logo
The US 'ghost' lake that returned 130 years after disappearing

The US 'ghost' lake that returned 130 years after disappearing

Metro17-05-2025

Hiyah Zaidi Published May 15, 2025 1:38pm Link is copied Comments Around a year ago, Tulare Lake reappeared in California's San Joaquin Valley. It was once one of the largest bodies of freshwater in the US. But 130 years ago it disappeared. Its return has sparked intrigue as it submerged almost 100,000 acres of land. So, what's going on? (Picture: Getty) The San Joaquin valley is a dry area, despite supplying around 8% of US agricultural output. And according to the National Weather Service, Fresno - which sits at the heart of the valley - receives just over 10 inches of rain a year on average, and sometimes as little as three. But until the late 19th century, the San Joaquin Valley held a lake more than 100 miles long and over 30 miles wide (Picture: Getty) According to Dr Vivian Underhill, formerly a postdoctoral research fellow at Northeastern University with the Social Science and Environmental Health Research Institute, Tulare Lake 'was the largest body of fresh water west of the Mississippi River', adding: 'It's really difficult to imagine that now.' It once had so much water that a steamship could carry 'agricultural supplies from the Bakersfield area up to Fresno and then up to San Francisco', a distance of nearly 300 miles. Dr Underhill explained that there were lakes and connecting waterways that could make such a route possible (Picture: REUTERS) The lake was regularly topped up by snowmelt from the Sierra Nevada mountains instead of rainfall and was known as 'Pa'ashi' by the indigenous Tachi Yokut tribe. Dr Underhill explains that since there is no natural outlet in the valley, the water collects to form the lake. So, in the 1800s 'Fresno was a lakeside town', she says (Picture: Alamy Stock Photo) So, where did the water go? Blame colonisers. Dr Underhill explains that by the late 1850s and early 1860s, the lake began disappearing, accelerated by 'the state of California's desire to take public land and put it into private ownership'. She said: 'When we say "public land," that is historically indigenous land that the state of California blanket-proclaimed as "public". They really wanted to get [land] into private hands so that indigenous land claims—that were ongoing at that time—would be rendered moot by the time they went through the courts' (Picture: Getty) This is known as reclamation, which Dr Underhill says was 'either draining inundated land or irrigating desert land to create arable farmland. Reclamation really was a process across the entire US west'. So, if people could drain the land they would gain ownership of it. She continued: 'So there was a big incentive for white settlers to start doing that work.' She said 'it was a deeply settler colonial project' that 'proceeded in fits and starts.' And by 1890, the lake had fully disappeared (Picture: Alamy Stock Photo) Then cue a change. In 2023, California was inundated with snow in the winter and then rain in the spring. Dr Underhill said: 'If you have a rain and snow event, the snow melts really fast.' And all that rain and snow still runs into the area where Tulare Lake sat. But it's important to note this isn't the first time the lake has appeared since the 1800s. She said: 'It happened in the '80s, it happened once in the '60s, a couple of times in the '30s'. But a year since its return, Dr Underhill notes that all types of birds, such as pelicans, hawks and waterbirds are returning. Even burrowing owls are nesting around the shore (Picture: Getty) For the Tachi Yokuts, the lake returning has been a 'deeply powerful spiritual experience'. Dr Underhill explains: 'They've been holding ceremonies on the side of the lake. They've been able to practice their traditional hunting and fishing practices again.' However, for the farmworkers and growers, they are impacted by the flooding of water. Dr Underhill added: 'Most of the news coverage about this time talked about it as catastrophic flooding. And I don't want to disregard the personal and property losses that people experienced, but what was not talked about so much is that it wasn't only an experience of loss, it was also an experience of resurgence' (Picture: REUTERS) Under climate change floods of this magnitude or higher will happen with increasing frequency. At a certain point, I think it would behoove the state of California to realize that Tulare Lake wants to remain. And in fact, there's a lot of economic benefit that could be gained from letting it remain.' She explains: 'This was not actually a flood. This is a lake returning' (Picture: Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New ‘poo pills' could flush out killer bugs that kill one million Brits each year
New ‘poo pills' could flush out killer bugs that kill one million Brits each year

Scottish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

New ‘poo pills' could flush out killer bugs that kill one million Brits each year

Find out how superbugs develop and spread below POO KNEW? New 'poo pills' could flush out killer bugs that kill one million Brits each year Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SUPERBUGS, or drug-resistant infections, are projected to cause more than 39 million deaths between now and 2050. This means that, on average, over three people are expected to die from antibiotic-resistant infections every minute. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Scientists focused on the gut to kill superbug infections Credit: Getty But now UK doctor are attempting to clear the number of dangerous superbug infections by using pills containing freeze-dried faeces. The "poo pills" contain stool samples from health donors, packed with good bacteria. And the idea comes from previous data that suggests superbugs can be flushed out of the bowel and replaced with a mix of healthy gut bacteria. Dr Blair Merrick, who has been testing the pills at St Guys and Thomas' hospitals, said the focus is on the bowels which are "the biggest reservoir of antibiotic resistance in humans". The bowel is considered a significant reservoir for these resistant bacteria, and from there they can cause trouble in places such as the urinary tract or bloodstream. Dr Merrick added: "So there's a lot in 'can you get rid of them from the gut?" Currently, people with recurrent illness caused by hard-to-treat bacterium Clostridium difficile can be offered faecal transplants. Scientists noticed they also had the potential to get rid of superbugs. In a new study, published in the Journal of Infection, researchers focused on 41 patients who had an infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria in the past six months. They were given pills made from faeces which people had donated to a stool bank. What is Klebsiella pneumonia? Each stool sample was tested to ensure it didn't contain and harmful bugs. Undigested food was removed, and then it was freeze dried into a powder. The powder, contained inside a pill, can then pass through the stomach unharmed and reach the intestines, where it then dissolves. Twenty of the participants were given three sets of capsules on three consecutive days, while the rest received placebo pills. For those who took the capsules , the donor bacteria was detectable in their gut flora a month later. Dr Merrick told the BBC: "It's very exciting. There's a real shift from 20 years ago, where all bacteria and viruses were assumed to do you harm; to now where we realise they are completely necessary to our overall health." To help avoid getting superbugs, the NHS recommends practising good hygiene - wash your hands frequently with soap and water, especially before eating, after using the toilet, and after coughing or sneezing. Use antibiotics responsibly - avoid taking antibiotics for viral infections like colds or the flu, as they won't work. Even if you feel better, finish all of your prescribed medication to ensure the infection is fully treated. And don't share antibiotics - sharing can be harmful and can lead to resistance. Also, take preventative measures when travelling - choose food from reliable sources, and ensure food is properly cooked and handled, avoid drinking water that may be contaminated, and make sure you are up-to-date on all recommended vaccinations before travelling.

Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim
Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim

Scottish Sun

time20 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim

The study found that the product boosts 'good' cholesterol CHANGE OF HEART Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BUTTER could actually reduce your risk of heart disease, scientists say. Having a teaspoonful a day was found to cut the risk of getting type 2 diabetes by a third. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Butter could actually reduce your risk of heart disease, scientists say Credit: Getty The study, published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found that butter boosts 'good' cholesterol - which helps to remove harmful fats known to cause heart attacks and strokes. Scientists from Boston University tracked 2,500 men and women over the age of 30 over decades, noting what they ate and how many went on to develop heart disease. Those who ate five grammes of butter a day or more were 31 per cent less likely to develop Type 2 diabetes - usually caused by poor diet and lifestyle - than those eating little or no butter. Margarines - often promoted as 'healthy' alternatives for butter - increased the risk of diabetes by more than 40 per cent and heart problems by 30 per cent. Researchers put it down to the unhealthy 'trans fats' used in margarines from the 1970s onwards - now largely ditched by spread manufacturers. Eating a portion of beans a day could also slash your risk of deadly heart attack or stroke, new research shows. Beans - whether they're dried, canned or frozen - can boost heart and metabolic health, according to scientists. Daily portions of chickpeas and black beans could serve as a "simple, cost-effective" way to reduce the risk of chronic diseases, they said. The new study links chickpeas to improved cholesterol levels, which blacks beans seemed to reduce inflammation.

Earth may be experiencing a sixth mass extinction event
Earth may be experiencing a sixth mass extinction event

Metro

time2 days ago

  • Metro

Earth may be experiencing a sixth mass extinction event

Hiyah Zaidi Published June 6, 2025 10:52am Updated June 6, 2025 10:52am Link is copied Comments There is no doubt that humans are changing the Earth. From global warming, to mass migration and many animal species being wiped out altogether, the way the world was is no more. But is all this change actually causing a mass extinction event? (Picture: Getty) It is no surprise that humans will one day be extinct, as nothing lasts forever. It's suggested that around 98% of all the organisms that have ever existed on our planet are now extinct. However, when an organism goes extinct, it is usually replaced by another that has a similar role (Picture: Getty) According to the Natural History Museum, Earth's 'normal' extinction rate is often thought to be somewhere between 0.1 and 1 species per 10,000 species per 100 years, which is known as the background rate of extinction. But at least five times in the last 500 million years there has been something called a mass extinction event (Picture: Getty) A mass extinction event is when species disappear much faster than they are replaced. This is usually defined as around 75% of the world's species being lost in a short period of geological time of less than 2.8 million years. Dr Katie Collins, Curator of Benthic Molluscs at the National History Museum, says: 'It's difficult to identify when a mass extinction may have started and ended. However, there are five big events that we know of, where extinction was much higher than normal background rate, and these are often used to decide whether we are going through a sixth one now.' Past extinction events were caused by extreme temperature changes, sea levels changing or one off events like volcanic eruptions or asteroids hitting the Earth (Picture: Getty) One study, published in the journal PNAS, says yes. It suggests that groups of related species are disappearing at a rate of 35% times higher than the expected rate. And there is no guarantee that humans would survive the extinction event. Co-author Dr Gerardo Ceballos suggests that the whole biosphere of the Earth may change, maybe even into a state where it may be impossible for humanity to endure unless dramatic action is taken. He said: 'Biodiversity will recover but the winners [are] very difficult to predict. Many of the losers in these past mass extinctions were incredibly successful groups' (Picture: Getty) It is undeniable that we are seeing some drastic changes to our planet. Extreme weather such as flooding, wildfires and drought have become more frequent, with data revealing that both 2023 and 2024 became the hottest year on record. But as migration changes, humans are also introducing invasive species that are threatening ecosystems all over the world. Although extinction naturally occurs over hundreds and thousands of years, humans are speeding up this process, which researchers have dubbed as the Holocene extinction (Picture: Getty) However, not all researchers agree. A paper published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution questions if we are really heading towards a mass extinction, as they say that less than 0.1% of Earth's known species have gone extinct in the last 500 years, and that the numbers alone do not support a mass extinction. They said: 'Claiming a sixth mass extinction requires a quantitative criterion, and no plausible scenarios for 75% species loss have been proposed.' They added: 'Current projections of future extinction seem more consistent with ~12–40% species loss, which would be catastrophic but far from the 75% criterion used to argue for a sixth mass extinction' (Picture: Getty)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store