First Channel crossing migrants arrive in UK as returns deal comes into force
Pictures taken on Wednesday afternoon show a UK Border Force boat ferrying migrants, including children, into the Port of Dover.
Migrants carrying their belongings and wearing orange life jackets were then escorted off the boat to be processed before leaving the port.
Soon after, a second Border Force ship also carrying migrants who set off from the French coast this morning was brought in.
Under the pilot scheme that takes effect on Wednesday, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time.
This is in exchange for an approved asylum seeker in France to be brought to the UK under a safe route.
One of today's boats I observed earlier
Coming to a hotel near you soon
Proof the government's new deal is not deterring anyone as predicted
I'm not seeing any women or children there
And France is a safe country, so no one on the boat is fleeing war or persecution in France pic.twitter.com/LkDujoQ9rW
— Chris Philp MP (@CPhilpOfficial) August 6, 2025
The deal comes as ministers grapple to crack down on smuggling gangs amid a record number of crossings.
On Wednesday, shadow home secretary Chris Philp posted a video on X from the Channel where he was watching a French warship follow a dinghy making the journey to the UK.
Speaking to the PA news agency, the Conservative MP was quick to say the Government's new deal 'clearly isn't working' after his trip across the Channel this morning.
'I've been out on the water since 7 o'clock this morning, I went all the way to Calais and what I witnessed is that quite clearly their deal is not working at all,' said Mr Philp.
He added that Labour 'foolishly' scrapped the Rwanda plan which would have seen '100%' of these arrivals removed.
A joint parliamentary committee report found that the Tories' plan was 'fundamentally incompatible' with UK Human Rights law in February 2024.
Latest Home Office figures show 25,436 people have arrived by small boat so far this year – a record for this point in the year since data began in 2018.
This is up 47% on the same point last year (17,284), and is 69% higher than in 2023 (15,071), according to the PA news agency analysis.
Under current procedure migrants who make the dangerous journey will be screened at Manston processing centre in Kent, where some will be selected to be removed from the country.
UK officials have up to 14 days after their arrival to request their return to France, and French officials must also respond within 14 days, or 28 in exceptional circumstances.
Migrants being returned will be held in an immigration removal centre until being sent to France by plane.
The treaty, which was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, commits for a return to be completed within three months in all cases.
Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances.
Ministers have rejected criticism that the returns deal leaves open a loophole for human rights laws to be exploited for migrants to avoid deportation.
The agreement contains a clause that says in order for people to be returned to France, the UK must confirm they do not have an 'outstanding human rights claim'.
Mr Philp said on Tuesday this section offered 'an easy loophole for lawyers'.
Borders minister Dame Angela Eagle said he was wrong, and that the clause was included 'precisely to ensure no-one can use 'clearly unfounded' human rights claims to avoid being returned'.
Reacting to the criticism on Wednesday, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy also said: 'The deal that we've struck will allow people with us to send people back to France who have human rights claims.
'Those claims will be heard in France. So, I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Police arrest 466 people over Palestine Action support at protest
Hundreds attended Saturday's demonstration in Parliament Square, organised by Defend Our Juries, with the Metropolitan Police warning it would arrest anyone expressing support for Palestine Action. In an update posted on X on Saturday evening, Scotland Yard said 466 people had been arrested for supporting the group as of 9pm. A further eight arrests were made for other offences, including five for assaults on officers. None were seriously injured, the force added. The Met earlier said the detained protesters were taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area, and those whose details could be confirmed were bailed, with conditions not to attend any further protest in support of Palestine Action. Hundreds gathered in Parliament Square (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Those whose details were refused, or could not be verified, were taken to custody suites across London. Charity Amnesty International described the mass arrests under UK terrorism law as 'deeply concerning'. The crowd, sat on the grass inside Parliament Square, could be seen writing 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' on white placards at 1pm, with the vast majority remaining silent. Several demonstrators carrying placards that read 'Palestine Action terrorises Britain while Hamas hides in hospitals, schools and mosques', briefly walked along the crowd before being led away by police officers. Other clusters of protesters who were not holding placards gathered around the Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela statues in the square singing pro-Palestinian chants. Arrest update: Parliament Square and Whitehall are clear. As of 9pm, 466 people had been arrested for showing support for Palestine Action. There were a further eight arrests for other offences including five assaults on officers. This will be the final update of the day. — Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) August 9, 2025 Officers were holding individual demonstrators sat on the edge of the grass before escorting them through swelling crowds to police vans parked on the edge of the square. A separate group of officers attended a protester lying next to the fenced-off Emmeline Pankhurst statue. They later began arresting protesters sat in the middle of Parliament Square. The officers lifted the protesters – some sitting and some lying flat – off the ground before escorting them away. A woman is detained by police in Parliament Square (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Onlookers applauded the protesters and shouted 'Shame on you' at the police making arrests. Protesters who were still sat in the middle of Parliament Square stood up together at 2pm and held their placards in the air. One person was also arrested at a separate Palestine Coalition march, which set off from Russell Square heading to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand. The arrest was 'for a placard showing support for Palestine Action', Scotland Yard said. Protesters held signs in support of Palestine Action (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000. Earlier this week, the first three people to be charged with supporting Palestine Action in England and Wales were named. Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, have all been charged with displaying an article in a public place, arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organisation after their attendance at a previous demonstration last month. Hundreds have been arrested in the wave of Defend Our Juries protests across the UK since the ban was implemented by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper last month. People were seen lying on the ground during the protest (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Home Secretary Yvette Cooper thanked police in London and across the country for their work to ensure peaceful protests, and officers' 'continued dedication in responding to support for a proscribed organisation'. She said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation. Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage. 'It also follows an assessment from the joint terrorism assessment centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings. 'Many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear, this is not a non-violent organisation. UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority. 'Their actions are not about the horrific suffering in the Middle East and do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across the country who are exercising their rights to protest peacefully.' Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said: 'The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists. 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.'
Glasgow Times
18 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Police arrest 466 people over Palestine Action support at protest
Hundreds attended Saturday's demonstration in Parliament Square, organised by Defend Our Juries, with the Metropolitan Police warning it would arrest anyone expressing support for Palestine Action. In an update posted on X on Saturday evening, Scotland Yard said 466 people had been arrested for supporting the group as of 9pm. A further eight arrests were made for other offences, including five for assaults on officers. None were seriously injured, the force added. The Met earlier said the detained protesters were taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area, and those whose details could be confirmed were bailed, with conditions not to attend any further protest in support of Palestine Action. Hundreds gathered in Parliament Square (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Those whose details were refused, or could not be verified, were taken to custody suites across London. Charity Amnesty International described the mass arrests under UK terrorism law as 'deeply concerning'. The crowd, sat on the grass inside Parliament Square, could be seen writing 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' on white placards at 1pm, with the vast majority remaining silent. Several demonstrators carrying placards that read 'Palestine Action terrorises Britain while Hamas hides in hospitals, schools and mosques', briefly walked along the crowd before being led away by police officers. Other clusters of protesters who were not holding placards gathered around the Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela statues in the square singing pro-Palestinian chants. Arrest update: Parliament Square and Whitehall are clear. As of 9pm, 466 people had been arrested for showing support for Palestine Action. There were a further eight arrests for other offences including five assaults on officers. This will be the final update of the day. — Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) August 9, 2025 Officers were holding individual demonstrators sat on the edge of the grass before escorting them through swelling crowds to police vans parked on the edge of the square. A separate group of officers attended a protester lying next to the fenced-off Emmeline Pankhurst statue. They later began arresting protesters sat in the middle of Parliament Square. The officers lifted the protesters – some sitting and some lying flat – off the ground before escorting them away. A woman is detained by police in Parliament Square (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Onlookers applauded the protesters and shouted 'Shame on you' at the police making arrests. Protesters who were still sat in the middle of Parliament Square stood up together at 2pm and held their placards in the air. One person was also arrested at a separate Palestine Coalition march, which set off from Russell Square heading to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand. The arrest was 'for a placard showing support for Palestine Action', Scotland Yard said. Protesters held signs in support of Palestine Action (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000. Earlier this week, the first three people to be charged with supporting Palestine Action in England and Wales were named. Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, have all been charged with displaying an article in a public place, arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organisation after their attendance at a previous demonstration last month. Hundreds have been arrested in the wave of Defend Our Juries protests across the UK since the ban was implemented by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper last month. People were seen lying on the ground during the protest (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Home Secretary Yvette Cooper thanked police in London and across the country for their work to ensure peaceful protests, and officers' 'continued dedication in responding to support for a proscribed organisation'. She said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation. Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage. 'It also follows an assessment from the joint terrorism assessment centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings. 'Many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear, this is not a non-violent organisation. UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority. 'Their actions are not about the horrific suffering in the Middle East and do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across the country who are exercising their rights to protest peacefully.' Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said: 'The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists. 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.'
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news
Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a summer visit to a library (Image: PA) Keir Starmer's approval rating has shown no sign of improvement, latest polling has shown. His net score, on all leadership attributes, has fallen and he remains on a low rating of -41%. Polling by Opinium Research of 2,050 UK adults aged 18+ from August 6 to August 8 has been weighted to be politically and nationally representative. Politicians are currently not sitting in Parliament as it is the summer recess, but even that break has not given the Prime Minister any boost as he takes a political gamble. Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling. The pollsters say that in terms of the Israel/Palestine conflict, two in five (42%) now see Israel as a threat to the UK, while only 18% still see it as an ally. This is slightly more than view Palestine as a threat (36%). Public disapproval of Starmer's handling of the conflict has increased by 14 points since October 2024, with 45% disapproving (+12 points on October 2024), compared to 17% who approve (-2 on October 2024). While 33% think he has provided sufficient support to Israel and Israeli citizens, two in five (40%) think he has not provided sufficient support for citizens in Gaza and could show more. Meanwhile 44% think the UK should recognise Palestine as an independent state – almost double the amount who think it should not (23%). For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . The Online Safety Act, which has recently been implemented, has more than half of people's approval, with 54% supporting its aims. Just 17% oppose it. The pollsters also asked about social media and schools finding 83% of people think social media should be banned for children under 13, with three in five (58%) thinking it should be banned for under 16s. Seven in ten (70%) think mobile phone use should be banned during the school day for under-16s, with a further 36% thinking it should be banned for all pupils in school or college, even if they're up to 18 years old. Two thirds (66%) think schools should teach pupils how to use emerging technologies such as AI, whereas 20% do not. Additionally, while half (50%) think pupils should be allowed to use AI to do research, most people (73%) think schoolchildren should not be allowed to use it to write their homework or essays. James Crouch, head of policy and public affairs at Opinium, said: "There is growing disapproval of Israel, with more than twice as many Britons viewing it as a threat to the UK than as an ally. Public dissatisfaction is mounting over Keir Starmer's handling of the Israel–Gaza conflict, particularly regarding the support offered to Gazan citizens. Article continues below "With state recognition on the agenda, the British public believes Palestine has as much right to exist as Israel. "As Israel's actions drift further from British public opinion, its latest plan to move Gaza City's population south presents Starmer with a difficult challenge: navigating the conflict in a way that shows meaningful support without alienating his own voters."
