Reverse migration: African Americans relocating to Kenya cite heritage and restoration
The 38-year-old retired veteran has found a community in the east African country's capital, where he now runs an Airbnb business. He loves admiring Nairobi's golden sunset from a rooftop terrace, and enjoys a luxurious lifestyle in a tastefully furnished apartment in an upmarket neighborhood.
Harris is part of a growing wave of African Americans who are relocating to Kenya, citing the need to connect with their ancestors — or 'coming home," a phrase often used among the Black community.
Like dozens of other African Americans who have moved to Nairobi in recent years, Harris was attracted to Kenya's tropical climate and what he describes as the warmth and friendliness of the people he believes he shares a history and culture with.
In search of community and a better life
'I have always had that adventurous spirit, especially when I joined the military and got to go to different countries. So I am taking the opportunity to venture out to new places," he said. 'That is what allowed me to make a home away from home and Kenya is my new home.'
Some friends have reaching out to him to explore a 'change from the US for their peace of mind,' he said.
Several other African Americans who have 'come home' like him have set up thriving businesses in Nairobi that include travel agencies, restaurants and farms.
Many African Americans who have sought a better life abroad or are considering it said President Donald Trump's administration — with its crackdown on diversity programs — isn't the main reason they want to move. Rather, most say they had been mulling a move for some time, and the current political environment in the US may be pushing them to act sooner than initially planned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
9 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
What makes Lake Malawi the 'calendar lake'?
Have you ever wondered why Lake Malawi is sometimes called the 'calendar lake'? It's not because it tells you the date, but because this African lake has some surprising numbers that match up almost perfectly with the calendar! Lake Malawi, also known as Lake Nyasa, stretches along the borders of Malawi, Mozambique, and Tanzania. It's the third largest lake in Africa and the ninth largest in the world. But what really makes it special is its incredible length — about 365 miles long, which is the same as the number of days in a year! As if that isn't amazing enough, the lake is around 52 miles wide at its broadest point, just like the number of weeks in a year. That's why people call it the 'calendar lake.' Imagine looking at a map and thinking, 'Wow! This giant lake matches the way we count days and weeks.' Of course, the measurements aren't exact, but the coincidence is so close that it's become a fun nickname and a source of pride for the people living around the lake. Lake Malawi is famous for more than just its numbers. It's one of the world's richest lakes for fish diversity, with over 1,000 different species — many found nowhere else on Earth. Fishermen paddle out every day in colourful wooden boats, and children play along the sandy shores. So next time you flip through a calendar, remember there's a sparkling blue lake in Africa whose size has amazed geographers, scientists, and storytellers for generations. Lake Malawi's 'calendar' coincidence makes it a fun and memorable natural wonder for everyone!
Mint
13 hours ago
- Mint
Why Mortgage Lenders Are Ignoring Trump's Rollback on Home Appraisal Reviews
At one midsized US mortgage lender, almost a quarter of customers who dispute property appraisals find that the value of their home had been miscalculated. It's an industrywide issue that has historically penalized minority groups, and now President Donald Trump has offered lenders the chance to ignore his predecessor's attempts to make it easier for homeowners to question the valuations assigned by property appraisers. Trump has scrapped some of the guidelines, part of his team's vow to stamp out what it sees as initiatives that support diversity, equity and inclusion. Many financial professionals agree that home appraisals can be unreliable, and that Black homeowners and other minorities are often put at a significant disadvantage. This can be especially damaging given that home ownership is the top wealth-creation tool in the US — and an appraisal is a key determinant of how much, if anything, someone can borrow. With their decision to end some of the requirements related to home valuations, however, Trump and his cabinet members may have little impact on lenders' practices. That's because there's fresh evidence that the changes the Biden administration put in place are supported by the industry. Some of the country's biggest lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and U.S. Bancorp, said they would make no policy changes as a result of the rollback. New American Funding, which also isn't planning to change its approach, was the only financial institution of more than 10 contacted by Bloomberg to disclose information about disputed home valuations. The Tustin, California-based mortgage lender, which provided roughly $14 billion of mortgage loans last year, said an average 2.5% of its customers request new valuations each month. Of those contested, roughly 22% are found to need an adjustment. New American didn't share a breakdown of borrowers' requests by race. 'The changes have made it much easier for the borrower,' said Michelle Rogers, New American's chief valuation officer. 'It's more transparent and the borrower knows they can initiate it.' The appraisal directives were put in place following a deep dive by the Biden administration into prejudices in the business. One of Trump's housing regulators, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, said rolling them back was part of an attempt by the president to put an end to the 'obsession' with DEI. The administration also has vowed to make deep cuts to the federal apparatus that enforced fair housing and fair lending laws, from slashing Consumer Financial Protection Bureau staff to gutting the Justice Department's Civil Rights division. A HUD official who spoke on background said the department's recent reforms simply reverted its stance to the way things were before Biden-era regulators imposed their standards. Lenders aren't being barred from letting borrowers dispute their appraisals, said the official who declined to be identified. The White House hasn't responded to a request for comment. Black homeowners have long reported having their homes valued more highly after taking down all evidence of their race. Research from the Brookings Institution and the federally controlled housing finance agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has shown that home appraisals can be affected by racial bias, which in turn affects the value of homes in entire neighborhoods. Brookings found, for example, that homes in neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black are valued between 21% and 23% lower than comparable homes in white neighborhoods, with appraisal bias as one of several contributing factors. Economists at Freddie Mac reported in 2021 that greater percentages of homes in majority Black and Latino census tracts were undervalued compared with those in white census tracts, leading them to conclude that there was a 'valuation gap' between homes in different neighborhoods. The appraisal problem for minority borrowers also is a problem for lenders, since having low appraisals can prevent a homeowner from qualifying for a mortgage refinancing or a new home loan. That means the lender loses out on valuable business. Banks also suffer when appraisers make mistakes in the opposite direction, valuing properties too highly, because it means the bank can't safely rely on the value of a property as collateral for a loan. The reforms that the mortgage industry recently adopted to try to make the appraisal process fairer originated with a Biden administration task force called PAVE , which was formed in 2021. The group consisted of public officials from 13 different agencies, and its goal was to produce a report with recommended changes to a suite of different mortgage industry standards. PAVE recommended more training for home appraisers and higher standards for appraisers seeking to qualify for professional licenses. Those changes were handled by the Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization that serves as the regulator for home appraisers. A spokeswoman for the foundation declined to comment on the Trump administration's recent changes, but said that new education and licensing standards put in place last year are still in effect. PAVE also called for an industrywide requirement for mortgage lenders to let borrowers request 'a reconsideration of value' if they disagreed with an appraiser's determination. Last year, regulators began requiring mortgage lenders to decide how they would standardize their procedures and to explain them clearly to their customers. In a rare win for the government, the policy received support from the Mortgage Bankers Association. Federal housing regulation includes a web of rules issued by different agencies, including HUD and also Fannie and Freddie. The new home-appraisal guidance went into effect for all of the housing agencies. But so far, the Trump administration has only rolled back the policy for mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which help low- to moderate-income families attain home ownership. On July 17, Senator Raphael Warnock, a Democrat from Georgia, proposed a bill that would make mortgage lenders' ROV policies required by law. It also would expand public access to data on mortgage appraisals by forcing a federal housing regulator to more regularly share details. While fair-housing advocates support the proposal, the bill also has backing from a more unlikely source: the National Association of Mortgage Brokers. The group represents more than 500,000 mortgage brokers across the US. Its president, Jim Nabors, called the proposed bill 'critical' for ensuring fairness for homebuyers and added: 'Our entire board of directors and membership applaud Senator Warnock.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India.com
a day ago
- India.com
After Pakistan, China plans to capture THIS African country in its debt-trap, Chinese companies to invest Rs 30521037715 for...
(File) China debt-trap: China, which has the mastered the art of gaining a giant foothold in smaller, economically weaker countries by making large investments in its various sectors, has now set its sights on Angola as two Chinese companies have signed deals to acquire land to grow food grains in the African country at an investment of $350 million (about Rs 3,052 crore). Where is China investing? According to a media report, the state-owned Chinese firms will invest Rs 3052 crore in Angola, to cultivate soybean, maize and other grains on thousands of hectares of land, a portion of which will be shared with the host country. The project is aimed at reduce China's dependence for food grains on the United States and Brazil. Notably, in recent years, China has invested in similar projects in other African countries including Tanzania, Ethiopia and Benin, as it pushes to end dependence on food exports from the West. Which companies are investing in Angola? As per a report by the South China Morning Post, two state-owned companies– SinoHydro Group and Citic Group — have signed agreements to invest in Angola. The SinoHydro Group has been leased 30,000 hectares of tax-free land for 25 years, up which it will cultivate food grains, with 60% of the produce going directly to China. The Citic Group will invest $250 million in the next 5 years and cultivate soybean and corn on a massive 100, 000 hectares of land, the report said, adding that work has already begun on 8,000 hectares. How China is luring African countries? According to experts, China is offering a major relief to African countries after US President Donald Trump imposed heavy tariffs on their export. Earlier, in June, Beijing announced to eliminate import duties on goods coming from nearly all of its African partners, providing these nations with a never-before opportunity to strengthen South-South trade, as per a CNN report. Why China is investing in Africa? However, many geopolitical analysts are skeptical of China's growing investments in Africa, stating that Beijing's goals are strategic and go well beyond the noble aim of ensuring food security. Several experts claim that China is taking tax-free land on a long lease period to strengthen its hold in Africa and reduce imports from the West, particularly the US. Before the farming deal, China and Angola had an 'infrastructure for oil' exchange deal, but now the African country has shifted focus to agriculture to ensure its economy does not remain dependent on a single resource.
