
Gazans fear Israel is enacting Donald Trump's ‘Riviera' plan
When Mahmoud Ghazali recently discussed the prospect of leaving
Gaza
with his six children, they were 'excited' at the idea of finally escaping the relentless war – though his youngest, eight-year-old Nabil, 'stunned everyone' by doubting whether they would be alive long enough to get out.
'We are all in despair,' said Ghazali, who had returned to his home in Gaza City during the short-lived ceasefire that
Israel
broke last month. 'I hope we never reach the point when we have to choose between our homeland and our safety.'
Like everyone in Gaza, the Ghazali family is struggling not only with the trauma, hunger and loss caused by 18 months of war. They are reckoning with the prospect of being expelled from their homeland as part of an outlandish plan first proposed by US president
Donald Trump
and unabashedly embraced by Israeli prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu
and his far-right allies.
Condemned around the world as ethnic cleansing, Trump's suggestion to empty the shattered strip of its 2.2 million people – and rebuild it as the 'Riviera of the Middle East' – has been described by Netanyahu as 'the only viable plan to enable a different future' for the region.
READ MORE
And since Israel broke the two-month ceasefire with Hamas and relaunched a ferocious offensive, once more driving people from their places of refuge, Gazans fear Israel is putting the plan into practice.
Piling pressure on the population, Israel has blocked the entry of all aid into the territory for more than 50 days; set up a 'voluntary emigration unit' encouraging Gazans to leave; and taken nearly a third of the strip as 'buffer' zones in which it plans to keep troops even after the war ends.
The aftermath of an Israeli air strike in the Gaza Strip. Photograph: AP
In escalating the conflict, Israel looks to have the clear backing of the Trump administration. Mike Huckabee, the US's new ambassador to Israel, dismissed calls to allow aid into the strip by urging the international community to 'put the pressure where it really belongs – on Hamas'.
Many Gazans, who had hoped the war would end with a ceasefire and reconstruction, could scarcely have imagined the situation deteriorating further but are suffering the consequences. UN secretary general
António Guterres
has described Gaza as 'a killing field' where civilians are trapped in 'an endless death loop'.
Shady Saqr, who is living with his wife and four children in the ruins of their wrecked Gaza City flat, said they had little to eat. His 15-year-old son, Uday, stands in line for hours every day to get water, which he then carries back on a long trudge home through rubble-filled streets.
But Saqr is adamant he will not leave. It is a widely shared stance, with many Gazans themselves the descendants of refugees who fled or were driven from their land during the fighting surrounding Israel's creation in 1948 – a period Palestinians call the Nakba, or catastrophe.
'They think we are chess pieces to move around,' Saqr said. 'No one is kicking me off my land. Who will bury the bodies of those still under the rubble? I will stay with them whether I am dead or alive.'
Israel says it will continue fighting until it has eradicated Hamas militants and brought back the remaining 59 hostages held by the group, fewer than half of whom are still thought to be alive.
Its military campaign has killed more than 52‚000 Palestinians, Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says. Israel launched the offensive in retaliation for the October 7th, 2023 cross-border attack by Hamas, in which the militants killed 1,200 people and seized 250 hostages, according to government figures.
Delegations from both sides have continued limited indirect negotiations as mediators in Qatar and Egypt try – so far in vain – to get agreement on another truce.
Israel's blockade, which the country says is aimed at undermining Hamas's control over the population, has had a devastating impact, with supplies of essentials including medicine, clean water and fuel depleted. The World Food Programme said on Friday it had run out of food in Gaza.
People inspect destroyed bulldozers and other heavy vehicles at the Jabalia municipality garage, which was hit by Israeli bombardment, in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip last week. Photograph: Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images
Gavin Kelleher, humanitarian access manager with the Norwegian Refugee Council in Gaza, said rising hunger had led to increasing instances of 'needs-based looting' as people raid aid stocks. This month a man fired shots in the air at a UN food distribution centre, which was looted and damaged.
As conditions deteriorate, many in the enclave feel their suffering has been forgotten. Kelleher said incidents that would have made global headlines a year ago, 'like 100 people killed in a day [or] dozens of children being murdered in military violence', appeared to have become normalised.
About 70 per cent of Gaza is now under forced evacuation orders by the Israeli military or has been designated no-go military zones, with hundreds of thousands of Palestinians displaced. Egypt and Jordan, the two countries mentioned by Trump as destinations for resettling Gazans, have both rejected his plan.
Lina Ahmed, mother of a two-year-old girl, said she was angry at the world for standing by and watching Israel 'commit genocide against us'.
'I don't care if they expel us to Guantánamo. At least there will be meals, water and electricity,' she added. 'But if they make it a condition that we can't come back, I won't go.' Israel vehemently denies it is committing genocide.
Suhaila Khalil, a mother of four, was displaced earlier in the war to the al-Mawasi coastal encampment, which Israel has designated a 'humanitarian area' but repeatedly bombed – setting tents aflame and incinerating their occupants.
The family now spent its days scavenging for wood and plastic to burn as cooking fuel, or searching for food and water while 'avoiding bombs', she said.
Yet Khalil insisted she would never go elsewhere. 'We will rebuild everything,' she said. 'This is our land ... the blood of tens of thousands of martyrs should not go to waste.' − Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
21 minutes ago
- The Journal
Government rejects motion calling on it to stop sale of 'Israeli war bonds'
GOVERNMENT HAS REJECTED a joint-proposal from the opposition which called on the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds within the EU, an issue that has moved up the political agenda in Ireland in recent months. The motion, put forward by the Social Democrats and supported by Sinn Féin, People Before Profit and the Labour Party, sought the reversal of a previous government decision to block a bill calling for the same measure last month . Members of those parties on Monday requested that a free 'vote of conscience' take place on the issue – meaning that government TDs would not have to vote with their party. The motion was defeated this evening 85 to 71 in the government's favour. Israeli State Bonds have been advertised as a method to support the country's economy and, more recently, websites promoting the investments have emphasised their importance to Israel's military operations in Gaza. Some TDs, as a result, have dubbed the securities as 'Israeli war bonds'. Coalition-supporting TDs, independents Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole, repeated their vote to support the opposition's call . Both TDs previously said that they had a right to vote, as independents, in a manner they agreed with, pointing out that the programme for government does not include references to the issue. Advertisement Bonds from countries outside the EU must have legal documents approved by a central bank from a member state in order for the securities to be sold within the European single market. In the case of Israel, the country is Ireland. A protest outside the Dáil today calling on government to support the opposition's motion. Alamy Alamy The Central Bank itself is responsible for assessing whether the products it offers are compliant with these EU requirements. Since Hamas's attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and Israel's subsequent bombardment and siege of Gaza, there has been mounting pressure on the Government from pro-Palestinian activists in Ireland to stop the facilitation of the sale of these bonds. But, Governor of the Central Bank Gabriel Makhlouf today defended its offerings, telling TDs at an Oireachtas Committee that the UN's Genocide Convention applies only to the Irish State, not the country's banking regulator. Activists have demonstrated at the site in Dublin over the last number of months and have called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. Speaking during a Fine Gael parliamentary party meeting this evening, finance minister Paschal Donohoe told members that oppositional TDs wanted the government to tell the state's banking regulator what to do, despite its mandated independence. The Dublin Central TD said government cannot approve legislation that impedes on the independence of the Central Bank for legal purposes. Opposition TDs argued this evening that, as the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza, Ireland has obligations under the UN's Genocide Convention to use 'all means likely to have a deterrent effect' on those suspected of committing such crimes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


The Irish Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Trump doesn't rule out arresting California Gov Gavin Newsom over LA riot chaos and says he had to save city from mob
DONALD Trump refused to rule out arresting California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of the Los Angeles riots. The pair have been trading blows since Newsom slammed Trump's decision to send federal troops into the city to 8 Trump and Newsom have publicly fought over the President's decision to send federal troops to LA Credit: Getty 8 A Waymo vehicle burns amid the warzone scenes Credit: AFP 8 Trump refused to rule out arresting California Governor Gavin Newsom Credit: PodForce1 / Youtube 8 Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an address on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Office of California Governor via AP) Credit: AP Trump has sent around 4,000 of the National Guard and 700 Marines into LA, where they have The Governor accused Trump of manufacturing the flare-ups, saying his actions were "akin to authoritarian regimes" - and was dismissed as "incompetent" in return. He vowed his state is "suing Donald Trump" for "creating fear and terror to [...] violate the US constitution". Trump has previously toyed with the idea of arresting Newsom, and refused to rule it out in an interview with the read more on los angeles Trump's border czar Tom Homan had warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal law enforcement. On Sunday, Newsom goaded Trump over the threats, saying in a MSNBC interview: "Come after me, arrest me. Let's just get it over with, tough guy." Asked directly if he is going to arrest and charge Gavin Newsom, Trump said: "Well, he's not doing a good job. "In theory you could, I guess. It's almost like a dissipation of duties. Nobody's ever seen anything like it." Most read in The US Sun Before Wednesday's interview, Newsom shared his thoughts on the arrest threats. He said: "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. Anti-ICE raid protest carnage spreads across US as Texas deploys National Guard & LA declares curfew after riots "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Trump follow up with a brutal takedown of Newsom's record in office - which included blaming him for Trump said: "First he had his wildfires that burned down half the place [...] I told them water, get the water from the pacific north west [...] I got the water to go down. "They were using environmental as a reason not to give water. They were protecting a certain type of fish - which by the way has not done well. "He should have done it [redirected the water supply] in my first term. You wouldn't have had the fires." 8 There are approximately 4,700 federal troops in LA at Trump's orders Credit: EPA 8 The rioters are protesting against Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants Credit: Reuters 8 The Marines and National Guard have been sent to assist local police Credit: The Mega Agency Interviewer Miranda Devine then asked about a much-disputed phone call between Trump and Newsom - with each swearing to a different version of events. The President claimed he rang to discuss sending in National Guardsmen - but Newsom branded him a "stone-cold liar". Newsom insists he "kept trying to bring up" the situation in LA, but that Trump veered onto other subjects. However, Trump doubled down today and said: "Of course I did [talk about it]. The phone call was to deploy the troops. "I said: 'You're city is burning down, your state is in bad trouble.' "All I want is him to do a good job [...] he's doing a poor job." In an effort to checkmate Newsom, Trump brandished a screenshot showing a 16-minute call between the two at 1:23am on June 7. Newsom does not dispute that the call happened - but maintains that Trump "never once brought up the National Guard". Trump landed other personal jibes, mocking the California High-Speed Rail project which has run over budget and claiming that, without him, Newsom "wouldn't have LA". He said: "Between the fires and the riots, there would be nothing left. You have a governor that's incompetent, a mayor that's highly incompetent." 8


Irish Examiner
31 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Government will be on 'the wrong side' of history over Israeli bonds decision, opposition says
The Government has been warned it is on the "the wrong side" of history after rejecting a motion to prevent the facilitation of Israeli war bonds. Opposition parties united behind a motion demanding the Government enact emergency legislation to explicitly force the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israel bonds. The Social Democrats motion, supported by Sinn Féin, Labour, and People Before Profit-Solidarity also called on the coalition to advise the bank that "by acting as the enabling cog in Israel's fund-raising machine in the EU, it is putting the State at risk of a charge of complicity in genocide". However, the Government's countermotion stated that it had "received advice from the Attorney General that recently proposed legislation to introduce 'restrictive measures' was not compatible with our obligations as members of the EU and in conflict with Article 215 and Article 63 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU". The motion with the amendment put forward by the Government was then passed by 85 votes to 71. Speaking in the Dáil ahead of the vote, finance minister Paschal Donohoe said: "Despite the human feelings I have and the determination of the Government to respond to this, I have to recognise the law with regard to the EU and the law that recognises the independent operation of the Central Bank of Ireland." But Social Democrats TD Cian O'Callaghan claimed that the Government was "hiding behind technicalities" and could act on the matter if it wanted to. Let us be clear about this. Genocide is taking place and is being part-funded by the sale of Israeli bonds including in Europe, which is being facilitated by the Irish Central Bank. Sinn Fein's Pearse Doherty described Mr Donohoe's response as "shameful", adding: "History will show that the minister is on the wrong side of this issue. He has used carefully constructed words to tell us what we cannot do. "However, the reality is that if Government wants to initiate national measures that will ensure that the Central Bank does not sign off on a prospective and therefore, not facilitate the sale of these war bonds in Ireland, then it can do so."