
Protesters throng Iowa capitol to decry bill to roll back trans rights protections
Amid a heavy police presence and hundreds of vocal protesters, Iowa lawmakers on Thursday considered an unprecedented bill that would strip the state civil rights code of protections based on gender identity, a move opponents say could expose transgender people to discrimination in numerous areas of life.
Both the house and senate were expected to vote on the legislation on Thursday, the same day the Georgia house backed away from removing gender protections from the state's hate crimes law, which was passed in 2020 after the death of Ahmaud Arbery.
Iowa's bill, first introduced last week, raced through the legislative process, despite opposition from LGBTQ+ advocates who rallied at the Capitol on Monday and Tuesday.
On Thursday, opponents of the bill filed into the capitol rotunda with signs and rainbow flags to rally before, during and after a 90-minute public hearing, shouting, 'No hate in our state!' There was a heavy police presence, with state troopers stationed around the rotunda and hearing room.
Of the 167 people who signed up to testify at the public hearing before a house committee, all but 24 were opposed to the bill. Each time a person who had spoken opened the hearing room door to leave, the roar of protesters outside filled the room, forcing repeated pauses.
To avoid delays, state troopers blocked off the hallway outside the room, creating a 'natural buffer', said the department of public safety commissioner, Stephan Bayens. The move was intended to allow the public hearing to proceed while also protecting first amendment rights to demonstrate, Bayens said.
In Iowa, gender identity was added to the civil rights code in 2007 when Democrats controlled the legislature. If removed, Iowa would be the first state to undo explicit non-discrimination protections based on gender identity, said Logan Casey, director of policy research at the Movement Advancement Project.
In Georgia, the changes to the hate crimes law were proposed in a bill that would restrict sports participation for transgender students. That is something the state's high school athletic association now does by policy but that Republican leaders insist needs to be in law and also apply to colleges and universities.
A Georgia house committee rewrote the bill at the last minute on Wednesday to leave the word 'gender' in the state's hate crimes law after Democrats warned removing the word could end extra penalties for crimes motivated by bias against transgender people.
Iowa's bill would remove gender identity as a protected class and explicitly define female and male, as well as gender, which would be considered a synonym for sex and 'shall not be considered a synonym or shorthand expression for gender identity, experienced gender, gender expression, or gender role'.
Supporters of the change say the current code incorrectly codified the idea that people can transition to another gender and granted transgender women access to spaces such as bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams that should be protected for people who were assigned female at birth.
Iowa Republicans say their changes are intended to reinforce the state's ban on sports participation and public bathroom access for transgender students. If approved, the bill would go to the Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, who signed those policies into law. A spokesperson for Reynolds declined to comment on whether she would sign the bill.
V Fixmer-Oraiz, a county supervisor in eastern Johnson county, was the first to testify against the bill. A trans Iowan, they said they had faced their 'fair share of discrimination' already and worried that the bill would expose trans Iowans to even more.
'Is it not the role of government to affirm rather than to deny law-abiding citizens their inalienable rights?' Fixmer-Oraiz said. 'The people of Iowa deserve better.'
Among those speaking in support of the bill was Shellie Flockhart of Dallas Center, who said she was in favor as a woman and a mother, a 'defender of women's rights' and someone 'who believes in the truth of God's creation'.
'Identity does not change biology,' Flockhart said.
About half of US states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights thinktank. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes.
Iowa's supreme court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity.
Several Republican-led legislatures are also pushing to enact more laws this year creating legal definitions of male and female based on the reproductive organs at birth following an executive order from Donald Trump.
Trump also signed orders laying the groundwork for banning transgender people from military service and keeping transgender girls and women out of girls and women's sports competitions, among other things. Most of the policies are being challenged in court.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Live updates: Trump warns California officials amid immigration protests; 12-country travel ban goes into effect
What to know today California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other Democrats said Trump's deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to help quell protests in the city over immigration raids will only ratchet up tensions and escalate the situation. Trump and his 'border czar,' Tom Homan, have threatened to arrest any government officials who impede federal enforcement efforts, prompting a defiant Newsom to respond, "So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go." Trump's travel ban went into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET for 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Seven more countries face visa restrictions, including Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.


The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
ICE is enforcing the law. Trump is right to send National Guard
President Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to restore peace in Los Angeles after protesters set fires, defaced buildings, slashed vehicle tires and hurled pieces of concrete at local police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. A Department of Homeland Security news release on June 7 noted that ICE agents - and their families - have endured a surge in threats and harassment. I've watched this violence, aimed at law enforcement officers who are attempting to uphold our nation's immigration laws, with growing anger. Read more If California is one version of America and the rest of the country is another version, I know which America I choose. It's the same one a majority of Americans also have chosen. Polls have consistently shown that voters side with Trump and other Republicans on immigration and border security, not the lawlessness and chaos that Democrats and their progressive allies promote. And to answer the question I'll inevitably get: Yes, I voted for this, and I'd vote for this again. California Gov. Gavin Newsom denounced Trump's decision to send in the National Guard as "inflammatory." That's not a good look for a governor with national ambitions. Newsom's staff hasn't helped him either. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth posted on X a photo of demonstrators posing in front of a fire while one person waved a Mexican flag. Hegseth wrote: "Another 'mostly peaceful protest' brought to you by @GavinNewsom. DEPORT." Newsom's press office responded: "Are you going to send in the Marines the next time the Philadelphia Eagles win, too?" Comparing violent protests against federal officers enforcing the law to a Super Bowl celebration that went too far is tone death, even for the governor of California. It's important to note that ICE agents aren't arresting just anyone. The Department of Homeland Security reported that the arrests in Los Angeles included people accused of drug trafficking, assault, cruelty to children, domestic violence, robbery and the smuggling of illegal immigrants. Our nation's immigration laws must be enforced The fact that the protests broke out because the demonstrators didn't want illegal immigrants with criminal records to be arrested or deported is sad and pathetic. America is a melting pot, and our arms should be open to people who want to come to this land to live a better life. But we must follow a legal process for immigrants to enter and stay in the United States. But progressive states like California and Democratic leaders like Newsom and former President Joe Biden have ignored our immigration laws. They sent a clear message to people all over the world that the border was open, and millions took advantage of that fact to enter our country illegally. Now, it is Trump who must enforce the law and restore order, whether Gavin Newsom and the violent protesters in the streets of Los Angeles like it or not. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter


The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump says Abrego Garcia's return to US 'wasn't my decision'
Abrego Garcia, a sheet metal worker and father of three from Maryland, was wrongly deported to El Salvador in March despite a 2019 court order barring his removal. His case drew national attention, after a standoff among the Trump administration, the courts and some congressional Democrats over his release. In April, a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return to the United States. Officials claimed they couldn't force a sovereign nation - El Salvador - to relinquish a prisoner. The Trump administration insists that Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, but a federal judge had previously questioned the strength of the government's evidence. Abrego Garcia denies being a gang member. Now, the Maryland man faces new charges on American soil. At a June 6 press conference, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi accused Abrego Garcia of making over 100 trips to smuggle undocumented immigrants across the nation. The indictment against Abrego Garcia alleges that he and co-conspirators worked with people in other countries to transport immigrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador, and Mexico, and then took the people from Houston to Maryland, often varying their routes, and coming up with cover stories about construction if they were pulled over. Trump told NBC News he believes "it should be a very easy case" for federal prosecutors. But Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, a lawyer for Abrego Garcia, criticized the Justice Department for bringing these charges at all: "Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice." Contributing: USA TODAY Staff