logo
Thermal coal regains edge over LNG as Middle East tensions push gas prices up

Thermal coal regains edge over LNG as Middle East tensions push gas prices up

Time of India16 hours ago

Thermal coal
may end up as a major beneficiary of escalating hostilities in the Middle East, as the fuel used to generate electricity becomes cheaper than one of its main competitors
liquefied natural gas
(LNG).
Much of the focus of the potential fallout from the conflict between Israel, and now the United States, and Iran is the threat to crude oil and refined fuels shipped through the Strait of Hormuz.
But all of Qatar's LNG also goes through the narrow waterway separating the gulfs of Persia and Oman, and this amounts to almost 20 per cent of the global seaborne supply of the super-chilled fuel.
While there has yet to be any disruption of Qatar's LNG, the mere threat that Iran may attempt to block the strait or attack shipping has seen spot LNG prices rise in Asia, the biggest market.
LNG for delivery to North Asia rose to $14 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in the week to June 20, a four-month high and up from $12.6 the prior week.
The weekly price assessment also came before the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign against Iran, with President Donald Trump claiming on June 21 that the strikes had "completely and totally obliterated" three nuclear facilities.
The involvement of the United States makes it more likely that LNG prices will continue to rise to reflect the increased risk premium.
But even at the current level, LNG is no longer competitive against thermal coal in the two major markets where fuel-switching can occur, Japan and South Korea.
Advantage coal
The price of Australian thermal coal with an energy content of 6,000 kilocalories per kilogram at Newcastle Port rose to a four-month high of $109.41 a metric ton in the week to June 20, according to data from globalCOAL.
This is the grade of thermal coal most used by Japan and South Korea, as well as Taiwan.
Using LSEG data to convert the price of coal into million British thermal units shows that Australia's Newcastle benchmark is currently around $12.18 per mmBtu, or a 13 per cent discount to the spot LNG price.
The most recent low for spot LNG was in early May when the price dipped to $11 per mmBtu, at which point it was cheaper than Newcastle coal, which was $11.47.
But spot LNG prices have rallied harder than those for coal in recent weeks, a trend that is likely to continue for as long as tensions remain high in the Middle East.
Since it has only been 10 days since Israel started its bombing campaign against Iran it's still too early to see a sustained trend in the volumes of coal being purchased by Japan and South Korea.
However, there are some signs that
coal imports
are starting to increase, with commodity analysts Kpler tracking Japan's arrivals at 6.57 million tons in June, up from 6.39 million in May.
More interestingly, Kpler is already estimating that Japan's thermal coal imports will jump to 7.23 million tons, which would be the most since March.
It's likely that the July number will be revised higher as more cargoes are assessed.
There is also an element of seasonality to Japan's thermal coal imports, which tend to rise in both the winter and summer peak demand periods.
This means it will be important to look at the year-on-year changes to see if Asia's third-biggest coal buyer is indeed buying more of the fuel.
Japan imported 10.05 million tons of thermal coal in July last year, and given that the volume already assessed for this coming July is more than 70 per cent of that total, it's likely that imports next month will show an increase from July 2024.
It's also worth noting that Asia's two biggest coal importers, China and India, don't have much ability to swap LNG for coal given their limited use of natural gas for power generation.
But on a longer-term note, both countries are likely to view the current unrest in the Middle East as another compelling reason to reduce dependency on imported crude oil and LNG as rapidly as possible.
If that means using their vast domestic reserves of coal, supplemented by imports, to electrify transportation at a faster pace, it's likely that this is a path they will pursue irrespective of climate change concerns.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Israel, Iran agree to ‘total and complete' ceasefire
Trump says Israel, Iran agree to ‘total and complete' ceasefire

The Hindu

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Trump says Israel, Iran agree to ‘total and complete' ceasefire

U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday (June 23, 2025) on social media that Israel and Iran have agreed to a 'complete and total ceasefire' to be phased in over 24 hours. The U.S. president said on Truth Social that the ceasefire would bring an 'official end' to the war, a major change in the hostilities that follows a U.S. strike over the weekend on three Iranian nuclear sites. Also read: Israel-Iran conflict LIVE updates 'On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end what should be called, 'The 12 day war',' Mr. Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. Earlier, Mr. Trump thanked Iran for giving the U.S. and allies 'early notice' of Monday's (June 23, 2025) retaliatory missile strike aimed at a major U.S. military installation in the Gulf nation of Qatar. The President expressed hope that Tehran — with its reprisal for the U.S. bombardment of three key Iranian nuclear facilities — had 'gotten it all out of their 'system'' and that the moment would lead to a de-escalation in the Israel-Iran war.

Iran's missile strike on US base in Qatar: What we know so far
Iran's missile strike on US base in Qatar: What we know so far

Mint

time38 minutes ago

  • Mint

Iran's missile strike on US base in Qatar: What we know so far

Iran launched a limited missile attack on the US-run Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar on Monday (June 23) in retaliation for American airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. The incident marked the first direct Iranian military action against US forces in the current conflict. However, both Washington and Tehran signaled a willingness to avoid further escalation. Missile attack: Iran fired 19 missiles at the base, according to Qatari officials. Of these, 18 were intercepted — seven over water and eleven over land. One missile struck the base but caused no casualties. Advance warning: US President Donald Trump labeled the attack a 'very weak response.' Trump praised the lack of casualties and expressed hope the strike marked the end of hostilities, urging Iran to "proceed to Peace and Harmony." Qatar condemns strike: Qatar sharply criticised the Iranian missile launch as a breach of its sovereignty and international law. Iran signals restraint: Iranian officials claimed the missile count mirrored the number of US bombs dropped on its nuclear sites, suggesting the attack was calibrated to avoid further escalation. Iranian media: State media described the strike as 'mighty and successful'. President Pezeshkian emphasised Iran's disinterest in war, stating: 'We neither initiated the war nor seek it.' Israel expands campaign: Israel launched strikes in Tehran on regime-linked infrastructure, including the Evin prison and military sites involved in suppressing protests. No regime change goal: Israeli officials clarified they do not seek to overthrow the Iranian regime, but aim to halt its nuclear ambitions. Draft UNSC resolution: Russia, China, and Pakistan circulated a draft at the UN Security Council condemning US strikes and calling for an immediate ceasefire. The US is expected to veto. Regional calls for calm: Leaders from Jordan, Qatar, and other Gulf states urged restraint and condemned attacks on sovereign territories.

Why Iran gave ‘early notice' of its attack on US base in Qatar
Why Iran gave ‘early notice' of its attack on US base in Qatar

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Why Iran gave ‘early notice' of its attack on US base in Qatar

A day after the United States struck Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, Iran on Monday (June 23) retaliated with missile attacks against the Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the forward headquarters of the US Central Command. The Iranian attack was telegraphed, calibrated, and evidently symbolic in nature. After promising retaliation following the American strikes, Iran gave 'advance notice' to their Qatari and American counterparts to minimise casualties. Almost all Iranian missiles were intercepted, with no American or Qatari casualties reported. This was confirmed by US President Donald Trump himself, who posted on Truth Social that Iran's response was 'weak and expected,' and 'there will, hopefully, be no further HATE.' 'I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured. Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same,' he wrote. Monday was the 11th straight day in which Iran and Israel exchanged missile strikes. According to reports, the latest Israeli strikes were the largest in scale, including an attack on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC') headquarters. Iran's Qatar gamble The American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites have neither eliminated Iran's enrichment capabilities, nor destroyed its existing stock of enriched uranium. Iranian officials claimed that stockpiles of 60%, 20%, and 3.67% enriched uranium had already been withdrawn from Fordow, partially or fully, ahead of the strikes. (This stockpile will remain central to Iran-US negotiations, if they ever resume). Arab media reports suggest that Washington supplied advance notice to Tehran of its June 22 strikes, and communicated privately that the attacks were a 'one-off' and that it was willing to resume negotiations. Across the 10 days of Israeli attacks, the Iranians consistently maintained two positions – that it was willing to resume nuclear negotiations if Israel ceased its attacks, and that Iran would certainly attack US bases (including those in Arab states) if the US joined Israel's attack. After the American attacks, Tehran had to find the optimal point between acting to preserve the credibility of its threats, and restraining itself enough to retain space for negotiations and recuperate. This is more so given Iran's abject economic condition, which has increasingly worsened over the last five years. Among all Arab states, Qatar was arguably among the few where the Iranians could risk targeting US assets, and attempt to contain diplomatic fallout. Qatar, which has positioned itself as a neutral mediator for the region's many conflicts (including between Israel and Hamas), has long maintained strong ties with Iran. This relationship was among the crucial reasons for Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, and Bahrain imposing an unprecedented blockade on Qatar between 2017 and 2021. This blockade ended in 2021, two years before the Arab rapprochement with Iran. Iran's 'advance notice' allowed Qatar to shut its airspace an hour before the attacks. Moreover, the US has spent the last week removing its aircraft from the base. By June 19, there were reportedly less than five American aircraft left at Al-Udeid. Iran's Israel challenge While the US strikes were the first American military attacks on Iranian soil in history, it is Israel's sustained attacks which have imposed the most substantial costs. Iran now faces an active threat to the Supreme Leader, attacks on its military, energy, and nuclear sites, and the elimination of key IRGC senior leaders. Its homeland defences have all but been decimated. However, while Ali Khamenei has reportedly named his successors in the event of his own demise, the IRGC has reorganised itself enough to sustain its missile salvos against Israel. For Iran, this is both symbolically and substantially important. Its threshold of success is lower, defined simply by its ability to hit Israel, beating both American air defence units in the region, and Israel's multi-layered AD systems. Following the US strikes, the IRGC for the first time employed its homegrown Kheybar Shekan solid-fuel missiles against Israel. This is what triggered a larger-than-before Israeli salvo on Monday. Unlike the US, which declared its one-time operation complete and successful, Israel's campaign continues to be fought with the maximal objectives of both Iranian nuclear dismantlement and regime change. Despite contradictory statements coming from the White House, Washington evidently remains unwilling to support the latter objective. Moreover, any bombing campaign, let alone a one-off strike, is likely to only delay, not end, Iran's road to a nuclear weapon. It is this clear inference that has always pushed both the US and Europe to seek negotiations with Tehran, despite the severe imbalance in conventional military power. What did not happen Despite issuing threats to this end, Tehran in the end did not close — or even try to close — the Strait of Hormuz, as has always been the case. The Strait is vital for both global and Iranian energy needs, and even now, the Iranian position is not dire enough to warrant a blockade. What is more interesting is the complete absence of its proxies in the Iranian retaliation. While the Yemeni Houthis declared an end to their April ceasefire with the US, the group has not yet resumed attacks against US shipping. The Houthis have thus far shown a marked ability to start/halt attacks on their own terms. On the other hand, Iran's Lebanon-based proxy, Hezbollah, has consistently maintained ambiguity, especially in the light of its significant internal challenges. Even after the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel, Hezbollah engaged only in calibrated rocket and drone attacks, drawing Israeli retaliation at a level it could absorb. Hassan Nasrallah did not commit to a full-scale war — until Israel initiated it in the second half of 2024, and killed Nasrallah himself. On June 20, Hezbollah's current chief, Naim Qassem, expressed strong solidarity with Iran amid Israel's attacks, but committed only to 'act as we see fit' — retaining the ambiguity that the group has now preferred for the past 20 months. In Iraq, Iran has cultivated the Hashd-al-Shaabi as an umbrella proxy group since 2019, after their successful campaign against ISIS in Iraq. The government in Baghdad, though firmly opposed to the Israeli and American aggression against Tehran, has long worked to remove Iraq as a proxy battleground, and to potentially integrate the Hashd, which has a strength of about 50,000 fighters collectively, into Iraq's armed forces. While US bases in Iraq were most expected to bear the brunt of any Iranian retaliation, Iran evidently did not press this militia into action, much like in January 2020. That month, after the US assassinated Iran's Maj Gen Qassem Soleimani, the IRGC launched missiles directly at US bases at Ain-al-Assad and Erbil in Iraq but excluded Hashd from an operational role. The Americans did not suffer any casualties, and chose not to escalate — then too Iran had telegraphed its impending attack. Not using its proxies, arguably allows Iran a greater ability to calibrate its actions, with relatively lesser risk of inadvertent escalation. But the attack on Al-Udeid is markedly different from the Iranian 2020 action in Iraq. The Al-Udeid base is the US military's crown jewel in the Middle East. The 29 year old self-sufficient base houses 10,000 troops from multiple countries and is the nerve-centre for US operations in the region. However, like in 2020, the US has recognised Iran's need to save face, and has refrained from escalating in response — as Trump's message makes amply evident. What now? With Israel keeping up its attacks, it is uncertain whether Iran will remain committed to its offer — which stood between June 13 and June 22 — to negotiate if the Israelis stop their assaults. Iran is close to withdrawing from the NPT and suspending cooperation with the IAEA, which indicates that the US attacks may have made it even more determined to pursue a nuclear weapon. However, Iran's economic imperatives for negotiations remain. In the larger scheme of things, the developments of the past few days might have convinced the Arab states in the Middle East of the value of nuclear deterrence. While Saudi Arabia and the UAE have long worried about an Iranian nuclear weapon and Iranian or Houthi-led attacks against their energy sites, the Israeli actions have potentially created a new threat-in-being. The UAE completed the first nuclear power plant of the Arab world last year, and Saudi is on the road to its own. One downstream impact of the Israeli aggression against Iran may be an increase in the collective Arab anxiety, regardless of their recent rapprochement with Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store