Insanity! Was this the greatest tennis match of all?
Alex de Minaur called it "insanity", Andre Agassi shook his head in disbelief from the VIP seats and Mats Wilander felt they were playing at a "not human" level. Other luminaries simply swooned it was the best tennis match they'd ever seen.
Indeed, Carlos Alcaraz's 4-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-4 7-6 (7-3) 7-6 (10-2) triumph over Jannik Sinner in the longest and perhaps best of all French Open finals was so astonishing that even the Spanish champ himself was asked where it belonged in the list of the greatest contests the sport had ever witnessed.
Modestly suggesting it wasn't as good as the Novak Djokovic-Rafael Nadal Australian Open epic in 2012 - which at five hours 53 minutes was the only final to last longer than Sunday's 5:29 marathon - Alcaraz, who saved three match points before prevailing, said he was just proud it was being mentioned as one of the finest of all.
"I don't know if our match is in the same table as them," he said when asked how it compared with Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer's final of 2008 and the Bjorn Borg-John McEnroe 1980 epics, both at Wimbledon.
"But just happy to put our match and our names in the history of the grand slams, in the history of Roland Garros. I leave the discussion to the people..."
Well, the tennis people were awed.
"The level of this whole match was insanity!!!!! What a day to be a fan of this beautiful sport," enthused Australia's main man de Minaur on X as he reflected on a contest between the two men he's played a combined 14 times and not yet managed a win.
This was a day to see why. Four-time grand slam champ Jim Courier, commentating on TNT Sport, echoed 'Demon's' incredulity as he said: "It's insane how good this is. Everybody's in disbelief at what they're seeing."
"One of the best 5th sets ever alongside Federer vs Nadal '08 Wimbledon + Djok vs Nadal AO 2012," tweeted former US Open champ Marin Cilic.
"Unbelievable level."
Sergi Bruguera, Spain's two-time French Open champ, told Alcaraz it had been the best match he'd ever witnessed, a view echoed by Greg Rusedski, Britain's former US Open finalist, who declared on BBC radio: "For me, personally, this goes down as the greatest tennis match I've ever seen.
"The standard was just exceptional. It's just incredible how hard these guys hit the ball."
So incredible indeed that seven-time grand slam single champ John McEnroe, talking on TNT Sport, wondered if the pair might even have eclipsed the king of clay, 14-time Roland Garros champ Rafa Nadal, here.
"It was an honour to witness. I've been doing this 30 years, that's one of the all-timers easily," said McEnroe.
"You would make a serious argument with both guys that they would be favoured to beat Nadal, at his best.
"Do I think they're gonna reach 20, 24 (titles), either one of them? No, because that plateau is so hard - but these two guys right now, it's like when you watch the NBA and you say nobody could be better than Michael Jordan. The tennis level right now is higher than I've ever seen."
Three-time Australian Open champ Wilander was left marvelling: "I cannot believe how lucky we are that we are going to have this rivalry as they have taken our sport to another level.
"I've seen Federer and Nadal, they played a couple of good finals but nothing comes close to this one to me.
"Because the anticipation was so high, especially from my side because I witnessed their matches and I always think that this is not possible, they are playing at a pace that is not human."
Alex de Minaur called it "insanity", Andre Agassi shook his head in disbelief from the VIP seats and Mats Wilander felt they were playing at a "not human" level. Other luminaries simply swooned it was the best tennis match they'd ever seen.
Indeed, Carlos Alcaraz's 4-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-4 7-6 (7-3) 7-6 (10-2) triumph over Jannik Sinner in the longest and perhaps best of all French Open finals was so astonishing that even the Spanish champ himself was asked where it belonged in the list of the greatest contests the sport had ever witnessed.
Modestly suggesting it wasn't as good as the Novak Djokovic-Rafael Nadal Australian Open epic in 2012 - which at five hours 53 minutes was the only final to last longer than Sunday's 5:29 marathon - Alcaraz, who saved three match points before prevailing, said he was just proud it was being mentioned as one of the finest of all.
"I don't know if our match is in the same table as them," he said when asked how it compared with Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer's final of 2008 and the Bjorn Borg-John McEnroe 1980 epics, both at Wimbledon.
"But just happy to put our match and our names in the history of the grand slams, in the history of Roland Garros. I leave the discussion to the people..."
Well, the tennis people were awed.
"The level of this whole match was insanity!!!!! What a day to be a fan of this beautiful sport," enthused Australia's main man de Minaur on X as he reflected on a contest between the two men he's played a combined 14 times and not yet managed a win.
This was a day to see why. Four-time grand slam champ Jim Courier, commentating on TNT Sport, echoed 'Demon's' incredulity as he said: "It's insane how good this is. Everybody's in disbelief at what they're seeing."
"One of the best 5th sets ever alongside Federer vs Nadal '08 Wimbledon + Djok vs Nadal AO 2012," tweeted former US Open champ Marin Cilic.
"Unbelievable level."
Sergi Bruguera, Spain's two-time French Open champ, told Alcaraz it had been the best match he'd ever witnessed, a view echoed by Greg Rusedski, Britain's former US Open finalist, who declared on BBC radio: "For me, personally, this goes down as the greatest tennis match I've ever seen.
"The standard was just exceptional. It's just incredible how hard these guys hit the ball."
So incredible indeed that seven-time grand slam single champ John McEnroe, talking on TNT Sport, wondered if the pair might even have eclipsed the king of clay, 14-time Roland Garros champ Rafa Nadal, here.
"It was an honour to witness. I've been doing this 30 years, that's one of the all-timers easily," said McEnroe.
"You would make a serious argument with both guys that they would be favoured to beat Nadal, at his best.
"Do I think they're gonna reach 20, 24 (titles), either one of them? No, because that plateau is so hard - but these two guys right now, it's like when you watch the NBA and you say nobody could be better than Michael Jordan. The tennis level right now is higher than I've ever seen."
Three-time Australian Open champ Wilander was left marvelling: "I cannot believe how lucky we are that we are going to have this rivalry as they have taken our sport to another level.
"I've seen Federer and Nadal, they played a couple of good finals but nothing comes close to this one to me.
"Because the anticipation was so high, especially from my side because I witnessed their matches and I always think that this is not possible, they are playing at a pace that is not human."
Alex de Minaur called it "insanity", Andre Agassi shook his head in disbelief from the VIP seats and Mats Wilander felt they were playing at a "not human" level. Other luminaries simply swooned it was the best tennis match they'd ever seen.
Indeed, Carlos Alcaraz's 4-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-4 7-6 (7-3) 7-6 (10-2) triumph over Jannik Sinner in the longest and perhaps best of all French Open finals was so astonishing that even the Spanish champ himself was asked where it belonged in the list of the greatest contests the sport had ever witnessed.
Modestly suggesting it wasn't as good as the Novak Djokovic-Rafael Nadal Australian Open epic in 2012 - which at five hours 53 minutes was the only final to last longer than Sunday's 5:29 marathon - Alcaraz, who saved three match points before prevailing, said he was just proud it was being mentioned as one of the finest of all.
"I don't know if our match is in the same table as them," he said when asked how it compared with Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer's final of 2008 and the Bjorn Borg-John McEnroe 1980 epics, both at Wimbledon.
"But just happy to put our match and our names in the history of the grand slams, in the history of Roland Garros. I leave the discussion to the people..."
Well, the tennis people were awed.
"The level of this whole match was insanity!!!!! What a day to be a fan of this beautiful sport," enthused Australia's main man de Minaur on X as he reflected on a contest between the two men he's played a combined 14 times and not yet managed a win.
This was a day to see why. Four-time grand slam champ Jim Courier, commentating on TNT Sport, echoed 'Demon's' incredulity as he said: "It's insane how good this is. Everybody's in disbelief at what they're seeing."
"One of the best 5th sets ever alongside Federer vs Nadal '08 Wimbledon + Djok vs Nadal AO 2012," tweeted former US Open champ Marin Cilic.
"Unbelievable level."
Sergi Bruguera, Spain's two-time French Open champ, told Alcaraz it had been the best match he'd ever witnessed, a view echoed by Greg Rusedski, Britain's former US Open finalist, who declared on BBC radio: "For me, personally, this goes down as the greatest tennis match I've ever seen.
"The standard was just exceptional. It's just incredible how hard these guys hit the ball."
So incredible indeed that seven-time grand slam single champ John McEnroe, talking on TNT Sport, wondered if the pair might even have eclipsed the king of clay, 14-time Roland Garros champ Rafa Nadal, here.
"It was an honour to witness. I've been doing this 30 years, that's one of the all-timers easily," said McEnroe.
"You would make a serious argument with both guys that they would be favoured to beat Nadal, at his best.
"Do I think they're gonna reach 20, 24 (titles), either one of them? No, because that plateau is so hard - but these two guys right now, it's like when you watch the NBA and you say nobody could be better than Michael Jordan. The tennis level right now is higher than I've ever seen."
Three-time Australian Open champ Wilander was left marvelling: "I cannot believe how lucky we are that we are going to have this rivalry as they have taken our sport to another level.
"I've seen Federer and Nadal, they played a couple of good finals but nothing comes close to this one to me.
"Because the anticipation was so high, especially from my side because I witnessed their matches and I always think that this is not possible, they are playing at a pace that is not human."
Alex de Minaur called it "insanity", Andre Agassi shook his head in disbelief from the VIP seats and Mats Wilander felt they were playing at a "not human" level. Other luminaries simply swooned it was the best tennis match they'd ever seen.
Indeed, Carlos Alcaraz's 4-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-4 7-6 (7-3) 7-6 (10-2) triumph over Jannik Sinner in the longest and perhaps best of all French Open finals was so astonishing that even the Spanish champ himself was asked where it belonged in the list of the greatest contests the sport had ever witnessed.
Modestly suggesting it wasn't as good as the Novak Djokovic-Rafael Nadal Australian Open epic in 2012 - which at five hours 53 minutes was the only final to last longer than Sunday's 5:29 marathon - Alcaraz, who saved three match points before prevailing, said he was just proud it was being mentioned as one of the finest of all.
"I don't know if our match is in the same table as them," he said when asked how it compared with Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer's final of 2008 and the Bjorn Borg-John McEnroe 1980 epics, both at Wimbledon.
"But just happy to put our match and our names in the history of the grand slams, in the history of Roland Garros. I leave the discussion to the people..."
Well, the tennis people were awed.
"The level of this whole match was insanity!!!!! What a day to be a fan of this beautiful sport," enthused Australia's main man de Minaur on X as he reflected on a contest between the two men he's played a combined 14 times and not yet managed a win.
This was a day to see why. Four-time grand slam champ Jim Courier, commentating on TNT Sport, echoed 'Demon's' incredulity as he said: "It's insane how good this is. Everybody's in disbelief at what they're seeing."
"One of the best 5th sets ever alongside Federer vs Nadal '08 Wimbledon + Djok vs Nadal AO 2012," tweeted former US Open champ Marin Cilic.
"Unbelievable level."
Sergi Bruguera, Spain's two-time French Open champ, told Alcaraz it had been the best match he'd ever witnessed, a view echoed by Greg Rusedski, Britain's former US Open finalist, who declared on BBC radio: "For me, personally, this goes down as the greatest tennis match I've ever seen.
"The standard was just exceptional. It's just incredible how hard these guys hit the ball."
So incredible indeed that seven-time grand slam single champ John McEnroe, talking on TNT Sport, wondered if the pair might even have eclipsed the king of clay, 14-time Roland Garros champ Rafa Nadal, here.
"It was an honour to witness. I've been doing this 30 years, that's one of the all-timers easily," said McEnroe.
"You would make a serious argument with both guys that they would be favoured to beat Nadal, at his best.
"Do I think they're gonna reach 20, 24 (titles), either one of them? No, because that plateau is so hard - but these two guys right now, it's like when you watch the NBA and you say nobody could be better than Michael Jordan. The tennis level right now is higher than I've ever seen."
Three-time Australian Open champ Wilander was left marvelling: "I cannot believe how lucky we are that we are going to have this rivalry as they have taken our sport to another level.
"I've seen Federer and Nadal, they played a couple of good finals but nothing comes close to this one to me.
"Because the anticipation was so high, especially from my side because I witnessed their matches and I always think that this is not possible, they are playing at a pace that is not human."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
SGA welcomes Aussie rookie to the Finals
NBA: Aussie Johnny Furphy was welcomed to the NBA FInals by Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander within seconds of checking in
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander creates NBA history as Oklahoma City Thunder defeats Indiana Pacers in Game 2 of the NBA finals
This has been Oklahoma City's formula all season: Lose one game, respond in the next. That's exactly what the Thunder did in Game 2 of the NBA Finals on Monday morning (AEST). Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 34 points, Alex Caruso added 20 off the bench and the Thunder beat the Indiana Pacers 123-107 to tie these finals at one game apiece. Jalen Williams scored 19, Aaron Wiggins had 18 and Chet Holmgren finished with 15 for the Thunder. It was the franchise's first finals game win since the opener of the 2012 series against Miami. "We did some things good tonight. We did some things bad," Gilgeous-Alexander said. "We've got to be able to get better and be ready for Game 3." Tyrese Haliburton scored 17 for Indiana, which erased a 15-point, fourth-quarter deficit in Game 1 but never made a push in this game. Myles Turner scored 16 and Pascal Siakam added 15 for the Pacers, the first team since Miami in 2013 to not have a 20-point scorer in the first two games of the finals. Game 3 is Thursday morning at 10:30am at Indianapolis, in what will be the first finals game in the city in 25 years. "A bad first half, obviously, was a big problem," Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. "And we just played poorly. A little better in the second half. But you can't be a team that's reactive and expect to be successful or have consistency." Gilgeous-Alexander's first basket of the night was a history-maker: It gave him 3,000 points on the season, including the regular season and playoffs. And later, he passed New York's Jalen Brunson (514) as the leading overall scorer in these playoffs. But the real milestone for the MVP came a couple hours later, when he and most everybody else on the Thunder got a finals win for the first time. A 19-2 run in the second quarter turned what was a six-point game into a 23-point Thunder lead. It might have seemed wobbly a couple of times — an immediate 10-0 rebuttal by the Pacers made it 52-39, and Indiana was within 13 again after Andrew Nembhard's lay-up with 7:09 left in the third — but the Thunder lead was never in serious doubt. "They did a good job being disruptive," Siakam said. "They got out in transition. … They were super aggressive, which is what they do." With the noise level in the building often topping 100 decibels — a chainsaw is 110 dB, for comparison purposes — the Thunder did what they've done pretty much all season. They came off a loss, this time a 111-110 defeat in Game 1, and blew somebody out as their response. Including the NBA Cup title game, which doesn't count in any standings, the Thunder are now 18-2 this season when coming off a loss. Of those 18 wins, 12 have been by double digits. "That's a long 48 hours when you lose Game 1 like that, coming into Game 2," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. "The guys did a great job of just focusing on what we needed to do to stack to a win tonight. That's how we got it." AP
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
GEORGIE PARKER: Men should play three sets at tennis majors like women after French Open female fixture snub
The French Open finals were both epic encounters, but there's something about the way the tournament is run that leaves a bitter taste. Coco Gauff won in three sets against world number one Aryna Sabalenka to claim her first French Open title, and Carlos Alcaraz triumphed in an absolute thriller — lifting the trophy after a five-and-a-half-hour marathon against Jannik Sinner overnight. I love a lot of things about tennis — it's one of my favourite sports to watch. One thing I really appreciate, which is rare in other sports, is the personalities of the players that shine through in their press conferences. They play and speak for themselves — not through a team's PR or brand — so they often say exactly what's on their mind. During the French Open, two things stood out to me from the press conferences. Australia's top male hope, Alex de Minaur, who has been battling injuries on and off, suffered a shock second-round exit. He complained, 'there's just too much tennis,' saying the season is too long and that 'the solution is you shorten it … because careers are going to get shorter and shorter — they're just going to burn out mentally.' In the women's draw, Aryna Sabalenka, Jessica Pegula, and Ons Jabeur all made comments about the visibility of women's tennis at the tournament, with no women's matches played in the prime-time evening slot — reportedly because they only play three sets, not five. That's not really a sound argument, as the Australian and US Opens alternate night matches between the sexes. Pegula said it made her feel like 'hitting her head against the wall.' Sabalenka played Olympic champion and world number eight Zheng Qinwen at 11 a.m.—a quarterfinal match that should have been a lock for prime-time action. In some ways, tennis is far ahead of many sports, with equal pay at Grand Slams. But in other ways, it throws women under the bus, and there's still deeply rooted sexism in the sport. In 2020, for example, the women's Italian Open champion received just €10 less than the men's champion — an amount so small it could only be interpreted as a deliberate statement that women shouldn't be equal. They won't allow women to play five sets (even though the WTA has repeatedly expressed interest) due to 'logistical challenges' with broadcasting and scheduling. Yet, because women aren't allowed to play five sets, they're denied prime-time slots—and the shorter matches fuel the 'you're not doing equal work for equal pay' criticism that women endure online every major tournament. It's infuriating. So, from these press conferences, I'm hearing two problems: the men are playing too much tennis (though de Minaur was more focused on the length of the season than match format), and the women want to be seen as equal. So here's a left-field solution: bring the men back to three sets at majors so everyone is on the same page? Grand Slams would be easier for men to handle workload-wise, as best-of-five is extremely taxing, and there would be no excuse for tournament directors not to give women prime-time slots. Now, if I'm being honest, I don't really want this. I love the five-set thrillers — staying up watching Lleyton Hewitt until 4:30 a.m. against Marcos Baghdatis in the 2008 Australian Open is one of my favourite sporting memories. But what I do want is a solution for the women. It's not fair to hold something over them that directly impacts their visibility and growth, while not only denying them the opportunity to change it but actively blocking any change that could help. Jabeur said it perfectly: 'Honouring one side of the sport shouldn't mean ignoring the other.' Something has to give — because it's 2025, and these women deserve better.
