logo
Cruel to be kind

Cruel to be kind

Express Tribune04-07-2025
Listen to article
As with any old animosity, the 'Tom & Jerry' show between Pakistan and India has continued since independence. Call it competition, identity clash or animosity, it has certainly inflicted severe damage, but often felt like a sibling rivalry in a sitcom. If I wrote something critical about India at a given moment, somebody on the other side would write a rebuttal, have a private laugh with me when we met personally, and be done with the whole episode.
It was eleven years ago that it all changed. One oddity was the hate mail's nature. When you write something critical, you can expect a degree of pushback. Still, a part of the new normal was that even when you praised India, you received an inbox full of hate mail trying to put you in your place - a citizen of a badly broken nation, a beggar state, India was out of your league. You should not besmirch its name by getting it out of your filthy mouth.
I would have heeded the advice, but you realise, since I have been writing almost my entire adult life, one runs out of things to write. It is not possible to ignore a nation of 1.45 billion. In my defence, every word I write is a product of care. If I talk to you, it's because I value your judgement. While others feel flattered by the attention, this was the first time one encountered people threatening to gouge your eyes out for just looking at them.
So, what was behind this weapons-grade hubris? The realisation that India has finally arrived? If yes, why police Pakistani media's online assets then? If you are so powerful, successful and rich, why worry about what a Pakistani says about you? America is so rich and powerful, yet all sorts of things are published about it. Do you think such websites and email addresses are swamped by American trolls? Absolutely not. You attack and police when either you are unconvinced of your own success or want to create an environment of fear with a clear outcome in mind.
You can see this from the methods that were employed. Nawaz Sharif was invited to Narendra Modi's swearing-in ceremony. Still, India's foreign office quickly clarified: he was just one of six SAARC leaders, and the visit should not be seen as bilateral. They also objected to his meeting with Hurriyat leaders. Let's decode that. Their message was clear: we are somebody, you are nobody. These ceremonial invitations to our "court" are acts of generosity; be grateful, obey protocol, and never presume equality.
And what was the expectation? When we berate you, do not fight back. When we stare at you, make a point of being seen as cowering. And when we raise our hand, fall down and pretend to writhe in pain. This will please our people, and as long as we are in power, we will ensure you get some morsels off our table. You guessed it. The we in the above statement is royal we. And this imagery creates a global superstructure echoing India's caste system.
Islam, according to this worldview, is synonymous with terrorism, and Pakistan is a Muslim country, so Pakistan gets a station lower than Dalits. This brings to mind the forgotten image of young BR Ambedkar sitting on a sack outside his classroom's door despite his brilliant mind, while his dull-witted classmates sat inside with standard desks and benches. Why? Because he was a Dalit and they were of the upper castes. He was not allowed to drink from the common water pot. Most teachers wouldn't even listen to him. America hasn't been able to shake off the ghost of Jim Crow Laws despite becoming one of the most tolerant societies today. A country which still sustains a fivefold Jim Crow system on acid as the present reality is unlikely to perpetuate anything different.
Sadly, I would be remiss if I failed to acknowledge that many Pakistanis fell for this scheme. The Indian media needed a certain archetypal Pakistan to represent the country's caricature. Many individuals lined up to volunteer. Those who refused were told that they would have no role among the emerging media elite of the country. Many policymakers and notables showed readiness to pretend to speak from a position of weakness whenever they spoke of India. As Indian politicians publicly tried to paddle Pakistan, there was no dearth of those shouting, stop, their voices, "thank you, sir, may I have another"? An economy has flourished since then.
People like me were duped by another phenomenon. Whenever dramatic developments occur, I imagine how it would impact me if I were there. So when I see suffering, I immediately empathise. We looked at Indian seculars and thought they must be going through hell. But we ignored that had it not been for the latent bigotry and active connivance of the secular elite, a party with so much history of bloodsport could not control a nation as diverse and populous for the past eleven years. Scratch an Indian secular, and a Nathuram Godse with a good accent comes out. They all want Akhand Bharat. Only they don't want the blame. Why not deal with the real deal then? Modi then wasn't the problem. He was India's elected leader. One should have put up or shut up. My bad.
But a direct consequence of India's carefully manufactured self-image was the demand for incremental aggression towards Pakistan in 2016, 2019, and now. This time, they misjudged the situation and are still licking their wounds. For the first time in eleven years, they have encountered a reset. While I do not condone war or violence, sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind.
Frankly, the mutual hostility of these nations has made them engines of poverty in this neck of the woods. There is no excuse for this to go on indefinitely. If this lesson does not sink in, more shocks may come.
While the jury is still out on the future of peace in South Asia, the economy mentioned above, which emerged in the past eleven years in Pakistan, hasn't gone away. From the 2014 sit-in to destabilising the Sharif government in 2017, the reelection of Modi in 2019, and many others, it has left behind indelible fingerprints on every crisis. Sadly, politicians who became its victims blame others for their plight. But I kept all the receipts. About time you knew who did what. I have faced attempts to deplatform and financially ruin me before, like between 2019 and 2022. I didn't enjoy it, but I survived. What is the worst they can do now? Kill me?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvard signals $500 million settlement to end dispute with Trump administration
Harvard signals $500 million settlement to end dispute with Trump administration

Express Tribune

time8 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Harvard signals $500 million settlement to end dispute with Trump administration

A view of the Business School campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., April 15, 2025. PHOTO:REUTERS The New York Times reported on Monday Harvard University has signaled a willingness to spend as much as $500 million to end its dispute with the Trump administration, the amount being more than twice of what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal probes. The report, which cited sources, says negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that Harvard opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal, seeing that as a red line. President Donald Trump's administration has initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal over allegations of race-related discrimination, making it the latest American university to face the threat of cuts to federal funding. The government said on Monday it will probe whether the Duke Law Journal's selection of its editors gives preferences to candidates from minority communities. "This investigation is based on recent reporting alleging that Duke University discriminates on the bases of race, color, and/or national origin by using these factors to select law journal members," the Education Department said in a statement. US Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sent a letter to the university's leadership alleging what the government called "the use of race preferences in Duke's hiring, admissions, and scholarship decisions." The letter urged the university to review its policies and create a panel "with delegated authority from Duke's Board of Trustees to enable Duke and the federal government to move quickly toward a mutual resolution of Duke's alleged civil rights violations." Duke had no immediate comment. Rights advocates have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Trump administration's attempted crackdown against universities. Trump Amiministration's Threats The government has threatened federal funding cuts against universities and schools over climate initiatives, transgender policies, pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Five members of Canada's 2018 world junior ice hockey team have been found not guilty of sexually assaulting a woman in a hotel room that year, in a trial that began in April and garnered national attention. Separately, Brown University has secured a $500 million loan amid federal cuts to research and financial aid in recent months, according to a regulatory filing. A U.S. official told Reuters in April that the Trump administration would block $510 million in grants for Brown. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on grounds of race in education programs receiving federal funding. The government said in April it was probing whether Harvard and the Harvard Law Review violated civil rights laws when the journal's editors fast-tracked consideration of an article written by a member of a racial minority. Harvard is legally challenging the government to have its frozen federal funding restored. Trump has claimed, without evidence, that groups like white people and men face discrimination due to DEI. Rights groups dismiss that, saying DEI addresses historic inequities against marginalized groups such as ethnic minorities.

Dar not a member of Sugar Advisory Board: Tarar
Dar not a member of Sugar Advisory Board: Tarar

Business Recorder

time13 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Dar not a member of Sugar Advisory Board: Tarar

ISLAMABAD: Federal Information Minister Attaullah Tarar has strongly dismissed recent media reports claiming that Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar is a member of the Sugar Advisory Board, terming the news misleading and taken out of context. Speaking to the media, Tarar clarified that a written response was submitted by the relevant department in the Senate in reply to a formal question, and all such records are available on the floor of the House. 'Before making such claims, the actual formation and composition of the Sugar Advisory Board should have been checked,' he said. Addressing other matters, the minister also defended Ishaq Dar over remarks related to Dr Aafia Siddiqui, stating that his statement had been deliberately misinterpreted. He noted that the Pakistani government is actively pursuing diplomatic and legal efforts for Dr Siddiqui's release, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has already met with Dr Fauzia Siddiqui. A legal committee, headed by the Law Minister, has also been formed to handle the case. Tarar added that unprecedented efforts are being made under the current administration for DrAafia Siddiqui's release, and political opponents are attempting to create controversy by misrepresenting facts. The minister also spoke about Pakistan's progress in regulating crypto currency, stating that it is the only country in the region to have established a proper regulatory framework. He criticised former finance minister Miftah Ismail's views on crypto, comparing them to India's stance. 'Crypto is a growing and regulated industry in Pakistan. Making uninformed statements or spreading baseless allegations only serves enemy agendas, not Pakistan's,' he said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Chidambaram pokes holes in Modi's Pahalgam narrative
Chidambaram pokes holes in Modi's Pahalgam narrative

Express Tribune

time17 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Chidambaram pokes holes in Modi's Pahalgam narrative

A senior leader of India's Congress party dealt a severe blow to Prime Minister Narendra Modi government narrative, saying that there was no proof that the assailants, who carried out the Pahalgam attack on April 22, had come from Pakistan. As Indian forces claimed to have killed "three foreign terrorists" linked to Pahalgam attack in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), former Indian minister P Chidambaram questioned why the government was not releasing the investigation report of the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The Indian army claimed in a statement on social media that the three were killed "in an intense firefight" near the major Hindu shrine of Amarnath in the mountains of Dachigam, around 30 kilometres from Srinagar. Though the army did not identify the deceased, a police officer told AFP on condition of anonymity that they were all "foreigners". Two Indian TV news channels, however, claimed that the men were suspected to be behind the Pahalgam attack. In Pakistan, however, the state media while quoting security sources said that India had initiated a new covert military operation, "Operation Mahadev," aimed at staging fake encounters to cover up the failure of its earlier campaign, "Operation Sindoor." Under this plan, according to a Radio Pakistan report, the Indian Army was killing detained Pakistani citizens in staged shootouts, branding them as "terrorists" to mislead the international community. It added that Operation Mahadev aimed at suppressing the freedom movement in IIOJK. On April 22, gunmen shot dead 26 tourists in Pahalgam. with presenting any evidence India blamed Pakistan. Pakistan vehemently denied the accusation and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif offered an independent investigation into the incident and offered Pakistan's full cooperation. However, in the night between May 6-7, India fired missiles at Pakistani civilian targets in six cities under its 'Operation Sindoor'. However, Pakistan gave a forceful reply, downing six Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets. Furthermore, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos in the morning of May 10, hitting 26 Indian military targets, inflicting heavy damage on the enemy's war machines. Hours later India agreed to a ceasefire after intervention from US President Donald Trump. During an interview given to the Indian newspaper 'The Quint', Chidambaram said that the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi had not yet presented any evidence that those who attacked Pahalgam had come from Pakistan. "The second thing is that the government is not bringing out the report of the NIA to see what the agency investigated during this time. Was the agency able to identify the terrorists? And where did they come from? These terrorists may be local. Why are you assuming that they came from Pakistan?" He said that the Indian government was hiding the losses incurred during the four-day war. When asked what the Indian government was trying to hide, Chidambaram said the government was trying to hide what the Indian Chief of Defence had pointed out that India made strategic mistakes. The Radio Pakistan report said that Operation Mahadev attempts to restore the dwindling political credibility of Modi's government, following the embarrassment of Operation Sindoor, which ended in failure after India's aggressive posturing against Pakistan backfired. According to the report, on April 24, two innocent Kashmiri citizens, Muhammad Farooq and Muhammad Deen, were extrajudicially killed by Indian forces after they mistakenly crossed the border. Additionally, the director general of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) disclosed in April that 723 Pakistanis were illegally detained in Indian jails, with another 56 forcibly disappeared by Indian intelligence agencies. There are growing fears that these detainees may be used in fake encounters under Operation Mahadev, where they could be coerced into recording anti-Pakistan statements before being killed and labelled as "terrorists." The sources indicate that Indian media is being fed fake videos, planted weapons, and staged images immediately after these encounters to reinforce New Delhi's false claims. This tactic mirrors past Indian false flag operations, where innocent individuals were framed as militants to justify military aggression. Operation Mahadev would constitute a grave violation of international law and human rights, the sources say. Pakistan has repeatedly exposed India's history of fake encounters, including the Pahalgam false flag operation earlier this year, which India used to justify its military aggression. Human rights organisations and the United Nations have been called upon to investigate India's alleged atrocities in IIOJK. With tensions still simmering after the May 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, the international community must prevent further escalation by holding India accountable for its actions. (WITH INPUT FROM AGENCIES)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store