Social media platforms remove 159,518 harmful content
He said the figure is part of 174,473 online content takedown requests made so far this year.
'Of the total, nearly 160,000 pieces of content have been taken down, with 51 per cent involving online gambling, 25 per cent scams, 12 per cent cyberbullying and nine per cent fake news.
'Of these, 57 per cent were on Facebook, 28 per cent on TikTok, and 13 per cent on YouTube. Other platforms involved smaller numbers, but these three alone represent nearly 95 per cent of the overall problems we are seeing on social media,' he said at the Communications Ministry's monthly assembly at Menara Komunikasi here today.
Present were Deputy Minister Teo Nie Ching and secretary-general Datuk Mohamad Fauzi Md Isa, as well as Malaysian National News Agency (Bernama) chief executive officer Datin Paduka Nur-ul Afida Kamaludin.
Fahmi said that despite the ongoing efforts to remove such harmful content, there are growing concerns over the continued presence of child exploitation content online, particularly on Facebook.
'This raises the question of whether existing laws and cooperation are sufficient, or whether we need a more strategic and efficient approach to tackle the issue.
'We are aware that late last year, the Royal Malaysia Police and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) conducted an integrated operation known as Op Pedo,' he said.
On the government's move to implement a licensing framework for social media platforms earlier this year, Fahmi said the initiative aims to make digital platforms in Malaysia safer, especially for children.
He added that the government's efforts have continued with the passing of the Online Safety Act (OnSA) 2024 in Parliament last December, which will be enforced soon.
'For everyone's information, the OnSA has received royal assent from His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, and is currently in the process of being enforced,' he said.
The OnSA grants the MCMC the authority to take action against social media platforms that fail to fulfil their obligations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
DBKL ordered to open Padang Merbok gates to public
KUALA LUMPUR: Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) has been instructed to reopen the gates of Padang Merbok to the public, restoring it as a recreational space for families and the wider community in line with the CHASE City vision, which promotes the concept of a Healthy City. Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zaliha Mustafa, in a Facebook post today, said Padang Merbok, which is steeped in history, should be fully utilised for the people's leisure activities. "Earlier today, I went to Padang Merbok after being informed that the area had been closed off to the public. I do not agree with such an action. Therefore, I have instructed DBKL to open the gates of Padang Merbok to the public," she said in the post. Dr Zaliha called on DBKL to improve basic infrastructure, including the lighting system, public toilets, and other facilities to better serve visitors, as part of its social responsibility to city dwellers. She also urged DBKL to organise suitable programmes to revitalise Padang Merbok, ensuring the area could be utilised in a more structured and effective manner. Additionally, she suggested the establishment of a café as a new attraction to draw more visitors, thereby positioning Padang Merbok as one of Kuala Lumpur's key recreational landmarks.
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
White House launches TikTok account amid US legal uncertainty
WASHINGTON: The White House officially launched its TikTok account on Tuesday despite ongoing legal uncertainties surrounding the Chinese-owned platform's operations in the United States. President Donald Trump continues to permit TikTok to operate despite a federal law requiring its sale or ban on national security grounds. 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' read the caption on the account's inaugural post, a 27-second video clip. The new White House account garnered approximately 4,500 followers within the first hour of its launch. Trump's personal TikTok account boasts 110.1 million followers, though his last post dates back to November 5, 2024, which was Election Day. TikTok remains owned by China-based internet company ByteDance despite legislative pressures. A federal mandate requiring TikTok's divestment or prohibition was scheduled to take effect on January 19, the day before Trump's inauguration. The Republican president, whose 2024 campaign heavily utilized social media, suspended the proposed ban. Trump extended the deadline for TikTok to find a non-Chinese buyer by another 90 days in mid-June, with this extension set to expire in mid-September. While previously supporting restrictions, Trump reversed his position after believing TikTok helped secure young voter support during the November election. The platform maintains nearly two billion global users despite geopolitical tensions. Trump's official X account has 108.5 million followers, though he prefers Truth Social, which he owns and where he has 10.6 million followers. The official White House accounts on X and Instagram maintain 2.4 million and 9.3 million followers respectively. This strategic move into TikTok reflects the administration's continued adaptation to evolving digital landscapes despite regulatory challenges. - AFP
The Star
24 minutes ago
- The Star
Words ‘offensive' and ‘annoy' crossed out from online law
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has struck down a part of Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that consisted of the words 'offensive' and 'annoy'. A three-judge panel, chaired by Federal Court judge Justice Lee Swee Seng, held that the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 were unconstitutional. 'We find the impugned words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 constituting an offence to be inconsistent with Article 10(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution read with Article 8, and hence unconstitutional and void. 'It is not a permissible restriction to freedom of expression under our Federal Constitution. 'The appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court is set aside,' Justice Lee said. The court did not make any order as to costs. 'Being a constitutional matter, we make no order as to costs as no one is the winner but the Malaysian public where freedom of expression is concerned. 'We declare this decision to have prospective effect so as not to resurrect the past which is better left interned,' Justice Lee said. Other judges on the Bench were Court of Appeal judges Justices Hashim Hamzah and Azman Abdullah. The Court of Appeal's judgment arose from an appeal by activist Heidy Quah, who filed an originating summons to declare the words in the law provision as null and void as it is inconsistent with Article 10 of the Federal Constitution read with Article 8. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. However, under an amendment effective February this year, the word 'offensive' was replaced with 'grossly offensive'. In this respect, the appellate court found that the amendment did not affect Quah's legal challenge. On July 27, 2021, Quah, who is the founder of Refuge for the Refugees, claimed trial at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court to a charge of sharing offensive content over a Facebook post that alleged mistreatment of refugees at an Immigration detention centre. She was accused of making the post through her Facebook page under the name 'Heidy Quah' with intent to insult others at about 5.30am on June 5, 2020. On April 25, 2022, she was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal after the Sessions Court allowed her preliminary objection. At the same time when her case at the Sessions Court began, Quah filed an originating summons at the Shah Alam High Court on Aug 30, 2021, to challenge the provision of Section 233 that was used against her. On Sept 12, 2023, the High Court dismissed her application without order as to costs. Quah then appealed the matter at the Court of Appeal, which resulted in yesterday's judgment.
