
Cuts to U.S.-Backed Rights Groups Seen as a Win for China
The nonprofit groups track the imprisonment of Chinese political dissidents and the expansion of state censorship. They speak out for persecuted minority groups like the Uyghurs and Tibetans. And they help sustain attention on Beijing's crackdown of freedoms in Hong Kong.
The future of their work is now in question as Elon Musk's government efficiency operation takes aim at an important backer of such groups: the National Endowment for Democracy, or N.E.D., an American nonprofit largely funded by the United States.
Several China-focused nonprofits told The New York Times that the endowment had informed them this past week that their funding had been suspended indefinitely. Money distributed to the endowment was no longer being delivered after members of Mr. Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency gained access to the Treasury Department's payment system.
The stoppage of N.E.D. funds affects groups all over the world, but activists say the impact on groups focused on China will be especially severe. Such work has become more crucial — and risky — as Xi Jinping, the most powerful Chinese leader in decades, has waged a far-reaching crackdown on civil society and tightened control on information.
Across China, scores of activists, lawyers, journalists and intellectuals have been harassed, detained or jailed since Mr. Xi came to power in 2012. In the far-western region of Xinjiang, officials have detained and imprisoned an estimated hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs and members of other Muslim ethnic minorities.
It is unclear how many organizations have been affected by the cuts to the endowment's funding. The Treasury Department and the endowment, which was allocated $315 million by Congress this year, did not respond to requests for comment. The Department of Government Efficiency could not be reached for comment.
The National Endowment for Democracy was established by Congress during the Reagan administration to bolster democracy worldwide. It has long attracted the ire of Beijing, which has accused the group of committing 'evil deeds' by instigating protests and 'colluding with anti-China destabilizing forces' in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet.
Among the endowment's grantees is China Digital Times, a United States-based website that monitors Chinese internet controls and censorship. It recently exposed a Chinese state-sponsored disinformation campaign targeting Canada's former finance minister Chrystia Freeland, who is running to succeed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The website's founder, Xiao Qiang, said his operations were 'severely disrupted' by the funding suspension, resulting in pay cuts and work-hour reductions for staff.
'We are facing significant financial challenges that threaten our ability to continue our work,' said Mr. Xiao, whose website has been financially supported by the endowment since the site was established in 2013.
A representative of the World Uyghur Congress, a group of exiled Uyghurs, which has also seen its N.E.D. funding frozen, said the cuts came at a difficult time for their advocacy work. The group said that the plight of Muslim Uyghurs in China had been overshadowed by other global crises, like the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And its advocacy efforts have been complicated by Beijing's growing ability to silence its critics abroad by targeting their family members still in the country and pressuring governments to repatriate asylum seekers.
The funding was especially important, the group said, because private donors like companies or entrepreneurs with overseas business interests were more vulnerable to Chinese retribution.
Some activists had hoped that the Trump administration's appointment of politicians with hawkish views on China was a sign that they would retain support from the United States. They lamented how abruptly the funds were cut.
'We in the China community were initially hopeful and optimistic about this administration because of appointments like Marco Rubio,' Zumretay Arkin, the vice president of the World Uyghur Congress, said about the secretary of state, who has long been critical of Beijing's human rights record.
'We are shocked by how rapidly things have changed in not even a month,' she continued.
Li Qiang, the founder of the New York-based China Labor Watch, which seeks to end the forced labor and trafficking of Chinese workers, said he was told on Wednesday that N.E.D. funds to his group would be halted for the first time in the 23 years he has been a grantee of the organization.
He said the sweeping way in which Mr. Musk had mobilized people online to attack groups like the National Endowment for Democracy reminded him of political crackdowns in China aimed at consolidating control under a top leader.
'History has proven that this approach ultimately led to chaos in China, resulting in the deaths of thousands of innocent people,' Mr. Li said.
Chinese nationalist voices, on the other hand, applauded President Trump's and Mr. Musk's moves to cripple the endowment. China has accused it of fomenting all kinds of dissent against Beijing, including the 2019 antigovernment protests in Hong Kong. Beijing said the endowment's support for rights groups there was an attempt at destabilizing the city and weakening Beijing's control over it. (Hong Kong activists have rejected the accusation of foreign meddling as an attempt at belittling their grievances.)
'I'm undoubtedly happy about it, and, hopefully, this cutoff will be long-term instead of temporary,' said Hu Xijin, a retired editor in chief of The Global Times, a Communist Party tabloid, in an interview.
Wang Yiwei, the director of the Institute of International Affairs at Renmin University in Beijing, said the dismantling of U.S. foreign aid pointed to a retreat by the United States from the global stage. He said the endowment's work was America's way of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and a waste of taxpayers' money.
'China welcomes this, of course, and so do other countries,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) led the entire Senate Democratic in writing to President Trump Sunday, demanding he remove all military forces from Los Angeles and cease threats to further deploy troops, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Padilla was physically removed from a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and handcuffed Thursday, triggering a five-alarm fire for Democrats. The letter from Padilla and 46 other Senate Democrats asked Trump to "immediately withdraw all military personnel that have been deployed to Los Angeles in recent day." Trump federalized California's National Guard without the state's consent and mobilized more than 700 Marines to the state to try to quash protests over his mass deportation program. "Respect for our Constitution and for our civilian law enforcement demands nothing less," the Senate Democrats wrote. Driving the news: A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration's deployment of the California National Guard can continue, for now. The Pentagon said on Friday that U.S. troops will not be responsible for law enforcement at the Los Angeles riots. Instead, they will protect federal property and personnel. Protests over the deportations have spread to numerous cities across the country, and Trump has warned that he may deploy troops to different areas. The Democrats asked Trump to "cease any further threats of deploying National Guard or other active duty military personnel into American cities absent a request from the Governor." Between the lines: The fight against the White House's deportation program is becoming a rallying point for Democrats who have largely been split over how to push back against Trump. Padilla's incident at the Noem presser on Thursday added more fuel to the flames. Democrats almost universally panned the manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Cost To Live in the US Cities With the Best Quality of Life
While cost of living is an incredibly important factor to consider when making any kind of financial plans for your life, perhaps less tangible but no less important is 'quality of life' — the measure of overall safety, education, healthcare and even commute times in your local area. After all, these elements are crucial to enjoying daily life and feeling satisfied with what that life financially costs you. Check Out: Learn This: Recently, U.S. News & World Report (UNWR) curated a list of the American cities with the highest Quality of Life Index (a system measuring the satisfaction level of residents in various cities). Further, UNWR broke down the cost of living for such high-quality cities — specifically, the average housing prices and median household income for cities that topped their Quality of Life Index. Wondering whether you could afford to live in an American city with a higher quality of life than nearly any other? Planning to retire somewhere with an easy commute, low crime and excellent healthcare? Check out the list to find out whether one of the 20 American cities with the best quality of life fits into your financial plan. Median home value: $1,272,125 Median household income: $144,602 Livability score: 5.8 Find More: Read This: Median home value: $1,170,994 Median household income: $193,307 Livability score: 6.5 Also See: Median home value: $1,004,244 Median household income: $189,538 Livability score: 6.8 Median home value: $1,235,465 Median household income: $162,072 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $605,251 Median household income: $96,668 Livability score: 5.1 Enjoy This: Median home value: $560,849 Median household income: $98,605 Livability score: 6.2 Median home value: $985,214 Median household income: $130,052 Livability score: 5.7 Median home value: $990,492 Median household income: $127,516 Livability score: 6.3 Learn More: Median home value: $636,683 Median household income: $127,516 Livability score: 6.3 Median home value: $410,180 Median household income: $62,393 Livability score: 4.5 Median home value: $627,797 Median household income: $163,286 Livability score: 6.8 See More: Median home value: $830,848 Median household income: $141,140 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $584,446 Median household income: $96,149 Livability score: 6.0 Median home value: $287,909 Median household income: $65,648 Livability score: 5.6 Trending Now: Median home value: $276,828 Median household income: $63,944 Livability score: 5.5 Median home value: $2,764,855 Median household income: $223,951 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $660,984 Median household income: $180,103 Livability score: 6.2 Median home value: $399,216 Median household income: $93,832 Livability score: 6.1 Find Out: Median home value: $729,136 Median household income: $78,477 Livability score: 4.4 Median home value: $337,136 Median household income: $68,895 Livability score: 5.4 More From GOBankingRates 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's the Cost To Live in the US Cities With the Best Quality of Life
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump
WASHINGTON — After years of admiring autocrats like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping and envying the sort of military parade they get to enjoy, President Donald Trump is finally getting one of his own. America's capital city will resemble Pyongyang, Beijing and Moscow's Red Square on Saturday evening, with tanks and missile launchers rolling down the street, thanks to Trump's $45 million birthday gift to himself at taxpayer expense. 'I don't really think the symbolism of tanks and missiles is really what we're all about,' Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul told HuffPost. 'If you ask me about a military parade, all the images that come to mind, the first images, are of the Soviet Union and North Korea.' Trump and his administration claim that the parade was actually organized for the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, not Trump's 79th. Both the Navy and the Marines also have founding date anniversaries this year, however, and there has been no discussion about holding $45 million celebrations for either. White House officials did not respond to HuffPost queries on the matter. Democracy advocates warn that Trump's use of the military to honor himself should not be downplayed as harmless, particularly given his deployment of thousands of troops in Los Angeles to put down protests against his deportations, his repeated attacks on judges, his use of his executive power to attack critics and his willingness to defy a Supreme Court order for months. 'The military parade is a blatant adoption and celebration of authoritarian power display,' said Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz who is now with the group Protect Democracy. 'Given this is coupled with the deployment of U.S. troops to police American streets, by no means should it be considered as only optics.' John Bolton, Trump's third of four national security advisers during his first term, said Trump has been infatuated with the idea of his own parade after attending France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017 at the invitation of that country's president, Emmanuel Macron. Bolton said Trump's advisers were able to talk him out of ordering one back then. 'He was dissuaded by a number of factors, not the least of which was how much it would cost, and how bad that would appear, and what damage the tank treads would do to the streets of Washington,' he said. Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, reportedly told Trump that a military parade was 'what dictators do.' The United States has had few military parades in its history, the last one taking place in 1991 during the presidency of George H.W. Bush after U.S. forces successfully pushed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, which he had invaded. 'It was a parade to celebrate winning the war, which is a good reason to have a military parade,' Bolton said. 'That's not what this is about. It's about Donald Trump.' Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington state, said during a hearing Wednesday that Trump's casual use of the military should alarm Americans. 'President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. military parade. Those sorts of actions and that sort of rhetoric from a president of the United States should stop every one of us cold. Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented,' she said. 'It is unconstitutional and it is downright un-American. We should all be speaking out against this and demanding accountability now.' Despite his frequent claims of support for the armed forces and service members, Trump has a decades-long history of disrespect, even disdain, for both. As a young man, Trump had the opportunity to fight in the Vietnam War but instead avoided service with a diagnosis of 'bone spurs' from a doctor who was a friend of his father. In 2015, running for president, Trump declared that Arizona Sen. John McCain, who spent nearly six years in a Hanoi prison undergoing routine torture, was not a war hero just because he was captured. Trump said he preferred those who were not captured. During his first term in office, when he was unable to get fellow Republicans running both chambers of Congress to approve billions of dollars for a border wall he had repeatedly promised Mexico would pay for, Trump instead raided a Pentagon fund for service members' housing and schools to pay for it instead. Also in those years, Trump disparaged those in the military who had died for the United States as 'suckers' and 'losers,' according to his own chief of staff. And just months into his second term, Trump broke the tradition of the commander-in-chief shaking the hand of every graduating cadet at a military academy by immediately leaving West Point after his speech and returning to his golf resort in New Jersey. Trump's predecessor Joe Biden spent 70 minutes congratulating each graduate last year, as Trump himself had done five years earlier, although he later complained about how many times he had to raise his arm to salute. To this day, Trump still does not seem to understand military protocol. On his recent trip to the Middle East, Trump saluted Saudi military officials, just as he had saluted North Korean officers during his summit meeting with Kim in 2018. Protect Democracy's Carpenter said Americans need to take Saturday as a warning of things to come. 'Americans should see this plainly for what it is: Troops in the streets are troops in the streets, whether it's a parade or a raid,' she said. Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force' GOP Senator Says Trump's Military Parade Reminds Him Of North Korea Trump's Real War Is Against America