EU proposes eel trade restriction despite opposition from Japan
The EU, along with the Dominican Republic, Panama and Honduras, submitted the proposal to the secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, or CITES.
The proposal is aimed at putting fry, full-grown eels and processed eel products of all 18 species under regulation.
CITES, also known as the Washington convention, lists animals and plants requiring protection in annexes on three levels depending on the degree of regulation. The EU and others seek to add all eel species to the second level.
The proposal will be discussed among parties to the pact at a conference in Uzbekistan from November to December.
If the proposal is approved, exporters will be obliged to issue permits based on scientific assessments, putting eels and processed products under stricter trade control.
Japan, where eels are prized food, opposes the proposal.
"There is no risk of eels becoming extinct due to international trade," a fisheries agency official has said.
On Friday, agriculture minister Shinjiro Koizumi voiced deep regret over the situation, adding that his country will do everything it can to block the adoption of the proposal in cooperation with China and South Korea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Demystifying the manufacturing success of China
Chinese manufacturing has come a long way — and by some measures, it is stronger than ever. Whereas foreign-invested enterprises were the driving force behind China's manufacturing exports 20 years ago, most of these firms are now leaving China, having lost their market share to domestic competitors. And these dominant Chinese companies are not limited to the low-value-added production of the past. They are global leaders in many high-tech industries, such as semiconductors and electric vehicles, where they hold an absolute price advantage. Today's China is reminiscent of Japan and South Korea in their heyday. In the 1970s, Japan was producing high-tech products, including home appliances and automobiles, that outperformed American alternatives. And in the 1990s, South Korea emerged as a powerhouse in the electronics and automobile industries. The difference is that the per capita gross domestic product of Japan in the 1970s and South Korea in the 1990s was approaching half that of the United States, but China's per capita GDP, in nominal terms, amounts to less than 16% of America's today ($13,300, compared to $85,800). The obvious question is how a country with such low per capita GDP has managed to reach the technological frontier in so many sectors. Another, perhaps more interesting question is how China manages to keep the prices of the cutting-edge technologies it produces so low. In both cases, an important part of the answer is China's massive scale. If a country with a huge population can deliver high-quality education to its people, it will eventually accumulate disproportionate human capital. Such a country will learn more readily from advanced economies and develop its own innovative capacity earlier in its development. Though China had little trade with the West during the Mao era, it had a large contingent of elites who had studied at Western universities prior to the establishment of the People's Republic. This group played an extremely important role in advancing China's scientific research and technology sector, helping to industrialize the economy with technical assistance from the Soviet Union. More importantly, China successfully established a modern basic education system in the 1950s, making it free for all Chinese children despite the country's high levels of extreme poverty and also restructured its higher-education system. Most of China's prestigious universities at the time had been established by Western religious institutions and missionary groups during the late Qing Dynasty (which ended in 1911) and the early Republic of China period (1911-1949). But under Mao, China embraced the Soviet model of higher education, which emphasized vocational and technical training, with a special focus on science and engineering. Unlike the Western model, which emphasized liberal education, the Soviet system aimed to produce specialists with practical qualifications. Over the last 40 years, China has retained this basic model and made it increasingly accessible. Since the government's 1999 decision to expand university enrollment, the annual number of university graduates has surged from 1 million in 1999 to 12 million today, roughly half of whom hold degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics. Today, China has nearly five times as many STEM graduates as the U.S. and seven times as many engineers. This explains why, unlike American consumers, Chinese consumers enjoy effective, affordable and widely available after-sales and maintenance services on the products they purchase, from electronics to EVs. China has also seen the value of learning from the West, sending more than 6 million students to foreign universities over the last 40 years, the majority of whom have returned to China after completing their studies. This has contributed substantially to China's manufacturing catch-up, especially over the last two decades. But education was just part of the equation. China's 1979 decision to allow local firms to establish joint ventures with foreign companies led to technological upgrading in a broad range of sectors. Crucially, as China built up increasingly advanced manufacturing capabilities, it also developed supply chains and supporting infrastructure. Today, China's manufacturing sector depends on a robust network of suppliers, innovators, manufacturers and logistics providers. China's government has played a vital role in building and nurturing this ecosystem. But, contrary to the prevailing impression in the West, this is not an exclusively — or even primarily — top-down process. China is composed of 31 provinces, around 300 prefecture-level cities and about 2,800 counties and cities, and at every level, governments compete with one another to promote growth and industrial development. While the central government sets priorities, any policy it introduces to support specific industries functions, in practice, as a horizontal competition policy. This economic strategy — made possible by China's massive scale — has been essential to the rapid development and continued competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing. Zhang Jun, dean of the School of Economics at Fudan University, is director of the China Center for Economic Studies, a Shanghai-based think tank. © Project Syndicate, 2025
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
TICAD African development conference to open Wed. in Yokohama
A Japan-led global conference on African development will take place in Yokohama, near Tokyo, for three days from Wednesday. The Tokyo International Conference on African Development, or TICAD, is held every three years. Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru is to co-chair this year's meeting. Japan's foreign ministry says it has invited 49 African countries. More than 40 have expressed their intention to attend. Following the opening ceremony on Wednesday, participants will discuss peace and stability. Themes over the following two days will focus on economic and social issues. On the last day, Ishiba will attend a joint news conference to explain the results. The prime minister is also scheduled to hold bilateral talks with the leaders of various countries with the aim of reinforcing ties, while keeping in mind that China and Russia are also strengthening their bonds with African countries.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Ishiba says Japan considering role in security guarantees for Ukraine
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Tuesday that Tokyo is considering playing a role in security guarantees being offered to Kyiv by a coalition of nations as peace talks with Russia to end its war in Ukraine gain steam. 'We'll watch the ongoing discussions closely, and while carefully considering what Japan can and should do — including various legal and capability aspects — we'll play an appropriate role,' Ishiba told reporters. Ishiba, who spoke hours after U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy and top European leaders met at the White House in Washington for peace talks, characterized the growing momentum as 'very meaningful.' But the prime minister, singling out Russia for killing civilians in Ukraine, also appeared to tamp down expectations of the type of quick peace deal being sought by Trump. 'Achieving a fair peace is an extremely difficult task that will take time,' Ishiba said. Earlier, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that the 'coalition of the willing,' which groups 30 nations backing Ukraine, had been working for months to craft a comprehensive package of security guarantees to deter Russian leader Vladimir Putin from an attempt to re-invade his neighbor under any hypothetical peace deal. 'Over the last couple of months ... a group of now 30 countries, including Japan and Australia, are working on this concept of security guarantees,' Rutte told Fox News on Monday after taking part in the talks in Washington. Japan joined the grouping in March. Tokyo has been watching the flurry of diplomacy nervously, with the precedent set by any hasty peace deal likely to have broad ramifications for Japan and Asia. Tokyo has been a strong proponent of maintaining the rules-based global order while condemning unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force — a stance widely seen as aimed at China, albeit obliquely. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has stoked concern in Japan that military powerhouse China — with its eye on democratic Taiwan — could take a page from Moscow's playbook and invade the island that it claims as its own. On Monday, Ishiba said that in addressing the war, leaders must "ensure that it does not undermine global security and the international order, including that of the Indo-Pacific region.' Japan in June last year became the first non-NATO country to ink a security accord with Ukraine, signing a 10-year deal that promised continued humanitarian and nonlethal aid, and bolstered support for the war-torn country's reconstruction. One of the biggest surprises to come out of Monday's meeting in Washington was Trump's pitch of a one-on-one summit between Zelenskyy and Putin that would be followed by a trilateral gathering involving all three. Although it remains unclear if those meetings will materialize, Zelenskyy also secured a key goal in winning Trump's commitment to the U.S. participating in security guarantees as part of any peace deal, while reserving discussion of territorial exchanges for any direct talks with Putin. Rutte said that while the grouping needed more time to discuss the details of the security guarantees, 'for Ukraine to consider what to do next when it comes to territory, it is important to also know what the situation will be with the security guarantees to prevent Vladimir Putin from ever trying again to invade parts of Ukraine.'
