logo
Health policy experts: Medicaid expansion, program changes have helped NC patients and providers

Health policy experts: Medicaid expansion, program changes have helped NC patients and providers

Yahoo2 days ago

Patients have their blood pressure checked and other vitals taken at a mobile dental and medical clinic in Grundy, Va. Republicans in Congress are considering making major cuts to Medicaid. ()
Medicaid managed care in North Carolina has resulted in fewer 'preventable admissions' to hospitals — hospitalizations for certain conditions that can be prevented with good outpatient care, according to a UNC researcher.
'We're talking about real money that's being saved through this change in utilization,' said Sandra B. Greene, professor of the practice of health policy at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at UNC. 'This is fantastic news.'
After the state expanded Medicaid, hospitals saw a decline in uninsured patients, Greene said. That means hospitals are now treating fewer people for whom they don't receive payment, she said.
Researchers, community advocates, and policy makers saw an overview of how the rapid changes to Medicaid in North Carolina over the last few years have altered the health care landscape at a symposium hosted by the Sheps Center for Health Services Research at UNC and the NC Department of Health and Human Services on Friday.
The state switched to Medicaid managed care for most enrollees in July 2021. That means that companies receive a certain amount of money per Medicaid enrollee and that health care providers are no longer paid for each medical procedure under a system called fee-for-service.
The state expanded Medicaid to add more low-income adults in December 2023. Since its launch, more than 600,000 people have enrolled in expanded Medicaid.
About 3 million North Carolinians use Medicaid as their health insurance.
Rural residents disproportionately rely on Medicaid for their insurance, and many rural hospitals struggle financially.
One of the arguments for Medicaid expansion was the opportunity it offered to strengthen rural hospital finances. Data from the first six months of expansion found that's what happened, said Mark Holmes, Sheps Center director.
'Expansion led to a substantial increase in revenue for all hospitals, more so in rural, and more so for the financially challenged hospitals,' Holmes said.
More Medicaid changes may be coming. A giant bill that passed the U.S. House includes work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. North Carolina Republicans are also actively considering work requirements. The state Senate passed a bill on Medicaid work requirements and included a work requirements provision in its budget. A state House committee has approved a work requirements bill.
Work requirements have been criticized because they have been found to not increase employment but to result in working people losing their insurance.
Susie Gurzenda, a doctoral student at Gillings, presented results of research on the work status of North Carolina adults before Medicaid expansion that showed 42% were working full time or part time; 26% were not working due to illness or disability; 10% had children; 5% were in school; 4% were looking for jobs; and 10% not working for some other reason.
DHHS is trying to save a project it launched in three mostly rural regions of the state in 2022 called Healthy Opportunities. It aims to lower health care costs and improve the health of Medicaid enrollees by helping them secure food, transportation, and housing, and help those experiencing interpersonal violence.
Healthy Opportunities saved $85 per person per month in health care costs, according to an evaluation by Dr. Seth Berkowitz, an associate professor at the UNC School of Medicine.
Neither the House nor the Senate budget proposals include money to continue and expand Healthy Opportunities, though three legislators who attended the symposium said they were interested in it.
The lack of Healthy Opportunities funding in the budget 'has been a huge concern of mine,' said Rep. Sarah Crawford (D-Wake).
'People are healthier because of Medicaid expansion,' she said. 'We have more work to do.'
Rep. Tim Reeder (R-Pitt), an emergency physician, said he sees value in Healthy Opportunities, and has talked with DHHS about 'how we can continue to demonstrate the value of the program.'
'I think, right now, we're just trying to find sources of revenue to help continue the program,' said Reeder, a chairman of the House Health Committee.
Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Harnett), a chairman of the Senate Health Committee and of the chamber's Health and Human Services budget committee, said he wants money for Health Opportunities, but raised the question whether House and Senate Republicans would agree on any spending plan for next year.
The two chambers' budgets differ greatly on proposed taxation and spending. The two chambers must reach a compromise before sending a budget to Gov. Josh Stein for his consideration.
'We're far apart,' Burgin said. 'Somebody asked me yesterday, 'Will we have a budget?' I don't know. It's the furthest apart I've ever seen it in my time.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail
Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail

San Francisco Chronicle​

time21 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration plans to pull the plug on federal funding to California's high-speed rail project. Following a review of the $4 billion in federal funds allocated to California's bullet train project launched in February, the Transportation Department said it plans to terminate federal funding for the project, according to a report released Wednesday. 'We have $4 billion that has been authorized to go to California to build this project and we don't want to invest in boondoggles,' Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy told Fox News Wednesday. The state will have 30 days to make the case that it has complied with the grant's terms and any corrective action it plans to take before the federal government can terminate funding. The Transportation Department is not asking for the state to repay federal funding previously given for the project, but said it could do so in the future — although any attempts to do so would likely be unsuccessful. 'What started as a proposed 800-mile system was first reduced to 500 miles, then became a 171-mile segment, and is now very likely ended as a 119-mile track to nowhere. In essence, (the California High-Speed Rail Authority) has conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, said. The federal government 'cannot continue to commit taxpayer dollars to (the California High-Speed Rail Authority's) Sisyphean endeavor,' Feeley said. California's high-speed rail project is a 'story of broken promises and of waste of Federal taxpayer dollars.' The Trump administration has 'been laying the groundwork for this for month. They're completely hostile, not just to California high-speed rail, but rail in general and public transportation,' state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, told the Chronicle. 'This is a Neanderthal administration that probably thinks public transportation is a communist plot.' Wiener, a staunch proponent of the bullet train, acknowledged the project's challenges. 'We certainly have to do better in California in terms of project delivery, but … it's not a reason to start canceling major, transformative public infrastructure projects. We need to find a way to get these projects done more efficiently and more effectively,' Wiener said. The first Trump administration pursued terminating the project's funding in 2019, but the Biden administration negotiated a 2021 settlement with the state to continue supporting the segment from Bakersfield to Merced. The project's costs — initially estimated to be $33 billion and now expected to cost between $89 billion and $128 billion — have ballooned and its timelines have been repeatedly delayed. Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Democrats have not backed down on funding for high-speed rail in past budgets, despite opposition from Republicans. Newsom has acknowledged for months that Trump would try to claw back money for the project, just as Trump did during his first term. Newsom has promised to fight any efforts to revoke the money. The high-speed rail funding is just one bucket of federal money Trump has threatened to withhold from California, along with federal health care and education funding. 'There still is the rule of law, still the court system, there's still due process,' Newsom told reporters in January when he unveiled an initial version of his 2025-26 state budget proposal. 'You can threaten, as Trump has consistently done ... but ultimately those federal dollars will be recovered.' Since January, California's budget outlook has deteriorated significantly, and the Newsom administration now predicts California faces a $12 billion shortfall, which will make it harder for state officials to backfill any federal funding cuts. Newsom and lawmakers are negotiating over the state budget for the upcoming fiscal year and must reach a deal on how to balance the budget this month to meet constitutional deadlines. Even with the state's difficult financial situation this year, Wiener said he expected the project to move forward because 'it's not about one year, this is about the long-term health and economic strength of California.' Republicans have for years decried the project's skyrocketing costs and lack of progress. President Donald Trump told reporters Feb. 5 that he would personally investigate the high-speed rail project. Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Rocklin (Placer County), introduced legislation on Jan. 6 to make the project ineligible for further federal funding, the same day Newsom drove a symbolic spike in the ground to celebrate the rail line's first 22-mile segment, from the border of Tulare and Kern counties to Poplar Avenue in Wasco (Kern County). Republicans in the Legislature sent a letter to Trump Feb. 13 expressing support for his probe and saying they have a duty to constituents to 'carefully examine the viability of this project.' 'I want to see high-speed rail in America,' Duffy said. 'Why it can't be built in America and why it can't be built within time frames that work for the people that invest in these projects makes no sense to me.' State leaders have focused largely on finishing the stretch of high-speed rail track from Merced to Bakersfield, with the idea of linking it to two other bullet train lines: the High Desert Corridor in Los Angeles, and the privately owned Brightline West route from Las Vegas to Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County). Ultimately, they also want to connect to Caltrain's commuter line on the Peninsula, patching together a network that somewhat resembles the original vision from the mid-1990s. The loss of this funding would 'certainly be a setback, but it is a relatively small percentage of the overall budget of the project,' Wiener said. 'It's not a death knell.'

Trump's new office of ‘Western values' will be a showcase of double standards
Trump's new office of ‘Western values' will be a showcase of double standards

Miami Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump's new office of ‘Western values' will be a showcase of double standards

The Trump administration's plan to create a State Department office of 'Democracy and Western values' sounds like a great idea — on paper. But given the administration's recent actions abroad and at home, this new bureau is likely to have less than zero credibility. According to a 130-page report to Congress by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the proposed office is part of a State Department overhaul that aims to cut 3,448 jobs. The shake-up would scrap most of the existing Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, merging its remnants into a smaller office led by a deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy and Western values. But based on the Trump administration's track record, this new department is shaping up to be a textbook case of political double standards. Expect plenty of finger-wagging at Cuba, Venezuela and Iran — which is fine and necessary — while turning a blind eye to the destruction of democratic institutions in Mexico, El Salvador or Hungary. What's worse, it may echo Trump's praise for some Trump-friendly dictatorships, such as Saudi Arabia, or near-dictatorships like El Salvador. During his visit to Saudi Arabia in March, Trump praised its de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as an 'incredible' and 'great' leader. The U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in 2021 that bin Salman had approved the operation that killed Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. In recent months, Trump has also rolled out the red carpet for El Salvador's authoritarian president, Nayib Bukele, describing him as a 'remarkable president' and showering him with praise at the White House. While Bukele is popular for slashing El Salvador's crime rates, human rights groups — and, until Trump took office Jan. 20, even the U.S. government — have accused him of widespread abuses and bending the law to seize absolute power. Recently, Bukele passed a law cracking down on human rights, pro-democracy and anti-corruption groups that receive foreign funding. His government has also stepped up arrests of critics. As a headline in The Economist magazine put it this week, 'First he busted gangs. Now Nayib Bukele busts critics.' The Trump administration has also been shy about criticizing Mexico's slow-motion slide into an elected autocracy. On June 1, Mexico held controversial elections to elect judges and Supreme Court justices by direct vote — a far cry from the merit-based appointment system used in most countries. Critics fear — rightly — that the ruling Morena party rigged the voting process to seize the judiciary and give the President Claudia Sheinbaum control over all branches of government. Only 13% of Mexican voters went to the polls. Furthermore, the Trump administration is slashing U.S. aid for human rights and press freedom groups worldwide, including independent pro-democracy websites in Venezuela and Cuba. At home, the administration has little to show when it comes to its defense of 'Western values.' Is it consistent with 'Western values' to try to deport hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, Cubans, Nicaraguans and Haitians who are legally in the United States under Temporary Protected Status (TPS), often separating them from their U.S.-born children? Is the United States really upholding 'Western values' when its president ignores court rulings, as has happened recently in several immigration cases? Can America really preach about 'Western values' when its president said that there were 'very fine people on both sides' after a group of neo-Nazis clashed with protesters at the infamous 'Unite the Right' rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017? Unless the Trump administration stops praising autocrats and shows respect for America's own constitution, the new 'Democracy and Western Values' office will quickly become a joke. Don't be surprised if it's soon dubbed the Office of Selective Outrage. Its acronym, OSO, means 'bear' in Spanish, which would be fitting for an office that hibernates whenever democracy is under threat. Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog:

GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral
GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral

Buzz Feed

time26 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral

Republicans are currently having a PR nightmare while bending over backwards to convince Americans that Donald Trump's proposed cuts to Medicaid in his "Big, beautiful, bill" are a good thing. (Spoiler alert: they're not). At least $880 billion in cuts have been proposed, largely from Medicaid, to fund tax breaks. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that under Trump's bill, 8.6 million people would lose healthcare over a decade. In a recent town hall, voters raised concerns about Trump's proposed Medicaid cuts potentially allowing people to die from lack of coverage. Republican Iowa Senator Joni Ernst flippantly told voters, "Well, we are all going to die." "A rising tide lifts all boats. And, uh, you know, the best for the people looking for healthcare, the best healthcare is a job." "And a lot of times, healthcare comes with a job, and so creating those better-paying jobs that come with benefits is ultimately the goal here." Obviously, people are pissed at Thune's comments. "Cool I'll just tell the literally [nearly] 40 million children on Medicaid this," one person wrote. "'The best health care is a job' = 'You are only valuable to us if you're able-bodied and work full time to make us richer and if you can't then you should just die.'" "This assumption that people on Medicaid don't want to work is just wrong. For folks like my constituent Emmanuel, Medicaid is the lifeline they need to get and hold a job. The best health care is health care," lawmaker Lisa Blunt Rochester wrote. "i work over 40 hours per week, our health insurance barely covers anything, and i WORK IN HEALTHCARE" "There are a lot of jobs that don't offer health care coverage, and dont pay enough to afford health care premiums. But John Thune doesn't care about that. His job offers health care coverage, and he's got plenty of cash." Needless to say, the midterms should be interesting!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store