Yukon miner's upcoming season in limbo as he waits longer than expected for permit renewal
Riley Gibson was born and raised in the Yukon and he co-owns a placer mining company that has been operating since 2016, first mining in the Kluane area, and now operating a site in the Duncan Creek area between Mayo and Keno City.
Gibson said his 10-year mining permit expires this year so he applied last April for a new one through the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB), anticipating he'd have it in time for the start of the season this spring.
According to Gibson, and confirmed by YESAB, a class 4 placer project's application can take between eight and 10 months to process. After the board reviews an application, it recommends whether a project should proceed and under what conditions.
It's then up to a decision body — typically formed by the territorial and local First Nation governments — to approve the permit or not.
Gibson says it's been 11 months and he hasn't received a response whether his permit will be renewed or not.
He says his company employs a handful of people each year, and the longer his permit is held up, the longer it'll be before he and his employees can get back to work.
"There's very little we can do on site," Gibson said. "We can't operate any machinery, we can't do any reclamation, we can't maintain any diversions of Duncan Creek we've done. These things need to be monitored. We can't do anything if we don't get this decision document."
Gibson explained that once the mining permit is granted, he then has to apply for a water licence through the Yukon Water Board, something he said could take up to four months if everything goes smoothly.
At this rate, Gibson said if he doesn't get his permits now, he and his crew may have to find work elsewhere this summer.
"We've been trying to talk to everybody as respectfully as we can and it doesn't seem like we're getting anywhere," Gibson said. "I feel there's a lot of complacency and indifference in the permitting process right now and it's letting a lot of people down.
"We're not fancy, rich miners. We're just trying to make a living."
Working through the backlog
Kent Bretzlaff, YESAB's executive director, said recommendations for Gibson's application were issued to the decision body on Dec. 9.
Bretzlaff said he understands how Gibson is feeling but that he isn't the only proponent waiting in queue for an application to get processed. He said the number of placer mining projects increases on a yearly basis, and his staff are doing their best to keep up but sometimes there are delays.
"We have double the amount of placer projects in our process now than we did this time last year," Bretzlaff said.
Bretzlaff said in the past two months, his office has received 42 project applications.
"The reality is, we keep getting more and more projects," Bretzlaff said. "We'll be as transparent as we can about expectations but for proponents, I encourage them to reach out to us too, to understand what's going on."
Bretzlaff said YESAB has done its part and now the decision for Gibson's placer mining permit lies in the hands of the decision body — the Yukon government, and the First Nation of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun.
Jay Chou, acting director with mineral resources branch of Yukon's department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, said that Gibson's application is still being discussed and he could not provide any details or timelines for when a decision will be issued.
He said it has taken longer than expected but it's important to ensure First Nation governments are involved with the process and sometimes more time is needed to come to a decision.
"The legislative timelines to issue a decision document under the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economical Assessment Act is 30 days," Chou said. "On average over the last few years, for the decision document for placer projects, we're seeing an average of 60 days or so."
Chou said his department is actively working on Gibson's file, as well as many others at this time.
He said on average his department consults on approximately 500 to 600 different projects a year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
3 days ago
- Cision Canada
Government of Canada launches Cyber Security Cooperation Program 2025 Français
OTTAWA, ONT, Aug. 14, 2025 /CNW/ - Today, the Honourable Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety, announced a new call for proposals under the 2025 Cyber Security Cooperation Program (CSCP), to strengthen the country's cyber resilience and address evolving cyber threats. Originally launched in 2019, the CSCP provided funding to projects that improved the security of Canada's vital cyber systems. CSCP 2025 will build on the success of its last call for proposals to provide up to $10.3 million over five years to support initiatives that promote cyber security innovation, knowledge sharing, and capacity building. The CSCP is a key component of Canada's new National Cyber Security Strategy. The new call for proposals will help support the Strategy's goals by funding grassroots and institutional efforts for a secure and resilient Canadian cyberspace. Applications for funding are now open, and interested organizations are encouraged to visit the CSCP page for more information, including a list of priority areas and Terms and Conditions. Quote "Cyber threats are becoming more sophisticated and frequent, creating risks for our personal privacy, our economy, and critical infrastructure. The 2025 Cyber Security Cooperation Program will help Canadian organizations to work together to build a safer and more secure digital environment for everyone." - The Honourable Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety Quick Facts The call for proposals for CSCP 2025 will be open from August 14, 2025 to September 25, 2025. Eligible recipients include Canadian not-for-profit organizations; Canadian academia and research institutions; Indigenous (First Nation, Inuit, or Métis) governments and organizations; provincial, territorial, and municipal governments and authorities; and, Canadian for-profit organizations. Funding proposals will be evaluated by a panel of Government of Canada cyber security experts. Associated Links Stay connected
Winnipeg Free Press
09-08-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brokenhead voters reject Sio Silica sand mine proposal
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation has rejected a partnership with sand-mining company Sio Silica, turning down a deal projected to generate up to $20 million in annual revenue for the reserve. In a one-week referendum, 181 band members voted against working with the Alberta-based company, while 129 voted in favour. 'We would like to thank everyone who participated in the recent referendum, and our council respects the decision and will proceed in the direction provided by our members,' Brokenhead's chief and council said in a Facebook post. Brokenhead member Taylor Galvin, a vocal critic of the proposed partnership, said she is 'on Cloud Nine.' She organized a demonstration against the mining project on Friday morning, the final day of voting. 'There's been a lot of work and advocacy going on, building up to this day.' Sio Silica is seeking provincial approval for mining operations in southeastern Manitoba. Its proposal includes drilling thousands of wells to extract silica sand, a critical mineral used to develop a variety of goods and electronics. The proposed mine does not fall on Brokenhead lands, but Sio Silica sought support from the First Nation in exchange for five per cent of the project's annual profits and a promise of jobs and training opportunities. In a statement, Sio Silica president Carla Devlin said her company respects the community's decision but noted 'it is difficult to see how widespread misinformation influenced' conversation about the issue. 'Our project is built on science, rigorous environmental oversight and a commitment to share its benefits with First Nations. This is an opportunity to position Manitoba as leaders in critical minerals, proving that the economy and the environment are not opposing forces,' Devlin said. 'The mining industry needs help from all stakeholders to ensure the public debate is based on facts, not fear, and to remind people that mining is essential to daily life.' Critics of the plan have raised concerns about the project's potential impact on an underground aquifer, fearing operations could compromise its geological stability and impact water quality. Manitoba's Clean Environment Commission reviewed the project and produced a report in 2023 that flagged similar concerns. The NDP government denied Sio Silica's environmental licences in February 2024, saying the risks outweighed potential benefits. Devlin told the Free Press last week that Sio Silica intends to reapply for its licence before the end of the month. She said Friday that the company remains committed to that goal, and to pursuing partnerships in which Indigenous communities benefit from the project. About 60 people gathered in protest outside the Private Thomas Chief Memorial Centre in Brokenhead on Friday, where band members were able to vote in-person before the referendum closed. Voting started online Aug. 1. Galvinc riticized the short voting window, noting it launched ahead of a long weekend and the community's annual Treaty Days celebration. Brokenhead officials pushed back against her assessment in a statement published on the band website this week. 'The vote was scheduled at a time when most members are available and gathered in (the) community to ensure maximum participation and transparency,' it said. The statement said council members were not taking a position on the referendum and were seeking input from members before continued talks with Sio Silica. 'This is why we are holding a referendum — to allow all eligible community members to have their say and determine the direction collectively,' it said. Tyler SearleReporter Tyler Searle is a multimedia producer who writes for the Free Press's city desk. A graduate of Red River College Polytechnic's creative communications program, he wrote for the Stonewall Teulon Tribune, Selkirk Record and Express Weekly News before joining the paper in 2022. Read more about Tyler. Every piece of reporting Tyler produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Globe and Mail
07-08-2025
- Globe and Mail
Ontario First Nation seeks injunction halting Ring of Fire mining development
An Ontario First Nation that has worked toward road access to the mineral-rich Ring of Fire on its traditional territory is now asking the courts to prevent the provincial and federal governments from mineral development in the region. Marten Falls First Nation, located about 400 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay, has filed a statement of claim asking for interim and permanent injunctions preventing Ontario and Canada from funding or participating in mining-related activities in the Ring of Fire. The claim centres on a series of massive projects between the 1930s and 1950s that the First Nation says diverted river systems on their territory using dams and artificial channels to benefit residents and industry in the southern part of the province and harmed their way of life. The First Nation now worries that a pair of contentious federal and provincial laws known as Bill C-5 and Bill 5 could be used to push through Ring of Fire development, including hydroelectric projects to serve as a power supply, over environmental concerns. Carney meets with Métis leaders on Bill C-5 despite prominent group's absence Premiers say buy-in needed from Indigenous leaders on major projects Chief Bruce Achneepineskum said his people have seen the ill-effects of development on their territory without their consent, with the water diversion destroying fish populations and drying up canoe routes, and they do not want it to happen again. 'Our people have been sickened, physically, emotionally and spiritually, mentally by the Crown's theft of our waters, and now, once again, the governments of Ontario and Canada want to move forward more development, more dams, more mines and more taken from our people,' he said Thursday at a press conference. Bill C-5 allows cabinet to quickly grant federal approvals for big projects deemed to be in the national interest such as mines, ports and pipelines by sidestepping existing laws, while Ontario's bill allows its cabinet to suspend provincial and municipal laws through the creation of so-called 'special economic zones.' The laws are designed to override environmental protections and push through development quickly, Achneepineskum said. 'The governments are passing these laws to immunize themselves from accountability, even though they knowingly violate our rights, even when they know that their decisions are causing us harm,' he said. 'Well, we are here to say, 'No more.'' Marten Falls First Nation has been working on environmental assessments for roads that would both connect its community to the provincial highway system and lead to the Ring of Fire. Two First Nations involved in Ontario's Ring of Fire project speak out against new mining law An Ontario government spokesperson said in a statement that Marten Falls has shown 'steadfast support' for the Ring of Fire since 2018. 'We are looking at all options to continue moving this multi-generational project of national significance forward,' Erika Robson wrote. 'We remain focused on building consensus with First Nations on shared priorities including all-season roads and resource development, that support long-term prosperity.' Marten Falls' court filing comes just weeks after nine Ontario First Nations launched their own legal challenge to Bill C-5 and Bill 5. The Indigenous communities say the laws represent a 'clear and present danger' to the First Nations' self-determination rights to ways of life on their territories. Despite assurances from both levels of government that Indigenous communities will be consulted, they do not believe consultation will be meaningful and fulfil the governments' obligations to them. Achneepineskum said his community has so far not been involved in any substantial talks to that end. 'Seemingly, it's the status quo of what happened with the diversion dam projects that we're being overrun, but talked to in a nice way,' he said. When confronted with criticism over Bill 5, Premier Doug Ford has previously hailed Marten Falls, Webequie First Nation and Aroland First Nation as examples of 'progressive' communities that want development and the prosperity that comes with it. But not only is Marten Falls seeking an injunction against it, Aroland was also one of the nine communities to challenge the bill.
