Texas doctor responds after controversial post about flood victims
Propst's (pictured) post went viral last weekend after a screenshot of it was shared across multiple social media platforms, resulting in calls for her termination and to have her medical license revoked. The Houston-based doctor has now issued a public apology - but still had the nerve to temper it and play the victim. She now claims she didn't realize at the time how many had died and that her post was 'being shared with the false impression that I made it after the devastating loss of life was known'.
'I speak to you as a mother, a neighbor, a pediatrician, and a human being who is deeply sorry,' Propst wrote Wednesday in a statement published by KPRC . 'I understand my comment caused immense pain to those suffering indescribable grief and for that I am truly sorry.' She said she wanted to 'apologize to each and every individual suffering through terrible loss in this difficult time'. The catastrophic flash floods have killed at least 120 people, with over 170 who are still missing also presumed dead.
Propst also urged the community not to direct 'responsibility or harassment' towards her former employer Blue Fish Pediatrics. 'They are kind, hard-working, dedicated pediatricians who had no role in this whatsoever,' she said of her ex-colleagues. 'Perhaps my biggest regret is that my words are now serving as a distraction from our shared responsibility to heal the pain and suffering of those whose lives have been forever changed by unspeakable loss, and to take every step to ensure such a disaster never occurs again.'
Blue Fish Pediatrics distanced itself from Propst in a statement Saturday night in which the practice disavowed her comments. 'We are aware that a personal social media comment by one of our physicians has caused significant hurt and outrage,' the statement read. 'The content and timing of that post do not reflect the values, standards, or mission of Blue Fish Pediatrics.
'We want to be clear: we do not support or condone any statement that politicizes tragedy, diminishes human dignity, or fails to clearly uphold compassion for every child and family, regardless of background or beliefs. 'Our practice exists for one purpose only - to provide excellent, loving, and respectful care to all children and their families.
'Our patients come from every walk of life, every political belief, and every background, and we are honored to serve each of them with empathy and integrity. 'In moments of crisis, we believe in unity over division, healing over judgment, and humility over rhetoric. We are taking this matter seriously, reviewing it internally, and have placed the physician on administrative leave.' The practice later added that 'the individual is no longer employed.'
The head of the Texas Medical Board Dr. Sherif Zaafran also shared Blue Fish's message and added: 'There is no place for politicization. The entire focus needs to be on looking for survivors. Any complaints we may receive will be thoroughly investigated.' Propst's profile has been removed from both the Blue Fish Pediatrics and Children's Memorial Hermann hospital websites.
Friday's flash flooding that has left more than 120 people dead, including dozens of children, across the Texas Hill Country region. The confirmed death toll is expected to rise as the urgent search for more than 170 people still missing entered a seventh day. Hundreds of workers in Kerr County and other central Texas communities continue to comb through piles of muddy debris, but there have been no live rescues reported this week.
President Donald Trump is preparing to visit the disaster zone Friday with First Lady Melania Trump. The floods are now one of the deadliest natural disasters in Texas history. It is also the deadliest from inland flooding in the US since 1976, when Colorado's Big Thompson Canyon flooded, killing 144 people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ghislaine Maxwell's former cellmate shares chilling premonition of what she thinks will happen to Epstein's fixer
's former cellmate shared a chilling premonition after Jeffrey Epstein 's former accomplice revealed she would 'tell all' about the pedophile's sex trafficking scheme. Jessica Watkins, a transgender veteran who was serving time for the January 6 riots before receiving a pardon by Donald Trump, suggested 63-year-old Maxwell could meet the same fate as Epstein, who was found dead in his prison cell. 'Just putting this out there: I know Ghislaine Maxwell personally when I was in prison with her. She isn't suicidal in the least,' Watkins posted on X. 'There are also virtually no working cameras in FCI Tallahassee,' she added in an apparent reference to the suspicious coincidences around Epstein's death, which was ruled a suicide. Watkins claimed that only 'maybe ten' cameras in the 'entire' prison were present or working. 'Just getting ahead of potential narratives,' Watkins said. Her chilling post implied Maxwell's life may be in danger after she expressed willingness to testify before Congress about the so-called Epstein list. It comes amid a furious civil war between Trump's top MAGA lieutenants after the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation stated there was no evidence that Epstein possessed a client list or "blackmailed prominent individuals". Watkins said that should Maxwell ' would not [be] by her own hand.' 'She also doesn't do drugs, is in good health, and works out everyday, so no "old age" or "natural causes" arguments will work either,' Watkins wrote. Watkins's warnings about her former cell mate come as a source claimed that Ghislaine Maxwell is willing to reveal the 'truth' on The Epstein Files in front of Congress Watkins said Maxwell was drawn to her as the only other 'celebrity inmate' in the Florida prison, based on her being named as Trump's codefendant in a January 6 legal case. 'Fortunately,' Maxwell was 'actually very nice' and a 'staunch advocate for her fellow inmates,' Watkins said, adding that that Epstein's accomplice lives in an 'open dorm' and had 'about 50 witnesses' who have eyes and ears on her at all times. . She describe Maxwell as a 'model inmate' who was 'sociable and kind.' 'So most people were nice to her. Doesn't mean she didn't do something evil,' Watkins wrote. 'But generally, she kept to herself.' 'She's safer there than in the SHU (Special Housing Unit- The Hole). They sent her there sometimes for talking to the Media,' she added. Watkins was sentenced to eight and a half years prison for charges connected to the January 6 Capitol riot, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, interfering with law enforcement officers during a civil disorder, and conspiracy to prevent an officer from discharging duties. The former 'Oath Keeper' was released in January after Trump commuted sentences to 'time served'. 'In my mind I thought it was this heroic American moment where I thought people were going into our house, we were going to be heard,' Watkins said. 'It was this moment where I lost all basic objectivity. I wasn't doing security anymore; I wasn't medic Jess anymore. I was just another idiot.' While the pardoned Jan 6 rioter said she and Maxwell were 'not friends at all,' they lived and worked together closely while behind bars. 'She always creeped me out, so I avoided her when I could . But even still, we talked often enough. In prison, it's kinda unavoidable,' she said. Watkins claimed that Maxwell was 'very tight lipped' about her case, but wrote: 'She did tell me (and I quote) "They had no interest in me until Jeffrey... died".' However, Maxwell allegedly asked members of the media, 'Why do you keep asking about [Trump], and not the Clintons?,' Watkins claimed. Maxwell is serving 20 years for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple minor girls with Epstein over the course of a decade. Epstein allegedly controlled a web of underage girls who claimed they were passed around as sex toys to his wealthy friends and billionaire business associates. A source told Daily Mail that 'she would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story.' 'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal,' the source said. 'No-one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows. She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth.' Maxwell argues she should have been protected from prosecution as part of a Non Prosecution Agreement made by Epstein - her former lover and boss - in 2007 when he agreed to plead guilty to two minor charges of prostitution in a 'sweetheart deal' which saw him spend little time behind bars. Controversy continues to rage over the Department of Justice's statement that there is no Epstein 'client list', despite the release of videos from inside New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center the DOJ claims 'proves' he committed suicide. Critics have pointed to the fact that there is a crucial minute missing from the jail house video that also does not show the door or, indeed, the inside of Epstein's jail cell. The scandal - and alleged 'cover up' - has prompted a rebellion amongst President Trump's loyal MAGA base. Some even believe Attorney General Pam Bondi should be fired after promising to release all files relating to Epstein and his high-profile male friends only to apparently renege on that promise. 'Congressional hearings have been held into everything from JFK's assassination to 9/11. The Epstein Files rank up there with those cases. Ghislaine would be willing to speak before Congress and tell her story,' the source close to Maxwell said. Maxwell had her appeal to overturn her conviction turned down yesterday. Her attorneys then appealed directly to President Trump, calling him the 'ultimate dealmaker,' in the hopes that he may overrule Attorney General Pam Bondi. The White House, however, dismissed any suggestion that the President would pardon Maxwell. 'There have been no discussions or consideration of a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, and there never will be,' a senior White House official told the Daily Mail. Outcry for Maxwell's release increased after she revealed she would be willing to testify to Congress about the case against Epstein.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk's Grok chatbot melts down – and then wins a military contract
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. This week, Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, saw its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok go Nazi. Then its CEO resigned. In the past three years of Musk's ownership of the social network, it feels like X has weathered at least one public crisis per week, more often multiple. Last week, Musk's artificial intelligence firm, xAI, saw its flagship chatbot Grok declare itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler'. It made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts, which the company deleted. One example, via my colleague Josh Taylor: Grok referred to a person with a common Jewish surname as someone who was 'celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids' in the Texas floods as 'future fascists'. xAI apologized for the bot's 'horrific behavior'. Earlier in the week, Musk himself had handed down a mandate that Grok be less 'woke'. In spite of the meltdown, xAI announced on Monday that it had won a contact of up to $200m with the US Department of Defense along with other major AI developers. The deal is for developing and implementing artificial intelligence tools for the agency. This contract may be the most blatant example of Musk flexing his newfound connections in government that the public has seen yet. Despite Grok's flailing and incendiary output, xAI has been rewarded alongside firms that have demonstrated far superior control of their AI products. Other companies in the group of contract winners, which include Google, OpenAI and Anthropic, have demonstrated the viability of their chatbots and implemented robust guardrails against offensive output. All three firms make public commitments to safety testing. Grok, by contrast, has made headlines repeatedly for its controversial and offensive output, as in May when it ranted about 'white genocide' in May, echoing Musk's own talking points. Musk's most notable comments on his AI's safeguards have been that they are too restrictive. My colleague Nick Robins-Early points out that xAI is reaching for revenue and investment anywhere it can get it: The DoD's contract will give xAI a boost of revenue as it seeks to compete with more established AI developers like OpenAI, which is led by Musk's former associate turned rival, Sam Altman. Musk has been heavily promoting xAI and attempting to use other parts of his tech empire to support its future, including having SpaceX invest $2bn into the startup, allowing it to acquire X, formerly, Twitter, and announcing on Sunday that Tesla shareholders will vote on their own investment in xAI. The world's richest person seems to be growing desperate as a result of the turmoil roiling his kingdom. He has said he will form an independent political party. xAI is pursuing financial Jenga. Tesla's sales are plummeting; its wobbly Robotaxis are under investigation. SpaceX's giant rockets keep exploding after liftoff. Nick Robins-Early again: Musk has found himself embroiled in controversy outside of X in recent months. His political alliance with Donald Trump, which began during the 2024 campaign and resulted in Musk's appointment as a special government employee and the creation of the so-called 'department of government efficiency', imploded in June in full public view. The tech tycoon has committed to starting an independent political party. Meanwhile, Tesla, the source of the majority of Musk's wealth, has seen its sales fall precipitously in response to his political activities, with prospective buyers and current owners alike shying away from the controversial CEO. SpaceX, Musk's rocket company, has struggled with its latest rocket, the massive Starship, which has repeatedly exploded after liftoff. On Wednesday, X's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, announced she would step down from her role at the social network. It was the day after Grok went Nazi. My colleagues Johana Bhuiyan and Nick Robins-Early assessed Yaccarino's tenure: In two years, Yaccarino has had to contend with the unpredictability of Musk, ongoing content moderation and hate speech issues on the platform, increasingly strained relationships with advertisers and widespread backlash her boss received for his role in Donald Trump's administration. Her response in some cases was to remain silent; in others, she chose to defend the company. Through it all, however, experts say it was clear Yaccarino was the chief executive in title only. Rather than become a destination for mainstream talent, a streaming powerhouse or the 'everything app' that Yaccarino promoted, X has largely become a megaphone for Musk to air his grievances, boost and then feud with Trump, and promote his companies. Far-right influencers, porn spambots and meme accounts proliferate, while many media outlets have deprioritized the platform or left it altogether. Misinformation and extremism are rampant, sometimes coming from Musk himself. When Yaccarino was hired, the Guardian published a story headlined 'Linda Yaccarino: does Twitter's CEO have the most difficult job in tech?'. The article describes the obstacles facing Yaccarino at the start of her tenure, which she never overcame. Two years later, we can say with certainty that she did have the most impossible job in tech: reining in Musk. My colleague Kari Paul reported in 2023: Musk promised to bring in a new CEO – a position he himself described as a 'painful' job that anyone would be 'foolish' to take on. When Yaccarino was appointed as the company's first female CEO, there was much talk about her standing on a 'glass cliff' – a concept that has emerged through research positing that women are more likely to be promoted to higher positions when companies are in crisis and failure is more likely. Much of her success, analysts said, would depend on how much Musk was willing to share control. The chaotic nature of the X announcement for some has dashed the hope that Yaccarino can clean up Musk's mess. Twitter has been in a downward spiral since Musk took over, grappling with a $13bn debt burden and a massive exodus of advertisers – historically the company's main source of income. Twitter is looking for new revenue streams, and the 'everything app' could be a path to doing so. 'If she's successful, she goes down in the history books. And if not, she becomes a footnote,' said Jasmine Enberg, social media analyst at the market research firm Insider Intelligence. Sony WH-1000XM6 review: raising the bar for noise-cancelling headphones 'I was nervous to ask for your socials': why missed connection posts are making a comeback Nvidia becomes first company to reach $4tn in market value Amazon asks corporate workers to 'volunteer' help with grocery deliveries as Prime Day frenzy approaches An AI-generated band got 1m plays on Spotify. Now music insiders say listeners should be warned Musk's giant Tesla factory casts shadow on lives in a quiet corner of Germany Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews 'I felt pure, unconditional love': the people who marry their AI chatbots
New Statesman
3 hours ago
- New Statesman
Donald Trump can't escape Jeffrey Epstein
Photo byOne of the biggest risks for the survival of any cult is when the leader starts making promises he can't keep. Doomsday prophets can get a few predictions wrong, but there are only so many times one can delay the apocalypse, reschedule the messiah's second coming, or postpone the spaceship before suspicions rise and sceptics start to leave. In the best-case scenarios, loyalty to the leader dissolves before his (and it's almost always his) familiar unravelling occurs – because then cults seem to inevitably devolve into drugs and child brides and weapon stockpiles and mass suicides. For those who want to see cult followers break free, it helps to nurture any seeds of doubt rather than jump to admonishment about how they should have known better. We should keep these lessons in mind as some Maga loyalists are now wondering why Donald Trump hasn't released the long-promised Jeffrey Epstein files. Trump has for years now promised to drain the swamp, and stoked suspicions about powerful and shadowy figures conspiring against the American people and their could-be saviour, Donald Trump. For reasons I will not pretend to understand, sex-trafficked children are core to Maga conspiracy theories, including QAnon. And so when Jeffrey Epstein, who had connections to some of the world's most powerful men and was accused of sex trafficking underage girls, died in prison in 2019 under odd circumstances in what investigators said was a suicide, well – it's not hard to see why the case was absolute conspiracy-bait. Trump and many high-profile members of his administration were happy to take advantage of their followers' fears by telling them that the Epstein case was an epic coverup, probably protecting various high-profile Democrats. They promised to dedicate significant resources to the Epstein case files, and to finally reveal the truth. A list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, attorney general Pam Bondi said not so long ago, is 'sitting on my desk right now to review'. Before he was Trump's FBI director, Kash Patel told conservative radio host Glenn Beck that Epstein's 'black book' was 'under direct control of the director of the FBI'. But just a few days ago Bondi's Department of Justice and Patel's FBI released a statement saying that, in fact, there was no client list or black book, that they wouldn't be releasing much else about Epstein, and that everyone should move along. Given that Maga followers have repeatedly done whatever Trump asked and have denied obvious wrongdoing happening before their eyes, one can't really blame the administration for assuming they could guide their flock away from this potential quagmire as well. They were spectacularly wrong. This administration lies all the time; its members lie so often that it's hard for fact-checkers to keep up. Many people outside of the Maga-verse remain confused about how such a blatantly dishonest group of painfully unqualified people have not only weaselled their way into power, but enjoy the obsessive devotion of millions of Americans who are convinced that Trump and his lackeys are the answer to sleaze and corruption in Washington, not the ones taking both to new heights. The truth is that Maga devotees exist largely in the closed information universes of Fox News, One America News Network, Newsmax, right-wing podcasts, and their own tightly tailored social media algorithms, all of which hammer home the point that the mainstream media is one of many deadly enemies – and that enemies will lie in order to vilify Trump. But these same outlets have also spent years frothing over the admittedly extremely fishy Epstein case. They have turned the Epstein story into ground zero of conspiracy theories about a global cabal of paedophiles that extends from the British royal family to DC pizza parlours, and positioned Trump as the hero who would finally liberate the trafficked children, expose their abusers, and save the republic from the depraved elite. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Much of this is very obviously nuts. But some of the Epstein-specific questions do seem legitimate. How did Epstein amass such wealth and influence? How was he able to commit suicide despite being not only on suicide watch, but one of the most famous inmates on the planet? The Department of Justice released prison surveillance footage of the night Epstein died but it has only raised more questions. How is it that not only was no one apparently watching him, but the relevant security cameras seem to have malfunctioned at the critical moments? And now: what information is in the Epstein files that turned the Attorney General and the FBI director from people who declared that a nation-changing scandal was afoot into those who released a neutered memo concluding that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted' in the case? What might have turned the president from a man who has encouraged Epstein conspiracy theories and into a person who now seems to have Epstein amnesia? 'Let's not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,' the president implored on Truth Social. Except that Maga has spent years caring about Jeffrey Epstein very much. Over the weekend, some of Maga's most influential activists and talking heads gathered at the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa Bay, Florida. When Fox News host Laura Ingraham took the stage, she asked audience members, 'How many of you are satisfied with the results of the Epstein investigation?' The crowd booed. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson was even more direct: 'The fact that the US government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said 'Case closed. Shut up, conspiracy theorist' was too much for me,' he said. 'And I don't think the rest of us should be satisfied with that.' Democrats have an incredible opportunity here to sow more doubts among these burgeoning doubtful. Some are starting: California representative Ro Khanna attached an amendment to Republican-supported cryptocurrency and defence spending legislation that would have required the Department of Justice to release all their files on Epstein; Republicans blocked it, practically handing Democrats a pre-written midterm ad script. Other Democrats should similarly push Republicans to answer for the Epstein secrecy, and use this moment to encourage the growing chorus of questions. Right now, the ire is mostly aimed at Bondi, and Democrats shouldn't overplay their hand by expecting this to be the moment that Maga loyalists suddenly see their emperor stark naked. But liberals should publicly note: Trump is the President of the United States, his team works in his service, and he seems awfully eager for the Epstein files to go away. Why might that be? Are there other instances of inexplicable Trump behaviour that deserve a second look? Maybe accepting a new luxury jet to be used as Air Force One and then a personal plane, not from domestic manufacturers, but from Qatar? These would be good questions for Democrats to raise when, say, they appear on any Fox News show or conservative podcasts. Regular real-world liberals can do the same in personal conversations with Maga relatives or acquaintances. The key isn't to rant about Trump's corruption and how his administration is the swamp; it's to puncture the echo chamber, and seed doubts that conservatives can see repeated in conservative media and among their conservative cohort. Powerful cults rarely see a mass exodus of followers even after a big promised event fails to take place. But America doesn't need Maga to fall apart entirely; we just need enough followers to come to their senses to turn Trump's base from GOP mainstream to laughingstock fringe – or at least enough to allow Democrats to trounce Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections. Trump gained popularity by appealing to the angry, the resentful, and the paranoid. He spoke to them in the language of conspiracy and coverup. His followers are suspicious of nearly all of those in power, except, of course, Trump himself. How satisfying it will be when more of them start to realise that the man who promised to drain the swamp is actually the king of it. [Further reading: The plot against Zohran Mamdani] Related
