logo
Scottish Water workers accept pay offer but ‘concerns continue', says union

Scottish Water workers accept pay offer but ‘concerns continue', says union

Glasgow Times17-07-2025
Unison said on Thursday that the latest pay deal, which covers the 2024-25 and 2025-26 financial years, had been accepted by its members.
The union represents more than 1,000 workers at the Government-owned corporation, making it the union with the largest presence at Scottish Water.
The pay deal is worth a minimum of £2,850 for staffers on salary bands one to six.
Staff on band seven salaries will receive an additional £3,030, and band eight workers will gain another £3,771.
Some 77% of Unison members at Scottish Water voted, 63% of whom accepted the offer.
Scottish Water initially offered workers a basic pay rise of 3.4% or £1,050 for those on the lowest grades.
Unison members had earlier rejected an improved pay offer from the employer.
There were 10 days of strike action this year at Scottish Water.
Staff who took action included treatment plant operators, maintenance crews, water quality teams and other frontline workers.
During the strikes, the union said there were no emergency repairs, water quality checks, or responses to public reports of problems with water supply, sewage or drainage.
The employer had originally offered a pay rise of £1,050 for those on the lowest-grade salaries.
This was later upped to 7% over two years, which was also rejected.
While the latest offer was accepted, Unison said it will continue to press Scottish Water bosses to cut the excessive use of contractors and agency staff.
The union also said more must be done to improve industrial relations across the sector following the dispute.
Unison Scotland regional organiser Greig Kelbie said: 'The immediate dispute may be over, but staff concerns continue. They want better pay and conditions, and to keep Scottish Water as a publicly-owned and run service.
'The company's behaviour has become ever more like that of profit-driven water firms in England. That's not the way a vital public service for Scotland should operate.
'The union and staff will be fighting the creeping privatisation of the industry.'
Unison Scottish Water branch secretary Patricia McArthur said: 'Staff have decided to accept this offer after a long and difficult dispute, but it's far from ideal.
'In theory, Scottish Water is still the jewel in the crown of Scotland's public services. But the reality is that its operations are being handed increasingly to private operators. That must stop.'
Fellow unions GMB and Union have also been in dispute with the employer.
Lynne Highway, Scottish Water's director of people, said: 'We are pleased that members of all three trade unions have voted to accept our pay offer.
'We now look forward to implementing the salary increases that our people have been waiting for and to working constructively with the trade unions in the future.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ignorant government plans to tax bookies more could destroy racing
Ignorant government plans to tax bookies more could destroy racing

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Ignorant government plans to tax bookies more could destroy racing

Tax the bookmakers more. It's a policy sure to garner public support, isn't it? The problem is not the idea of taxing the betting industry at a higher level, it is the way that the government is proposing to do it. It is not far-fetched to say that the changes, if introduced in the autumn statement, could be the death knell for horse racing in Britain. The government needs cash and the bookmakers are a soft target. The idea is to harmonise tax on bookmakers' profits on all their income streams. At the moment there is a division between tax paid on online casino profits (21 per cent goes to the government) and sports/racing betting (paid at 15 per cent). The suggestion is to charge 21 per cent across the board. There are exceptions, such as George Freeman (Conservative, Mid Norfolk) and Sally Jameson (Labour, Doncaster Central), but many MPs do not appear to understand the differences between betting on sports, which involves an element of skill, compared with casino betting, where bookmakers cannot lose. They also appear to be oblivious of the damage it will do to the racing industry, which provides jobs for 85,000 people. A further 10 per cent of bookmakers' profits from bets placed on horse racing are paid back to the sport. This levy came into force when betting shops were legalised in 1961 as a means to help fund the sport. It was introduced to combat the fact that fewer people would go racing once off-course betting was permitted, while also recognising the symbiotic relationship of the racing and betting industries. As a result, though, betting on racing is less profitable for bookmakers, making them keen to push punters towards higher-margin products, with online casinos being top of their list. The reason that racing will be badly hit by the proposed tax changes is that it will make bookmakers even less keen to promote betting on the sport, which provides the lifeblood of the industry. Modelling commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority suggested that increasing tax on betting on racing to 21 per cent, to level it up with betting on online casinos, would cost the sport £66million a year in lost income from levy, media rights and sponsorship. That would be ruinous for a sport that is already struggling. A hike in tax on online casino betting would make more sense and could generate the same level of revenue for the government. There is zero skill in betting on online casinos — bookmakers take a fixed margin, set by themselves, on a product on which they literally cannot lose in the long run. A higher level of tax on online casinos would have the added bonus of discouraging bookmakers from promoting a product that causes the majority of problem gambling. The Gambling Commission has already inflicted damage to racing's finances. In 2023 it produced a white paper suggesting that bookmakers should 'check for financial vulnerability' if a gambler lost either £125 in a month or £500 in a year. Bookmakers saw the proposals and, keen to avoid being hit with large fines, started making intrusive checks on their customers' financial situations to the extent that many punters now use offshore gambling companies that provide no income for racing or the government purse. The latter point is not hearsay — betting on racing has dropped 16 per cent in three years and polling carried out by YouGov for the Betting and Gaming Council recently found that 14 per cent of punters admitted to gambling on a black-market site. The public, many of whom are only cognisant of the biggest events, will perhaps believe that racing is a wealthy sport that can well afford the hit. That is a misconception. Flat racing in Britain has been kept competitive at an international level by the largesse of wealthy foreign owners, primarily from the Middle East. Even so, it is struggling at the top end, with prize money that compares badly with other leading racing nations. Much of the best bloodstock that is bred in Britain has been heading overseas for some time and it is now approaching a tipping point where British breeders will not be able to compete with similar operations abroad. Prize money at the bottom level is so poor that a horse can win eight races in a year and still not cover its costs. The vast majority of trainers and jockeys are struggling to make a living. The effects of overtaxing racing can be seen from recent events in India. In 2017 the government introduced a goods and services tax on money bet on racing at a rate of 28 per cent. Punters paid the price and as their returns dwindled many turned to illegal bookmakers who paid no tax. Government revenues from racing more than halved in five years. British racing has been revered throughout the world for decades. Its history has maintained its place in the minds of leading owners but the point is fast approaching where that is no longer the case. If the sport is to continue to provide work for so many, and continue to attract inward investment to the UK, the government needs to rethink its proposed tax changes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store