
Big Tech struggles to find footing in Trump's first 100 days
The world's biggest tech firms have been left scrambling to adjust to the tumultuous first 100 days of President Trump's second term, despite their efforts to cozy up to the president and his tech-heavy administration.
Trump's unpredictable approach to tariffs, his administration's continued accusations of censorship and the decision to double down on antitrust enforcement have underlined the limits of Big Tech's approach, even as it sees some wins on deregulation.
'These efforts to build close relationships have not altogether paid dividends,' said Andrew Lokay, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors.
'It's a tough time to be a tech CEO in Washington, D.C., and I think that may come as a little bit of a surprise to some of the CEOs who thought that investing in the relationships with Trump would have a bigger payoff in terms of policy,' he added.
Big Tech had a contentious relationship with Trump throughout his first term, and it took a turn for the worse after numerous social media platforms banned the president in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, riots.
Following Trump's win last fall, the biggest names in tech seemed keen to start anew with the incoming president, visiting him at his Mar-a-Lago resort and offering million-dollar donations to his inaugural fund.
These tech leaders — including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook — attended Trump's inauguration in January, sitting side by side in prime seats in the Capitol Rotunda and giving the appearance of a new rapport with the president.
With Tesla CEO Elon Musk and several other Silicon Valley figures joining the administration, it also appeared as though Big Tech would have key allies in the White House.
'Silicon Valley was perhaps expecting low taxes, low regulation, pro-business perspective in the White House, and to some extent, we've seen some of that, with the push for tax cuts in Congress and the president's deregulatory agenda,' Lokay said.
'But at the same time, tech remains in the crosshairs,' he added.
Trump's back-and-forth on tariffs has wreaked havoc on the tech industry, threatening to disrupt supply chains central to the flow of electronics.
In March, the president announced sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs, including massive import taxes on goods from China and Taiwan — key prongs in tech supply chains.
Trump ultimately backed off as the markets panicked, opting for a 90-day pause on most tariffs. However, the levies against China remained in place and continued to rise as Beijing and Washington went tit for tat on tariffs.
As a result, Chinese imports in the U.S. now face a 145 percent tariff, and U.S. imports in China face a 125 percent tariff.
The tech industry received a reprieve earlier this month when Trump announced that electronics would be exempt from the tariffs. However, the relief was short-lived, as the president signaled he would levy separate sector-based import taxes.
The administration's rapid shifts have left tech companies scrambling to keep up.
'It's been a 'Nightmare on Elm Street,'' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said. 'No one expected it would've been this turbulent.'
'Everyone knew reciprocal tariffs [were] going to come. … No one thought we were going to basically put a shut-off valve for China, which is the heart and lungs of the supply chain,' he added.
After Punchbowl News reported Tuesday that Amazon was planning to show customers how much Trump's tariffs added to the cost of an item, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed the move as a 'hostile and political act,' holding up a photo of Bezos.
The e-commerce giant later denied the report, saying the plans were not approved and 'not going to happen.'
At the same, Big Tech's efforts at reconciliation with Trump have seemingly not tempered Republicans' frustrations with the industry over what they view as censorship of and bias against conservatives.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a probe into leading tech firms' policies related to content moderation and user bans in February, suggesting they could amount to illegal censorship.
The administration's efforts have been accompanied by those of GOP leaders in Congress. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) has sent off dozens of subpoenas to major tech companies, demanding information about potential censorship.
'Now that Republicans hold both chambers of Congress and the White House, I expect this is an issue that they will pursue more aggressively,' Lokay said.
The Trump administration has also declined to pull any punches on antitrust enforcement against Big Tech, taking Meta to court over monopoly allegations and pushing forward with an effort to break up Google.
Both cases were brought during the first Trump administration. The Biden administration pushed ahead with an aggressive antitrust approach, bringing additional cases against Google, Amazon and Apple.
However, as Trump took office a second time surrounded by Silicon Valley moguls, it was unclear whether his administration would take up the antitrust mantle with the same vigor.
His picks to fill key roles at the FTC and Department of Justice (DOJ) hinted at continued scrutiny of Big Tech, which was reinforced by the DOJ's decision to follow through with the prior administration's push to split Google and Chrome.
The FTC's trial against Meta also got underway earlier this month, despite Zuckerberg's reported efforts to lobby Trump for a settlement. The Meta CEO was called to the stand as the agency's first witness and spent three lengthy days answering questions.
'There has continued to be a rather aggressive pursuit of antitrust actions against some of the leading tech companies,' said Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow in tech policy at the Cato Institute.
Still, Trump's second term hasn't been entirely negative for the tech industry. Deregulation has been a key emphasis for the administration, including on artificial intelligence (AI), where officials including Vice President Vance have instead placed a heavy emphasis on innovation.
'This administration appears to likely be taking a lighter-touch approach to artificial intelligence, although we don't fully know what that approach will look like yet,' Huddleston added.
Shortly after taking office, Trump revoked former President Biden's executive order focused on AI safety, which Huddleston noted was seen as 'more restrictive and prescriptive when it came to the future' of the technology.
The administration has yet to release its own AI policy but put out a request for public comment on its 'AI Action Plan' in February, which received more than 10,000 responses, the White House said earlier this month.
'With President Trump, it's always worth keeping in mind, expect the unexpected,' Lokay said. 'He can be unpredictable, and you can be on his good side one moment, you can be on the outs another moment.'
'I wouldn't be surprised if tech continues to try to build those relationships with the president,' he continued. 'But at the same time, there's no guarantee that that could yield results in terms of policy outcomes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem says "we're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown
Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday that the administration won't allow a "repeat of 2020" to occur after President Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the Los Angeles area amid protests over activity by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. "We're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen," Noem said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," referring to the unrest in Minneapolis following the killing of George Floyd. At the time, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz made the controversial decision to deploy the state's National Guard amid the 2020 riots in Minneapolis, but Noem on Sunday criticized Walz for what she said were "very bad decisions," claiming he "let his city burn for days on end." Mr. Trump also deployed the National Guard in June 2020 to Washington, D.C, to quell protests. And as California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom urged that the state had things under control after protests broke out in L.A. in reaction to ICE operations in recent days, Noem claimed Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 8, 2025. CBS News "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the President chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added. "And that's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers are being federalized so they can use their special skill set to keep peace." Mr. Trump signed a memo Saturday using Title 10 authority to order the deployment of at least 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles County following clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators in Paramount, California, and large-scale protests elsewhere in the county. It marks the first time since 1965 that a president has "sent troops into a state without a state request," said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program. Newsom claimed in a post on X that the move by the Trump administration was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," adding that "there is currently no unmet need." "The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle," Newsom said in another post, adding "Don't give them one." The California governor called Mr. Trump and the two spoke for about 40 minutes Saturday night, a spokesperson for Newsom told CBS News. Noem said the National Guard soldiers being engaged Sunday are "specifically trained for this type of crowd situation" and will "provide safety around buildings and to those that are engaged in peaceful protests, and also to our law enforcement officers so they can continue their daily work." "They're there at the direction of the president in order to keep peace and allow people to be able to protest, but also to keep law and order," Noem said, adding that "unfortunately, we've seen some violent protests happen, and that's why these National Guard soldiers are being utilized to help with some security in some areas." Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Saturday that "if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized," adding that "they are on high alert." On the issue of sending in active-duty military personnel to police a domestic disturbance, Noem said she's hopeful "that we work with local leaders that would do their jobs," saying in L.A., the mayor "has refused to recognize the dangerous situation that she's perpetuating." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KCAL late Saturday that she is "confident in our law enforcement partners here in Los Angeles, that we can handle the situation" saying "there is no need for 2,000 National Guard troops." When pressed on the idea of sending U.S. troops, Noem said "ICE and Homeland Security are running these operations right now," while noting that Mr. Trump "makes the decisions." Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who also appeared on "Face the Nation" Sunday, defended the ability of governors to "make their own decisions based on the situation." "When you look at where the American people are, they want to make sure you follow the law and that there's due process, and you don't want to inflame things by threatening to bring in the Marines or deporting people based on a mistake," Klobuchar said. The developments come as a new CBS News poll, conducted just prior to Saturday's protests in L.A., found that more than half of Americans approve of the Trump administration's deportation program, though large percentages of Americans continue to say it is not acceptable if legal residents are mistakenly deported as part of the program.


CBS News
37 minutes ago
- CBS News
ABC News suspends correspondent over X post attacking Trump, Stephen Miller
ABC News on Sunday suspended a senior correspondent following a since-deleted social media post where he criticized White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and President Trump. Shortly after midnight on Sunday, senior national correspondent Terry Moran wrote on X that Miller is "richly endowed with the capacity for hatred." Moran continued, "He's a world-class hater." Moran also lambasted Mr. Trump, claiming his hatred is "only a means to an end, and that end [is] his own glorification." The post was removed early Sunday morning and Moran has not publicly said anything since. An ABC News spokesperson confirmed that the news division suspended Moran pending further evaluation of the incident. "ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others," the spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News. "The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards." The White House went on the offensive against Moran on Sunday, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt responding to Moran's comments, Sunday, calling it "unhinged and unacceptable." Miller posted on social media that Moran's "full public meltdown" shows that the "privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose." Vice President JD Vance also weighed in, calling Moran's post a "vile smear" on Miller and that it is "dripping with hatred." "As it happens, I know Stephen quite well," Vance continued. "And he's motivated by love of country. He's motivated by a fear that people like Terry Moran make rules that normal Americans have to follow, but well connected people don't." In April, Moran interviewed Mr. Trump in the president's first major broadcast appearance in his second term. Moran has been with ABC News since 1997, and has covered the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the Iraq war. In December 2024, ABC News settled a defamation suit with Mr. Trump, agreeing to contribute $15 million to his presidential foundation and museum. The lawsuit, brought on by Mr. Trump, accused anchor George Stephanopoulos of acting with "malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth," for incorrectly reporting that a jury found Mr. Trump liable for rape in the E. Jean Carroll case, rather than sexual abuse. Mr. Trump is also suing CBS News accusing the news organization of election interference for "deceitful" editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign. CBS News calls the claims "false. "


Chicago Tribune
39 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.