Canadian ambassador likens Trump Golden Dome comments to ‘protection racket'
Canadian ambassador to the United Nations Bob Rae on Wednesday compared President Trump's recent comments about the 'Golden Dome' missile defense program to a 'protection racket.'
Trump on Tuesday said he offered Canada free Golden Dome protection if the northern neighbor agrees to join the U.S. as its 51st state.
If Canada does not agree to be annexed — and chooses instead to 'remain a separate, but unequal, Nation' — the protection would cost $61 billion, Trump said.
'In another context this would called a 'protection racket,'' Rae posted on X, responding to Trump's comments.
'Both Canada and the United States signed the UN Charter in 1945. Article 2 of the Charter states clearly 'The Organization is based on the sovereign equality of all nations,'' Rae wrote in a subsequent post.
'Threats to sovereign integrity also prohibited,' he added.
The remarks come as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has repeatedly stressed his country would not join the U.S. under any circumstance. His recent election victory is often attributed to his firm defiance of Trump's musings about annexing Canada.
'The prime minister has been clear at every opportunity, including in his conversations with President Trump, that Canada is an independent, sovereign nation, and it will remain one,' Carney's office told a Canadian news outlet, in response to Trump's remarks.
Carney's office confirmed last week that there were 'active discussions' between the two countries on existing and new security programs such as Golden Dome, the BBC reported.
'Canadians gave the prime minister a strong mandate to negotiate a comprehensive new security and economic relationship with the United States,' Audrey Champoux, a spokesperson for Carney, told the BBC.
'To that end, the prime minister and his ministers are having wide-ranging and constructive discussions with their American counterparts. These discussions naturally include strengthening [North American Aerospace Defense Command] and related initiatives such as the Golden Dome,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
22 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Profit and Power
Donald Trump's willingness to mix public office with personal benefit is facing scrutiny, as are his latest pardons. Panelists on Washington Week With The Atlantic joined last night to discuss how the president may be using his power to profit, and more. Meanwhile, Trump's battle with Harvard continued this week. Panelists considered how that fight is being received by voters and Republican lawmakers—and whether the president's continued crackdown on higher education could have political consequences. For Republicans, Trump's action against Harvard is 'not something that they want to break with the president on,' Leigh Ann Caldwell said last night. 'This is not an issue that they're willing to stand in front of him on, like most issues.' Joining the editor in chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, to discuss this and more: Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times; Leigh Ann Caldwell, the chief Washington correspondent at Puck; and Stephen Hayes, the editor of The Dispatch. Watch the full episode here.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
In Iowa, Trump's agenda collides with 2028 ambitions
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Florida Sen. Rick Scott, at fundraisers in Iowa this week, sought to explain to the Republicans who are poised to have the first say in picking the party's 2028 presidential nominee why they want to put the brakes on the 'big, beautiful' bill that contains much of President Donald Trump's agenda. But Sue Cheek, a resident of Eldridge nearby, didn't want to hear it. 'We are the ones that elected Trump. This is what we wanted him to do. So let him do it,' she told CNN minutes before Scott took the stage at a fundraiser Friday night at a casino in Davenport. 'We are in a critical place right now in our country,' said Cheek, who works at a credit union. 'I don't care how much it costs to make our country secure. Once we get that done, then we can worry about that other stuff.' Trump is only months into his second term in office, but already, ambitious Republicans are flocking to the state whose caucuses are expected to kick off the party's 2028 presidential nominating contest. Paul spoke at a GOP fundraiser in Cedar Rapids on Thursday, and Scott followed with a fundraiser in Davenport on Friday. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders will speak at the conservative Christian group The Family Leader's summit in July. Days later, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin will visit Des Moines to headline the state party's Lincoln Dinner. The two senators arrived in Iowa while the fate of Trump's legislative agenda rested in the Senate. Conservatives like Paul and Scott are demanding changes — with Paul seeking to remove a debt ceiling increase and both seeking much steeper spending cuts. Their positions put them at odds with many Republicans in this politically potent state who helped propel Trump to the White House. Asked by CNN before Thursday's event if he's faced pushback from Republicans in Iowa who want to see Trump's agenda advance quickly, Paul acknowledged that 'some have.' 'Some people come up to me and some people genuinely say, 'Support the president. Support the president,'' Paul said. 'But I think I was elected to be an independent voice.' 'There are things that we have some disagreements, and I don't think it would be right just to be quiet and not try to make the bill better,' Paul said. Scott said he is eager to achieve much of Trump's bill, including making 2017 tax cuts permanent and funding efforts to secure the US-Mexico border. 'I want to get the president's agenda done, too,' he told CNN. But, Scott said, 'we have to understand we have a spending problem.' 'Interest rates are high. Inflation is high. If we want to help … we got to get a balanced budget,' Scott said. 'We've got to have a we have to have a clear path to balanced budget.' Though the 2028 election is still years from taking shape, Iowa — where an open race for governor and competitive House races in next year's midterm elections give ambitious Republicans a pretext to visit and help raise money — is a near-permanent presidential battleground when an incumbent won't be on the ballot in the next election. Jeff Kaufmann, the longtime Iowa Republican Party chairman, said potential candidates are already calling him to ask for advice. 'We're certainly not going to have a 'Never Trump' candidate that even has a prayer. I'm not even sure at this point if a person that is lukewarm on Trump is going to do very well,' Kaufmann told CNN. But, he said, voters there have 'a high tolerance for debate.' 'As long as they explain themselves — and in Iowa, they're going to have a chance to do that — and as long as they are methodical and the underlying basis is conservative, come to Iowa,' Kaufmann said. 'Everybody is going to get an honest look.' That tolerance for debate was on display Thursday night in Cedar Rapids, when Paul received a friendly applause even after delivering a speech criticizing Trump's tariffs and staking out his opposition to the 'big, beautiful bill' that contains much of Trump's agenda. The Kentucky senator said he opposes the measure's debt ceiling hike and wants to see overall spending levels drastically reduced. Doug Dix, a retired banker who lives in Hiawatha who attended Paul's speech Thursday night in Cedar Rapids, said he agrees with Paul's positions on principle, but doesn't want to see Trump's agenda thwarted. 'I'm looking for somebody that wins and gets things done,' he said. 'Let's see if they get it done. I don't think Rand Paul's going to prevent it from getting it done.' 'Get the bill done. Get it on his desk,' Dix said. Many Republicans said they are frustrated — not with Senate conservatives yet, but with judges, Democrats and the media, which they described as playing much larger roles in impeding Trump. Tim Striley, the chairman of the Clinton County Republican Party, said Friday the intra-party debates over the bill are 'healthy.' More frustrating, he said, are court rulings blocking Trump's actions. 'You've got to give the man a chance to govern,' he said. 'They didn't do that the first time.' Bonnie Powell, a retired nurse in Davenport, said she'd like to see Republicans on Capitol Hill back Trump. 'It gets frustrating,' she said. 'But no matter how frustrating, Republicans aren't near at the level of disagreeing as the other party.' Her husband Steve Powell added: 'Rand Paul, I've always liked him, but I don't agree with him on this. … He's only one vote. He's not going to make the difference.' 'I'd like to see them follow through with what Trump's already started,' he said.
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Iran has increased its stockpile of near weapons-grade uranium, nuclear watchdog says
Where U.S. and Iran still stand apart on nuclear talks Where U.S. and Iran stand apart on nuclear talks Where U.S. and Iran stand apart on nuclear talks Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels, a confidential report by the United Nations nuclear watchdog said Saturday, and called on Tehran to urgently change course and comply with the agency's probe. The report comes at a sensitive time as Tehran and Washington have been holding several rounds of talks in the past weeks over a possible nuclear deal that U.S. President Donald Trump is trying to reach. The report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency — which was seen by The Associated Press — says that as of May 17, Iran has amassed 900.8 pounds of uranium enriched up to 60%. That's an increase of 294.9 pounds — or almost 50% — since the IAEA's last report in February. The 60% enriched material is a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. A report in February put this stockpile level at 605.8 pounds. There was no immediate comment from Tehran on the new IAEA report. The IAEA report raised a stern warning, saying that Iran is now "the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material" — something the agency said was of "serious concern." Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, speaks to journalists attending a weeklong seminar at the agency in Vienna, Austria, Wednesday, May 28, 2025. Jon Gambrell / AP Approximately 92.5 pounds of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic bomb, if enriched further to 90%, according to the watchdog. The IAEA report, a quarterly, also estimated that as of May 17, Iran's overall stockpile of enriched uranium — which includes uranium enriched to lower levels — stood at 20,387.4 pounds. That's an increase of 2,101.4 pounds since February's report. Iran's nuclear program Iran has maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but the IAEA chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make "several" nuclear bombs if it chose to do so. Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. U.S. intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program, but has "undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so." Israel said Saturday's report was a clear warning sign that "Iran is totally determined to complete its nuclear weapons program," according to a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. It said IAEA's report "strongly reinforces what Israel has been saying for years — the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is not peaceful." It also added that Iran's level of enrichment "has no civilian justification whatsoever" and appealed on the international community to "act now to stop Iran." It is rare for Netanyahu to make statements on Saturday, the Jewish day of rest, underlying the urgency with which he sees the matter. Grossi said Saturday that he "reiterates his urgent call upon Iran to cooperate fully and effectively" with the IAEA's years-long investigation into uranium traces discovered at several sites in Iran. The IAEA also circulated to member states on Saturday a second, 22-page confidential report, also seen by the AP, that Grossi requested following a resolution passed by the 35-member IAEA Board of Governors last November. In this so-called "comprehensive report," the IAEA said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has "been less than satisfactory" when it comes to uranium traces discovered by IAEA inspectors at several locations in Iran that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces discovered by the IAEA could provide evidence that Iran had a secret military nuclear program until 2003. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018 after Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this but in 2019 IAEA inspectors detected the presence of manmade uranium particles there. After initially blocking IAEA access, inspectors were able to collect samples in 2020 from two other locations where they also detected the presence of manmade uranium particles. The three locations became known as Turquzabad, Varamin, and Marivan. A fourth undeclared location named as Lavisan-Shian is also part of the IAEA probe but IAEA inspectors never visited the site because it was razed and demolished by Iran after 2003. In Saturday's comprehensive report, the IAEA says that the "lack of answers and clarifications provided by Iran" to questions the watchdog had regarding Lavisan-Shian, Varamin and Marivan "has led the agency to conclude that these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear program carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material." FILE - The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency flies in front of its headquarters during an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, on Feb. 6, 2023. Heinz-Peter Bader / AP How the world could react to U.N. report Saturday's comprehensive report could be a basis for possible further steps by European nations, leading to a potential escalation in tensions between Iran and the West. European countries could move to trigger snap-back sanctions against Iran that were lifted under the original 2015 nuclear deal ahead of October, when the deal formally expires. On Thursday, senior Iranian officials dismissed speculation about an imminent nuclear deal with the United States, emphasizing that any agreement must fully lift sanctions and allow the country's nuclear program to continue. The comments came a day after Trump said he has told Netanyahu to hold off on striking Iran to give the U.S. administration more time to push for a new deal with Tehran. Trump said on Friday that he still thinks a deal could be completed in the "not too distant future." "They don't want to be blown up. They would rather make a deal," Trump said of Iran. He added, "That would be a great thing that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East."
