
How St Mary and St Anne's became Glasgow's Tron Church
With the consent of the patrons, one of the chaplainries of the church of St Roche's was, in about, incorporated with the Collegiate Church of St Mary and St Anne.
John Bell Minister of the Laigh Church Glasgow Museums (Image: Supplied) The Chaplain of St Roche was appointed a canon of that church, subject to the obligation to say mass and other offices in St Roche's Chapel for the souls of its founder.
The Cathedral and the Collegiate Church of St Mary and St Ann both maintained choirs in pre-Reformation Glasgow.
The Cathedral choir will have sung daily at Mass and each of the eight regular prayer times for the Divine Office.
Boys in both choirs studied at the Sang School.
(Image: Supplied) The Collegiate Church of St Mary and St Ann had an organist who directed the choir and taught the three boy choristers who studied in the Sang School where they learned how to sing plainchant and polyphony, how to sing improvised harmonies, and play the organ.
The boys were removed from their post when their voices broke, but there was provision for them to continue their education at the Grammar School for another two years.
After the Reformation, the church with its cemetery in the Trongate, fell into a ruinous state.
(Image: Supplied) It was sold by the council in 1570 and reacquired by them around 1592.
They had it repaired to be used as a Church of Scotland.
The church, which for more than a quarter of a century after the Reformation had been in a poor state, was repaired by the town and was used as a place of worship under the name of the Tron or New Kirk, sometimes known as Laigh Church.
They then needed to find the means of supporting a minister.
The old revenues of the church had been given to the magistrates of the city by Queen Mary's Act of 1566-7 to be used to fund for poor scholars at the college.
(Image: Supplied) There were allegations that these bursaries had been improperly applied to the support of the richest men's sons.
An Act of Parliament was therefore obtained in 1594, cancelled the bursaries, and instead devoted the revenues "to the sustentation of the ministry within the city of Glasgow".
The bell house of the old church seems to have been occupied till the alterations were made, as in 1593 a tenant was allowed a reduction of half a year's rent "in respect the steeple was taken down".
In 1594, the Scottish Parliament passed an act in favour of the ministry of Glasgow, referring to a gift which, after the Reformation, had been made to the magistrates of the city of the chaplaincies and emoluments of the "New Kirk of the College of Glasgow," meaning apparently the Collegiate Church of St Mary and St Ann.
A little over 10 years later, the Tron Church was repaired and restored as a Protestant place of worship and a fourth minister was introduced to the city.
In 1599, the ministers applied to the Town Council to ask that the town be divided into two separate parishes to allow each minister to know their flock.
The city agreed to this on the understanding that the citizens should not be burdened with the building of more kirks or the support of more ministers than already existed.
The Tron was as a result separated from the High Kirk.
Additions were later made to the church, and the steeple which formed such a conspicuous spot in Trongate was built in 1637/8.
In 1793, the old Church was destroyed by fire, and the Tron or St Mary's Church was built on the same site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Unusual history of Glasgow building where Sugababes had 'secret' gig
The Barony Hall was once known as the Laigh Kirk, because its original home was in the crypt of Glasgow Cathedral. The story begins in the 16th century The Roman Catholic religion prevailed in Glasgow from around 560 to 1560. Presbyterianism was established by law that year, but their ministers did not immediately get complete possession of the Cathedral Church. After the Reformation in 1560, Glasgow contained a population of only 4500. The Cathedral remained the only church in the city and became the parish church of Glasgow. There was only one minister until 1588 when a second joined. (Image: Glasgow City Archives) The ever-increasing population in the city led to the repair of the Tron Church in 1592 for the reception of a congregation. To serve this additional congregation, a third minister was provided. The Cathedral became the urban or city parish church. In 1593, by an order of Synod and Presbytery, the Barony Parish was instituted, the intention being that its congregation be drawn from those outside the city proper. Consequently, a fourth minister was appointed who was admitted to the Barony, which separated from the city parish in 1596. The crypt of the Cathedral was set apart for the use of this congregation. The minutes of the Presbytery from 1596 to 1597 record negotiations with the parishioners; and it was announced that the parishioners of Glasgow "without the toune" should be a congregation by themselves. According to the acts of the General and Synod assemblies, the Barony Parish was constituted without any formal disruption, and the crypt below the cathedral was fitted up for the service of the congregation. As a result of the congregation using the Cathedral crypt, it became known as the Laigh or Lower Kirk to distinguish it from the Cathedral Parish church proper. The Barony became known as the Laigh Kirk since it worshipped in the Cathedral crypt. In Rob Roy, Sir William Scott described the Barony Laigh Kirk as follows: 'Conceive, Tresham, an extensive range of low-browed, dark and twilight vaults, such as are used as for sepulchres in other countries, and had long been dedicated to the same purpose in this, a portion of which was seated with pews and used as a Church.' Norman McLeod (Image: Glasgow City Archives) Its ministers included Zachary Boyd, 1625-1653; John Burns, 1774-1839, who preached to his congregation in the crypt and then in the new Barony Church; Norman McLeod, 1851-1872, who introduced many innovations at Barony Church, including evening services for working people; and John White, 1911-1934. The Barony Church continued to worship in the cathedral crypt but by the 1790s the congregation had outgrown it. In 1798 work began on a new church, on the east side of Castle Street. Designed by James Adams, it opened in late 1799, early 1800. This gave the congregation for the first time a building of their own. While this was a lighter and more comfortable place of worship than the crypt of the Cathedral could ever make, many criticised its design. Its Minister, Norman McLeod , is reported to have told Queen Victoria that it was 'the ugliest kirk in all Europe.' Others, a minority, believed it to be an architectural gem. (Image: Newsquest) Whatever its merits, faced with the continued deterioration of the building, the church was replaced in 1889 in its final location on the west side of Castle Street, diagonally opposite the Cathedral. It opened in April 1889. Designed by JJ Burnett and JA Campbell, it has been described as unquestionably the most important Gothic church in Glasgow, possibly in Scotland. It is an A-listed building. The congregational numbers were dwindling from the 1950s to the 1970s with the redevelopment of High Street and Townhead. In its last years, the congregation joined with St Paul's and St David's (Ramshorn) in 1982. The last service was held in 1985. The Sugababes, as they were in 2007, at the Barony Hall (Image: Newsquest) The buildings were purchased in 1986 by Strathclyde University, and it opened its doors as Barony Hall in 1989. It now hosts examinations and ceremonial functions, including university graduations and functions. In 2007, it was the location for a "secret" gig performed by the Sugababes. The group's line-up at the time - Heidi Range, Amelle Berrabah and Keisha Buchanan - played an up close and personal acoustic concert for just 250 fans in the December of that year.


Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Mum thanks Glasgow charity for life-changing support
Shazia, a mum living in Glasgow after seeking asylum from Pakistan, has extended her thanks to family support charity Home-Start Glasgow South She said: 'Thanks to Home-Start Glasgow South, I am happy. 'I am learning. 'I am moving forward.' Read more: Law firm recognised by Scottish Parliament for charity work in Glasgow Shazia's journey with the Glasgow charity began after she arrived in the city in 2014. She was living in temporary accommodation and spoke no English. Following the birth of her daughter, she experienced severe anxiety and depression. Shazia said: 'I just couldn't cope. 'I would wake in the night screaming, thinking someone was trying to kill me.' Her GP referred her to Home-Start Glasgow South, which became a turning point. She said: 'A kind lady came to see me and gave me the courage to carry on. 'She would say, these feelings will pass. 'Maybe tomorrow will be better. 'And slowly, slowly, it was.' With the charity's support, Shazia joined a parents' group, built friendships with other mothers and secured permanent housing. Home-Start Glasgow South also arranged for a volunteer tutor to visit Shazia, who then encouraged her to apply for college. She is now studying English and settling into life in Glasgow. Her husband Tahir said: 'I am so proud of Shazia – and of how well our kids are doing in school. 'Home-Start Glasgow South has given us hope for the future.' Home-Start Glasgow South has provided emotional and practical support to thousands of families in the south of the city since 2000. The charity helps parents adjust to life with a new baby, cope with isolation or manage the effects of poverty and mental health struggles. It has more than doubled its reach over the past decade, now supporting 370 families and 798 children each year. Read more: Construction has begun on a unique housing scheme in Glasgow - what we know This year, it will mark its 25th anniversary with events throughout the year, including a family sports day, volunteer celebrations and a fundraising camp. Colette Boyle, director of Home-Start Glasgow South, said: 'This anniversary is a celebration of the strength of our community. 'For 25 years, we've walked alongside families, offering friendship, understanding and hope. 'We are incredibly proud of the impact we've made – and excited for what the future holds.'


Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Why we shouldn't kill 'menacing' seagulls in towns – and what to do instead
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Around a month ago, I visited a friend who lives in Burntisland. His third-floor flat overlooks a level roof at the back, which a lesser black-backed gull had chosen to nest on and hatch a chick. It felt like a privilege to watch this fluffy new being investigate her world, while her parent watched carefully. This memory makes quite a contrast to the screaming headlines that we frequently see at this time of year, proclaiming gulls to be a 'menace' or a 'nuisance' and blaming them for 'mugging' and 'divebombing' people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Such language is unhelpful and misleading. It implies that gulls are acting maliciously against us, which is simply not true. It turns gulls into the enemy, rather than seeking to understand the causes of any tension and seek solutions. Seabirds like kittiwakes are devoted and protective parents of their young (Picture: Dan Kitwood) | Getty Images Gulls are constituents too While some within the media are responsible for creating and amplifying a negative and inaccurate depiction of gulls, disappointingly, politicians also make judgmental, harmful statements about them. In June, during a member's debate in the Scottish Parliament, various MSPs vilified gulls using the same inflammatory words as the tabloids and demanded that they be 'controlled' – a widely used euphemism for 'killed'. MSPs represent their constituents. Gulls cannot vote but are constituents in the other sense of the word, being part of a larger whole, our shared community. And the human constituents, who do vote, overwhelmingly want wild animals to be protected. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A 2024 poll of more than 7,000 people in the UK found that 92 per cent think that it is important to protect wildlife in towns by legislation or regulation, and 76 per cent believe that human survival depends on protecting the survival of wildlife. MSPs should not allow scare stories to muffle the voices calling for us to live in harmony with other animals. Preventing gulls from gaining access to rubbish is one way to reduce the problems they can sometimes cause without resorting to killing them (Picture: Vincenzo Pinto) | AFP via Getty Images Intelligent and resourceful Thankfully, many don't, and other MSPs who spoke in the debate did so thoughtfully and well. At OneKind, we hear stories every day from our supporters that confirm how much people care about animals and want governments to do more to protect them. For more than 100 years, we have advocated for animals, supported by individual donors who want animals to be fairly represented in debates. For many gull species, natural nesting sites and food sources are dwindling, due mainly to human activities. As intelligent and resourceful birds, they have adapted to life in towns, and what they have found is safe nesting sites and abundant food sources. Gulls are devoted, protective parents. When people come near to their nest, they feel that their eggs or chicks are threatened and dive towards people to communicate this. Far from the nefarious intentions too often mis-attributed to gulls, this diving behaviour is born of deep care. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The other main complaint made about gulls – taking food from people's hands – is a foreseeable consequence of decades of directly feeding them, littering, and having unsealed and often overflowing bins. Stop feeding gulls There are simple changes that could go a long way to reducing the behaviours that people have complained about. Everybody could stop feeding gulls and littering, and authorities should ensure that all bins are secure and 'gull proof' and seek measures that allow gulls and humans to feel safe during the birds' breeding season. There are some vulnerable people who can be at risk from gulls' defensive behaviour, and it is, of course, very important that they are protected. There is help available for business owners, local authorities and individuals to minimise harms to gulls and advise on more complicated situations. For example, Humane Wildlife Solutions is a business that offers expert advice and non-lethal alternatives to 'pest control', including services relating to gulls. They have also worked with NatureScot to develop guidance for the non-lethal removal of eggs and chicks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Across the UK, many local authorities understand their responsibilities and are seeking to co-exist with gulls, adapting their practices accordingly. It was reported recently that in Lowestoft kittiwakes began nesting in the town centre following the destruction of a derelict building at the docks where some had been nesting. They found ideal nesting sites in the town and the numbers grew. Building owners are now, rightly, being encouraged to provide simple wooden nesting ledges for them, in sites that are less inconvenient for people, rather than trying to remove the gulls. Sharing the planet In 2018 South Ayrshire Council launched their 'feed a bin, not a gull' campaign, encouraging people to dispose of food waste and other litter responsibly. Local primary school children took part by designing posters for the launch, a good initiative to empower and educate young people. This is the path that those in power and the media should be following, seeking solutions to help people live alongside gulls and other wild animals, not repeating worn narratives of domination. The Scottish Government plans to hold a summit to discuss issues relating to gulls. I urge them to choose this less travelled path. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Now – in a time of nature and climate crises, following the devastating impact of Covid and avian flu, both linked to industrial animal farming – is an opportune time to recalibrate our relationship with other animals. We must learn to share a little better the finite space on our planet. Can we care more and blame less? Can we look beyond the problems and remember the joy that comes from connecting with others, including our fascinating, clever gull neighbours?