
More than 100 Indian & Pakistani fighter jets ‘battled in massive dogfight in one biggest battles in modern warfare'
MORE than 100 Indian and Pakistani fighter jets reportedly clashed in a ferocious dogfight, marking one of the biggest aerial battles since World War Two.
The hour-long showdown in the skies on Wednesday saw advanced Chinese and Western weapons go head-to-head for the first time.
11
Pakistani and Indian jets had a fierce clash in the skies on Wednesday
Credit: AFP
11
The hour-long dogfight was one of the biggest aerial battles since World War Two
Credit: AFP
11
People inspect the damage from an Indian missile attack in Muzaffarabad, Kashmir
Credit: Rex
11
The high-stakes engagement reportedly involved a staggering 125 warplanes as both sides hurled long-range missiles at each other from within their own airspace, according to
Pakistani officials claimed five Indian jets were shot down using Chinese-made PL-15 missiles — though New Delhi has yet to confirm any losses.
Salman Ali Bettani, an international relations scholar at Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad, told CNN: '(It) is now being characterized as the most intense air-to-air combat engagement between two nuclear-armed nations.
'The engagement represented a milestone in the operational use of advanced Chinese-origin systems.'
Read more on India Pakistan
If verified, the
Pakistan reportedly deployed its Chinese-built J-10C jets, boasting that they had downed Indian Rafale fighters, while Indian pilots made repeated passes at targets.
Neither side crossed the border, apparently wary of triggering a repeat of the 2019 incident where an Indian pilot was captured and paraded on Pakistani TV.
But the fight is only part of a spiralling conflict between the two nations following a massacre in the Indian resort town of Pahalgam, where 26 civilians were gunned down last month.
Most read in The Sun
India blames Pakistan for the attack — a charge Islamabad denies.
In response,
India 'launches airstrikes on Pakistan' in escalation between countries
Among them was the headquarters of terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), where
'India has killed the brutal terrorist assassin Abdul Rauf Azhar, whose psychopathic beheading of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002 we all remember,' said former US special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad.
'Justice has been served.'
Pakistan has yet to confirm his death.
11
Damage left behind after Pakistani shelling in Uri sector of North Kashmir
Credit: Rex
11
An elderly man sits inside a damaged house after shelling from the Pakistan side following the Indian Army's 'Operation Sindoor'
Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
11
Meanwhile, India accused Pakistan of using civilian planes as 'shields' during its air assault.
Wing Commander Vyomika Singh said: 'Pakistan launched an unprovoked aerial assault, targeting Indian territory with drones and missiles.
'But Pakistan did not close its civilian airspace, so that commercial flights would become shields against any counterstrike.'
Indian officials also say they 'repulsed' a wave of Pakistani drone attacks overnight, and blasts were reported in Jammu as air raid sirens blared in several cities.
Pakistan's army
Why are India and Pakistan enemies?
DISPUTES between India and Pakistan over the region of Kashmir date back decades.
The Muslim-majority territory was fought over in the aftermath of both countries' independence following the partition of India in 1947.
War between India and Pakistan would break out again in 1965 - which ended in a ceasefire.
Kashmir's control remains divided to this day, and tensions frequently flare up over the region.
India also fought Pakistan wars in 1971 and 1999 - with the conflict in the 70s resulting the independence of Bangladesh from Pakistan.
And the current conflict stems from how the region was split up as the two countries were gaining independence.
Indian troops took two-thirds of Kashmir, while Pakistan seized the northern third.
Since then, the row has developed into one of the most intense geopolitical rivalries on earth.
There are about 16 million people in Kashmir, split between the Indian-controlled and Pakistani-controlled zones.
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has vowed revenge, saying: 'I promise that we will take revenge for every drop of blood of these victims.'
The Pakistani Defence Minister also issued a chilling nuclear warning:
'If they aggravate this then if a chance of war arises in which there is a sign of nuclear option being used on both sides, then the responsibility for that will be on India.'
India struck back diplomatically,
11
A woman and a girl walk past Indian security forces standing guard
Credit: Rex
11
India launched Operation Sindoor on Wednesday
Credit: X/CLASH REPORT
11
Locals pick through a damaged building near Muzaffarabad, capital of Pakistan controlled Kashmir
Credit: AP
11
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said: 'I don't need to remind the audience where bin Laden was found.'
The aerial battle has sparked alarm across the globe.
US President Donald Trump said he is prepared to do 'anything to help,' while UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urged 'urgent dialogue' to avoid catastrophe.
'This isn't just a bilateral clash anymore; it's a glimpse of how Chinese defense exports are reshaping regional deterrence,' said Craig Singleton of the US-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Chinese defence stocks have surged since the battle, with shares in AVIC Chengdu Aircraft—maker of the J-10C—up 40% this week.
Beijing, which supplies the bulk of Pakistan's weapons, has so far stayed quiet, saying only that it is 'not familiar with the situation.'
Colonel Philip Ingram, a former British Army commander, previously told The Sun: 'Western intelligence in particular will be focused on the readiness and the outloading of nuclear stocks inside both Pakistan and India and monitoring what's happening to them very closely indeed.'
The dogfight is now being compared to the most historic air battles in military history — drawing parallels with the Battle of Britain, the Battle of Kursk, and the 1973 Battle of El Mansoura.
But with both sides boasting nuclear stockpiles — estimated at around 170 warheads each — the stakes today are infinitely higher.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons said it is 'gravely concerned' by the escalation.
Experts warn that if nuclear war erupts, it could kill as many as 125 million people.
How nuclear war could kill 125 million?
By James Halpin, Foreign News Reporter
INDIA and Pakistan are being urged to step back from armageddon as a nuclear war between the two rivals could kill 125million people.
The fighting neighbours traded rocket and artillery attacks in an overnight blitz leaving dozens dead and fears of all-out conflict.
Now, fears are abound that fighting could escalate to the use of nuclear weapons and kill tens of millions.
Peace campaigners like the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons are "gravely concerned" and have called for the two sides to step back from the brink.
And Colonel Philip Ingram, a former British Army commander, said the West will be particularly nervous about a nuclear conflict.
Ingram told The Sun: "Western intelligence in particular will be focused on the readiness and the outloading of nuclear stocks inside both Pakistan and India and monitoring what's happening to them very closely indeed.
"The worrying thing about these two nations is that the tensions are very real.
"The nuclear weapons are not there to protect them against attack from China or Russia or anyone else. It's focused purely on each other."
Ingram said escalation to using nuclear weapons could happen rapidly and powers like the US would step in to try and prevent their use.
He said: "The US Secretary of State, flying into India and Pakistan, would carry out shuttle diplomacy between the two."
But that might not be enough to overcome the animosity between the two enemies and their desire to escalate the conflict.
Xiaodon Liang, a Senior Policy Analyst, Nuclear Weapons Policy and Disarmament, at Arms Control Association also said the primary concern should be the possibility of a battlefield use escalating to "strategic nuclear exchanges".
Liang said: "Pakistan has made very clear that it will use nuclear weapons to prevent a full-scale Indian invasion of its territory, and the potential for uncontrollable escalation is part of what makes every crisis between India and Pakistan particularly dangerous."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Bloodcurdling moment ruthless soldier cocks his gun & presses it against woman's temple during restaurant brawl
THIS is the bone-chilling moment a ruthless cop pins a woman to the ground and holds a loaded gun right up against her temple. The shocking scene happened as tourists brawled outside a Chinese restaurant in Russia. Advertisement 5 The startled woman falls backwards onto the stairs as the cop moves in Credit: NewsX 5 The cop pinned the woman to the ground at gunpoint Credit: NewsX 5 It came after she slapped him hard around the ear Credit: NewsX Russian National Guard officers were The fight had spilled out into the streets of the Khabarovsk - in the A bystander caught the cops' intervention on their phone, but it soon The clip begins with burly officers confronting the brawling tourists as they try to bring order to the streets. Advertisement read more in world news But the crowds aren't having it, and make an attempt to scrap with the cops. As the outnumbered officers work to bring the situation under control, a woman suddenly strikes one of the the cops from behind. She slaps him hard on his ear before taking a step back. But instead of attempting to restrain the woman by hand, the enraged officer suddenly pulls his gun on her. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun Onlookers can hear the sound of the handgun being cocked as shouting and screaming continues in the background. The startled woman falls backwards onto the stairs as the cop moves in, pinning her to the ground. Baby among 5 dead as Putin unleashes strikes on Ukraine hours after revenge vow He plants the barrel of his weapon onto her temple for a nerve-shredding split second. But after a moment, he holsters his weapon while continuing to restrain the woman on the steps . Advertisement He then takes handcuffs from a fellow officer as he hauls her away from the scene. By this point the fight had mostly quietened down, with a few onlookers nervously watching the cops leave. They barge their way through a few tourists still standing there as they take the woman away for questioning. According to the Russian state news agency TASS, the cop was later treated in hospital for a burst eardrum. Advertisement A Russian Federation Investigative Committee statement said: "A criminal case has been opened for the use of violence against a government official in the performance of his official duties." Any offenders could face up to 10 years in jail if they are convicted. Two other suspects are also reported to have been detained. It comes after two kids were Advertisement Drone footage shows them looking around while trying to avoid capture. The cops eventually make the decision to fire two rubber bullets in an attempt to de-escalate the situation. They are eventually surrounded and apprehended by cops. 5 Officers had been called to reports of a fight in Khabarovsk Credit: NewsX Advertisement 5 Two other suspects are also reported to have been detained Credit: NewsX


Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Top Irish University to cut future ties with Israeli institutions
Trinity College Dublin is to divest from new arrangements with Israeli universities, firms and institutions. The board of the prestigious Dublin University, home to over 20,000 undergraduate and postgraduate students, made the decision to divest from Israeli links yesterday. Pro-Palestinian activists have called on other Irish universities to follow suit. Last May, students formed an encampment at Trinity in protest against a € 214,285 fine imposed on the students' union after a series of demonstrations regarding fees and rent, as well as the university's ties to Israel. Pic: AFP via Getty Images Following engagement with the protesters, the college dropped the fine and said it would complete a divestment from Israeli companies that have activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and appear on the UN blacklist. The students dismantled the camp after Trinity said it would 'endeavour' to divest in other Israeli companies, noting that its supplier list contains just one Israeli company, which remained in place until March this year for contractual reasons. Yesterday, Trinity's board received a report from a task force set up last October to examine academic and institutional links, including with Israel. Trinity College, a top university in Dublin City. Pic: Shutterstock Although the report is to return to the board later this year for its final consideration, based on 'the strength of the evidence shared', the board accepted the report's recommendations. This included recommendations that the college enter into no Erasmus, collaborative research or supply agreements with Israeli universities, institutions or firms. Meanwhile, aid sites in the Gaza Strip were temporarily closed yesterday, with Israel's army warning roads leading to distribution centres were 'considered combat zones'. Pic: Anwar Amro/AFP via Getty Images The announcement by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation follows a string of deadly incidents near its aid sites centres, including one Tuesday, in which 27 people were killed when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF site. Yesterday, the UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said: 'Yesterday alone, dozens were declared dead at hospitals after Israeli forces said they had opened fire. 'This is the outcome of a series of deliberate choices that have systematically deprived two million people of the essentials they need to survive.' He echoed the call by UN chief Antonio Guterres for immediate independent investigations, saying they were not isolated incidents, and the perpetrators must be held accountable. 'No-one should have to risk their life to feed their children,' said Fletcher.


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
Nato defence ministers are set to approve purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic, as part of a US push to ramp up security spending. The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth delivers a statement ahead of the meeting at Nato headquarters in Brussels on Thursday (Virginia Mayo/AP) US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian? Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.