Vance Says Pope Francis Had 'Disagreements' With Trump Admin Policies
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Vice President JD Vance has reflected on the legacy of Pope Francis and their recent meeting, acknowledging policy disagreements but emphasizing the pontiff's lasting impact as a pastoral leader.
Speaking to reporters in Agra, India, on Wednesday, Vance addressed questions about whether he would attend the pope's upcoming funeral and shared personal insights into their encounter, which occurred less than a day before the pope's death.
"I'm aware he had disagreements with some of the policies of our administration," Vance said. "He also had a lot of agreements with the policies of our administration. I'm not going to soil the man's legacy by talking about politics. I think he was a great Christian pastor and that's how I choose to remember the holy father."
Pope Francis receives U.S. Vice President JD Vance before bestowing the Urbi et Orbi blessing in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican on April 20, 2025.
Pope Francis receives U.S. Vice President JD Vance before bestowing the Urbi et Orbi blessing in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican on April 20, 2025.
Vatican Media via AP, HO
Why It Matters
Pope Francis died on Monday at the age of 88, just hours after meeting Vance during his Easter Sunday visit to the Vatican. The two exchanged greetings in what became one of Francis' final public interactions. Vance, a Catholic convert since 2019, described the meeting as "a great blessing."
The pope had publicly criticized some Trump administration policies, particularly on immigration. In 2016, Francis addressed then-candidate Donald Trump's proposal to build a border wall, stating: "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian."
Vance acknowledged these differences during remarks at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast earlier this year. "My goal is not to litigate with him or any other clergy member about who's right and who's wrong," he said, according to CBS News.
During Sunday's meeting, the vice president greeted the pope, who was seated in a wheelchair. "I know you've not been feeling great, but it's good to see you in better health," he said in a video released by the Vatican.
When Is Pope Francis' Funeral?
Francis' funeral is scheduled for Saturday at 10 a.m. local time (4 a.m. ET) in St. Peter's Square, following three days of public viewing beginning Wednesday at St. Peter's Basilica. His body will be buried at Rome's Basilica of Saint Mary Major in a simple wooden casket, per his request.
Who Will Attend Pope Francis' Funeral?
Among the world leaders confirmed to attend are President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, who announced their plans to be present in Rome.
Other global dignitaries expected at the service include Argentinian President Javier Milei, French President Emmanuel Macron, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Polish President Andrzej Duda, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Several royal figures will also attend, including the heir to the British throne Prince William and the Spain's King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking to reporters on Monday, said conversations about the broader U.S. delegation were ongoing. Vance has not committed to attending, stating: "I'm not currently planning to attend his funeral, I'm not currently planning not to attend his funeral, we just haven't thought that much about when his funeral is going to be and who is going to attend from our government."
A Final Encounter
For Vance, the recent encounter with Francis was a deeply personal moment.
"I've thought a lot about that. It's pretty crazy, actually, and obviously when I saw him I didn't know that he had less than 24 hours still on this earth, I think it was a great blessing," Vance told reporters.
The vice president shared his condolences on social media.
"My heart goes out to the millions of Christians all over the world who loved him," he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. He highlighted one of Francis' homilies delivered during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, calling it "really quite beautiful."
"The thing that I will always remember Pope Francis for is that he was a great pastor. People on the margins, poor people, people suffering from diseases, they saw in Pope Francis an advocate and I think a true expression of Christian love," Vance told reporters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who's questioning women's right to vote?
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivers remarks at Fort Bragg, North Carolina on June 10, 2025. (Daniel Torok/The White House) This story was originally reported by Mariel Padilla, Grace Panetta and Mel Leonor Barclay of The 19th. Meet Mariel, Grace and Mel and read more of their reporting on gender, politics and policy. 'In my ideal society, we would vote as households,' a pastor tells CNN. 'And I would ordinarily be the one that would cast the vote, but I would cast the vote having discussed it with my household.' Another agrees, saying he'd back an end to a woman's right to vote: 'I would support that, and I'd support it on the basis that the atomization that comes with our current system is not good for humans.' The discussion of 19th Amendment rights was part of a news segment focused on Doug Wilson — a self-proclaimed Christian nationalist pastor based in Idaho — that was reposted to X by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The secretary is among Wilson's supporters, and his involvement with Wilson's denomination highlights how a fringe conservative evangelical Christian belief system that questions women's right to vote is gaining more traction in the Republican Party. Kristin Du Mez, a professor of history at Calvin University and author of 'Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation,' said Wilson's broader vision of Christian nationalism has gotten more attention over the past several years, alongside President Donald Trump's rise to power. 'He was a fairly fringe figure, but this moment was really his moment,' she said. 'And then as part of that, also, I think he signaled and gave permission to others that they didn't need to hide some of their more controversial views, such as, should women have the vote? And that's something that you didn't hear proudly promoted from very many spaces, even just a handful of years ago.' In the CNN interview, Wilson said he'd like to see the United States become a Christian and patriarchal country. He advocates for a society where sodomy is criminalized and women submit to their husbands and shouldn't serve in combat roles in the military — a belief Hegseth has also publicly shared in the past though walked back during his confirmation hearings. Hegseth appeared to support the nearly seven-minute interview with the caption, 'All of Christ for All of Life.' Wilson has built an evangelical empire over the past 50 years that is centered in Moscow, Idaho, and now spans more than 150 congregations across four continents — including a new church in Washington, D.C. In July, Hegseth and his family attended the inaugural service at Christ Church, according to CNN. 'The Secretary is a proud member of a church affiliated with the Congregation of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC), which was founded by Pastor Doug Wilson,' Sean Parnell, the chief Pentagon spokesperson, said in a statement to The 19th. 'The Secretary very much appreciates many of Mr. Wilson's writings and teachings.' Du Mez said Wilson built his brand as a vocal critic of mainstream evangelicalism. 'They were too wishy washy,' Du Mez said, referring to Wilson's view of much of White evangelicalism in the 1990s and early 2000s. 'They were too soft. And so he was kind of bringing a harsher biblical truth, and that included things like a much more rigid application of biblical patriarchy. ' In 2024, only 1 in 10 Americans qualified as Christian nationalism adherents, according to the Public Religion Research Institute. Ryan Dawkins, an assistant professor of political science at Carleton College, said Christian nationalism hasn't necessarily gotten more popular in the past 20 years. But there have been partisan trends. 'While they used to be more evenly divided between the two parties, over the last two decades, Christian nationalists have sorted into the Republican Party at incredibly high rates,' Dawkins said. 'Christian nationalism is almost non-existent within the Democratic Party today, at least among White Democrats.' While it's still far from a mainstream opinion, several figures within the Republican Party have flirted with the idea of repealing the 19th Amendment. Paul Ingrassia, who Trump nominated to lead the Office of Special Counsel, suggested approval for the idea in a 2023 podcast. Podcast host Alan Jacoby told Ingrassia that his own wife is the 'biggest misogynist this side of the Mississippi, by the way. My wife literally thinks women should not vote.' Ingrassia responded, 'She's very based,' a term expressing support for a bold opinion. During the 2020 Republican National Convention, Republicans featured anti-abortion activist Abby Johnson, who has advocated for a new kind of voting system where households, not individuals, would cast votes. Head-of-household voting has historically disenfranchised women and people of color by concentrating power on the male leaders of the home. In the leadup to the 2016 presidential election, FiveThirtyEight, a political forecasting site, shared data that suggested if women didn't vote, Trump would win. The hashtag #repealthe19th — a reference to the 19th Amendment, which grants women the right to vote — quickly went viral. And a former Trump-backed Michigan candidate for the U.S. House who has also held positions in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development was found to have made statements criticizing women's suffrage while in college at Stanford University in the early 2000s. John Gibbs, now an assistant secretary at the agency, said that the country had been damaged by the 19th Amendment because women's suffrage had led to an increase in the size and scope of the government. He added that women making up half of the population wasn't enough reason for women's suffrage. Gibbs' 2022 congressional campaign denied he opposed women's right to vote. Kelly Marino, associate teaching professor at Sacred Heart University and author of 'Votes for College Women: Alumni, Students and the Woman Suffrage Campaign' said that while conservative religious sects adamantly opposed to women's suffrage have always existed, now there is renewed momentum. 'If you look at the way things played out in the past, we have this very liberal period followed by a conservative backlash,' Marino said. 'And that's what's going on now. You have this period of liberalism where people were having a more expansive view of gender ideology, ideas about sexuality and women in politics. We had some pretty prominent female politicians that were making it pretty far in the last couple of years. And now there's a backlash.' Marino said the conservative backlash is reminiscent of the 1960s and 70s. There were significant progressive movements for civil rights, women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights and environmental protections. But at the same time, the early 1970s saw the emergence of the men's liberation movement, which focused primarily on issues like divorce law and child custody. 'There's some men who are promoting a sort of return to tradition, a patriarchal vision for society,' Marino said. 'It's always sort of there, but it's gaining traction within mainstream consciousness again. And now, you have all this stuff about soft girls and tradwives — this gender ideal of women being the domestic homemaker within a traditional family structure. There's been a big push for this radical Christianity and some of its values — it's become really popular even among younger people.' Joseph Slaughter, an assistant professor of history at Wesleyan University, said Wilson is having his moment in the spotlight — but it's important to remember that he does not speak for the majority. 'He delights in upsetting people or saying transgressive, un-PC things,' Slaughter said. 'Ten years ago, when he posted a video talking about man's biblical duties — people just sort of yawned and dismissed him. Now, he's saying things and they're gaining more currency because of some of this other new right-wing masculinity and the online manosphere.' Slaughter said it's particularly concerning that Wilson's teachings have found their support in a man as powerful as Hegseth. 'What does it mean for somebody who's running an organization which has had its struggles over the years integrating women and trying to understand existential questions about women's role in combat?' Slaughter said. 'Are Hegseth's views reinforced by his religion now? Does this church reinforce his cultural chauvinism? For somebody in his position, it's certainly fair game to ask.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: CAIR's national deputy director defends the group against L.A. Times op-ed
To the editor: Contributing writer Josh Hammer's recent column repeats bigoted, discredited conspiracy theories about American Muslims ('Label the Muslim Brotherhood's branches as terrorist organizations,' Aug. 15). Just as extremists once smeared Catholic and Jewish Americans as disloyal and accused Black civil rights leaders and Vietnam War protesters of being communist agents, Islamophobes today falsely claim that American Muslim institutions are part of a global terrorist conspiracy. The main target of Hammer's article was my civil rights group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. For more than 30 years, CAIR has defended free speech, racial equality and religious liberty while consistently condemning all forms of bigotry — including antisemitism and Islamophobia — and unjust violence. We have spoken out against terrorism so often that ISIS once put a target on our executive director. Like other American Muslim institutions, CAIR is an independent nonprofit, not an agent of any foreign group. If Hammer's real grievance with CAIR is our advocacy for Palestinian human rights, polls show that most Americans oppose U.S. support for Israel's devastating war in Gaza. Does Hammer smear American Muslim groups because he fears our growing civic engagement will continue to reorient U.S. policy on Israel and Gaza in a more just, humane direction? Anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian activists are entitled to lash out, but the rest of us should not take their bigoted conspiracy theories seriously. Edward Ahmed Mitchell, Washington, writer is a civil rights attorney and the national deputy director of CAIR.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. What's happening? The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. Why would Trump do this? In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit? That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' Why would Intel do a deal? The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Would this deal be unusual? Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. Would the government run Intel? U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. What government grants does Intel receive? Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
