US stocks close mostly lower after mixed data
Chip companies came under pressure as markets digested the economic news. Photo: Reuters
Wall Street stocks finished mostly lower on Friday with chip companies under pressure as markets digested mixed US economic data.
US retail sales climbed 0.5 percent in July to US$726.3 billion from June, in line with analyst expectations and a solid performance after numerous tariff announcements by US President Donald Trump.
But the Federal Reserve's index for industrial production edged down in July, while the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey fell for the first time in four months.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a 0.1 percent gain at 44,946.12, after earlier hitting an intraday all-time high.
But the broad-based S&P 500 dropped 0.3 percent to 6,449.80, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index slid 0.4 percent to 21,622.57.
Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers said Friday's reports amounted to a "difficult combination" of data that the market took in stride.
"When the news is good, (stocks) react really positively," he said. "And when the news isn't good, they just go down a little."
Several semiconductor companies traded lower following a disappointing outlook from Applied Materials, which tumbled 14.1 percent as it warned of lower revenues in the current quarter while it navigates "near-term uncertainties" in economic conditions.
Trump also announced plans to set tariffs on semiconductors in the coming weeks.
Lam Research, KLA and Micron Technology all finished sharply lower.
But UnitedHealth Group surged 12 percent after Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway disclosed an equity stake in the insurer, which has been beset with government investigations into its billing practices. (AFP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Washington has already lost dirty chip war but does not know it yet
The United States is fighting two chip wars against China. One involves playing dirty, which it has already lost, though it doesn't know it yet. The other, more legitimate, remains to be seen. It depends on whether America can maintain its longstanding tech innovation and leadership. But with Donald Trump at the helm with his weird and often incomprehensible 'strategies' – from cuts and firings in government-funded basic research to direct interference in the tech sector – things don't look good. The dirty chip war essentially tries to trip China over with export restrictions, bullying of allies from selling advanced tech, and sanctioning of Chinese tech firms, which often includes targeting their non-Chinese suppliers as well. It was started by Donald Trump 1.0, intensified under Joe Biden, but now somewhat moderated under Trump 2.0. You can say China also has its own tit-for-tat dirty war, which involves smuggling and copying of export-restricted advanced chips and related tech such as automated software designs. But historically, rising tech superpowers, including Britain and the US, have always taken from others as a kind of state industrial policy. China's development is the rule, not the exception. Tech diffusion can be slowed but never stopped. At the moment, there is something of a truce, though Washington clearly sees it as a continuation of the tech war by other means. There seems to be a consensus within the Trump White House that putting the squeeze on China has actually made it move faster to refashion its entire chipmaking industry by creating an increasingly self-sufficient domestic sector with its own secure supply chains. That's why Trump and Co have switched to a different track, by allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell to China respectively their lower-performance chips H20 and MI308 for artificial intelligence.
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's ‘pay-to-play' trade policy sets a dangerous precedent
Any lingering doubts about the extent to which US President Donald Trump has rewritten the rules of global trade should have been laid to rest with reports that chip giants Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of the revenue from chip sales in China. The payments are a quid pro quo for approval of the export licences needed to sell semiconductors critical to China's artificial intelligence (AI) ambitions. The previously stalled licences were approved by the Commerce Department on August 8. As the US-China geostrategic rivalry has intensified in recent years, both Democratic and Republican administrations in Washington have tightened restrictions on the sale of sophisticated technologies to China. The export controls on Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips were put in place earlier this year in response to US concerns that the chips would find their way into Chinese military applications and give Beijing a leg up in the race for AI superiority. This unprecedented arrangement with Nvidia and AMD does something which until now would have been considered incomprehensible. It monetises US trade policy. Companies are essentially paying the US government for approval to export their products.
South China Morning Post
19 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
The Europe-China trade relationship: deficits, disputes and de-risking
When Donald Trump took office as US president for the second time in January 2025, many people anticipated trade ties between the European Union (EU) and China to grow closer. The reality has been more complex. As the world's third-largest economy, the EU navigates choppy waters between the US and China, while facing a widening trade imbalance with China and increasingly assertive Chinese trade measures. The EU seeks to 'de-risk' as trade talks with China remain stiff and trade disputes between the European bloc and China remain unsolved. What are the core issues at stake and where is this vital partnership heading?
