences'
Ahead of Friday's talks, Araghchi said "fundamental differences" remained with the United States, while adding that Tehran was open to its nuclear sites undergoing more inspections.
"We will not have an agreement at all" if the United States wants to prevent Iran from enriching uranium, he said.
The talks came ahead of a June meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the October expiry of the 2015 accord.
The deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aimed to allay Western suspicions that Iran was seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition that Tehran has consistently denied.
In return for curbs on its nuclear programme, Iran had received relief from international sanctions. But the accord was torpedoed in 2018 when Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States and reimposed sanctions.
A year later, Iran responded by ramping up its nuclear activities.
It is now enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far above the deal's 3.67 percent cap but below, though close to, the 90 percent level needed for a nuclear warhead.
'It's quite simple'
Analysts in Tehran said Iran was unlikely to back down.
"It's quite simple; if the US expects Iran to halt nuclear enrichment, then there can't be a deal," said Mohammad Marandi, a political scientist who was once an adviser on the nuclear issue.
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran says the country's nuclear industry employs 17,000 people, similar to other countries where uranium is enriched for civilian use.
"The Netherlands, Belgium, South Korea, Brazil and Japan enrich (uranium) without possessing nuclear weapons," its spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said.
Iran's enmity with 'Israel', whose main backer is the United States, has been a constant backdrop to the talks.
In a letter to the United Nations, Araghchi wrote: "We believe that in the event of any attack on the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Zionist regime, the US government will also be involved and bear legal responsibility."
The warning came after CNN, citing unnamed US officials, reported 'Israel' was making preparations to carry out such a strike.
The White House said Trump had a "productive discussion" with 'Israeli' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday about Iran and the fatal shooting of two 'Israeli' embassy staff in Washington.
'Irreversible'
Friday's talks take place before an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna in June during which Iran's nuclear activities will be reviewed.
The 2015 deal provides for the possibility of UN sanctions being reimposed through a mechanism called "snapback" if Iran fails to fulfil its commitments.
The agreement's three European parties -- Britain, France and Germany -- have warned they will trigger the mechanism if the continent's security is threatened.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Roya News
9 hours ago
- Roya News
Lebanon: Israel refused inspection request before Beirut strikes
The Lebanese army has accused the Israeli Occupation of undermining a ceasefire agreement by launching new airstrikes and refusing to cooperate with mechanisms aimed at preventing further escalation. In a statement issued Friday, the army condemned "Israel's" ongoing strikes in southern Lebanon and Beirut's southern suburbs, saying the attacks are a 'continuation of its aggression' and a clear breach of the 2024 ceasefire agreement. The military added that its attempts to inspect targeted areas in coordination with the UN monitoring committee were dismissed by "Israeli" forces. 'Despite our coordination efforts with the monitoring committee to prevent an attack, and dispatching patrols to inspect several sites, the Israeli side rejected the proposal,' the army said, warning that Lebanon may reconsider its collaboration with the UN-led ceasefire monitoring mechanism if violations persist. The latest "Israeli" assault, carried out Thursday evening, included eight airstrikes on Beirut's southern suburbs following evacuation warnings. Two additional strikes were reported in Ain Qana, a town in southern Lebanon. This marked the fourth and most intense round of attacks since the ceasefire came into effect on November 27, 2024. Lebanon reaffirmed its commitment to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which outlines the terms of the truce that ended the 2006 war between Hezbollah and "Israel". The resolution mandates a halt in hostilities and calls for Lebanese military control in the south, with support from UN peacekeeping forces. 'The enemy's continued breach of the agreement and refusal to cooperate with the monitoring committee weakens the role of both the committee and the army,' the Lebanese army warned, signaling that continued noncompliance could lead to 'a freeze in cooperation.' In a sharp response, "Israeli" Defense Minister Israel Katz issued a warning of his own, 'Lebanon will enjoy no peace or stability without Israel's security.'


Al Bawaba
14 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Kanye West begs Trump and Elon Musk to "Please Stop Fighting" in viral plea
ALBAWABA - Kanye West jumps into Elon Musk and Donald Trump's viral online feud. Kanye West, now known as Ye, has openly appealed for peace between two of the most divisive people on the internet: tech billionaire Elon Musk and former US President Donald Trump. This is a strange development that could only happen in 2025. As tensions between Trump and Musk reached a dramatic peak this week, the rapper-turned-presidential hopeful-turned-pariah tweeted a call for reconciliation that went viral on X (previously Twitter). 'Broooos, please noooooo ,' Ye shared something on Musk's platform, X. "You two are so loved by us." Broooos please noooooo 🫂 We love you both so much — ye (@kanyewest) June 5, 2025 His remarks coincided with a growing online rivalry between Trump and Elon Musk that has enthralled millions of people and rocked the political and business worlds. Elon Musk's assertion that Donald Trump's name was there in the disclosed Jeffrey Epstein documents sparked the dispute, and it swiftly spread throughout X via fiery threads and viral memes. Trump, who never backs down, responded with a subtly implied threat that if the attacks continue, federal subsidies and government contracts for Musk's businesses, including SpaceX, may be in jeopardy. Trump's words were mostly limited to his Truth Social platform, but Musk's enormous impact on X, where his postings frequently receive hundreds of millions of impressions, far outstripped their reach. Elon Musk taking a picture with his phone \ US President Donald Trump ( SAUL LOEB and NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) There were immediate real-world repercussions from the social media controversy. Investors' cautious and hesitant response to the high-profile controversy hurt Tesla's stock as well as Trump Media & Technology Group's shares. Kanye West's latest foray into the turbulent whirlpool of politics and pop culture is his attempt to mediate a peaceful resolution. Ye was once a strong Trump supporter who visited the White House in 2018 while wearing MAGA caps. He later started his own presidential campaign and broke with both parties. But in recent years, a series of antisemitic outbursts and unpredictable actions have damaged his public image. Restoring public trust has not been greatly aided by his recent attempts to portray those remarks as a "social experiment." LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 02: Kanye West (Photo by Matt Winkelmeyer / Getty Images via AFP) Nevertheless, Kanye West's remark draws attention to the peculiar power dynamics that are currently taking place on digital platforms. Political power used to entail command of the national discourse. It might be the algorithm's owner today, and Musk has the advantage in visibility and narrative control thanks to his hold on X. It's unclear if Kanye West's internet outreach will have any effect. Trump and Elon Musk have yet to directly address the rapper's post. However, Kanye West's straightforward appeal, "Broooos please noooooo," may be the most cohesive message of solidarity we receive during an election season when social media conflict appears to match real policy discussion.


Al Bawaba
14 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Tesla takes a hit as Musk battles Trump
Published June 7th, 2025 - 12:43 GMT ALBAWABA - Tesla Inc. has experienced one of the largest market value declines in its history, shedding nearly $380 billion since the start of 2025, as tensions rise between CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump. Market data shows that Tesla's valuation dropped from $1.3 trillion in early January to $950.63 billion by June 6, a 29.3% decline — the worst performance among major global firms this year. The sharp downturn coincided with an increasingly public dispute between Musk and Trump. The conflict was triggered by Musk's vocal criticism of Trump's new tax and spending bill, which proposes eliminating incentives for electric vehicles. Musk slammed the bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' claiming it would add $2.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Trump responded by suggesting that federal contracts with Musk's companies could be cut, sparking panic among investors. Tesla's stock subsequently plunged 14% in a single trading day, erasing $152 billion from its market value — the largest one-day drop in the company's history. Musk's personal fortune also took a significant hit, shrinking by $34 billion, though he remains the world's richest individual with an estimated net worth of $334.5 billion. The feud escalated further when Trump, who had previously shown public support for Musk by purchasing a Tesla vehicle, said he was considering selling or donating it and referred to Musk as someone who had "lost his mind." — Business Standard (@bsindia) June 7, 2025 Beyond political drama, Tesla is also dealing with weakening demand for electric vehicles, increased competition from both legacy automakers and emerging startups, and declining sales in the European market. As of April, Tesla reported a 71% drop in earnings, further amplifying investor concerns over the company's future. Despite its setbacks, Tesla remains a key player globally, currently ranked 11th in market capitalization. Analysts warn that continued discord between Musk and Trump could have broader implications for the financial markets. With Tesla playing a critical role in major indices and investor portfolios, a prolonged conflict may lead to a market correction ranging from 5% to 10%. Experts point to the Tesla case as a clear example of how political instability and policy uncertainty can significantly impact corporate performance, particularly in sectors like technology and renewable energy that rely heavily on government support. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (