Michigan's 2026 gubernatorial race is already getting crowded. Here's who's running so far
Since January, five people have already announced plans to seek the state's highest office, including two Republicans, two Democrats and one longtime Democrat running as an independent.
Several other individuals have said they are considering their own campaigns or have created gubernatorial campaign finance committees.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has two more years in office. She is term limited and will leave an open field for the 2026 gubernatorial election.
The next governor will take office in 2027 after Whitmer's term expires. To qualify for the ballot, candidates for governor must submit petitions with a certain number of voter signatures.
Currently, the Michigan Secretary of State website does not list deadline dates for when candidates in the 2026 election must file nominating petitions. Numerous people are listed as having finance committees in place on the state website.
Deadlines for 2026 haven't been written yet, spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said, but "we will likely have them to post by the fall."
For partisan candidates, the deadline is 15 Tuesdays before the August primary election and for candidates filing without party affiliation, it's 110 days before the November election.
Declared candidates include Democrats Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson, Republicans Anthony Hudson and State Sen. Aric Nesbitt, and Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, running as an Independent.
In addition, Republican Mike Cox, a former attorney general, said in December he's considering a run and has formed a campaign committee.
The next election for governor of Michigan is Nov. 3, 2026. The 2026 primary election is Aug. 4, 2026.
Here's a closer look at the declared candidates (in order of when they created their campaign committee) and those considering running for governor.
Benson, 47, was first elected Secretary of State in 2018 and then again in 2022. As Michigan's chief elections officer during the 2020 election, Benson spoke out against President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn his loss that year.
In addition to her election duties, Benson also oversees motor vehicle services in Michigan. During her time in office, Benson has moved more services online and, with self-service kiosk stations in Michigan, drivers have replaced in-person visits to a Secretary of State office with a trip to the grocery store.
Before serving as Secretary of State, Benson was the dean at Wayne State University Law School in Detroit.
"I want Michigan to be the best place in the country to be a kid, raise a kid, and be healthy, safe, and successful. A place where government is efficient and easy to deal with, where businesses and communities thrive, and where every resident has access to quality child care, health care, education, and housing," Benson said in a statement.
Nesbitt, 44, is a Porter Township Republican, who grew up on a farm and has a long career in Republican politics. He was first elected to the Michigan House of Representatives in 2010, serving three terms in the chamber.
He was elected to the Michigan Senate in 2018. When Democrats flipped that chamber from Republican to Democratic control in the 2022 election, his fellow GOP lawmakers chose him to serve as the Senate Republican Leader.
"As governor, I will put Michigan first by supporting taxpayers over the woke left, empowering parents, keeping families safe, and standing with President Trump to revive our manufacturing industry and Make Michigan Great Again," Nesbitt said in a statement.
Hudson, a Grand Blanc resident, was born in Hillsboro, Texas, and served in the U.S. Army from 1999 to 2001. He moved to Michigan in 2012, his online biography says, after his divorce to be near his children.
His career experience includes owning a small trucking company, Longhorn Logistics, according to Ballotpedia.
Anthony is running for governor to eliminate property and state income taxes, demand transparency and accountability, and return power to local communities where it belongs, he says on his website.
Duggan, 66, is a Detroit native and was elected the 75th mayor of Detroit in 2013. He took office as mayor in 2014 and is currently serving his third four-year term.
After graduating from law school at the University of Michigan, he became an attorney for Wayne County, and then served for 14 years as Deputy Wayne County Executive, a biography on the city website said.
Duggan chaired the stadium authority and was involved in building Comerica Park and Ford Field, the downtown stadiums for the Tigers and Lions. He also oversaw the construction of the McNamara Terminal and modernization of Metro Airport, the website said. Duggan also was CEO of the Detroit Medical Center.
Duggan says he wants to find ways to keep Michigan's young people in the state, improve public education, and expand access to affordable housing. He also hopes to end partisanship in Lansing.
Swanson was elected Genesee County sheriff in 2020. He won reelection in 2024.
The Secretary of State's campaign committee website does not currently list a gubernatorial committee under Swanson's name.
Swanson grew up in Grand Blanc and currently lives in Fenton, both Genesee County cities. He has worked in law enforcement for almost three decades, according to the Genesee County Sheriff's website.
Swanson attended Mott Community College in Flint, and holds a bachelor's degree and master's degree in public administration, both from the University of Michigan.
During a campaign kickoff event, Swanson named protecting Michigan residents' 2nd Amendment, collective bargaining and civil rights as some of his priorities as well as the freedom to worship in a speech in which he invoked his own faith, saying the Lord had opened doors for him.
Democrat Marni Sawicki has a Facebook page, Michigan Loves Marni, Governor, that says "Marni is the former mayor of Cape Coral, Florida. She was elected in 2013 and served for four years. She is now running to the next Governor of Michigan!"
"Getting geared up for campaigning! Looking forward to getting out and meeting Michiganders!" a Jan. 27 post says.
A website linked on the page calls her a life coach, speaker and consultant.
Mike Cox, 62, hasn't officially announced a run, but said he's considering it.
He served as Michigan's top law enforcement officer from 2003-10. He ran in the GOP gubernatorial primary in 2010, finishing third in a five-candidate field that year.
Cox grew up in Redford Township. After graduating from high school, he enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps. He received his law degree from the University of Michigan in 1989 and went on to work for the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office and then the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office. His wife, Laura Cox, previously served as the Michigan GOP chair during the 2020 election.
While other candidates haven't announced candidacies, several people have filed paperwork.
Larry Hutchinson, with no party affiliation, Richard Fuentes, with no party affiliation, Republican Joyce Gipson, Republican Benita Carter, and have all filed paperwork forming candidate committees with the state since the last gubernatorial election in 2022.
The Detroit Free Press contributed reporting to this story.
This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Michigan's 2026 governor's race figures to be crowded. Who's running.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom's proposed redistricting would split Simi Valley from the rest of Ventura County
If California voters approve the new congressional maps that appear headed for the November ballot, Simi Valley will get a new U.S. House representative next year. Simi Valley's representation in Washington, D.C. is not top of mind for Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Sacramento Democrats. Their goal is to add a few seats to the 43-9 advantage Democrats already hold in the California House delegation, countering the Republican-led redistricting in Texas and giving Democrats a better chance of controlling the House next year. To that end, the proposed district maps introduced in the State Assembly on Aug. 18 carve up some currently safe Republican districts and tweak some Democratic ones to make them safer. The two districts that cover most of Ventura County are considered fairly safe for Democrats, and both would remain largely unchanged. The 24th District, currently held by Santa Barbara Democrat Salud Carbajal, stays the same under the map that Newsom wants to put on the ballot. It includes the city of Ventura and the Ojai Valley, along with all of Santa Barbara County and some of San Luis Obispo County. Julia Brownley, a Democrat from Westlake Village, represents the rest of Ventura County in the 26th District. Under the proposed redistricting, most of that district would stay the same, but the city of Simi Valley would be cut from its southeastern edge. Instead, Brownley's district would extend northeast into the high desert, all the way to the outskirts of Lancaster and Palmdale. Simi Valley would be added to the 32nd District, which is now represented by Brad Sherman, a Democrat from the San Fernando Valley. In addition to Simi Valley, the district would include part of the San Fernando Valley and all of Malibu and Pacific Palisades. A statewide election is necessary to draw new maps because in 2010, California voters approved a constitutional amendment that gave redistricting authority to an independent, nonpartisan commission. Newsom's plan is to ask voters to set aside the commission's maps until for the next three congressional elections, then go back to the commission to draw maps after the 2030 census. Herb Gooch, a professor emeritus of political science at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks, said he doesn't think the new district map would change much for Simi Valley residents. They are represented by a Democrat now, and in all likelihood, they will be represented by a different Democrat if voters approve the governor's redistricting plan. "I don't know that it fundamentally changes the dynamics," Gooch said. "Julia's district is pretty safe, but Brad's is even safer. You're probably pretty much used to it if you're in Simi Valley." Simi Valley is the only city in Ventura County with more Republicans than Democrats. But for more than a decade — ever since Republican Elton Gallegly retired from Congress in 2012 — Simi Valley has either been represented by a Democrat, or it's been separated from the rest of Ventura County to fall into a district represented by a far-off Republican. "I don't know why, but it seems like Simi Valley is the area that always gets stuck in the middle," said Barbra Williamson, a Republican who served on the Simi Valley City Council from 1992 to 2012. "We get carved out every single time," said Leanna Brand, a Democrat and the leader of the liberal group Indivisible Simi Valley. "We know it. We expect it." Brand said she doesn't think Simi Valley was well served from before 2023, when it was part of a district that included Santa Clarita and Palmdale. Mike Garcia, a Republican who represented the district from 2020 to 2022, was focused on the Santa Clarita Valley and "did absolutely nothing for us," she said. Brand said it seems "a little less logical" to put Simi Valley in a district with Malibu, Topanga Canyon, Pacific Palisades and the more upscale parts of the San Fernando Valley, but she doesn't think it will change much about the city's representation. The only exception, she said, might be if Sherman is laser-focused on helping Pacific Palisades rebuild from the fire and doesn't pay much attention to the new part of his district. Williamson said she thinks Newsom's redistricting plan is "a terrible idea," while Brand sees it as a necessary move to counter Republican gerrymandering in other states. "We've got to play hardball at this point," Brand said. "But it's temporary." The question, Gooch said, is whether California voters will see it that way. The ballot measure to let the independent commission draw congressional districts passed with more than 60% of the vote, and the concept still polls well. "It might be harder to pull off than the governor thinks," Gooch said. "We've spent a lot of time educating people about having a neutral commission, and a lot of people are pretty proud about what's been done." Tony Biasotti is an investigative and watchdog reporter for the Ventura County Star. Reach him at tbiasotti@ This story was made possible by a grant from the Ventura County Community Foundation's Fund to Support Local Journalism. This article originally appeared on Ventura County Star: Newsom's redistricting plan would move Simi Valley to new district Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Police escort Texas Democrats to prevent new redistricting walkout as California moves to retaliate
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Democrats who ended a walkout found themselves shadowed by law enforcement officers to keep them from repeating the protest that stalled Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts and fulfill President Donald Trump's desire to reshape U.S. House maps. Republicans in the Texas House forced returning Democrats to sign what the Democrats called 'permission slips,' agreeing to around-the-clock surveillance by state Department of Public Safety officers to leave the floor. However, Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier, of Fort Worth, refused and remained on the House floor Monday night. The Democrats' return to Texas puts the Republican-run Legislature in position to satisfy Trump's demands, possibly later this week, as California Democrats advance new congressional boundaries in retaliation. Lawmakers had officers posted outside their Capitol offices, and suburban Dallas Rep. Mihaela Plesa said one tailed her on her Monday evening drive back to her apartment in Austin after spending much of the day on a couch in her office. She said he went with her for a staff lunch and even down the hallway with her for restroom breaks. 'We were kind of laughing about it, to be honest, but this is really serious stuff,' Plesa said in a telephone interview. 'This is a waste of taxpayer dollars and really performative theater.' Collier, who represents a minority-majority district, said she would not 'sign away my dignity' and allow Republicans to 'control my movements and monitor me.' 'I know these maps will harm my constituents,' she said in a statement. 'I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' The tit-for-tat puts the nation's two most populous states at the center of an expanding fight over control of Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The battle has rallied Democrats nationally following infighting and frustrations among the party's voters since Republicans took total control of the federal government in January. Dozens of Texas Democratic lawmakers left for Illinois and elsewhere on Aug. 3, denying their Republican colleagues the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. Republicans now hold 25 of Texas' 38 U.S. House seats. They declared victory Friday, pointing to California's proposal intended to increase Democrats' U.S. House advantage by five seats. Many absent Democrats left Chicago early Monday and landed hours later at a private airfield in Austin, where several boarded a charter bus to the Capitol. Cheering supporters greeted them inside. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows did not mention redistricting on the floor but promised swift action on the Legislature's agenda. 'We aren't playing around,' Republican state Rep. Matt Shaheen, whose district includes part of the Dallas area, said in a post on the X social media platform. Even as they declared victory, Democrats acknowledged Republicans can now approve redrawn districts. Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu said Democrats would challenge the new designs in court. Lawmakers did not take up any bills Monday and were not scheduled to return until Wednesday. Trump has pressured other Republican-run states to consider redistricting, as well, while Democratic governors in multiple statehouses have indicated they would follow California's lead in response. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. The president wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the midterms during his first presidency. After gaining House control in 2018, Democrats used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. Nationally, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Redistricting typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade after the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions, giving Newsom an additional hurdle. Democratic legislators introduced new California maps Monday. It was the first official move toward the fall referendum asking voters to override the independent commission's work after the 2020 census. The proposed boundaries would replace current ones through 2030. Democrats said they will return the mapmaking power to the commission after that. State Republicans promised lawsuits. Democrats hold 43 out of California's 52 U.S. House seats. The proposal would try to expand that advantage by targeting battleground districts in Northern California, San Diego and Orange counties, and the Central Valley. Some Democratic incumbents also get more left-leaning voters in their districts. 'We don't want this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we cannot run away from this fight,' said Democrat Marc Berman, a California Assembly member who previously chaired the elections committee. Republicans expressed opposition in terms that echoed Democrats in Austin, accusing the majority of abusing power. Sacramento Republicans said they will introduce legislation advocating independent redistricting commissions in all states. Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott launched the expanding battle when he heeded Trump's wishes and added redistricting to an initial special session agenda that included multiple issues, including a package responding to devastating floods that killed more than 130 people last month. Abbott has blamed Democrats' absence for delaying action on those measures. Democrats have answered that Abbott is responsible because he effectively linked the hyper-partisan matter to nonpartisan flood relief. Abbott, Burrows and other Republicans tried various threats and legal maneuvers to pressure Democrats' return, including the governor arguing that Texas judges should remove absent lawmakers from office. As long as they were out of state, lawmakers were beyond the reach of the civil arrest warrants that Burrows issued. The Democrats who returned Monday did so without being detained by law enforcement. The lawmakers who left face fines of up to $500 for each legislative day they missed. Burrows has insisted Democratic lawmakers also will pay pick up the tab for law enforcement who attempted to corral them during the walkout.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Generational cracks on Israel grow on the right
The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. Sign up here or in the box below. Dramatic shifts in public opinion on Israel that have emerged as the war in Gaza drags on are not just affecting the left side of the political spectrum. Cracks are propagating in a Republican Party and right wing that have been historically supportive of the country. Skepticism of Israel from younger Republicans is increasing as the party debates the meaning of 'America First,' a dynamic that's being reflected on some of the biggest conservative stages and megaphones even as other Republicans double down on their Israel support. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) is going further than even many of her progressive colleagues in accusing Israel of 'genocide' in Gaza. Turning Point USA, the largest conservative youth group in the country, hosted a major debate at its summer conference on how much support the U.S. should give Israel — with attendees cheering both sides. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has often been the sole GOP vote against pro-Israel measures in the House as he takes a staunch noninterventionist stance on foreign policy, told me he senses a shift on the right. 'I think people are being more vocal now,' Massie said. 'They're probably saying things they thought before but were afraid to say, and now that more people are saying them, it's sort of a cascade effect.' Massie said he's seen that change in support for Israel reflected in internal polls in his district that he's conducted for the last decade. Public surveys show the same thing. A March Pew poll found that 53 percent of surveyed U.S. adults had an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 42 percent in 2022. That negative view is most pronounced among Democratic adults, whose unfavorable views of Israel went up to 69 percent — a dynamic that is dramatically reshaping how Democratic lawmakers are approaching Israel. But there was also a stark shift among Republicans under the age of 50, whose unfavorable views of Israel shot up from 35 percent in 2022 to 50 percent in 2025. Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), who is Jewish and is one of the most vocal defenders of Israel in Congress, said the increasing skepticism of Israel among younger Republicans is due to 'Muslim propaganda.' 'Conservatives generally have a big heart, so those things are going to have some impact on public polling,' Fine told me in a phone interview, going on to deny widespread reports of starvation in Gaza. 'The only people starving in Gaza are the hostages.' The division, though, is not yet large enough to challenge the overwhelming Republican support for Israel. Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, said that aside from Massie and Greene, Republicans on Capitol Hill have remained 'extremely strong on Israel' and argued that President Trump has been 'stronger on Israel than any president we've ever had.' The Trump administration has notably cited antisemitism on college campuses amid protests of Israel as a basis for cracking down on colleges and universities. A large bipartisan group of congressional lawmakers traveled to Israel with the American Israel Education Foundation, a group affiliated with the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) also traveled to Israel this month. AIPAC spokesperson Marshall Wittmann sent me this comment: 'Reps. Greene and Massie's views and votes on Israel are more aligned with Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [D-N.Y.], Rashida Tlaib [D-Mich.] and Ilhan Omar [D-Minn.] than any of their Republican House colleagues, who overwhelmingly stand with the Jewish state. Only a few weeks ago, the House resoundingly rejected an anti-Israel amendment offered by Rep. Greene by a vote of 422-6. These extremists are in a distinct minority because they would betray an American ally that shares our values and interests.' Massie and Greene have largely argued against U.S. support for Israel from a noninterventionist, 'America First' perspective. 'They're not a poor country. They don't need our handouts,' Massie said. 'I've been making the economic case, and recently started making the moral case that we shouldn't be sending them the money because their bombing of Gaza's led to tens of thousands of civilian deaths.' Asked about that interpretation of 'America First,' Fine pointed to the hundreds of thousands of American citizens who live in Israel. 'Saying that they should all die doesn't sound like a very America First position.' A chunk of the anti-Israel messages circulating in right-wing circles online are clearly antisemitic — a charge that has also been lobbed at elected Republican critics of Israel. 'I always say, neither party has a monopoly on antisemitism,' Fine said of criticism of Israel from within the GOP. 'I think their voices have been amplified in recent months. But you know, for every one elected Republican antisemite, there are hundreds who stand with Israel.' Massie said of the antisemitism attacks: 'I think they're wearing the word out. … It's ridiculous that you would say somebody's antisemitic based on a vote on legislation.' Still, the Kentucky congressman doesn't expect to see many other elected Republicans to pipe up with Israel criticism. 'Everybody else is still afraid of, basically, Trump and AIPAC,' Massie said. In case you missed it, I chatted with Greene about her decision to dub Israel's actions in Gaza a genocide earlier this month. Welcome to The Movement, a weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm Emily Brooks, House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what's on your radar: ebrooks@ Not already on the list? Subscribe here FROM BANNON GUEST TO BLS PICK President Trump's nomination of Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) — coming after Trump fired the agency's previous head after accusing her of rigging jobs numbers — is kicking off widespread skepticism and concerns about politicization of critical data that will define Antoni's upcoming Senate confirmation. Antoni is largely a product of the conservative movement. Before Heritage, he was an economist at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, the major conservative think tank in the state that also produced now-Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts. His profile on the site boasts of his work being featured in a litany of conservative outlets and organizations. One of Antoni's most notable boosters was Steve Bannon, the former senior adviser to Trump who has maintained a prominent perch on the right through his ' War Room ' show. Antoni had appeared on Bannon's show. But the selection of the ideological Antoni — and some of his suggestions for the agency — have raised eyebrows. Antoni told Fox News before his nomination that 'the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly jobs reports, but keep publishing more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' since BLS data is often subject to revision. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent later told Bloomberg TV that he did not support the idea of suspending the monthly job reports, while defending Antoni's qualifications. 'I was there when E.J. was interviewed, and he is incredibly qualified,' Bessent said. 'I think the most important thing here is that we get back to the integrity of the numbers, because it just became OK — just like so many things in our government — for it to get sloppy.' Go in depth on Antoni: Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee, from my colleague Tobias Burns … 'Underlying motives': Why Trump's BLS pick is in for a fight, from Politico's Nick Niedzwiadek and Sam Sutton … The Partisan Economist Trump Wants to Oversee the Nation's Data, from The Wall Street Journal's Paul Kiernan. EARMARKS BATTLE SET TO HEAT UP With the Sept. 30 government funding deadline rapidly approaching, get ready for a big internal GOP battle over earmarks — or community project finding, as they're known in their newest form — when Congress returns. 'The return of earmarks to the annual appropriations bills has sparked a battle among Republicans on Capitol Hill, pitting fiscal hawks against members of the Appropriations Committees and their allies,' my colleague Alex Bolton reports. The dynamic is set to complicate Republicans' path to avoiding a government shutdown, which is already tricky given they will need Democratic support in the Senate to do so. Republican appropriators and beyond are working hard to try to steer funding to their home states, but that is set to clash with fiscal hawks who balk at any increased government spending — a sentiment that has become a core part of the GOP. ON MY CALENDAR Thursday, Aug. 21: The American Enterprise Institute hosts an event on 'The Power of Presence: Sustaining Progress in Reducing Chronic Absenteeism' at 3 p.m. Monday, Aug. 25, to Thursday, Aug. 28: State Policy Network annual meeting in New Orleans. THREE MORE THINGS Last week in The Movement, I wrote about whether Trump's takeover of D.C. police could lead to conservatives getting more interested in cities they have historically loved to hate. Jack Posobiec, activist and editor at Human Events, had an interesting take separating conservatives into two camps, 'ruralcon' and 'citycon.' 'For decades, the American Right has been dominated by the image of the rural conservative — the pickup-driving, small-town patriot with deep roots in red-state soil. You can't help but love this guy,' he wrote. 'But there's a new archetype emerging on the New Right: the citycon — the disaffected conservative trapped behind enemy lines in a blue-state metropolis.' Right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer had a deposition as part of her defamation lawsuit against comedian Bill Maher that was ' uncomfortably revealing,' as The Bulwark's Will Sommer put it, with NSFW 'did-she-really-say-that' digs at Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). Are the Epstein files finally coming? House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said the Department of Justice will start turning over documents related to its investigation of the sex offender on Friday — a few days later than the Tuesday deadline set in the panel's subpoena that it issued pursuant to a Democratic-led motion in a subcommittee last month. WHAT I'M READING
