U.K. prime minister says online content moderation could be part of trade talks with U.S.
First Trump officials were trying to get Europe to accept chlorinated chickens and hormone-infused beef from the United States. Now, it seems they are trying to foist the toxicity of our social media platforms and a laissez-faire approach to harmful content onto Europe, as well.
Evidence suggests the Trump administration is targeting content moderation laws in the United Kingdom designed to curb hate speech and misinformation as a part of trade negotiations.
Last week, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer acknowledged to Parliament that 'a review of online safety rules [is] on the table in trade talks with the United States,' Politico EU reported. When asked about whether top tech firms might be powerful enough to be treated as independent nations, Starmer hedged and pivoted to points about 'the appropriate way to tax digital services' and 'how technology impacts with free speech.' (Below is a video of the exchange posted by a member of Parliament, Chi Onwurah.)
Starmer's comments seem to suggest that U.K. laws against hate speech and disinformation have become a factor in trade negotiations with Trump, who is destabilizing the U.S. economy with a haphazard tariff war that has targeted American allies, such as the U.K.
Starmer's comments also followed a recent report by The New York Times that said European Union officials have weighed enforcement of content moderation laws against Elon Musk and his social platform, X, against the risks of angering the Trump administration amid ongoing trade negotiations.
Trump's administration has been known to rely on hateful rhetoric and disinformation, so its open criticism of European officials' punishment of such speech in their countries hasn't come as a surprise. Vice President JD Vance, for example, recently framed European laws targeting misinformation as an attack on free speech at a conference in Munich.
After the Times' report on the E.U., I explained why European countries are justified in their efforts to curb the spread of disinformation and hate speech, particularly when it comes to Musk, who has remade X into a platform for promoting far-right propaganda. Meanwhile, a loud chorus of activist groups in Europe is encouraging officials to resist the Trump administration's demands when it comes to content moderation.
Americans should be disturbed by the administration's apparent doggedness in making stable economic relations with a top ally at all contingent on giving greater latitude to hate speech and disinformation in its online discourse. Were we a country led by sensible people, we would be crafting our own policies to deter hate speech and misinformation online, not pressuring allies to weaken theirs.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
The success of a key NATO summit is in doubt after Spain rejects a big hike in defense spending
BRUSSELS (AP) — The success of a key NATO summit hung in the balance on Friday, after Spain announced that it cannot raise the billions of dollars needed to meet a new defense investment pledge demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump and his NATO counterparts are meeting for two days in the Netherlands from next Tuesday. He insists that U.S. allies should commit to spending at least 5% of gross domestic product, but that requires investment at an unprecedented scale. Trump has cast doubt over whether the U.S. would defend allies that spend too little. Setting the spending goal would be a historic decision. It would see all 32 countries invest the same amount in defense for the first time. Only last week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte expressed confidence that they would endorse it. But in a letter to Rutte on Thursday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote that 'committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' 'It would move Spain away from optimal spending and it would hinder the (European Union's) ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defense ecosystem,' Sánchez wrote in the letter, seen by The Associated Press. Spain is not entirely alone Belgium, Canada, France and Italy would also struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars, but Spain is the only country to officially announce its intentions, making it hard to row back from such a public decision. Beyond his economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern, and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He's under growing pressure to call an early election. In response to the letter, Rutte's office said only that 'discussions among allies on a new defense investment plan are ongoing.' NATO's top civilian official had been due to table a new proposal on Friday to try to break the deadlock. The U.S. and French envoys had also been due to update reporters about the latest developments ahead of the summit but postponed their briefings. Rutte and many European allies are desperate to resolve the problem by Tuesday so that Trump does not derail the summit, as he did during his first term at NATO headquarters in 2018. Budget boosting After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO allies agreed that 2% of GDP should be the minimum they spend on their military budgets. But NATO's new plans for defending its own territory against outside attack require investment of at least 3%. Spain agreed to those plans in 2023. The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP. A further 1.5% would go to upgrade roads, bridges, ports and airfields so that armies can better deploy, and to prepare societies for future attacks. Mathematically, 3.5 plus 1.5 equals Trump's 5%. But a lot is hiding behind the figures and details of what kinds of things can be included remain cloudy. Countries closest to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine have all agreed to the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the June 24-25 summit. The Netherlands estimates that NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Supplying arms and ammunition to Ukraine, which Spain does, will also be included as core defense spending. NATO estimates that the U.S. spent around 3.2% of GDP on defense last year. Dual use, making warfighting possible The additional 1.5% spending basket is murkier. Rutte and many members argue that infrastructure used to deploy armies to the front must be included, as well as building up defense industries and preparing citizens for possible attacks. 'If a tank is not able to cross a bridge. If our societies are not prepared in case war breaks out for a whole of society approach. If we are not able to really develop the defense industrial base, then the 3.5% is great but you cannot really defend yourselves,' Rutte said this month. Spain wanted climate change spending included, but that proposal was rejected. Cyber-security and counter-hybrid warfare investment should also make the cut. Yet with all the conjecture about what might be included, it's difficult to see how Rutte arrived at this 1.5% figure. The when, the how, and a cunning plan It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit the 2% target, although most will this year, and they had a decade to get there. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That's far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate that Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within 5-10 years. The U.S. insists that it cannot be an open-ended pledge, and that a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. Another issue is how fast spending should be ramped up. 'I have a cunning plan for that,' Rutte said. He wants the allies to submit annual plans that lay out how much they intend to increase spending by. The reasons for the spending hike For Europe, Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat. A major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents is blamed on Moscow. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The United States also insists that China poses a threat. But for European people to back a hike in national defense spending, their governments require acknowledgement that the Kremlin remains NATO's biggest security challenge. The billions required for security will be raised by taxes, going into debt, or shuffling money from other budgets. But it won't be easy for many, as Spain has shown. On top of that, Trump has made things economically tougher by launching a global tariff war — ostensibly for U.S. national security reasons — something America's allies find hard to fathom.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Korea's Record Surplus With US Adds Strain to Tariff Talks
(Bloomberg) -- Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks global trade. Sign up here. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown South Korea's current account surplus with the US surged to a record high last year, highlighting the challenge President Lee Jae Myung faces as he seeks to secure a trade deal with Donald Trump. The surplus reached $118.2 billion in 2024, the highest on record, the Bank of Korea said Friday. The figure has increased every year since 2019, reflecting deepening trade ties — and now potential friction — with Washington. The data serve as the latest reminder of the scale of South Korea's surplus with the US, with the Asian economy already on Trump's top 10 list of nations amplifying the US trade deficit. Lee, who secured the presidency earlier this month after protracted political turmoil following the impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol, must now engage in trade negotiations with a US administration that favors hardline tactics and unilateral pressure. The two leaders were poised to talk on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Canada this week, but the meeting was called off at the last minute as Trump left the event early amid rising tensions in the Middle East. Lee's nominee for prime minister said the Korean president is hoping to reach an agreement ahead of a July deadline that'll ramp up the baseline tariff rate the country faces. Exports remain vital to South Korea's economy, equivalent to more than 40% of gross domestic product last year. Its supplies of chips, smartphones, cars and batteries are also key elements for global supply chains. With so-called reciprocal tariff rates of 25% still on the table, the stakes for the negotiations are high. 'There's considerable uncertainty around how Trump or other nations will respond,' said Joonyoung Hur, an associate professor of economics at Sogang University. 'The impact on GDP could be significant, but it's hard to quantify with so many variables in play.' Hur estimates that such tariffs may shrink Korea's overall exports by 2%, adding that the maximum estimated impact on GDP growth could reach 0.7 percentage point. The US is Korea's second-largest export destination after China, accounting for 18.7% of outbound shipments worth $127.8 billion last year. The Office of the US Trade Representative said the country ran a $66 billion trade deficit with Korea in 2024, its eighth-largest bilateral gap. That was bound to draw the attention of Trump, who has framed persistent trade shortfalls as a national emergency. The reciprocal tariffs — if reinstated at 25% as announced on the so-called Liberation Day — could slash US-bound shipments by more than half, potentially dragging down Korea's GDP by over 1% by 2030, according to Bloomberg economist Hyosung Kwon. Even if Seoul manages to strike a deal, fallout may still follow. Closer alignment with the US could strain Korea's relationship with China, its biggest trading partner, which took in $133 billion worth of exports last year. Sector Implications Trade exposure underscores Korea's dependence on exports in a few key sectors. Semiconductor shipments totaled $141.9 billion in 2024, accounting for about 21% of South Korea's total exports, according to the Trade Ministry. Automobiles, the second-largest export item, exceeded 10%, while steel products neared 5%. Autos, which make up more than a quarter of Korea's exports to the US, are particularly exposed. Hyundai Motor Co., the country's top carmaker, faces greater risk than peers with local production due to its reliance on South Korean factories. It's already made efforts to mitigate that threat, announcing in March plans for a $21 billion investment in the US for vehicle production and other projects. Automobile exports are expected to be the most severely affected by US tariffs in both the short and long term, the BOK said in a May report. The central bank projected the nation's total goods exports to drop by 0.6%, with automobile shipments to the US sliding by as much as 4%. It also warned of longer-term risks as companies may relocate production to the US to avoid tariffs. Semiconductors have so far avoided direct sectoral tariffs, but face rising scrutiny as Washington considers broader tech-related trade measures. The US Commerce Department is expected to announce within weeks the results of its Section 232 investigations into industries deemed critical to national security, including semiconductors. Battery makers are also in the crosshairs. Despite building US-based joint ventures, South Korean firms rely heavily on components produced at home, exposing them to tariffs that could disrupt electric vehicle rollout plans for both South Korean and American automakers. In May, South Korea's trade surplus with the US fell to its lowest since July 2024, even as America's deficits with other Asian economies widened — a possible sign of shifting trade flows and strategic recalibration. South Korean companies in the automobile, semiconductor and battery industries invested billions of dollars to build out their supply chains in the US during the Biden administration in order to qualify for tax credits. Those investments are now poised to help partially shield them from Trump's tariffs, and may ultimately lead to a drop in goods exports from Korea to the US, narrowing the trade surplus. At the same time, growing direct investment by Korean firms in the US has led to increased income from dividends and interest, contributing to a larger surplus in the primary income account. Primary income also surged to a record last year, accounting for almost 16% of South Korea's surplus with the US, the BOK said. 'The impact of US tariff policy is gradually emerging,' Kim SungJun, director at the BOK's balance of payments team, said at a briefing Friday. 'And it is expected to become more pronounced in the second half of this year.' Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not just $Trump: Several top administration officials have put their money into crypto
Trump has made millions from cryptocurrency and launched a meme-coin earlier this year. Members of his Cabinet have also invested thousands, sometimes millions, in cryptocurrency. They include JD Vance, RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and others. There's something that several top Trump administration officials have in common: They've poured thousands of dollars into cryptocurrency. While much has been made of President Donald Trump's own involvement with crypto, financial disclosures show that several of his top advisors and Cabinet officials also have substantial cryptocurrency investments. That includes Vice President JD Vance, who owns bitcoin worth between $250,000 and $500,000. Officials are generally only required to disclose the range of the value of their assets, so we don't know the exact amount. At the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas last month, Vance described himself as "one only people running for office who actually owned bitcoin" when he ran for Senate in Ohio in 2022. "I still own a fair amount of bitcoin today," he said. Among Cabinet officials, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be the largest holder of Bitcoin: he reported owning between $1 million and $5 million in the cryptocurrency in his December disclosure. Others hold at least hundreds of thousands of dollars in crypto. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy reported owning between $502,000 and $1.3 million in various cryptocurrencies, while Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz reported holding between $500,000 and $1 million in bitcoin. Todd Blanche, a former personal defense attorney for Trump who now serves as Deputy US Attorney General, reported owning between $158,000 and $470,000 in various cryptocurrencies, primarily bitcoin. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also owns between $15,000 and $50,000 in bitcoin. Some Cabinet officials are invested in Bitcoin funds, which track the performance of Bitcoin without involving direct ownership. Among them is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who disclosed having between $250,000 and $500,000 in such a fund. Oz and Duffy also invested in bitcoin funds in addition to their direct crypto holdings. Other top officials used to own cryptocurrencies but agreed to sell them off. That includes Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who reported owning between $33,000 and $145,000 in various cryptocurrencies, primarily bitcoin, which she sold off on May 13. Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought agreed to divest his holdings of up to $15,000 in bitcoin, while FBI Director Kash Patel agreed to sell off his investments in bitcoin ETFs, which were worth between $51,000 and $115,000. "President Trump, Vice President Vance, and senior White House staff have completed required ethics briefings and financial reporting obligations," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement for this story. "The Trump Administration is committed to transparency and accessibility for the American people." Ultimately, Trump remains the biggest cryptocurrency investor in his administration. His most recent financial disclosure shows he made more than $53 million from cryptocurrency sales last year in connection with World Liberty Financial, a crypto firm that's majority-owned by Trump and his family. Trump launched a meme-coin, $Trump, in the days before his second inauguration in January. Read the original article on Business Insider
