Starmer welcomes Zelensky to Downing Street ahead of Putin-Trump meeting
A red carpet had been rolled out for his arrival.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer welcomes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to 10 Downing Street (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
The Ukrainian leader left more than an hour later, and the Prime Minister walked Mr Zelensky to his car.
The Prime Minister's meeting with Mr Zelensky comes after he said Britain stands ready to 'increase pressure' on Russia if necessary.
During a call with the US president and European allies on Wednesday, Sir Keir praised Mr Trump for his work to bring forward a 'viable' chance of an end to the war ahead of his scheduled meeting with the Russian leader.
Concerns have been raised over Mr Zelensky's exclusion from the discussions between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, which are set to take place in Alaska on Friday.
Speaking on Wednesday, Sir Keir said: 'This meeting on Friday that President Trump is attending is hugely important.
'As I've said personally to President Trump for the three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on, we haven't got anywhere near a prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer co-chairs a virtual meeting with pro-Ukraine allies from Downing Street (Jack Taylor/PA)
'And now we do have that chance, because of the work of that the president has put in.'
Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said.
'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' he told allies.
'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.'
Sir Keir and European leaders have repeatedly said discussions about Ukraine should not happen without it amid concerns the country is being sidelined in negotiations about its own future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
21 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Russia drone attack kills seven including toddler as Zelensky and Trump set for crunch White House meeting
'Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence. Now, our soldiers have successes in Donetsk and Sumy regions. I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance. Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace.'
Spectator
21 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why Putin wants Donetsk
Will Ukraine's fate depend on Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka? These may not be household names, but they are the four key 'fortress cities' in the remaining portions of Donetsk region that Vladimir Putin is reportedly demanding as the price for peace. Although the details are still unclear, it seems that the framework for a peace deal agreed in outline between Putin and Trump would see the Russians agreeing to freeze the current front line. They could maybe even hand back some small sections of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions they have conquered in return for Kyiv surrendering the much larger portion of Donetsk region it still holds. This would be a bitter pill to swallow on so many levels. It is not just that the area in question – around 30 per cent of the region, over 6,000 square miles – is so much larger than the territory which would be liberated in Trump's vaunted 'swap'. It is also because of its strategic value. Within that region lies the so-called 'fortress belt', made up of the aforementioned well-defended cities and several other towns and settlements running north to south along the N-20 Kostyantynivka-Slovyansk highway. Given that Kyiv would inevitably and understandably fear some renewed Russian aggression, whatever the terms of any deal, it becomes all the more important for them to have those defensive lines on their side of the front line. Besides, this is territory now soaked in the blood of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and also of symbolic importance: Slovyansk is the city seized by Russian nationalist Igor 'Strelkov' Girkin when, in his own words, he 'pulled the trigger' on the risings that generated the undeclared war in the Donbas that in due course led to the 2022 invasion. In those circumstances there may even be some question as to whether the military would even accept orders to withdraw. Nonetheless, Putin does seem to have reshaped the debate. By making it about whether or not this surrender is acceptable, he has in effect made the West acknowledge that the existing occupied territories are lost. Perhaps some day, whether through military or political means, they may be regained, but there is no credible theory of victory that sees Kyiv regaining them in the foreseeable future that does not rest on some unlikely deus ex machina like a Russian economic collapse or Putin's imminent demise. Besides, Putin's line is presumably that ultimately this territory is lost to Kyiv anyway – whether it takes a month, a year, or longer, someday his forces will grind their bloody way through the fortress belt. A refusal to deal now just means more death and misery all round before the inevitable. Putin may be wrong and may prove willing to abandon this demand, but he will not do so easily or cheaply. Territorial conquest was never Putin's real objective, so much as the subjugation of Ukraine. Given that he never anticipated that he was getting himself into a major, expensive and open-ended war though, Putin may be willing to take a deal that he can still trumpet as a triumph at home. However, Ukraine may also feel it wins a victory of sorts if it is able to gain the kind of meaningful security guarantees and reconstruction assistance to become a truly sovereign, democratic and stable nation, outside Moscow's sphere of influence. This, after all, is where the really difficult negotiations are likely to remain. That chunk of Donetsk matters, but it is the environment in which Ukrainians will rebuild their country that will be crucial. Putin will want to leave them undefended and divided (indeed, a small part of the reason for his demand for Donetsk is precisely to force Zelensky either to doom his people to more war or take a monstrously unpopular decision in the name of peace). The question is how far Ukraine's allies are willing to offer those serious and credible guarantees and to force Putin to swallow them. They may be tempted to stick to their hollow mantras that 'Putin cannot be allowed to win'. Ukrainians, fighting at the front and hiding from Russian drones in air-raid shelters, have every right to choose to hold out and resist any such ugly deal. Given that Ukraine's European allies are clearly (and rightly) unwilling to put their own soldiers directly into harm's way, though, one could question the morality of their seeking to encourage Zelensky to stand firm simply to avoid confronting the grubby moral compromises peace would demand.
Daily Record
21 minutes ago
- Daily Record
BBC Breakfast breaking news report leaves fans fuming as they say 'stop wasting my licence fee'
BBC Breakfast fans have been left fuming after the show was paused for a breaking news segment as viewers switched off their TVs and complained 'stop wasting my licence fee'. The programme aired segments live from Washington D.C. where US president Donald Trump was meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian president Vladimir Putin. Keir Starmer is also joining the world leaders in the States to 'flesh out the details with other European leaders'. BBC reporters were live in Kyiv to cover the ongoing war in Ukraine as the summit takes place, while political correspondent Joe Pike was live in Westminster to discuss the news. However, as BBC Monitoring Russian editor Vitaly Shevchenko spoke to viewers via video link, fans were left furious. One complained: 'Why do you employ so many staff? Aren't we allowed to see the same person twice? "You are wasting my licence fee. He's told us what we already know.' Another chimed in: 'Stop with your BS and biased reporting. Two Tier Keir couldn't negotiate peace between three disgruntled rent boys […] he's to diplomacy as you are to the truth,' before adding the hashtag #DefundTheBBC. A third angry viewer remarked: "BBC Breakfast and Sky News must have the same editors, both constantly showing clips of Trump bullying Zelensky in February and both read out verbatim nonsense posted by Trump on Truth Social. No wonder [he] loves UK media." It comes amid rising fears regarding Trump's 'friendliness' with Putin, the Express reports. Despite demanding an immediate ceasefire, in person he downplayed the need for sanctions targeting buyers of Russian oil. He told reporters: 'The best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' It comes just two days after another episode of BBC Breakfast sparked some backlash on Friday, August 15. The segment came when Only Fools and Horses legend Sir David Jason appeared on the show for an "uncomfortable" interview with host Naga Munchetty. The actor, 85, appeared on the programme to promote his upcoming tour, An Evening With Sir David Jason, and to share anecdotes from his 60-year career. David did not hold back when it came to flirting with Naga throughout the segment and fans were left unimpressed by his "creepy" comments. While trying to recall a story he was telling, David trailed off and said:'Yes I was, but… you… it's Naga, I can't resist, [I can't] take my eyes off her.' The actor said he could not go into too much detail about his upcoming tour as he said: "I'm not going to give anything away because I've been told not to." Munchetty asked the actor: 'Do you always do as you're told?' Jason teased: 'Naga, please! Yes, I will. For certain people,' before joking: 'Not you, Charlie.'
