logo
Trump wants to lower prescription drug prices. What it means for your pharmacy bill.

Trump wants to lower prescription drug prices. What it means for your pharmacy bill.

Yahoo13-05-2025

Americans pay more for prescription drugs than people in Europe or in any other wealthy nation. Is that likely to change anytime soon?
President Donald Trump took aim at that pricing disparity with an executive order on May 12 that aims to lower drug prices for U.S. consumers and taxpayers, sharing on social media that they'd be cut by "59%, PLUS!" and later at the White House adding, "I guess even 90%."
But some doubt how much consumers will feel the cuts. Pharmaceutical experts say the executive order will have no immediate impact on how much people pay at the pharmacy or for mail-order prescriptions. The president has asked the drug industry to voluntarily lower drug prices for U.S. consumer or be subject to a barrage of regulatory actions to force lower prices.
"The president thinks of pharmaceutical price differences between countries the same way he thinks of our trade imbalances with other countries," said John Barkett, managing director at the management consulting firm BRG and a former senior policy advisor in the Biden White House. "If we pay more than other countries, then he thinks we're getting ripped off."
The United States trade representative and the Department of Commerce have 30 days to give drugmakers price targets "to bring prices for American patients in line with comparably developed nations," the order said.
If they don't make significant progress toward those goals within six months, drugmakers could face actions from several federal agencies. The requested drug discounts could range for 59% to 80% from list prices.
Trump said other wealthy nations should pay more for prescription drugs. He called his executive order, which aims to charge Americans less and other nations more, "equalization."
If drugmakers that don't cut prices, the order directs Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Health and Human Services Department to draft federal rules to impose prices in line with other developed nations.
Trump's enforcement tool would come from federal regulators. Drug companies that fail to meet price targets could be investigated by the Federal Trade Commission for anti-competitive practices or face Food and Drug Administration reviews to "potentially modify or revoke" approvals of drugs found to be "unsafe, ineffective or improperly marketed."
The order also resurfaces an idea from the Trump administration's first term that achieved little uptake − importing less expensive pharmaceuticals from other nations.
Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, said the threat of regulatory action from several federal agencies amounts to "throwing spaghetti against the wall."
"If they throw everything (at drug companies), they are more likely to get drug companies to do what they want," Cannon said.
The executive order will have "no immediate impact on the American consumer," Barkett said.
The amount consumers pay for prescription drugs depends on their health insurance plans, which often charge copayments or a percentage of the pharmacy bill. Prices also often include complex rebates hidden from public view.
Studies show consumers are feeling the pinch of higher drug prices. A 2023 survey by The Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation that focuses on access to health care, said nearly 2 in 5 people skipped or delayed medical care or didn't fill a prescription that year because they couldn't afford it.
Some Democrats are skeptical that the executive order will deliver meaningful drug price relief to consumers or taxpayers.
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, said Trump talks about lowering drug prices "but fails to accomplish anything."
"Rather than changing the law, Trump issues another press release that will offer consumers little or nothing," Doggett said. "Begging Big Pharma to show some benevolence to the taxpayers and consumers, whom they continue to price gouge, will do nothing to assure access to affordable medications."
Americans pay more for these life-saving medications than residents of other wealthy nations.
U.S prescription drug prices run more than 2.5 times those in 32 comparable countries, according to a 2023 HHS report. The U.S. spent $1,310 per person on prescription drugs, compared to $646 per person paid in other developed nations, the report said.
In January 2025, AARP Public Policy Institute examined average list prices on 25 drugs for which Medicare spent the most on but had not yet negotiated lower prices. The report found prices nearly doubled since they hit the market and collectively cost Medicare and taxpayers nearly $50 billion in 2022.
About 7 million older adults on Medicare used the drugs and had to pay a portion of the bill at the pharmacy or via mail order.
Under Biden's 2022 climate and health legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act, Medicare was empowered to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies on a limited number of medications.
The law called for extensive rules, public comments and talks with drug companies before Medicare implemented discounts.
The Biden administration lowered prices on 10 widely prescribed drugs, such as the blood thinner Eliquis, which will take effect in 2026. In January, Medicare announced an additional batch of 15 drugs subject to negotiation for discounts beginning in 2027.
The law also called for penalties on drug companies that raised prices on prescription drugs faster than the rate of inflation.
Stephen Ubl, president and CEO of the trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, agreed with Trump's assessment that foreign countries are not paying their fair share.
Ubl also said pharmacy benefit managers, which negotiate drug prices on behalf of insurers and patients, also demand scrutiny.
"The administration is right to use trade negotiations to force foreign governments to pay their fair share for medicines," Ubl said. "U.S. patients should not foot the bill for global innovation."
But Ubl said U.S. pharmacy benefit managers, insurers and hospitals take half of every dollar spent on medicines.
"The amount going to middlemen often exceeds the price in Europe," Ubl said. "Giving this money directly to patients will lower their medicine costs and significantly reduce the gap with European prices."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump plans to lower prescription drug costs

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Washington Post

time21 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Federal officials at NASA and the Pentagon moved swiftly this week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station.

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Now that was a real lulu. The dictionary tells us that the slang term "lulu", which dates to the 1850s, can be used to describe a person or thing "outstanding for some quality." 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 That quality can be positive or negative, and for Lululemon () it translated into about 5 pounds of oy vey in a two-pound bag. Shares of the Vancouver athleisure giant nosedived on June 6 after it beat Wall Street's first-quarter-earnings expectations but slashed its full-year guidance, citing a 'dynamic macroenvironment' that included increased competition and the impact of the Trump administration's tariffs. "The current tariff paradigm has brought uncertainty into the retail environment," Chief Executive Calvin McDonald told analysts during the earnings call. "As consumers try to assess the impact they will have on daily life, as businesses evaluate these impacts as well, I believe we are better positioned than most to navigate the near term while also maintaining our focus on investing in our growth potential over the long term," he added. Chief Financial Officer Meghan Frank said Lululemon estimated a thinner operating margin, which measures profitability by dividing a company's operating income by its net sales for the full year. It now expects a narrowing of 1.6 percentage points, compared with the previous estimate of 1 point, "all driven by the net impact of tariffs." More Retail Stocks: Halloween retailer sounds warning consumers need to hear Target expands same-day delivery to 100s of retailers Walmart makes surprise cuts as it looks at tariff price hikes "We are planning to take strategic price increases, looking item by item across our assortment as we typically do, and it will be price increases on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature," she said. Comparable sales in the quarter rose 1% from a year earlier, missing analysts' forecasts calling for a 3% increase. The result reflects a 2% decrease in the Americas and a 6% increase internationally. "We're definitely not happy where the growth is in the U.S., but relative to the market and our performance versus others, pleased that we're putting on share, pleased with the reaction to the newness and with the mix of newness that's coming," McDonald said. Lululemon is known for advanced athletic apparel, particularly its workout leggings, and it is said to use "holistic guerrilla marketing" to make customers feel that they are part of a community. In April, President Donald Trump unleashed a broad range of tariffs that he has since paused and rebooted several times, causing widespread confusion among companies and consumers and in the markets. Several retailers have reduced or withdrawn their guidance and indicated that they would raise prices due to the uncertainty surrounding the tariff regime. Meanwhile, Trump said that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer on June 9 for renewed trade talks with China, adding that "the meeting should go very well."Lululemon's stock sank nearly 20% on June 6. The shares are off 31% in 2025 and down roughly 18% from a year earlier. Several investment firms issued research reports on Lululemon following the earnings report, including Needham, which lowered its price target to $317 from $366 and affirmed a buy rating on the shares, according to The Fly. The company posted fairly lackluster Q1 results, though the selloff in the stock seems "aggressive" relative to the size of management's guidance cut, the investment firm said. That's particularly since the guidance reduction is mostly tariff-driven, and also considers that management struck an encouraging tone about how new products are performing, Needham said. Lululemon's domestic business remains sluggish, however, while international comparable-sales growth slowed in Q1, likely raising questions about the growth algorithm going forward, Needham added. Telsey Advisory analyst Dana Telsey pared the firm's price target on Lululemon to $360 from $385 and maintained an outperform rating. The Q1 results "nicely topped" the Wall Street consensus and the company's guidance, Telsey said. Consumers continue to respond well to newness and new-product launches, Tesley added. BMO Capital lowered its price target on Lululemon to $250 from $302 and maintained a market-perform rating. The company reported what the investment firm called a slight top- and bottom-line beat to estimates, with better gross margins partly offset by a miss of estimates for selling, general and administrative expense. But looking ahead, BMO Capital said, management guided in Q2 "materially below" estimates and pared the fiscal 2025 outlook for gross margin and earnings due to tariffs and markdowns. This marks the first time the company has lowered its fiscal-year earnings forecast at Q1 since fiscal 2014, BMO Capital analysts reboot stock price target after earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.

Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

The White House is challenging the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's assessment that President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will raise the federal deficit by trillions of dollars throughout the next decade. The national debt, currently $36.2 trillion, tracks what the U.S. owes its creditors, while the national deficit measures how much the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues. So far, the federal government has spent more than $1 trillion more than it has collected this fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an analysis Wednesday predicting that the so-called "big, beautiful, bill" the House passed in May would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. But according to the White House, the CBO's analysis is based on a faulty premise because it assumes that Republicans in Congress will fail to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Rather, the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts that the tax and spending measures would independently reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion. Senate Weighs Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' As Policy Group Backs Cbo, Projects $3 Trillion Debt Increase Read On The Fox News App Additionally, the White House argues that the measure, coupled with other initiatives like tariffs and other spending cuts, will lead to reducing the deficit by at least $6.6 trillion over 10 years. The "big, beautiful, bill" has faced criticism from figures including SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who labeled the measure an "abomination" and argued that the bill would increase the federal deficit. The measure now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., have voiced opposition to the legislation. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears Meanwhile, OMB Director Russell Vought told lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that he believed the CBO's analysis was "fundamentally wrong." "It will lead to reduced deficits and debt of $1.4 trillion," Vought said. "It will reduce mandatory savings of $1.7 trillion. I don't think the way they construct their baseline, not only does it not give a fair shake to economic growth, but it fundamentally misreads the economic consequences of not extending the current tax relief." Failure to pass Trump's tax package would trigger a recession, according to Vought. "We'll have a recession," Vought told lawmakers. "The economic storm clouds will be very dark. I think we'll have a 60% tax increase on the American people." Meanwhile, the White House has accused the CBO of employing those who've contributed to Democratic campaigns, even though CBO Director Phillip Swagel served in former President George W. Bush's administration. Price Tag Estimate For House Gop Tax Package Rises To $3.94T "I don't think many people know this: There hasn't been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000," Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political." The CBO director is appointed according to the recommendations of the House and Senate Budget Committees. Then-Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, first recommended Swagel in 2019, and then Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, recommended Swagel again in 2023. The CBO did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital on OMB's analysis or claims from the White House about the office being full of staffers who've backed Democrats. Fox News' Deirdre Heavey contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store