Delhi: Man sentenced to 20 years in jail for raping minor daughter
A court here has sentenced a man to rigorous imprisonment of 20 years for repeatedly raping and having unnatural sex with his 13-year-old daughter, saying that the victim was going through a never ending ordeal, where years after the crime, she feared that if her father were sentenced, she would be blamed by society.
Expressing abject disappointment, Additional Sessions Judge Anu Aggarwal, in an order dated May 28, said the girl was subjected to the most heinous crime within the four walls of her home by her father, to whom she had bestowed her utmost trust.
On May 19, the court had convicted the man under the POCSO provisions for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault and under the penal provisions for rape, unnatural offences and criminal intimidation.
During the arguments on the quantum of sentence, Additional Public Prosecutor Arun K V said the convict deserved no leniency for the horrific crime, where he raped his daughter for over 20 days.
The court said, "For a child, home is a space that gives him a sense of security, love and affection; a place where the child is nurtured, and is the most relaxing place for a child. The relationship between father and daughter is such that under the father's shadow, the daughter feels safe and secure."
It said that, however, at times, a children's most cherished place became a place where they were "subjected to the most heinous crime" and in the present case, the girl was raped by "a person, on whom she bestowed her utmost trust."
"After hearing the victim, it seems that this ordeal is never-ending for her. She was subjected to the most heinous offence and was not only raped but was also subjected to unnatural sexual assault. However, even after passing of seven years, the victim is still afraid that if her father is sentenced to jail, she will be blamed by everyone in society,' the court said.
It then sentenced the convict to 20 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act.
The court also awarded ₹16 lakh compensation to the victim.
The case came to light on June 30, 2018, after the victim narrated the crime to a neighbour, who then informed police.
Upon investigation, the police visited the victim's residence, where the minor girl recounted her ordeal. At the time, the girl, aged 14, was studying at a madrasa in Lucknow.
During her summer vacation in June 2018, her father brought her to the national capital. Initially, they stayed at her paternal aunt's house, following which he rented a separate room, where the crime was committed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Woman seeks bail for live-in partner she charged with abuse of minor daughter
Kolkata: In a bizarre turn of events, a Salt Lake-based entrepreneur, who lodged a complaint against her live-in partner for allegedly abusing her minor daughter leading to his arrest under Pocso charges, pleaded for his bail in Calcutta High Court on Tuesday because her "child misses her father (the live-in partner)". The woman told the HC that while her partner "is dying in prison", she was "dying outside". The court granted bail to the accused, who is at Dum Dum Central Jail since Aug 8, 2024, stating that "there is no immediate chance of conclusion of trial". Moving the bail plea before Justice Prasenjit Biswas, senior advocate Phiroze Edulji argued that Pocso charges were being "weaponised" in this case. Edulji said the woman met the accused in prison, and the minor daughter, who was allegedly abused, refused to corroborate the claims before the trial court. The state had to declare the child a "hostile witness", he said. The state counsel opposed the bail plea, citing several "incriminating documents" about the involvement of the accused in the crime. The state argued that it would be risky to grant bail when the trial was ongoing, and that the accused could tamper with evidence. Edulji said: "The woman said she lodged the complaint in a fit of rage. Her daughter, she said, misses her partner." "Failure to conclude the trial within a reasonable time resulting in prolonged incarceration militates against the precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution," Justice Biswas said. The court noted that the victim girl (PW1), who already deposed before the trial court, was examined on Jan 8, 2025. It also noted that the victim girl was declared "hostile" by the prosecution, and nothing came out after her cross-examination. It was also noted that the de facto complainant didn't turn up in trial court on several dates despite receiving summons, the latest being on May 7. Justice Biswas directed the accused to furnish a bail bond of Rs 20,000 and directed him to appear before the Pocso special court, Barasat, on each hearing date. The court also asked him to stay outside the jurisdiction of Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate until further orders.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Delhi HC quashes POCSO case at victim's request, directs accused to perform community service
The Delhi High Court has quashed a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case following the victim's request. The court asked the accused to perform community service at a government hospital for a month and deposit ₹50,000 towards the Army Battle Casualties Welfare Fund. 2019 case The accused had been booked in an FIR registered in 2019 on IPC sections pertaining to voyeurism, assault on a woman with intent to outrage her modesty, criminal intimidation, and sexual harassment, among others, apart from the relevant sections of the POCSO Act. In her complaint, the minor girl said the accused had pressured her into sharing intimate photographs. After communication between the two ceased, the accused allegedly threatened to share her photos online and demanded ₹6,000 from her in February 2018. The victim said she 'made several payments under duress', and later, a friend of the accused also blackmailed her for money. In his May 27 order, Justice Sanjeev Narula stated that the allegations were 'undoubtedly serious', involving charges of harassment and exploitation of a minor girl, which disclosed 'a pattern emblematic of the darker undercurrents of the social media age, where technology is misused to exert control, induce fear, and compromise dignity'. Ordinarily, such allegations, he added, would not merit quashing of the FIR, but it considered the victim's 'desire to move on from this chapter'. The court then ordered the quashing of the FIR, based on the accused's undertaking that he had not retained the photographs. It directed the accused to perform a month of community service at Lok Nayak Hospital.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Man accused in rape and murder of minor girl sentenced to death in Chandigarh
Chandigarh's Fast Track Special Court on Tuesday sentenced a 41-year-old man to death for raping and murdering an eight-year-old girl in the city. This is the first case of a death sentence being pronounced for a crime in convict, Heera Lal, alias Guddu, was a neighbour of the victim and had raped and murdered the girl by slitting her throat and stabbing victim went missing on January 19 and a search was launched following a missing complaint by her family members. Her body was recovered from a heap of garbage near her home in Hallomajra on the intervening nights of January 21 and January 22, 2024. A post-mortem report revealed that she was raped and murdered. Following this, an investigation was launched and the girl's slippers were recovered from a neighbouring house, whose resident, Hira Lal, was identified the accused from CCTV footage and he was arrested in Bihar after seven to police, the accused had come to Chandigarh from Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh and was living in the victim's neighbourhood. A chargesheet was filed against the accused after further investigations revealed that he was behind the rape and court framed charges against the accused under sections 201, 302, 363, 366, 376, 376(3), 376 AB and 511 and section 6 of the POCSO Act and the court convicted the accused on the basis of DNA reports and other Watch
