
Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with Nato on defence spending
On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with Nato allies and responded to Mr Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy.
Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez (Omar Havana/AP)
'What is clear is that trade policy is a policy directed from here, from Brussels,' Mr Sanchez said. 'Spain is an open country. It is a country that is friendly to its friends, and we consider the United States a friend of Spain.'
At the military alliance's summit on Wednesday, members agreed to raise their defence spending to 5% of GDP. But Mr Sanchez secured a last-minute exemption, saying that Spain will only spend up to 2.1%, which he called 'sufficient and realistic'.
Mr Trump criticised the country after the summit, saying Spain wanted 'a little bit of a free ride,' and that it would 'have to pay it back to us on trade' through higher tariffs.
How Mr Sanchez's gamble could play out was up for debate on Thursday.
'It is not always easy to interpret exactly what Mr Trump means,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters at an EU summit.
'How he wants to impose import tariffs on Spain separately is a mystery to everyone. Could this perhaps concern specific products from Spain? We will have to wait and see.'
Spain's move on the international stage comes at a complex moment for Mr Sanchez at home as corruption cases involving his inner circle have ensnared his Socialist party and resulted in louder calls — even from some left-wing allies — to announce early elections. So far, Mr Sanchez has refused.
'To Trump's theatre, Mr Sanchez responds with something similar,' said Montserrat Nebrera, political analyst and professor of constitutional law at the International University of Catalonia. 'Domestic problems are piling up, and this resistance to meeting the arbitrary 5% target also seeks to wink at his partners most critical of defence spending.'
Spain is Nato's lowest spender, with just 1.28% of its GDP spent on defence (Omar Havana/AP)
Spain was Nato's lowest spender last year, according to the alliance's estimates, spending around 1.28% of its GDP on defence expenditure.
In April, Mr Sanchez announced that the country would reach 2% this year, for which he was criticised by some left-wing allies.
On Thursday, Antonio Garamendi, president of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations, criticised Mr Sanchez for the spending opt-out.
'We have to stick with our allies and not going along with the other Europeans is an error, and even more so if that increases the chance we will be punished,' Mr Garamendi said.
While Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries, it could still be targeted by tariffs that hit its most vulnerable industries, Mr Garamendi said.
He specifically pointed to Spanish steel, cars and olive oil sectors.
'There are industries that can be impacted, and that has to concern us,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Why an independent Scotland should stay well away from Nato
Even more nauseating was the shameless brown-nosing of Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who offered Trump his 'congratulations' on what he called the US president's 'decisive action in Iran'. Trump's spectacularly dangerous and inflammatory assault on the Islamic Republic was, Rutte snivelled, 'truly extraordinary and something no-one else dared to do. It makes us all safer'. On the 5% commitment, Rutte grovelled: 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' READ MORE: Humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach Gaza, John Swinney says Rutte, with this display of arse kissing, has given Keir Starmer a run for his money where obsequious flattery towards the president is concerned. What Rutte means by European member states paying in a 'BIG way' for their Nato membership is that their citizens will pay the price in cuts to health, education and other social spending. When the Spanish delegation dared to suggest that its fiscal sovereignty belongs not to Nato but to its own parliament, Trump threatened Spain with economic sanctions. The US president is keen to be seen as a strongman. He left The Hague able to boast that he forced a deal whereby the US only agreed to uphold Nato's totemic Article 5 (the 'one for all, and all for one' clause that ensures collective defence among Nato members) after extracting the 5% commitment. However, the agreement reflects not the US's strength, but its relative weakness. Despite its seeming victory over the old Soviet Union, the US empire has suffered a long period of decline. Catastrophic defeats in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan have exposed the dangers of imperial overreach on the part of a US federal state that thought it had an unchallengeable global hegemony. (Image: Julia Demaree Nikhinson, via REUTERS) Trump's foreign policy – which, ironically, is based upon former president Barack Obama's 'pivot to Asia' – involves a tacit acknowledgement that a rising China threatens the US's position as the dominant world power. It is also an admission that the great US imperium cannot attempt to counter Chinese power in the South China Sea and the wider Asia-Pacific region while maintaining its current level of military expenditure in Europe. That is the fundamental reason for the 5% agreement. Trump's bullying is par for the course for a Western nuclear alliance that was established in 1949 as a belligerent creature of the Cold War. Now as then, Nato is predicated not on peacemaking diplomacy, but upon a sabre-rattling, militarist stance against its perceived enemies. In 1949, those enemies were the Soviet Union and its allied Warsaw Pact countries. Today they are Vladimir Putin's Russian Federation and Alexander Lukashenko's Belarus. (Image: Sergey Bobylev via REUTERS) Far from being a defender of the 'free world', the founding states of Nato included the brutal fascist dictatorship of António de Oliveira Salazar in Portugal. Following their coup d'état in 1967, the Greek colonels' fascistic junta was accepted readily as a Nato member. Little has changed. In the Nato 'family photo' taken in The Hague this week Starmer is – appropriately enough – sandwiched between two semi-fascists: namely, Trump and Türkiye's authoritarian president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Standing behind them is the ideological talisman of the global far right, Hungary's dangerously racist and antisemitic prime minister Viktor Orban. By contrast, standing on the outer edge of the group is Canadian prime minister Mark Carney. Having pledged Canadian 'elbows up' in the face of Trump's threat to his country's sovereignty, Carney stands, elbows down, having agreed to the US's 5% demand. All of which poses tough questions for the current party of Scottish government. The SNP aspire for an independent Scotland to be a member of Nato, yet also free of nuclear weapons. As this week's Nato summit underlines, the SNP's desire to join Nato would involve our country relinquishing a significant proportion of its hard-won economic sovereignty. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Keir Starmer's in an historic mess. There's only one person to blame Scotland's admission would be dependent upon 5% of GDP being spent on the military, with devastating implications for spending on social goods such as health, social care, education and housing. If the fiscal implications of Nato membership are deeply worrying, the idea that an independent Scotland could join while simultaneously removing British nuclear submarines from the Firth of Clyde is naive at best. It is impossible to imagine Scotland's accession to Nato being granted without Holyrood agreeing, at the very least to lease the Faslane nuclear base to the UK Government for an extended period. The rationale would be that the Westminster administration would require Faslane until such time as it identified a site for, and then built, a new nuclear submarine base. In any case, it is hard to imagine a scenario in which a UK lease on Faslane was not negotiated and renegotiated in perpetuity, keeping nukes on the Clyde on a permanent basis. Nato membership would make the SNP's longstanding opposition to nuclear weapons a dead letter. From its highly dubious beginnings to its current recalibration in the face of the decline of the American empire, Nato is not a club that any progressive government should want to belong to. An independent Scotland would do well to follow the lead of our Irish neighbours and keep well out of it.


Sky News
40 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump's Pentagon vs the press: What comes next?
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump's defence secretary, launched a tirade against the media yesterday as the row over the impact of the US strikes on Iran rumbles on. James Matthews and Mark Stone digest a dizzying week, and explore the questions that still remain over America's campaign in Iran. They also discuss Trump's deportation policy that's still continuing apace in the background. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
How Europe's militaries depend on US supplies; a big inflation burger; and summer holiday trends
Hello and welcome to another edition of The Crunch! In this week's newsletter we have charts on strangers talking for 30 minutes, the unequal distribution of AI computing, when different European countries go on holiday, how dependent European countries are on US arms sales, various maps and charts about war in the Middle East, and more. Woodside's North West Shelf gas project on the Burrup peninsula in Western Australia is one of the world's largest liquefied natural gas ventures. In May the Labor government approved an extension for the project to run for an additional 40 years, from 2030 to 2070. The extension is expected to be responsible for about 87.9m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent every year in the decades ahead, after the gas has been exported and burned. Our latest One Big Chart puts that number into context. 1. The global AI divide This chart from the New York Times shows how the AI boom is unevenly distributed, with certain countries and companies dominating the market for AI datacentres: You can read more here. 2. How Europe's militaries depend on the US Europe's militaries still overwhelmingly rely on US-made weapons and equipment, according to Guardian analysis of stockpile data that raises doubts about ambitions for European-led rearmament. This visual analysis by my colleague Alex Clark shows the source of arms sales to European countries over the years, in the context of the US pushing for increased military spending by Nato members. Check out the full piece for more charts and analysis. 3. ♪ We're all going on a summer holiday ♪ Consider this chart a mental holiday from the rest of news. Sebastian Gräff from the European Correspondent has visualised when holidays peak in different European countries: Northern European countries go on holiday earlier, with breaks more spread out, while southern European countries go on holiday later, and with holiday times more concentrated over the same weeks. Sign up to The Crunch Our data journalists showcase the most important charts and dataviz from the Guardian and around the web, free every fortnight after newsletter promotion 4. It's a big inflation-burger The winners of the Information is Beautiful awards have been announced, and this piece from the ABC in Australia took out the silver in the Business Analytics category. We have featured this piece before, but it reminded me again of how much I liked it! You think you're getting a straightforward explainer about inflation (which you are), but then it turns into an illustration of how multinational companies are able to manipulate intellectual property payments to themselves to send money offshore. How effective was the US attack on Iran's nuclear sites? A visual guide Mapping the conflict between Israel and Iran Mideast conflict imperils a tiny waterway vital to the world economy It's another banger by Alvin Chang for the Pudding! This visual essay illustrates the participants and effects of an experiment which paid participants to have a 30-minute conversation with a complete stranger. It is fascinating, and I love the ASCII art style. Enjoying The Crunch? If you like what you see and think you might know someone else who would enjoy it, please forward this email or send them a link to the sign up page. If you have a chart tip or technical issue viewing this newsletter, please reply to this email. If you are a Guardian supporter and need assistance with regards to contributions and/or digital subscriptions, please email