NCERT brings Operation Sindoor to classrooms, calls it a promise of peace
Pahalgam terror attack
. The material has been introduced a little over three months after the counter-offensive.
The modules underline that despite Pakistan's official denial, the Pahalgam attack was carried out on the 'direct orders' of Pakistan's military and political leadership. Detailing India's retaliatory action, the material notes: 'India launched missiles and air strikes, targeting nine terrorist sites situated in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, 2025. Out of nine targets which were finally chosen and approved, seven of these terror camps were destroyed by the Indian Army, while the Indian Air Force destroyed terrorist targets in Muridke and Bahawalpur, which are the nerve centres of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed.
'
The council has reiterated the government's position that civilians were not harmed. 'Every target was double-checked. Only terrorist bases were attacked. This operation showed that India would not let terror masterminds escape punishment,' one module states.
The two modules are titled Operation Sindoor: A Saga of Valour for Classes III–VIII and Operation Sindoor: A Mission of Honour and Bravery for Classes IX–XII.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says
CNA
Read More
Undo
They aim to raise awareness among students about India's military capability and resilience. The material describes Operation Sindoor as 'a triumph of bravery, strategy and innovation,' highlighting India's use of advanced air defence systems like the S-400, which shot down enemy aircraft and neutralised drones.
The modules also place emphasis on the wave of public solidarity after the Pahalgam attack. They describe nationwide candlelight marches and note that 'Muslim communities in Hyderabad, Lucknow, and Bhopal wore black armbands and openly denounced the attack.
In Kashmir, shopkeepers closed their shops in protest, and border villages demanded strong action in support of the Armed Forces.' The secondary module stresses that local Kashmiri populations 'stood up and spoke against terrorists, breaking stereotypes and reflecting the real voice of peace-loving people.
'
Explaining the choice of the name, the modules state that 'Operation Sindoor' was selected as a tribute to the widows of victims, symbolising solidarity, empathy and respect.
The content situates Operation Sindoor within the continuum of India's firm responses to terror, drawing parallels with the Balakot air strikes of 2019 after Pulwama and earlier wars in 1947, 1965, 1971 and 1999. It underscores that groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hizbul Mujahideen and Pakistan's ISI were behind the attacks.
'It was not just a military operation; it was a promise to protect peace and honour the lives lost,' the modules conclude.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Why should public pay? MP demands MPs bear cost of disrupted Parliament session
On the final day of the Monsoon Session, Independent MP from Daman and Diu, Umesh Patel, staged an unusual protest inside Parliament. Holding a banner that read, 'Ruling and opposition parties must apologise,' Patel demanded accountability for what he called a 'washed-out' session. He argued that the enormous cost of running Parliament, squandered amid repeated disruptions, should be recovered from the Members of Parliament the House does not function, ruling and opposition parties must apologise to 144 crore people for wasting the nation's money,' Patel's placard read. The Monsoon Session of Parliament, held from July 21 to August 21, was marred by repeated adjournments and uproar—first over Operation Sindoor, and later the Bihar voter list the washout 'sad and unfortunate,' Patel accused both the ruling party and the opposition of letting down people's expectations.'The ruling party and the opposition did whatever they wanted and they stabbed hopes and expectations of 144 crore people in this temple of democracy. There were so many important bills some passed with little to no debate. Income Tax bill was 600 pages but there wasn't even a 6-minute discussion on it. You saw yesterday and today how the session was over in 30 seconds Neither of them were in mood for the session,' he appealed for the cost of the disrupted parliamentary proceedings to be deducted from Members of Parliament's salaries.'I request the government that the MPs should not get salary for the Monsoon Session and the expense of running Parliament should be taken out of MPs' pockets. When the House did not function, why should innocent people bear the cost?' he SESSION OF PARLIAMENTDespite the logjam, the Lok Sabha passed 12 bills and the Rajya Sabha cleared 15, including legislation to regulate online gaming and overhaul sports two Houses saw heated exchanges between the ruling party leaders and the members of the Opposition on Operation Sindoor. Tempers flared further when the government introduced three contentious bills providing for the removal of the Prime Minister, chief ministers and ministers if they are under arrest for 30 days on serious charges. Opposition MPs tore copies of the draft law in the House, alleging that the bills strike at the roots of federalism and constitutional principles.- Ends
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tech varsity stalemate: Kerala HC junks temporary vice-chancellor's appeal
Kochi: High court on Thursday dismissed the appeal filed by Kerala Technological University (KTU) temporary vice-chancellor K Sivaprasad, challenging a single bench order which had denied his plea for interim relief directing three senior govt officials to attend the varsity's syndicate meeting. The bench of Justices Anil K Narendran and S Muralee Krishna observed that there were no grounds to interfere with the single bench order, as the interim relief sought was identical to the main relief in the writ petition. The division bench, however, clarified that the dismissal was without prejudice to the legal and factual contentions raised by the appellant and the state govt, leaving all issues open for consideration in the pending writ petition. Earlier, Sivaprasad had moved HC seeking a directive to the finance secretary, higher education secretary and director of technical education — who are ex-officio members of the syndicate — to attend its meetings in order to prevent an administrative stalemate. He alleged that these officials, along with nominated legislative members, were deliberately abstaining from meetings at the behest of the state govt, causing repeated adjournments for want of quorum. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Sivaprasad further contended that the university's administration had come to a standstill due to the deliberate and conscious actions of the state govt, which, according to him, had not accepted his appointment as vice-chancellor by the chancellor. In his petition filed on Aug 11, Sivaprasad sought, as interim relief, a direction compelling the officials to attend the syndicate meeting scheduled for Aug 13. The single bench declined to grant such relief. Meanwhile, in a subsequent development, the Supreme Court appointed a former judge of the apex court to oversee the selection of a permanent vice-chancellor for the Technological University in a petition filed by the governor in his capacity as chancellor. Citing this development, the state govt argued before the single bench that Sivaprasad's petition had become infructuous. The bench accordingly adjourned the matter without granting interim relief, prompting Sivaprasad to file the present appeal, which has now been dismissed. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration targets student loan forgiveness with rule linking relief to employers' conduct
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) The Trump administration is preparing to redraw the contours of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) programme in a move that could fundamentally alter its reach and purpose. The Department for Education, now under Linda McMahon's leadership, has proposed a sweeping rule that would bar borrowers from receiving loan forgiveness if their employers are deemed to be engaged in 'illegal activities undermining national security or American values.' Under this draft rule, graduates whose organizations are found to have a 'substantial illegal purpose,' ranging from supporting terrorism to violating immigration laws, would be excluded from eligibility. The move marks a sharp departure from the programme's original framework, which has for nearly two decades sought to ease the burden of federal student debt for teachers, law enforcement officers, and other public servants who dedicate a decade of service to their communities. The original intent of PSLF Introduced in 2007 during George W. Bush's presidency, PSLF was envisioned as a way to strengthen public service by making it financially sustainable. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Passive Income Ideas Sitting at Home Mone Click Here Undo For thousands of professionals entering modestly paid but socially vital roles, the promise of eventual loan forgiveness has been a critical incentive. The Trump administration's proposed changes, however, shift the programme's emphasis from rewarding service to scrutinizing employers, injecting legal and political considerations into a process once defined by public benefit. Preserving values or policing ideology? The Department for Education has defended its plan as a safeguard to ensure that taxpayer-funded relief does not flow to individuals working for organizations acting against the nation's interests. Framed as a measure to uphold the integrity of public service, the policy is positioned as a corrective to what the administration views as loopholes that allow unscrupulous actors to benefit from federal largesse. Yet the scope of the proposal raises fundamental questions. By tethering loan forgiveness not simply to the borrower's service but to their employer's perceived alignment with 'American values,' the administration risks blurring the line between legitimate legal enforcement and political gatekeeping. Critics have already voiced alarm that such an approach could open the door to disqualification based on ideological disagreements rather than clear-cut legal violations. A deepening polarisation in higher education policy The announcement comes against the backdrop of intensifying national debates over education, immigration, and cultural policy. Where earlier reforms to PSLF have largely centred on administrative efficiency or expanded eligibility, this marks the first attempt to impose a moral and political filter on the programme. It is a shift that reflects not only a legal recalibration but also a broader cultural struggle over who defines the values that public service should uphold. The rule's broad phrasing, particularly the emphasis on activities that 'undermine national security' or 'American values,' creates significant ambiguity. Such language could empower the Department to deny relief based on contentious interpretations of what constitutes a threat or an offense, potentially chilling the work of organizations that serve vulnerable communities or engage in advocacy at odds with federal priorities. The road ahead The Department for Education has opened a public comment period until September 17, signaling that it expects robust debate over the proposal. Early reactions suggest that this will be no routine administrative adjustment but a flashpoint in the larger battle over student debt and the political role of education policy. If implemented, the changes would mark one of the most consequential shifts in PSLF since its inception, transforming it from a straightforward debt-relief mechanism into an instrument shaped by the government's judgment of organizational conduct. The long-term implications could reverberate far beyond student loan policy, touching the relationship between public service, political authority, and the contested definition of American values itself. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
