AI ‘Band' the Velvet Sundown Used Suno, Is an ‘Art Hoax,' Spokesperson Admits
'Personally, I'm interested in art hoaxes,' Frelon continues. 'The Leeds 13, a group of art students in the U.K., made, like, fake photos of themselves spending scholarship money at a beach or something like that, and it became a huge scandal. I think that stuff's really interesting.… We live in a world now where things that are fake have sometimes even more impact than things that are real. And that's messed up, but that's the reality that we face now. So it's like, 'Should we ignore that reality? Should we ignore these things that kind of exist on a continuum of real versus fake or kind of a blend between the two? Or should we dive into it and just let it be the emerging native language of the internet?''In the phone conversation Tuesday morning, Frelon originally maintained that AI was used only in brainstorming for the music, then admitted to the use of Suno but 'not in the final product,' and finally came to acknowledge that at least some songs ('I don't want to say which ones') are Suno-generated. 'I haven't admitted that to anyone else,' Frelon says. He also acknowledged employing Suno's 'Persona' feature — the same one Timbaland is using with his controversial AI artist TaTa — to maintain a consistent singer's voice across songs, although he continues to claim that's not the case on every track.
More from Rolling Stone
Timbaland's New Artist Is Young, Photogenic - and Not Human
ABBA's Björn Ulvaeus Working on an AI-Assisted Musical
A Bullet Killed Him. AI Brought Him Back to Life in Court
Some observers have wondered whether some kind of playlist manipulation was used to build Velvet Sundown's Spotify listenership, but Frelon dodged that question. ' I'm not running the Spotify backend stuff, so I can't super speak to exactly how that happened,' he says. 'I know we got on some playlists that just have like tons of followers, and it seems to have spiraled from there.' Did Frelon and his associates use playlists of their own to boost the process? 'I don't have an answer that I can give to you for that because I'm not involved,' he says. 'And I don't want to say something that's not true.'
The Velvet Sundown enigma began in June, when two of the band's albums suddenly appeared on Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Music, and other streaming services. A band that no one had ever heard of, and didn't seem to have any sort of digital footprint, suddenly had hundreds of thousands of listeners for music that the band described as 'fusing Seventies psychedelic textures with cinematic alt-pop and dreamy analog soul.'
But how real was it? The songs, like 'Dust on the Wind,' felt like generic reproductions of Seventies rock, and 'photographs' of the group obviously had the amber-encased glow of AI-generated content. On Reddit, two posters called out what one poster called 'a completely fake band'; musician and writer Chris Dalla Riva questioned their existence on TikTok; and the streaming service Deezer noted that 'some tracks on this album may have been created using artificial intelligence.' The site Music Ally determined that most of the Spotify playlists which featured the band came from just four Spotify accounts — and no one could explain how the band's catalog ended up on a playlist of songs evoking the Vietnam War.
Early this week, the 'band' pushed back on its X account, claiming it was 'absolutely crazy that so-called 'journalists' keep pushing the lazy, baseless theory that the Velvet Sundown is 'AI-generated' with zero evidence.… This is not a joke. This is our music, written in long, sweaty nights in a cramped bungalow in California with real instruments, real minds and real soul.' ('Then make an appearance on live TV,' responded one person on X. 'Proof [sic] it make a real video,' replied another.)
Spotify, for one, has no rules against AI music. In the past, says Glenn McDonald, a former data alchemist at Spotify, 'fake listeners were a larger problem than fake music. It might have flipped.' McDonald feels the Velvet Sundown's prominence on that platform is the result of several factors: Artists and content creators are able to pay for more exposure on playlists, he says, and the company's recommendations systems have moved 'away from understandable algorithms with strong grounding in actual human listening and communities' and toward AI-driven systems that 'can pick songs for recommendations based on characteristics of their audio.'
Added together, McDonald says, these factors 'increase the lottery-like dynamics of the system so that there are fewer reasons why a fake band couldn't be successful. Most fake bands still won't be successful, and of course nobody notices when an AI band gets no listeners, but there are no protections against it happening, and probably from Spotify's business point of view it's not even clear that this is a bad thing to be 'protected' against.' (A spokesperson for Spotify declined to comment.)
As for the viral attention Velvet Sundown has garnered, 'it's because they're AI, not because the music's great,' says one veteran A&R executive, who asked for anonymity. 'It doesn't feel authentic. That said, it's clearly just a matter of time before AI creates a genuine hit song. Not convinced yet it will create a sustainable hit artist. My prediction is that a hit song will appear that the public loves. At that point, someone will reveal it to be AI. No one will care because they love the song.'
The Velvet Sundown's Frelon, meanwhile, says that music fans need to learn to accept AI tools, calling the fear of them 'super overwrought.' 'I respect that people have really strong emotions about this,' he says. 'But I think it's important that we allow artists to experiment with new technologies and new tools, try things out, and not freak out at people just because they're using a program or not using a program. People have this idea that you have to please everybody and you have to follow the rules. And that's not how music and culture progress. Music and culture progressed by people doing weird experiments and sometimes they work and sometimes they don't. And that's kind of the spirit that we're [embracing].'
Best of Rolling Stone
Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Jellycat Cuts U.K. Stockists Amid Brand Control Debate
Jellycat, the British-born viral soft toy company, sparked a social media backlash when it dropped approximately 100 independent stockists in the U.K. Disgruntled retailers, some of which had supported the brand for over twenty years, took to social media to share how devastated they were to receive nonpersonalized letters informing them that Jellycat had dropped them. The public backlash was severe, with Jellycat receiving numerous negative comments on its Trustpilot account and across social media. A Jellycat spokesperson said via email, 'We have been humbled by our recent growth and are working hard to supply our stockists of all sizes – small and big - in a way that is fair and reasonable'. Will this backlash cause the brand lasting damage? And with other viral toys on the scene, how long will Jellycat's growth last? The Rise Of Jellycat Jellycat was founded in 1999 by two brothers, Thomas and William Gatacre. In 2008, the Amuseables range launched, featuring inanimate objects with smiling faces and dangly limbs. The Amuseables' success sparked intense growth, with Jellycat turning over an estimated £200 million by 2023. The brand also enjoyed immense popularity on social media, with fan accounts springing up especially on TikTok. 'Jellycat hunts,' where fans would go from store to store to discover rare or limited edition characters, became a trend in their own right. The brand took a distinct move towards more premium positioning with the launch of themed pop-ups in late 2023. Partnering with FAO Schwarz in the US to create a diner experience, Galeries Lafayette in Paris with a patisserie, and Selfridges in London to offer fish and chips, the pop-ups combined exclusive Jellycats with fun and theatre to create experiences that sold out months in advance, showcasing the brand's creativity and Darker Side Of Jellycat's Growth With rapid growth and soaring popularity came new issues. Along with the growing issue of Jellycat thefts, current and former stockists cited that stock began to become a significant issue at the beginning of 2025. Jellycat also made other significant changes to its wholesale model at the beginning of the year, replacing independent sales agents with an in-house team. Stockists had to order stock from a list sent by email, and if they didn't open the email in time, they missed their chance. Several former and existing stockists gave comments via email for this article, many speaking anonymously, mindful of their relationship with the brand. Stock availability was a common theme that came up in almost every conversation. They mentioned issues such as 'no stock', 'no information as to when the stock might be coming in,' and 'backorders cancelled without notice'. Letters That Cut 100 U.K. Jellycat Stockists Then came the letters. These were not personalized, but addressed to 'Dear Jellycat Stockist'. Jellycat divided the stockists into three camps. Some received an 'official Jellycat' stockist letter and accompanying window sticker. Others were informed that Jellycat would help them attain 'official stockist' status in 2026 by working on their 'Jellycat experience', yet the letters gave no clear criteria for what a 'good' experience looked like. The letters informed others, including Georgie Stewart, co-founder of Stewarts of Bakewell, a gift, card, and party shop in the Peak District, England, that they were no longer stockists and should not place any more orders as Jellycat would not fulfill them. Stewart, who had stocked Jellycat for over twenty years, was devastated. 'We have cried over this,' she said. A Jellycat spokesperson said via email: 'We are big supporters of small business stockists and today there are over 1,200 independent stores across the UK stocking Jellycat. They've been the backbone of our business for over two decades… Our hope is that slightly reducing our stockists by 8% will help us to give better service to the remaining 92%, so they can offer their customers the best possible Jellycat experience. We are very sorry about this and the hurt it has caused… we just did not feel we had a better option.'Jellcat's Strategy The message from Jellycat is clear - this shift was all related to stock. 'With the constant increase in demand for our soft toys continuing to mean there is limited supply, unfortunately, we're not able to support every shop that wants to stock Jellycat… We are also increasing supply as fast as we can without compromising our high quality and production standards.' However, it seems likely that there is also an element of brand positioning at play. In 2022, during rapid growth, Jellycat appointed a new CEO, Arnauld Meyselle, from Ren Skincare. At Ren Skincare, he focused on establishing the brand as more sustainable, away from mass-market beauty, and towards a more premium positioning. The Jellycat moves, and recent marketing activities such as the viral pop-ups suggest that the brand wants to position itself as more premium and consolidate its retailer base. The fact that Jellycat brought the sales team in-house and changed the way orders are placed also speaks to its aim of driving efficiencies and managing costs as the business continues to grow. As Therese Oertenblad, a wholesale expert, shares, 'in my 17 years, I've never seen a brand reshuffle its stockists in this way. It's undoubtedly a short-sighted attempt to cut costs by having fewer people to deal with.'Jellycat's Communication Style Ultimately, controlling costs, improving efficiencies, and protecting the brand are solid and understandable business decisions. The issue with Jellycat is partly what they did, but mostly how they did it. Jellycat is a brand known for spreading joy and fun, as one stockist put it, 'a little bit of fluffy joy to lighten my customers' day.' By sending nonpersonalized letters to people who had spent thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of dollars over the years, the brand acted inconsistently with its joyful, fun image. PR expert Fiona Minett adds, 'There was no empathy, no transparency, and that erodes trust.' While Jellycat has issued public apologies, as of the time of writing, no direct apologies have been made to the cut businesses. The treatment of these stockists has caused a negative backlash and bad feelings on social media from people who feel that the brand is turning its back on the shops that helped build the business to where it is next for Jellycat Ultimately, the Jellycat story is a stark reminder that even a fast-growing, viral product will not make a brand immune to a negative backlash. It highlights the importance of the relationship between brands and the small independent stockists championing them. It also reminds those stockists that they cannot rely too heavily on any one brand when, ultimately, that relationship is not in their control. The question remains whether Jellycat has permanently damaged its relationship with the indie retail world that built it up or whether it can move beyond this chapter to a renewed era of growth and efficiency.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to get My Chemical Romance tickets for 2026 UK tour
The iconic emo band are bringing their Long Live The Black Parade tour to UK shores. My Chemical Romance are bringing their Long Live The Black Parade tour to the UK, with the band confirming the first dates for the band's return. The iconic emo band are celebrating the upcoming 20th anniversary of their breakout hit album The Black Parade with a worldwide tour. The band are in the midst of touring in North America and have already announced tour dates for South America and South East Asia. Here is what MCR fans need to know about the band's return to the UK, their first tour dates in the country since 2022. How to get tickets to My Chemical Romance's 2026 UK tour My Chemical Romance have announced two dates so far for their UK tour, with the band set to perform at London's Wembley Stadium on Friday 10 July and Saturday 11 July, 2026. Tickets for the show will be available to purchase at 10am on Friday, 15 August on Ticketmaster, as well as on AXS and Gigs and Tours. There is not currently a pre-sale option for the tour, so fans of the band who wish to see the group will all have to try their luck on Friday. The two stadium dates are also the only UK tour dates the band has announced so far. The group had been teasing a UK tour announcement for some time, sharing a quirky video of an old school game show called Quizzo that declared the country that had won a "nuclear winter" was the UK. Wembley Stadium then teased the MCR logo and the 'Long Live The Black Parade' poster on Sunday, 10 August ahead of the official announcement on Monday. The teaser is very much in line with the band's tour, which has seen the band create their own language and lore around a fictional country that has served as inspiration for the Long Live the Black Parade tour and has given it a rock opera feel thus far. As part of the new tour the band are performing their breakout 2006 album The Black Parade in full as well as a number of rare songs from their back catalogue. My Chemical Romance last toured the UK in 2022 as part of their reunion tour, they performed in Milton Keynes, Cornwall, Dublin, Warrington, Cardiff and Glasgow at the time. It is currently unclear if more UK tour dates will be announced for 2026.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Christopher Biggins condemned over ‘grabbing women' remarks
Christopher Biggins has been called out after attempting to defend sacked MasterChef host Gregg Wallace with the admission that he used to 'grab women' while working on sets. The 76-year-old pantomime actor bizarrely joked that his past conduct towards women would've landed him in 'prison' if he did it today. Biggins, who also appeared on Celebrity MasterChef in 2014, claimed that this type of misconduct was not uncommon 25 years ago and was considered 'affection'. Speaking to The Sun, he said: 'Years ago, I would approach a woman from behind and grab her... Well, I'm gay, so it didn't matter. And I'd like to still be doing it, but I don't think I can anymore. 'If I were to do that now, I'd be put into prison. Twenty-five years ago, we were all doing it. It was a thing of affection.' He continued: 'Everybody is now terrified. I wouldn't want to be a comedian. I think comedians have a really tough job.' Refuge ambassador and former Love Island star Sharon Gaffka told the publication: 'Touching someone without their consent, regardless of the context, is never funny.' The Independent has contacted Biggins' representatives for comment. His remarks come after he revealed that he had reached out to Wallace and his family following his departure from MasterChef. 'I love Gregg and I love his wife,' he explained during an appearance at the National Reality TV Awards. 'I've tried to get hold of her because they must be going through a terrible time, because suddenly careers are vanishing, it's so wrong.' Wallace's position on MasterChef was deemed 'untenable' last month when an investigation into historical misconduct upheld 45 of 83 allegations against the presenter, including claims of inappropriate sexual language and one incident of unwelcome physical contact. Meanwhile, John Torode, who had presented MasterChef alongside Wallace since 2005, was sacked just a day later, as the same report upheld a complaint against him involving 'an extremely offensive racist term'. The latest series of MasterChef, which is presented by Wallace and Torode, premiered this week. The heavily edited first three episodes were made available on BBC iPlayer and appeared to feature fewer jokes and interactions between the hosts and contestants. Some viewers said they felt 'conflicted' seeing the hosts on screen following the accusations against them. One contestant, Sarah Shafi, agreed to be edited out of the series after objecting to it being broadcast over concerns that it sent the wrong message to women. The BBC later revealed that news about the show had an impact on ratings, as the launch show was watched by just 1.96 million, as opposed to the 2.73 million who watched last year's debut episode. The fact that this series launched in August, rather than in the usual April slot, may also have affected the viewership. Solve the daily Crossword