logo
A United Front?

A United Front?

New York Times2 days ago
President Trump has been known to parrot the positions of the last person he's heard. Which might explain why European leaders rushed to the White House yesterday. They were loath to let Vladimir Putin's message during Friday's Alaska summit with Trump go unanswered.
So presidents and prime ministers disrupted summer holidays and scrambled to Washington on less than 24 hours' notice from, among other places, an island off the French Riviera. Our London bureau chief, Mark Landler, called it 'diplomatic FOMO.' They came to support Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky. One by one, they lavished Trump with the praise and gratitude that moves him. (They've learned by now, that's what works.) And they repeated their priorities: security guarantees and cease-fire, cease-fire and security guarantees.
Trump was a gracious host, complimenting the German chancellor's tan and the Finnish president's youthful looks. He demurred on a cease-fire, saying several times that he'd ended six wars around the world this year without one. He seemed to commit to security guarantees, though it's not clear what they would look like. He all but promised a 'trilat' — a three-way meeting — among himself, Putin and Zelensky within a week or two.
Here's a look at yesterday's talks, the prospects for a peace deal and what's at stake.
Presidential pivots. The tone of Trump's appearance with Zelensky was a 180-degree shift from their disastrous Oval Office session six months ago. Having been accused of disrespect last time, the Ukrainian leader traded his fatigues for a black jacket, a button-down and slacks. Having been chastised for ingratitude, Zelensky publicly thanked Trump at least 10 times. Trump, in turn, was downright friendly.
Land concessions? Putin says he won't withdraw from Ukraine unless Russia gets the Donbas, an industrial region he has claimed since 2014. It's the focus of Russia's summer offensive. But at least 200,000 civilians live in the fraction still under Ukrainian control. And the Ukrainian Constitution bars Zelensky from giving up territory without a public referendum.
Still, it's clear the men discussed the idea, writes David Sanger, a White House correspondent who covered the Alaska summit. 'Thank you for the map, by the way,' Zelensky said in front of the cameras. Not said was who had drawn the map or what, exactly, it showed. (This piece helpfully explains Putin's fascination with the Donbas.)
Protection from Russia. What does Ukraine need to feel safe? 'Everything,' Zelensky said. He ticked off weapons, troops, training and intelligence. Trump ducked questions about whether American troops might join a peacekeeping force. But after months of berating his predecessor for spending billions to help Ukraine defend itself, Trump now suggests that the U.S. would indeed help protect the country from future invasions. Read more about how security guarantees could work.
Seated around a table with cameras whirring, several of the European leaders invoked as a model NATO's Article 5 — which says that an attack on any member is considered an attack on all members. Trump agreed that the provision for Ukraine could be 'NATO-like.' The NATO chief, a Trump fan and one of his eight guests yesterday, called this seeming change of heart 'a really big deal.'
Fighting continues. Even as Zelensky arrived in Washington, Russia was still firing on Ukraine. Its strikes yesterday killed at least 14 people, including two children. But Trump was noncommittal as several of his European counterparts said that hostilities must stop immediately. 'I don't think you need a cease-fire,' Trump said, noting that his negotiations to end the decades-long conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo, among others, had taken place without one. 'I know that it might be good to have. But I can also understand, strategically, why one country or the other wouldn't want it.'
Later, he said that 'all of us would obviously prefer an immediate cease-fire,' but that Putin and Zelensky would have to work it out themselves. 'As of this moment, it's not happening.'
Next steps. Trump says he'll soon bring the Ukrainian and Russian presidents together. 'If you like, I'll go to that meeting,' Trump told Zelensky. ('Ukraine will be happy if you participate,' Zelensky responded.) It would be the first face-to-face for the adversaries since 2019, three years before Putin invaded Ukraine. 'If we have a trilat,' Trump said, 'there's a good chance of maybe ending it.'
While Zelensky and the Europeans were still at the White House, Trump called Putin to fill him in on the day's talks. He said they'd talk again after the European leaders left. If he did, the Russian leader would again be the last person he heard on the subject.
For more
The most clicked article in The Morning yesterday was about what to expect from the talks. Read about what actually happened: Here are five takeaways.
After the Alaska summit, some feared that Trump was about to forge a peace around Russian demands. Yesterday's talks seem to have forestalled that outcome.
Trump gave vague assurances of security guarantees if Zelensky agreed to a deal with Putin. A lot is riding on whether Zelensky can trust Trump, Zolan Kanno-Youngs writes.
Trump published a personal letter that Melania Trump sent to Putin, asking him to protect children. It did not directly mention the war in Ukraine.
Voting
Trump said that he would push to eliminate voting by mail shortly after he discussed the issue with Putin. Trump claims, without evidence, that mail-in voting is rife with fraud.
Texas Democrats ended their two-week walkout, allowing Republicans to pass a gerrymandered congressional map backed by Trump.
Newsmax, a right-wing cable channel, will pay $67 million to settle a libel lawsuit over its false claims that Dominion Voting Systems rigged votes.
More on the Trump Administration
The Air Force's top general will retire early, about halfway through his term. Trump purged much of the Pentagon's top brass soon after returning to office.
The governors of Mississippi and Louisiana said they would deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington.
The administration has discussed taking a 10 percent stake in Intel, the troubled American chipmaker, as part of a revival effort.
European Heat Wave
Thousands of soldiers and firefighters are battling wildfires in Spain as southern Europe swelters under life-threatening heat.
Spain's afternoon napping tradition has helped people cope with extreme heat for centuries.
Here's a map tracking Europe's heat wave.
Middle East
Hamas accepted a new cease-fire proposal put forward by Qatar and Egypt, diplomats said. It was unclear whether Israel would accept it.
Israel is in talks to send Gazans to South Sudan. Critics say a mass relocation could violate international law.
Protests in Tel Aviv show that many Israelis believe that the government needs to come to terms with Hamas in order to free hostages, writes Isabel Kershner.
Media
Shari Redstone spent a lifetime trying to win control of her family's media empire. Why did she then sell Paramount Global so quickly? She spoke to The Times about her decision.
A group of philanthropists are giving $27 million to the PBS and NPR stations most at risk from government funding cuts.
Trending: People were searching online for why MSNBC is changing its name to MS NOW. (A corporate spinoff is splitting it from NBC News.)
Other Big Stories
Air Canada reached a tentative deal to end its flight attendants' strike. The airline says the walkout has affected 500,000 passengers.
A top House Republican said that the Justice Department would begin to share documents related to its Jeffrey Epstein investigation this week.
Hurricane Erin is getting bigger: Its powerful winds and heavy rain could cause dangerous conditions along parts of the East Coast. North Carolina ordered some coastal evacuations.
Do you have questions about the new school year? Ask them here, and we will pick some to answer in an upcoming newsletter.
The Humanoid Robot Games sounds like something out of a science-fiction movie. But the event is real. Over three days in Beijing, robots from 16 countries competed in running, kickboxing and soccer. Some landed back flips and navigated obstacle courses. Others fell over — a lot. Alan Fern, a robotics professor, said the games highlighted the progress of the industry, but also how far it had to go. 'The robots are still dumb,' he said.
Vaccines don't cause autism, but this visual analysis shows how a father and son manipulated data to say it does, Jessica Steier writes.
Tech companies should stop obsessing over the prospect of making A.I. superhuman and focus on its benefits for everyday life, Eric Schmidt and Selina Xu write.
Here's a column by Thomas Edsall on Trump's wartime style.
Romeo and Juliet: The Times spent an evening in Central Park following two shy and graceful coyotes.
'Roommate Court': In a video series, a comedian passes judgment on New Yorkers' household disagreements.
Can you eat that? Food expiration dates are often not based on science, experts say.
A Hollywood staple: Dan Tana, who has died at 90, was a former soccer player who opened the buzziest and most beloved Italian restaurant in Los Angeles. On a scale of 1 to 10, The Los Angeles Times wrote in 1989, 'the people-watching at Tana's rates 10.'
Cincinnati Open: Iga Świątek won the Cincinnati Open, a message to the U.S. Open field that she's back in top form. Carlos Alcaraz won the men's title in just over 20 minutes after Jannik Sinner, the world No. 1, retired through illness down 5-0. (Sinner fought back tears.)
M.L.B.: The M.L.B. commissioner, Rob Manfred, says potential league expansion would provide an opportunity to geographically realign, which would 'save a lot of wear and tear on our players in terms of travel.'
A new masculine archetype has arrived. Social media is obsessing over 'performative males'; TikTokers are posting stealth videos of them in the wild. But what is a performative male? He is the opposite of macho — the antithesis of toxic masculinity. His vibe is designed to attract progressive women.
He carries a tote bag (perhaps with a Labubu attached).
He sips an iced matcha latte.
He reads — or pretends to read — Sally Rooney or Joan Didion.
He wears wired headphones and baggy pants.
He listens to Clairo and wants to tell you about his vinyl collection.
Street contests in Seattle and New York have sought to crown the best example. See photos and read about how we got here.
Make creamy tomato lentil soup in the slow cooker.
Achieve the perfect smoky eye with these expert tips.
Keep cool with a neck fan.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was inflexible.
And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections, Sports Connections and Strands.
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Culture minister says ‘biggest anxiety' is public service broadcasters' budgets
Culture minister says ‘biggest anxiety' is public service broadcasters' budgets

Yahoo

timea minute ago

  • Yahoo

Culture minister says ‘biggest anxiety' is public service broadcasters' budgets

Culture minister Sir Chris Bryant has said his 'biggest anxiety' when it comes to the British TV industry is the reduced budgets of public service broadcasters (PSBs). The commissioning budgets of PSBs have been 'squeezed by the real-terms reduction of the BBC licence fee', as well as a reduction in advertising revenue, according to a report from the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Committee published earlier in the year. The MP also spoke about the Government's rejection of a streamer levy, after the report called for platforms, such as Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV+ and Disney+, to commit to paying 5% of their UK subscriber revenue into a cultural fund which would help PSBs through financing drama with a specific interest to British audiences. Speaking at the Edinburgh TV Festival, he said: 'We want to get a mixed economy. I love the fact that the streamers and big Hollywood houses make lots of shows in the UK … I want to mix it, to be making our own stuff.' Speaking about the importance of 'a mixed economy', he said: 'Film and TV, and high-end television in particular is fundamentally an international thing. 'I think that some politicians in the world don't seem to fully understand us, but one of the things I've been trying to achieve in the UK is, yes, it's great that the streamers do make fabulous stuff here, and lots of wonderful films made here. 'Tom Cruise is probably one of the biggest investors in the UK economy over the last decade. Brilliant. 'I really want to celebrate that, but I don't want everything that is made in the UK, all the IP (intellectual property), simply to go back to the West Coast of the United States of America. 'I'd like us to have some IP that remains here so that we can continue making investments and have strong UK production companies, which also make stuff which maybe sometimes is specifically made for a UK audience as well as for a wider audience. 'So I've been trying to make that mixed economy.' Cruise's blockbuster Mission Impossible films, particularly recent instalments, have frequently filmed in the UK, with locations including London, Derbyshire and the Lake District. Sir Chris added: 'My biggest anxiety is the state of public service broadcasting budgets, and if they haven't got any funding, they're not going to be making any progress.' After the report into British film and high-end television, chairwoman of the CMS committee, Dame Caroline Dinenage, said 'there will be countless distinctly British stories that never make it to our screens' unless the Government intervenes to 'rebalance the playing field' between streamers and public service broadcasters (PSBs).

Editorial: Allies to the rescue — European leaders try to keep Trump on the correct side in Ukraine/Russia war
Editorial: Allies to the rescue — European leaders try to keep Trump on the correct side in Ukraine/Russia war

Yahoo

timea minute ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Allies to the rescue — European leaders try to keep Trump on the correct side in Ukraine/Russia war

It's not often that you have eight European leaders, including one whose country is at war, descend on Washington in as close to an unplanned snap visit as you can get. Let's hope that the White House visit convinced the White House resident of the importance of the moment. Monday afternoon, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was joined by the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, the U.K., Finland, the European Commission and NATO in a surprise summit following President Donald Trump's Alaska meeting with Russian despot Vladimir Putin. Trump seems to have understood the Oval Office meeting as him, the genius dealmaker, convening the allies after a successful rendezvous with the Russian adversary, bringing everyone together in advance of brokering the peace deal that will win him the Nobel Peace Prize. Whatever it takes; and that perception was likely reinforced by the heavy praise heaped on him, though of course he doesn't grasp that his NATO counterparts have internalized the fact that flattery is the only language Trump will listen to. That and English, which fortunately they all speak well enough to have been able to tag team off each other without translators in bringing Trump around on not selling out Europe to an imperialist Russia, something European leaders probably did not expect to have to be doing 80 years after the end of WWII. In actuality, this was more like the adults rushing to stop a toddler who had announced his intention to put a fork in the light socket before any further damage could be done. They certainly all watched in horror as Trump accomplished little but once again parroting Putin talking points after rolling out the red carpet for his admired authoritarian on U.S. soil, a meeting at which the Ukrainians were not represented. This after having spent days talking about the possibility of ceding Ukrainian territory as part of some sort of agreement, and chastising Ukraine — invaded unprovoked by a much larger neighbor — of starting the war itself. At least this frenzied intervention by our European friends does seem to have yielded some success, primarily in the form of Trump agreeing to some form of U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine, which are likely to be the only thing that actually incentivizes Putin to back off and stay back when a peace deal is reached. Something akin to NATO's core Article 5 on joint defense comes to mind. The problem is that such guarantees are only really worth anything if they're credible; it is fundamentally a threat, and threats are meaningful when the target has reason to believe there will be follow-through. Unfortunately, we can't say that we expect Trump to stick to this message discipline. Given everything that we've seen so far in this administration, odds are that shortly Trump will be insisting that Ukraine handle its own affairs or that the U.S. will only provide security guarantees in exchange for some kind of pay or materials deal; either that or he'll simply back off from the position altogether. Even if he then comes around again, every time Trump wobbles on dead-serious international commitments, including support for the NATO alliance itself, it saps at their ultimate credibility and therefore makes them less potent. We guarantee this: neither Trump nor any of us want to live in the world in which Putin believes he is not going to face consequences for his aggressive expansionist agenda. Trump made the commitments, now prove us wrong by sticking to them. _____

The 1600: Dems Want a Fighter. Is Newsom It?
The 1600: Dems Want a Fighter. Is Newsom It?

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

The 1600: Dems Want a Fighter. Is Newsom It?

The Insider's Track Good morning, We've got a late entry for The Craziest $#*! I Read This Week. It's a local story here in the Big Apple, but it's a good one and comes courtesy of the great journalists over at The City: A close advisor to Eric Adams, our illustrious mayor, has been suspended from his re-election campaign after she gave a reporter a wad of cash tucked inside a bag of Sour Cream & Onion potato chips. The failed payoff, which she brushed off as a cultural misunderstanding, comes as even more of Adams' associates are expected to be indicted on corruption charges in the coming days. If you enjoy a good trainwreck election, I really recommend following the New York City mayoral race. It's got everything. A cartoonishly corrupt incumbent polling in the single digits. A disgraced former governor attempting and failing the world's most half-hearted political comeback. A charismatic rich-kid socialist with no experience whose first real job will be running a $2T economy. And on the GOP side, a beret-wearing perennial also-ran most famous for staging vigilante subway rescues in the 80's, who now lives in a studio apartment with six cats. Greatest city in the world, baby! On the topic of elections, there have been some notable developments this week while we've spent our time together focused on geopolitics. Today, the Texas Senate will likely pass the state's new mid-cycle congressional map, after the House rammed it through yesterday. This kicks off a new redistricting war that California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to answer with his own redrawn map. The move got the blessing from Barack Obama, who weighed in from his perch in Martha's Vineyard that Newsom was taking a "smart and measured" approach ahead of the midterms. If you haven't been following, Newsom is the toast of the town at the moment—at least among liberals—for the aggressive posture he's adopted, both in policy and style. On social media, the governor has crafted this new persona as a Trump-esque troll, posting in ALL CAPS and in Trump's signature style, generating AI memes at Trump's expense, excoriating MAGA as a bunch of lemmings and essentially playing POTUS' own game against him. And it's working. He has rocketed to the top of the (very early and still meaningless) 2028 polls with this strategy, which tells you that Democratic voters badly want a fighter. I can see why Newsom is an attractive choice to go up against what will likely be JD Vance in '28. He is one of the few Dems who is able to play in the mud with Trump and come out clean. Michelle Obama was famous for that saying, "When they go low, we go high" even though it was precisely the wrong political advice for the Trump era. Newsom understands that it should actually be, "When they go low, we go lower." But he has two big problems. One is that he runs what is arguably the most dysfunctional state in the country, and that comes with a lot of baggage. The other is that he comes across as just a little too slick for his own good. As a buddy of mine put it, "Newsom looks like he'd lay off your dad and then post on LinkedIn about how difficult it was." Maybe I'm wrong. If Vance is the nominee, maybe Newsom is the perfect candidate to run against him. Both of them seem like they're willing to say or do anything to get elected, with no deep or apparent convictions. Remember, Vance called Trump "America's Hitler" not all that long ago, and now he's his VP! That's still crazy to me. Newsom is also a very good fundraiser, and there are reports this week that Elon Musk has already pumped the brakes on his brief attempt at building a third party and is now leaning toward backing Vance instead. That is going to be formidable: an incumbent veep, with Trump's blessing and Musk's unlimited cash. But I think Democrats have a way to win in such a scenario. We'll get into that tomorrow. The Rundown Thirty minutes into conversing with Ohio College Republican Federation President Spencer Mandzak, I was compelled to ask why he was a Republican instead of a Democrat. After nearly three years in Washington, D.C., I found the answer to that question generally materialized within five minutes of meeting a politico. Mandzak was different, however. He introduced himself by sharing an op-ed he'd written on the importance of curating bipartisanship online. He said that economics and foreign policy were his top political issues, and he offered no charged opinions on topics like religion or sexuality. "You're not going to get a lot of probably interesting viewpoints from me, just because I try to stay in my lane," he responded. "But I can tell you why I'm not a Democrat." Read more from Newsweek's Alex J. Rouhandeh. Also happening: Election 2028: Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. Read more . Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. . Immigration: A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration in its bid to end humanitarian protections for tens of thousands of immigrants from Central America and Nepal. The ruling puts on hold a lower court's order that had temporarily preserved Temporary Protected Status for nearly 60,000 migrants. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store