Will the real JK Rowling please stand up?
Now fast forward 17 years to the JK Rowling of 2025. The one who published a supposed "critique" of Nicola Sturgeon's biography but which in reality consisted of little more than a litany of personal abuse about the former First Minister set alongside derogatory comments about transwomen.
Conspicuously absent was a lack of empathy for others, especially for the "literal nightmares" Ms Sturgeon was experiencing as a result of having to stand in front of the cameras every day during Covid to announce the latest death toll. The First Minister also found herself accused of somehow being personally responsible for these deaths.
However, instead of offering sympathy based on her own experiences Ms Rowling opines: 'Her English fans can't be expected to know about every single clusterf*** over which the supposedly competent Sturgeon presided.'
Transwomen fare little better, being somewhat simplistically described as merely men who 'put on dresses and call themselves women'. No attempt there at encouraging people 'to wonder how it would feel to have been born other than they are'.
Last but not least we have the dreadful irony of somebody whose power and wealth are derived from her ability to communicate with children now having to post a warning that her latest publication is not suitable for a young audience due to the sheer level of profanities contained therein.
I have but one question. Which of the above is the real JK Rowling?
Robert Menzies, Falkirk.
Read more letters
Why Sturgeon was feared
Day after relentless day, your Letters Pages have been dominated by outpourings of bile directed at Nicola Sturgeon; anyone would think the woman had started an illegal war.
During her time in government, Ms Sturgeon introduced policies rooted in social justice, worked tirelessly to keep us safe during the pandemic and tried to make life easier for a small minority of people. Going by the level of nasty, sneering comments, she was clearly feared by unionists as an effective operator, and did a very good job.
Ruth Marr, Stirling.
Character assassination
Reading your correspondents' daily litany of complaints about Nicola Sturgeon's nine years as First Minister (and leaving aside the small fact that she is still alive), I can't help but reflect on Marc Antony's famous oration following the assassination of Julius Caesar – 'The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones.'
Cue your correspondents' comparisons of Ms Sturgeon and Caesar perhaps?
Iain Stuart, Glasgow.
False depiction of a humanitarian
It is disappointing that an academic would attempt to misrepresent context in order to promote personal views and to denigrate our first female First Minister.
Dr Mireille Pouget (Letters, August 19) makes reference to 'Ms Sturgeon accusing women who disagreed with her of being not just transphobic, but probably racist too, and misogynistic', but this is misleading as it is a different statement from what Nicola Sturgeon actually said: 'There are people who have opposed this bill that cloak themselves in women's rights to make it acceptable, but just as they're transphobic you'll also find that they're deeply misogynist, often homophobic, possibly some of them racist as well.'
It would be naïve to believe that this statement applies to women in general and that it is not aimed at far-right protagonists and extremist groups such as the US anti-abortion lobby which has attempted to undermine legislation here in Scotland. The statement that 'she tried very hard to destroy women's rights' is not only misleading but mischaracterises a humanitarian who as First Minister worked hard to help and protect the rights of the poor, the disadvantaged and the marginalised in our hopefully increasingly-compassionate society.
Stan Grodynski, Longniddry.
Beware the rise of battery parks
There is rightly growing anger at the ever-increasing steel forests of pylons, turbines, and substations scarring our countryside to feed distant demand. Yet a far graver threat looms unnoticed: the monstrous battery parks propping up intermittent wind power.
To bridge one windless day in Britain, estimates demand 100-200 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of storage – enough to power six million homes for 24 hours. That's millions of electric car-sized batteries. A week-long lull? Multiply that nightmare several times over.
These aren't gentle giants. They devour lithium, cobalt, and nickel, ripped from the earth in ruinous, exploitative mines across the DRC, Indonesia, and China. Rivers poisoned, landscapes gutted, 40,000 children toiling in cobalt mines – all to prop up Britain's hollow 'clean' energy mirage.
Worse, lithium-ion battery parks are ticking time bombs. Fires, like those in California and South Korea, rage uncontrollably, spewing toxic fumes and defying suppression. Who'd welcome such a menace near their home?
The cost? Astronomical. The UK's push for vast battery capacity by 2030 carries a price tag of tens of billions – every penny heaped onto taxpayers and households through crippling bills.
Wind power is peddled as cheap and green, yet the Labour and SNP governments push ahead with this reckless agenda, blind to its failures. Sky-high energy costs – the highest in Europe – plunge 5.6 million households into fuel poverty, close businesses, and drive reliance on imported energy, materials, and finished goods from nations scoffing at our environmental standards, gutting our net-zero ambitions and impoverishing us all. This isn't progress; it's folly, a betrayal of families and industries for a green dogma that exports emissions and imports ruin. The truth – rampant mining, hazardous storage, obscene costs – demands exposure. Until politicians dismantle the myth of wind as a silver bullet, their policies deserve our utter contempt.
Ian Lakin, Aberdeen.
A battery storage park (Image: Getty)
Aitken should focus on Glasgow
I am sure the leader of Glasgow City Council's plea for financial assistance to help migrants is heartfelt and perhaps true ("I am proud of Glasgow's welcome – but we need help before we break", The Herald, August 18) but I will not be alone in thinking she should concentrate on core local services.
I look out of my front window and see broken, hazardous pavements, litter everywhere, endless road works and blocked water drains. I look out of my side window and I see vomit that has been there for days. I look out of my back window and see bins overflowing with rubbish ... and this is in the "posh" West End.
Susan Aitken needs to recognise that failure abounds on the streets of her beloved Glasgow and should sort it before her constituents start kicking up a fuss. Migrant issues can be left to "national" politicians, to probably bags up, admittedly.
James Miller, Glasgow.
But what about Gaza?
I find the excitable media commentators reporting about the Euro-leader group trip to Washington utterly bemusing. The ongoing slaughter of their fellow journalists in Gaza, along with the civilian population never elicits that kind of response. Are they all cowed by the possibility of being accused of being terrorist sympathisers?
Was it too much to have hope that these very busy leaders might have mentioned Gaza since they are able to prioritise the concerns of a country which has only lost 13,000 civilians in three and a half years in contrast to more than 60,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, in just under half the time?
Seriously, it looks as if our foreign policy is led by the recipients of our armaments largesse; it would be very interesting to quantify European aid to both Ukraine and Israel.
Meanwhile the "free world" is led by a puerile narcissist who can't even write a sentence without inappropriate capital letters.
Marjorie Thompson, Edinburgh.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Spectator
When national flags are a warning sign
I don't quite see the point of flying Union flags in Tower Hamlets, or complaining about it when the council takes them down. This squalid little fiefdom run by the deeply corrupt Lutfur Rahman is not part of the UK: it is a suburb of Sylhet, with all that such a location might entail. This would include the mayor himself, who once rigged the votes and used imams to intimidate voters. Of course it is true that London is headed the same way as Tower Hamlets and will get there depressingly soon, an upheaval aided by the self-flagellating liberals who still choose to live in the capital and whose yearning for self-annihilation is close to absolute. The temptation is to write off our first city, and maybe others, too, come to that. Tower Hamlets is certainly by no conceivable stretch of the imagination particularly 'British'. It is, rather, a fly-blown satrapy where many of the locals at best are ignorant of our culture and at worst despise and loathe it. A significant minority of the population can barely speak English (6 per cent) and half of the population are foreign born. Now, if you believe in multiculturalism you will have no problem with that, I suppose – and would probably advance the argument that people from the same ethnic groups tend to band together, although that understanding of human nature would not, of course, extend to white British people. When they express a preference for living among their 'own kind', they are told that they are racist scumbags and had better get with the project, sharpish. I wonder if it has occurred to any members of our government to ask why this whole Operation Raise the Colours business has taken off and why quite so many people seem to be taking part in it. My suspicion is that while Sir Keir Starmer feigns an affection for the flag of our country and will even wave one about when the England team are playing football, especially if it is the chicks, he almost certainly thinks that people with too fond an affection for the Union Jack and the cross of St George are right-wing racists and entirely deplorable. Filed away in the back of his mind is the notion that it's probably just those football hoolies again, the ones who rioted last summer. What he is missing, then, is the importance of the current protests – the weight of numbers behind them, the fact that it is not just yer usual suspects, the depth of anger it conceals and the problems which thus lie in store in the future. The UK is quite quickly tipping towards serious civil disorder: in many parts of the country, whitey has had more than enough. A clever government would work out why this might be and do something about it. Unfortunately, we do not have one. Brits have never hitherto been disposed towards waving the flag about. It has always been my contention that any country where there are too many national flags on view is feeling very insecure about itself and is headed for trouble. This is broadly the position of the UK right now, perhaps for the first time. And it is not terribly difficult to see how we have been brought to this point. Yes, much of it is down to the sheer weight of numbers of immigrants coming into the country. But it is not just the weight of numbers. It is also partly the manner in which many of these incomers have behaved which grates a little. The way in which towns and cities have been overwhelmed, changing entirely the nature of once familiar neighbourhoods. The stoic refusal of many to embrace the culture of the country in which they have made their homes and in many cases the espousal of aggressive and hostile views rooted in an implacable creed which always takes precedence. But even this is not the main reason the tension has been simmering both last year and this. More than anything it is a blind fury at the way in which our elected representatives have allowed this to happen – and even welcomed it. And more even than this, the way in which the British seem at every turn to be having their noses rubbed in it. The Australian sociologist Karen Stenner, in her book The Authoritarian Dynamic, analysed what it was that made people cease displaying a peaceable nature when faced with large-scale immigration and become inflamed and angry (authoritarian, in her words). She found it was precisely this – when they have their noses rubbed in it. When they perceive that everything is tilted against them. When the entire established order insists that 'diversity' is bloody marvellous and we can't have enough of it and that Britain's history is steeped in wickedness. That nothing whatsoever beneficial came of colonialism. That black people and other minorities should be hugely over-represented in our films, dramas and adverts on the television and that the rest of us should suck it up without question. That white people are inherently, unavoidably racist and that we should be at the back of the queue for any job we might fancy. That if we start to question a possible connection between the religion of Islam and a certain predilection towards deranged homicidal violence we will be guilty of Islamophobia and prosecuted. That if we tweet our anger we will be prosecuted. You can get away with this stuff for just so long – and then even the mildest-mannered will start waving a flag saying, in effect: we're still here, just.
Press and Journal
3 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Alex Salmond's north-east adviser rubbishes Nicola Sturgeon book claims
A north-east political adviser who worked closely with Alex Salmond in government claims Nicola Sturgeon has spread 'falsehoods' in her new book. Geoff Aberdein took aim at three allegations in Frankly, including that the late SNP leader was against same-sex marriage. 'That one really actually gets my goat,' he said on the Holyrood Sources podcast. Like Ms Sturgeon, he had a ring-side seat during the Mr Salmond's time as first minister. On her side of the story, Ms Sturgeon wrote: 'What started as a calm discussion very quickly descended into a shouting match. Alex very rarely raised his voice to me – or vice versa – so I knew that I had a real battle on my hands to get him to agree. He was implacably opposed. But Mr Aberdein, who went on to help set up strategic advisory firm True North in Aberdeen, says that claim was demonstrably false. Another claim he disputes is the allegation Mr Salmond did not read the pro-independence blueprint before the 2014 referendum, known as the 'white paper'. 'To suggest, as I think was the purpose of this story, that he wasn't engaged in the process of a prospectus for independence is utterly nonsense,' he added. Mr Aberdein also rejected the idea that Mr Salmond could have possibly leaked details of his own alleged sexual misconduct – something Ms Sturgeon speculated about in the run-up to her book publication. Asked if he read the memoirs, he said: 'No I haven't and no I won't.' On the excerpts he has read about, he told the podcast: 'There was falsehoods at worst, fabrications at best. 'I was brought up that you didn't speak ill of the dead. But if you are going to speak ill of the dead, at least make your claims are accurate.' The claims come days after Mr Salmond's widow, Moira Salmond, from Strichen in Aberdeenshire, is suing the Scottish Government over its botched handling of an investigation into sexual harassment allegations levelled against him. Mr Salmond died of a heart attack in North Macedonia in October last year, aged 69. He previously lodged a claim in the Court of Session alleging misfeasance – the wrongful exercise of lawful authority – by civil servants. In her book, Ms Sturgeon laments losing Mr Salmond as a friend, which she compared with a grieving process. 'I had occasional, vivid dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft,' she added.
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
JK Rowling ‘entitled to speak her view' on trans issues, says Sturgeon
Rowling was a vocal critic of the gender recognition reforms championed by Ms Sturgeon, famously donning a T-shirt which branded the then first minister a 'destroyer of women's rights'. Ms Sturgeon said the T-shirt – which Rowling posted a picture of herself wearing on social media – 'brought more abuse on my head than almost anything else'. But she said she had 'never stopped JK Rowling having a view on anything'. Ms Sturgeon told BBC Radio Ulster she 'wasn't destroying women's rights', and added: 'Is it really the best way to elevate a debate, put a picture of yourself in a T-shirt with something like that? That is the point I am making.' Nicola Sturgeon recently published her memoir, Frankly (Jane Barlow/PA) In a review of Ms Sturgeon's newly published memoir, Rowling accused the former SNP leader of being 'flat-out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts'. Ms Sturgeon however has made clear her views on the issue have not changed, despite the fury that erupted when Holyrood debated proposals for her government to make it easier for trans people to legally change their gender. The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed by Holyrood but it was blocked by Westminster, with the changes never coming into force. Speaking on Wednesday, Ms Sturgeon said: 'I don't believe – never have and I never will – that you have to choose between being a feminist and being a supporter of the rights of one of the most stigmatised groups in society. JK Rowling was a vocal critic of Nicola Sturgeon's gender recognition reforms (PA) 'That's still my position.' While she added the debate on the issue had become 'deeply entrenched', with opposition to the reforms from people such as Rowling, some within the SNP and women's rights groups, Ms Sturgeon was adamant the 'fundamental principle and the issue is one I haven't changed my mind on'. Speaking about Rowling, she told the Nolan Show she is a 'huge admirer of her work'. Ms Sturgeon said: 'I have bought Harry Potter books for all of the kids in my life and I will continue to do so as long as they want to read them. 'I think she is an amazing talent and has done great things.' She added that Rowling is 'absolutely entitled to speak her mind', but added: 'I don't admire the way some people have gone from speaking their minds on this issue to, almost it seems, to be punching down on trans people who have never harmed anybody at any point in their life. 'I am not singling out one person in this, but a cruelty has entered this debate which I find really difficult, because we are talking here about a discriminated against, stigmatised minority. 'In every group in society there will be bad people, but they are not representative of the wider group and with trans we seem to take the bad apples and say 'that makes all trans people bad'. 'I don't agree with that and I don't like that. 'JK Rowling is absolutely entitled to her view, maybe putting herself up for a bit more scrutiny about her view would be helpful, but I don't criticise her for expressing her view. 'But I think I would like to see a bit less punching down on trans people to be perfectly frank.'
