What is the UK-France migrant returns deal, who will be returned and how many?
The UK and French leaders announced the "one in, one out" agreement on 10 July after months of talks.
This is what we know about the deal:
What is the basic agreement?
The UK will be able to send migrants who enter the UK on small boats back to France.
For each one returned, the UK will allow an asylum seeker to enter through a safe and legal route - as long as they have not previously tried to enter illegally.
The two leaders, and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, were clear it is a pilot, for now.
3:01
When will it begin?
Sir Keir said it will start "in the coming weeks", but did not give a specific date.
Who will be returned?
There have been no details released on how the government will select who is returned, but the initial focus will be on adults and they will not split up families.
They will be held in removal centres before being sent back to France.
It is not clear how long the process will take, but it is understood migrants will be returned weekly.
0:27
How many will be returned?
Sir Keir and Mr Macron mentioned no numbers, but it is understood around 50 people a week will be returned to France.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Sky News: "We haven't fixed the ultimate numbers yet."
She said that was because it is just a pilot at this stage, but that there was a plan to increase the numbers returned.
Since the start of March, an average of more than 1,000 people have arrived in small boats every week. Sending 50 of them back would represent less than 5% of that total.
Is the deal set in stone?
For now, it is just a pilot, so the final details will not be set until later. The government has not said how long it will run as a pilot.
The deal also needs approval from the EU, with France saying it needed to be legally ratified before being put into action.
The home secretary said she thought the European Commission would sign it off, despite some Mediterranean countries' concerns about returned asylum seekers travelling back to southern Europe.
She told Sky News she had been talking to France's interior minister since October about the deal, and had also been talking to EU commissioners, who represent all 27 member states and she said had been "very supportive".
What else is being done to tackle illegal migration in the UK?
Mr Macron has repeatedly said the UK needs to address "pull factors".
The Home Office has said authorities will soon undertake "a major nationwide blitz targeting illegal working hotspots, focusing on the gig economy and migrants working as delivery riders".
Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Just Eat have already committed to ramp up facial verification and fraud checks in the coming months after ministers called them in for talks.
2:28
The government has also introduced eVisas for people in the UK on a visa to make it easy to identify those who are in the UK legally.
For the first time, France has also agreed to allow police officers to enter the water from the beaches in northern France to try to stop the boats from leaving.
Over the past two weeks, they have been filmed slashing the rigid inflatable boats (RIBs) the people smugglers load up with migrants.
The British government, which is helping fund the French police's efforts, is pushing France to go further and let officers intervene against boats in deeper waters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
6 minutes ago
- Times
Free speech blow as national library bans book opposing gender self-ID
Scotland's national library banned a book about feminists' fight against Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-ID law after staff complained its contents were 'hate speech' comparable to racism. The National Library of Scotland (NLS) has been accused of a 'shameful' capitulation to censorship after it emerged that The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, a collection of essays by gender-critical women, had been cut from a major exhibition celebrating the institution's centenary. Members of the public had been asked by the library, which promotes itself as a national forum for 'ideas, debate and discussion', to nominate books which had shaped their lives for inclusion in a ten-month public display intended as a 'love letter' to the power of reading. However, despite The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht receiving double the number of nominations necessary to guarantee inclusion in the Dear Library public display, Amina Shah, Scotland's national librarian and the NLS chief executive, decided not to include the book after a staff backlash.
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kate Forbes may be banned from arts venue because of her views on trans issues
A venue at the Edinburgh Fringe festival has triggered a freedom of speech row after indicating that Kate Forbes won't be allowed back because of her views on trans issues. Summerhall Arts issued an apology to other performers for the 'oversight' of allowing the Deputy First Minister, who has spoken up against gender reforms and backs single-sex spaces for biological women, being interviewed onstage last week. Several of the performances at the venue during this year's Fringe run feature gay or transgender themes, and some of the artists set up a 'safe room' because they were said to have been 'terrified' while 5ft 2in Ms Forbes was in the building. Now bosses at the venue have indicated that they will develop 'robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again'. Women's rights campaigners claimed that banning critics of self-ID would be against the law. It comes after the Stand comedy club was forced to reinstate a show featuring Joanna Cherry at the Fringe two years ago after she threatened legal action for discrimination when the venue initially planned to cancel the event because of her views on trans issues. Marion Calder, a director at For Women Scotland, said any refusal to allow Ms Forbes and others who share her views to appear at the venue would be 'against the law' for the same reasons as in the battle between Ms Cherry and the Stand two years ago. She said: 'They clearly haven't taken legal opinion on this. Why on earth would members of staff and other performers be scared of a young woman having 'dangerous' thoughts? 'Summerhall is renowned as being one of the largest Fringe venues: what is this saying about the Edinburgh Fringe if free speech doesn't exist and this appearance is intolerable? And who are these arbiters who think some people are not allowed to have thoughts?' She also highlighted that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who has indicated that his party would no longer support gender reform legislation, was among the other speakers with no similar backlash. Ms Calder said: 'Why were they not up in arms about Anas? Why burn the witch? At a time when people are crying out for edgy and different Summerhall is doing the opposite of what it should be doing. 'People are fed up of the same woke shows that are appearing.' Ms Forbes had appeared at Summerhall on August 7 as part of the Herald's Unspun Live at the Fringe series of political interviews. Artists were said to have been so 'terrified' that they set up a 'safe room' while she was at the venue, while bosses at the venue issued an apology. A source at Sumerhall Arts, which was awarded £608,302 of public cash from Scottish Government quango Creative Scotland in January, said: 'This event was booked as a series of longform interviews prior to the guest list being confirmed. 'Summerhall Arts' primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again. 'Summerhall Arts issued a communication to all artists making them aware of the event.' Scottish Conservative equalities spokesman Tess White said: 'This is an outrageous and unacceptable statement from a venue that is clearly detached from reality. 'Not only is this a scandalous attempt to curtail free speech, it is seemingly oblivious to the Supreme Court ruling which fully vindicated in law those whom Summerhall wishes to silence. 'As for its concern for 'the safety and wellbeing' of artists, this clearly doesn't extend to female artists. 'While Kate Forbes has been disgracefully treated, she might reflect that it's the SNP which imposed this toxic gender ideology across Scottish public life, and it's her current party leader who refuses to disown it.' During the interview, presenter Andrew Learmonth highlighted that there were people in the building 'who didn't want this show to go ahead', complained to management and wanted it to be cancelled because they 'didn't like what they think of your views, particularly around gender, sex and trans issues'. Ms Forbes said: 'These issues have been well documented and can I just say how brilliant it is for us to have freedom of speech in this country.' She said there needs to be spaces where people can have discussion and debate, and added: 'My approach is to respect the fact and to appreciate the fact that a lot of people disagree with me. 'I think it is a reflection on a healthy democracy that people both agree with me and disagree with me. 'I am not anti any human being. I am taught to love my neighbour as myself, which is to give them greater respect, greater honour and greater appreciation than I would expect myself.' In 2023, The Stand announced it had cancelled Ms Cherry's appearance because staff were not comfortable with her views on transgender issues. The appearance eventually went ahead after the threat of legal action, with the venue saying it took legal advice and accepted the decision was 'unfair and constituted unlawful discrimination against Ms Cherry'. Responding to the freedom of speech row, Ms Forbes said: 'As I stated at the event, I fervently believe in freedom of speech. Any effort to 'cancel' people, especially politicians, undermines democracy. 'Many people attended the Herald event and it is important that we could freely discuss and debate matters in a respectful manner. 'I respect and acknowledge the fact that in a liberal democracy there are people who will agree with me and others who will disagree with me. 'That is all the more reason to create events where the audience and journalists can question politicians openly, as the Herald did.'
Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Cut their throats' Labour councillor ‘prone to emotional arousal'
A suspended Labour councillor who said far-Right activists' throats should be cut might be prone to 'reactive speech' because of his 'probable ADHD', a court heard. Snaresbrook Crown Court was told that Ricky Jones, 58, suffered from 'emotional arousal' which could 'override deliberate decision-making'. A video of Mr Jones speaking into a microphone at a demonstration held by Stand Up To Racism on Aug 7 last year went viral on social media. It showed Mr Jones – at the time a councillor for Dartford, Kent – referring to the rioters and protesters who took to the streets after the Southport murders. Drawing his finger across his throat, he said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Mr Jones, who was also a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) union at the time, does not dispute what he said but denies one charge of encouraging violent disorder. As part of a set of facts agreed by the prosecution and the defence, the jury was told that experts for both sides had confirmed that Mr Jones 'suffers from a number of neurodivergent challenges'. Issues identified by the experts included 'impulsivity (probable ADHD), increasing the likelihood of reactive speech rather than intentional incitement'. The experts said testing had established that Mr Jones suffered from 'impaired verbal comprehension potentially leading to misunderstanding the impact of his words' and 'slower cognitive processing, meaning he may not have evaluated the situation in real time'. They said Mr Jones suffered from 'emotional arousal, which can override deliberate decision-making'. Giving evidence in court, Mr Jones told the jury he suffered from dyslexia, dyscalculia – which impairs the ability to work with numbers – and Irlen syndrome, which means he has difficulties when reading black text on white paper over long periods of time. He told the jury his daughters had previously suggested he might have ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) but he 'didn't really want another label'. Hossein Zahir KC, his defence barrister, asked Mr Jones: 'What is the difference between you and someone you might describe as neurotypical?' Mr Jones replied: 'If I get emotional and distracted I come out with things I don't always mean.' The father of four was asked about racism in Hackney, east London, where he grew up as a mixed-race child. He said: 'Wherever you went you saw huge 'NF' graffiti and ... that meant National Front, who were a far-Right organisation at that stage. 'It [was] a bit like the situation today, in the sense of the Reform party. A lot of people are being taken in by the Reform party and believe what they say.' Mr Jones said his white grandmother, who raised him, was called a 'black man's whore' when he was a boy and she held his hand in public. Concealed razor blades A borough councillor since 2019, Mr Jones was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. At the time of his arrest, he told police in a prepared statement that his comments referred to individuals whom he understood to have stuck a National Front sticker on a train with razor blades concealed behind it. He added: 'I did not intend for my comments to be taken literally by anyone and I did not intend to encourage or incite anyone to commit violence against any other. 'I am, however, extremely sorry for making the comments which were made in the heat of the moment and I very much regret having done so.' He said he had not been invited to speak into the microphone at the Stand Up to Racism event 'until the last minute' and 'had not planned or thought about' what he was going to say in advance. Giving evidence on Tuesday, he said he was appalled by political violence, adding: 'I've always believed the best way to make people realise who you are and what you are is to do it peacefully.' Mr Jones, who said he was on the Left of the Labour Party, told jurors the riots had made him feel 'upset' and 'angry' and said he felt it was his 'duty' to attend counter-protests. The trial continues.
