OHA uncovers latest report highlighting issues at Oregon's psychiatric hospital
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Oregon State Hospital has less than two months to prove it is now in compliance with federal standards and maintain its Medicare agreement.
The state's public health leaders have uncovered a survey they conducted at the Salem behavioral health facility on Apr. 29. According to the , investigators found OSH 'was not in substantial compliance' with several regulations related to its governing body, patient rights and special provisions for psychiatric hospitals.
'Deeply private': Oregon AG challenges potential sale of 23andMe users' personal data
The survey came after a patient's death in March, which led to the Joint Commission conducting its own report and . The Oregon Health Authority's newly released investigation shows that several staff members told surveyors that executive leadership 'largely ignored and dismissed' warnings and complaints about safety at the hospital.
OHA's statement of deficiencies also alleged employees were 'coached' on what to say during the probe from officials. Any corrective actions that were established in response to the survey were soon discontinued, the document shows.
'This report is a clarion call for the need for the immediate changes being implemented now that will have impact to assure that patients at OSH are safe and receiving the care they need and deserve,' OHA Deputy Director Dave Baden, who is the hospital's active superintendent as of April 11, said in a statement. 'Sustained and ongoing cultural changes at the hospital will take time. We need to improve our processes in support of not only patients in seclusion or high-risk patients, but every patient at OSH.'
The public health agency's report also includes a letter from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. According to CMS' health insurance specialist, the Oregon psychiatric facility's Medicare agreement is currently set to terminate on Aug. 4.
This means that Medicare won't cover services for patients admitted on or after that date. Patients admitted ahead of the deadline could still receive payment for another 30 days.
Port of Portland OKs lease for mass timber facility to boost jobs, housing
Federal officials said the termination would only be averted if the facility created a plan of correction, which was due on June 2.
According to Baden, OSH has already paused telework for patient-facing staff and required leadership to regularly visit units in order to help employees serve the hospital.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UC Health, Blue Shield contract dispute could disrupt care for thousands in California
Thousands of Californians who get medical care at UC Health through Blue Shield of California — including many in the Bay Area who go to UCSF and One Medical, a UCSF affiliate — may need to find a different health insurer or pay out-of-network rates for services if the parties cannot reach a new contract by July 10. UC Health and Blue Shield, two of California's largest health care industry players, are renegotiating contracts to establish how much Blue Shield will reimburse for services provided by UC Health hospitals, clinics and other facilities. One Medical is an affiliate of UCSF Health, one of the six UC Health academic health centers. In the Bay Area, this could impact residents insured by Blue Shield who get care at UCSF Medical Center, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals in San Francisco and Oakland, UCSF Medical Group and UCSF Benioff Children's Physicians, UCSF said in a notification posted online this month. It includes people on CalPERS plans, employer plans, Covered California plans and Medicare plans (including Medicare Advantage) offered or administered by Blue Shield. The dispute could also affect people insured by Blue Shield who are members of the popular primary care provider One Medical, which is an affiliate of UCSF. Services will remain in-network through July 9. UCSF Health community hospitals at Saint Francis and St. Mary's are not affected by the negotiations and will remain in-network. Neither UC Health nor Blue Shield would specify how many of its patients or members could be affected. But it's at least in the tens of thousands, as this potential contract termination would impact about 35,000 CalPERS members who have Blue Shield plans and receive care from UC Health, according to CalPERS. Contract negotiations between health care providers and insurers are common and often involve disagreements over reimbursement rates. Last year, UC Health and Anthem Blue Cross, another major insurer in the state, similarly had a dispute over contract renegotiations that lasted months. It eventually resulted in the two parties reaching a new contract. 'UC Health continues to do our part to negotiate with Blue Shield in hopes of reaching a new, fair agreement to preserve in-network access to UC Health locations without interruptions for Blue Shield of California members,' the UC Office of the President said in a statement. 'Despite months of negotiations, the University of California Health system administrators have decided to end its contract with Blue Shield of California on July 10, 2025, unless a new agreement is reached with higher reimbursement rates,' Blue Shield of California said in a statement. 'It is our desire to reach an agreement that ensures members continue to have access to UC Health hospitals and providers at reasonable costs that are sustainably affordable for our customers. We will continue to negotiate with UC Health system administrators in good faith.' One Medical declined to comment. The provider recently sent members a notice saying it was informed by UCSF that unless an agreement is reached between Blue Shield and UC, One Medical providers in the Bay Area will no longer be in-network with Blue Shield of California as of July 10.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
This recent URI grad had a late-night snack. An allergic reaction killed him.
After their son, a recent University of Rhode Island graduate, died just days after his graduation from anaphylactic shock, a Massachusetts family is raising awareness about food allergies. Timothy Howard, who grew up in Southborough, Massachusetts, died May 24 from a severe allergic reaction to a late-night snack − a chocolate bar − that was contaminated with peanuts, his mother, Patty Howard, told USA TODAY. His whole body went into shock. He went into his parents' bedroom, and they administered three EpiPens, a life-saving drug used by people at risk of anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions, but the reaction was "very fast," and the EpiPen "didn't work." The chocolate bar Timmy ate said "may contain" peanuts on the label, according to his parents. His mother says if a food label says it "may contain" your allergen, don't take the risk. Now, his family is sharing their story to prevent similar tragedies. His sister, Julia, says manufacturers need to make food labels clearer instead of relying on "may contain" warnings. His dad, Tim, says that individuals also need to carefully read those labels. Timmy Howard's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity brothers are raising money for the Food Allergy Research & Education, a nonprofit advocacy organization that spreads awareness and funds research for food allergies. They've raised nearly $28,000 as of June 12. The donations will go toward advancing anaphylaxis research and treatment options; supporting education programs in schools and communities; promoting life-saving awareness and emergency preparedness and advocating for stronger food allergy policies and labeling laws. "We don't want people to go through what we're going through after burying our child. This is hell," his mother says. Howard's story is frightening and not entirely uncommon. Food allergies impact more than 33 million people in the U.S. You can never assume a food or object is free of your allergen, experts say, as it can lurk in the most unexpected places. Fish and shellfish, for example, are sometimes dipped in milk to reduce their fishy odor, putting those with dairy allergies at risk. Cross-contamination – when an allergen is accidentally transferred from one food to another – can also expose you to an allergen. Federal laws require that the nine most common allergens – milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts, soy, wheat, fish, shellfish and sesame – must be labeled on packaged foods sold in the U.S. However, there are no laws requiring manufacturers to say whether a product may have come into contact with a specific allergen, allowing potential cross-contamination to fly under the radar. Teenagers and young adults with food allergies are at the highest risk of fatal food-induced anaphylaxis. "This age group is a high-risk group," Timmy's mother says. "They are independent. They don't want to trouble people at a party to say, 'Hey, what's in this brownie?'" Contributing: Katie Camero and Providence Journal Staff reports. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Recent URI graduate dead after anaphylactic shock from food allergy
CBS News
13 hours ago
- CBS News
Medicaid cuts could devastate hundreds of rural hospitals in GOP states, Democrats say
Cuts to federal spending on Medicaid could affect hundreds of rural hospitals in many states that have elected Republican senators and voted for President Trump, Senate Democrats warned Thursday, citing a list they commissioned of rural hospitals in financial distress. "If Republicans plan to pass drastic cuts to Medicaid and Medicare and effectively repeal the Affordable Care Act, communities should know exactly what they stand to lose," Sen. Ed Markey, the top Democrat in the Senate's health committee, said in a statement. The warning from Senate Democrats, outlined in a letter sent to President Trump and Republican congressional leaders, comes as senators are now wrestling with the budget package that Mr. Trump dubbed the "big, beautiful bill," which narrowly passed the House last month. Budget analysts say a slew of changes that the House bill made to Medicaid provisions — which backers argue would target "excesses and abuses" in the program — could add up to reduced federal Medicaid spending by more than $800 billion over the next decade, resulting in 7.8 million more uninsured people. The American Hospital Association has warned Medicaid cuts being considered by Congress "could have a devastating impact on rural hospitals," which often face larger shares of patients without health insurance. "Rural hospitals serve as critical — and sometimes the sole — source of care for rural communities," the hospital lobbying group says. Democrats cited a list of at-risk rural hospitals that the University of North Carolina's Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research compiled at their request. "If your party moves ahead with these drastic health care cuts that will cut millions of people off their health insurance coverage, rural hospitals will not get paid for the services they are required by law to provide to patients. In turn, rural hospitals will face deeper financial strain," the Democrats' letter states. The center analyzed data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to compile a list of rural hospitals at the highest risk of financial distress, broken down by state and congressional district. "Republican health care cuts would be felt by rural hospitals across the country. In Louisiana, 32 rural hospitals — or a majority of rural hospitals in the state — are serving a high concentration of Medicaid patients. A total of 33 hospitals are at risk based on serving a high share of Medicaid patients, experiencing negative total margins, or both," Democrats wrote. Louisiana is the home state of Sen. Bill Cassidy, the top Republican on the Senate health panel. The letter also itemized rural hospitals at risk in Alaska, Kentucky, West Virginia, Alabama and Tennessee. "Substantial cuts to Medicaid or Medicare payments could increase the number of unprofitable rural hospitals and elevate their risk of financial distress. In response, hospitals may be forced to reduce service lines, convert to a different type of healthcare facility, or close altogether," wrote University of North Carolina researchers Mark Holmes, George Pink and Tyler Malone in their responses to the Democrats.
